Looking at that YouTube thumbnail, I initially thought that you had a third guest on yesterday. On the technical issues, I think one day, both you and David should just try using the computers without any external peripherals, be it speakers, headphones or anything else, and see how it performs: I think a part of the issues are due to the computer not managing device conflicts very well
Patrick Kelleysays
We need to refer to Muslims as Jewphobes, Christianphobes, non-Muslimphones.š„·š
Infidelsays
But that won’t distinguish them from the Woke Leftists
mortimersays
Reply to Infidel and PK: If you add that Muslims hate atheists, Buddhists, Bahai’is and Hindus, then you will have identified Muslims. They hate 80% of all humans according to the doctrine called ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’.
-Imam Abdul-Latif ibn Abdur-Rahman Rahimullah said, āIt is not possible for someone to realize Tawheed (Islamic faith) and act upon it, and yet not be HOSTILE against the mushrikeen (i.e. wrong worshippers). So anyone who isnāt HOSTILE against the mushrikeen, then it cannot be said that he acts upon Tawheed nor that he realizes it.ā [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 8/167]
– “The Muslim should regard the Kuffaar as ENEMIES and HATE them because of their kufr (wrong belief), just as he HATES their kufr (wrong belief) itself.” – from Umar Sulayman ‘Abd-Allaah al-Ashqar, āBelief in Allahā
-“The doctrine of al Walaa wal Baraa is the REAL IMAGE for the actual practice of this faith.” – source āAl Walaa wal Baraa According to the Aqeedah of the Salafā, by Sheikh Muhammad Saeed al Qatani, authoritative Saudi Sharia lawyer and imam at the Abu Bakr and Al Furqan Mosques in Mecca.
gravenimagesays
All true, Mortimer.
Patrick Kelleysays
Woke Leftists are anti-Americans, anti-Constitutionalists, anti-freedom, anti-liberty, so who gives a damn about them. Iām more concerned with average American citizen, defining for them, what Islam is in one or two words. Jewphobes, Cheistianphobes, kaffirphobes, all in just a few words. When you reverse the roles we become the victim, much like Muslimās are always the victim. You canāt argue with the victim.
mortimersays
Reward for Salman Rushdie’s murder boosted by Iran cleric – increase of $500,000
An Iranian religious foundation has increased its reward for killing British author Salman Rushdie as part of its response to a film that mocks the Prophet Muhammad.
Rushdie, an Indian-born British novelist, has nothing to do with the U.S.-made film Innocence of Muslims, which has sparked violent protests in Muslim countries.
He spent 10 years in hiding after being condemned to death in 1989 by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran’s late leader, over his novel The Satanic Verses, which Khomeini claimed was blasphemous.
Iranian media quoted Hassan Sane’i, a cleric heading the 15 of Khordad Foundation, as saying if Rushdie had been killed the anti-Muslim film Innocence of Muslims would never have been made.
“I am adding another $500,000 to the reward for killing Salman Rushdie, and anyone who carries out this sentence will receive the whole amount immediately,” said Sane’i in a statement carried by the Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA).
The total reward for the authorās death offered by the foundation stands at $3.3 million, with Sanei saying “these days are the most appropriate time to carry it (Rushdie’s murder) out.”
Khomeini’s original fatwa on Rushdie was condemned in the West as incitement to murder and an assault on freedom of speech.
Patrick Kelleysays
Do Muslimās have a bottomless resource of money to fund jihad, mosque construction, millions of Islamic organizations, enough to conquer every continent in the world?
gravenimagesays
All of that unearned oil wealth needs to go for something…
gravenimagesays
Hopefully this thug will never be able to claim this reward.
mortimersays
Reward for Salman Rushdie’s murder boosted by Iran cleric
An Iranian religious foundation has increased its reward for killing British author Salman Rushdie as part of its response to a film that mocks the Prophet Muhammad.
Rushdie, an Indian-born British novelist, has nothing to do with the U.S.-made film Innocence of Muslims, which has sparked violent protests in Muslim countries.
He spent 10 years in hiding after being condemned to death in 1989 by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran’s late leader, over his novel The Satanic Verses, which Khomeini claimed was blasphemous.
Iranian media quoted Hassan Sane’i, a cleric heading the 15 of Khordad Foundation, as saying if Rushdie had been killed the anti-Muslim film Innocence of Muslims would never have been made.
“I am adding another $500,000 to the reward for killing Salman Rushdie, and anyone who carries out this sentence will receive the whole amount immediately,” said Sane’i in a statement carried by the Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA).
The total reward for the authorās death offered by the foundation stands at $3.3 million, with Sanei saying “these days are the most appropriate time to carry it (Rushdie’s murder) out.”
Khomeini’s original fatwa on Rushdie was condemned in the West as incitement to murder and an assault on freedom of speech.
somehistorysays
OT
Jerusalem Post
“Palestinian Islamic State leader in Sinai killed by Egyptian forces – report”
“The leader of Islamic State in Sinai responsible for the death of 305 Egyptians in a 2017 mosque massacre has been killed in fighting with the Egyptian Armed Forces, the Sinai United Tribes announced on Monday.”
gravenimagesays
Jihadists killing other Muslims–very common.
staffsgt7says
al qaeda put out some orders in their Inspire magazine to do fire and vehicular jihads. ISIS put out orders to do fire jihads. They probably are all getting the message to do things like the knifings, vehicular and fire jihads, plus other things.
From what I am gathering – the ones that are old probably do their violent jihad because they probably are dying and need to get rid of their sins and are afraid that they might die before they get rid of those sins.
VICE is owned by a moslem. And I hid that channel on my channel lineup.
As for the other moslems being ‘shocked’ about the killer – that is for us – a big show. They were acting like a non-moslem was the killer and telling us they were very fearful. No apology from them, no accusations that they are non-moslemophobes, etc.
gravenimagesays
Video: This Week in Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer (Rushdie, Naked Attackers, More)
……………………………………….
I love the “Tick tock, time to Rock!” opener. But I think that no one can do that quite like David Wood (no offence to Robert Spencer, of course).
Then, the terrible Jihad terror attack on Salman Rushdie. This poor man has been under a death Fatwa *for 33 years*. This was when I first realized that there was a serious problem with Islam (I had realized that Iran was a problem a decade earlier, but like so many in the West assumed that the Ayatollah did not represent any sort of normative Islam).
But Muslims firebombed a bookstore in Berkeley–Cody’s–for daring to showcase Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses. Staff took a vote and despite the danger decided to reopