I watched the video. While most of it was good, I was appalled at RS’ advice in the first 5 minutes that he’s opposed to boycotts of all muslims. This in the context that most of the 9 Hindus killed in connection w/ Nupur Sharma were killed by known muslim acquaintances. Particularly the guy Umesh Kohle who Ms Minnie mentioned around 7:00, where he not only was friends w/ the muslim who informed other muslims to behead him, but he had also lent him money for that muslim’s daughter’s marriage, and forgave/extended that loan. That muslim was also shameless enough to attend Kohle’s funeral, and nobody stopped him
The idea that one has to monitor one’s muslim friends for their devotion to islam, and quietly start distancing themselves when they start getting suspicious is just dangerous: it’s like the Trojans already bringing that horse into their fort. When you have a friend, do you probe them on each and every aspect of their life, or do you allow them some privacy on certain things, especially faith? Also, given how they also indulge in taquiyya, what does one expect him to say: “I have discovered allah, and it is my deen to kill you in due course?”
No siree, what the Hindus who’ve decided to boycott all muslims are doing is fine: they are securing themselves by not exposing themselves to their enemies, and more importantly, not enriching nor empowering their enemies. One of her other guests a few days ago told her how he had, after the Umesh Kohle murder, gone into his WhatsApp contacts list and deleted every muslim name from it. Another Hindu Youtuber narrated a news story where a muslim AC repairman raped the daughter of a customer whose AC he was there to repair. That YouTuber suggested that if you have a broken AC, either find a non-muslim who can fix it, or just leave it alone. The idea of not boycotting all muslims is way too stupid and dangerous
I also disagree w/ the moral equivalence RS placed b/w Jihadis killing innocent Hindus, and Hindus boycotting innocent muslims. The former involves killing, whereas the latter merely inconveniences muslims: there’s nothing stopping them from going back to their halal economies. And I’m not even touching the fact that Hindus ain’t an existential threat to muslims, but muslims are an existential threat to Hindus
So to all Hindus in particular, as well as all non-muslims in general, just boycott muslims whenever you can. I do, and on top of that, I do what I can to boycott muslim countries as well. I don’t fly their airlines, I don’t buy, say, apparel made in Bangladesh or Malaysia or Egypt or other muslim countries where they are made. And if I buy something from a muslim once and then learn that he’s a muslim, that’s my last transaction w/ him
Boycott is non violence, civil disobedience and peaceful protests all rolled in one. That should be one’s first resort when dealing w/ muslims
somehistorysays
I agree. It is a fact that most women who are murdered, are killed by someone the woman knows…ex-boyfriend, ex-husband, current husband/boyfriend or a guy who wanted to be boyfriend or husband.
the same with mozlums in this case. And it’s true that many mozlums murder their family members.
and we have read many accounts of mozlums turning on and murdering an infidel “friend”…
so, I agree. Avoid all contact when possible with every one of them….every one.
Devasursays
Correct, when Muslims are even allowed to parallel the economy why cant Hindus boycott muslims? but am not hopeful of a pro-Islamic Indian govt and judiciary. Who may even jail Hindus for it just like the British.
Infidelsays
What are they gonna do? Force you to buy something from a muslim owned shop? Or a package marked ‘halal’? Or marry a muslimah? This government is asking to fall if it tries anything even close, and then it might be a hung parliament like it was in the late 90s
Johnsays
India needs to do what Burma has done. Start kicking Jihad Muslims out of the country into Bangladesh or Pakistan.
If they do nothing they will not have a country as the Muslims are reproducing with four wives and 20 children like rats.
gravenimagesays
Video: Robert Spencer on Politically Perfect on moderate Muslims, Muslim friends, boycotts, and more
………………………..
Good stuff. And I was not previously familiar with “Politically Perfect”.
mortimersays
Robert Spencer is correct: Islam seeks for or creates, and then exploits WEAKNESS in the non-Muslim KUFAAR, whom Muslims are supposed to overcome, subjugate and turn into submissive slaves under Islam. This process is called ‘jihad’.
Since KAFIRS will not voluntarily submit to Islam, much DECEPTION must be used.
– “Taqiyya permeates almost all the activities and dealings of Muslims with non-Muslim societies…” – former sheikh Sam Solomon
– “Taqiyya is of fundamental importance in Islam. Practically every Islamic sect agrees to it and practices it … We can go so far as to say that the practice of taqiyya is mainstream in Islam, and that those few sects not practicing it diverge from the mainstream … Taqiyya is very prevalent in Islamic politics, especially in the modern era.” – Sami Mukaram, At-Taqiyya fi ‘l-Islam (London: Mu’assisat at-Turath ad-Druzi, 2004)
– “Taqiyya in order to dupe the enemy is permissible.” – from Mukaram, At-Taqiyya fi ‘l-Islam, p. 32
– ‘One who does not lie has no Islamic Faith (Iman)’ . [Muhammad Ibn al-Hanafia in Al-Musanaf, Volume 7 page 642]
– “The Taqiyya is my religion, and the religion of my ancestors … He who doesn’t practice al-Taqiyya, doesn’t practice his religion.” – Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq
– Abd Ibn Hameed, on the authority of al-Hassan, said: “al-Taqiyya is permissible until the Day of Judgment.” (Reference 12. Narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari, v7, p102)
– Abu al-Darda, a companion of Mohammed said: “(Verily) we smile for some people, while our hearts curse (those same people).” (Reference 13. Narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari, v7, p81)
– Allah is the best of deceivers – “Allahu khayru al-makireena” – K. 3:54; cf. 8:30
Hoi Polloisays
Mentioning Rushdie was certainly prescient.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Infidel says
I watched the video. While most of it was good, I was appalled at RS’ advice in the first 5 minutes that he’s opposed to boycotts of all muslims. This in the context that most of the 9 Hindus killed in connection w/ Nupur Sharma were killed by known muslim acquaintances. Particularly the guy Umesh Kohle who Ms Minnie mentioned around 7:00, where he not only was friends w/ the muslim who informed other muslims to behead him, but he had also lent him money for that muslim’s daughter’s marriage, and forgave/extended that loan. That muslim was also shameless enough to attend Kohle’s funeral, and nobody stopped him
The idea that one has to monitor one’s muslim friends for their devotion to islam, and quietly start distancing themselves when they start getting suspicious is just dangerous: it’s like the Trojans already bringing that horse into their fort. When you have a friend, do you probe them on each and every aspect of their life, or do you allow them some privacy on certain things, especially faith? Also, given how they also indulge in taquiyya, what does one expect him to say: “I have discovered allah, and it is my deen to kill you in due course?”
No siree, what the Hindus who’ve decided to boycott all muslims are doing is fine: they are securing themselves by not exposing themselves to their enemies, and more importantly, not enriching nor empowering their enemies. One of her other guests a few days ago told her how he had, after the Umesh Kohle murder, gone into his WhatsApp contacts list and deleted every muslim name from it. Another Hindu Youtuber narrated a news story where a muslim AC repairman raped the daughter of a customer whose AC he was there to repair. That YouTuber suggested that if you have a broken AC, either find a non-muslim who can fix it, or just leave it alone. The idea of not boycotting all muslims is way too stupid and dangerous
I also disagree w/ the moral equivalence RS placed b/w Jihadis killing innocent Hindus, and Hindus boycotting innocent muslims. The former involves killing, whereas the latter merely inconveniences muslims: there’s nothing stopping them from going back to their halal economies. And I’m not even touching the fact that Hindus ain’t an existential threat to muslims, but muslims are an existential threat to Hindus
So to all Hindus in particular, as well as all non-muslims in general, just boycott muslims whenever you can. I do, and on top of that, I do what I can to boycott muslim countries as well. I don’t fly their airlines, I don’t buy, say, apparel made in Bangladesh or Malaysia or Egypt or other muslim countries where they are made. And if I buy something from a muslim once and then learn that he’s a muslim, that’s my last transaction w/ him
Boycott is non violence, civil disobedience and peaceful protests all rolled in one. That should be one’s first resort when dealing w/ muslims
somehistory says
I agree. It is a fact that most women who are murdered, are killed by someone the woman knows…ex-boyfriend, ex-husband, current husband/boyfriend or a guy who wanted to be boyfriend or husband.
the same with mozlums in this case. And it’s true that many mozlums murder their family members.
and we have read many accounts of mozlums turning on and murdering an infidel “friend”…
so, I agree. Avoid all contact when possible with every one of them….every one.
Devasur says
Correct, when Muslims are even allowed to parallel the economy why cant Hindus boycott muslims? but am not hopeful of a pro-Islamic Indian govt and judiciary. Who may even jail Hindus for it just like the British.
Infidel says
What are they gonna do? Force you to buy something from a muslim owned shop? Or a package marked ‘halal’? Or marry a muslimah? This government is asking to fall if it tries anything even close, and then it might be a hung parliament like it was in the late 90s
John says
India needs to do what Burma has done. Start kicking Jihad Muslims out of the country into Bangladesh or Pakistan.
If they do nothing they will not have a country as the Muslims are reproducing with four wives and 20 children like rats.
gravenimage says
Video: Robert Spencer on Politically Perfect on moderate Muslims, Muslim friends, boycotts, and more
………………………..
Good stuff. And I was not previously familiar with “Politically Perfect”.
mortimer says
Robert Spencer is correct: Islam seeks for or creates, and then exploits WEAKNESS in the non-Muslim KUFAAR, whom Muslims are supposed to overcome, subjugate and turn into submissive slaves under Islam. This process is called ‘jihad’.
Since KAFIRS will not voluntarily submit to Islam, much DECEPTION must be used.
– “Taqiyya permeates almost all the activities and dealings of Muslims with non-Muslim societies…” – former sheikh Sam Solomon
– “Taqiyya is of fundamental importance in Islam. Practically every Islamic sect agrees to it and practices it … We can go so far as to say that the practice of taqiyya is mainstream in Islam, and that those few sects not practicing it diverge from the mainstream … Taqiyya is very prevalent in Islamic politics, especially in the modern era.” – Sami Mukaram, At-Taqiyya fi ‘l-Islam (London: Mu’assisat at-Turath ad-Druzi, 2004)
– “Taqiyya in order to dupe the enemy is permissible.” – from Mukaram, At-Taqiyya fi ‘l-Islam, p. 32
– ‘One who does not lie has no Islamic Faith (Iman)’ . [Muhammad Ibn al-Hanafia in Al-Musanaf, Volume 7 page 642]
– “The Taqiyya is my religion, and the religion of my ancestors … He who doesn’t practice al-Taqiyya, doesn’t practice his religion.” – Imam Ja’far al-Sadiq
– Abd Ibn Hameed, on the authority of al-Hassan, said: “al-Taqiyya is permissible until the Day of Judgment.” (Reference 12. Narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari, v7, p102)
– Abu al-Darda, a companion of Mohammed said: “(Verily) we smile for some people, while our hearts curse (those same people).” (Reference 13. Narrated in Sahih al-Bukhari, v7, p81)
– Allah is the best of deceivers – “Allahu khayru al-makireena” – K. 3:54; cf. 8:30
Hoi Polloi says
Mentioning Rushdie was certainly prescient.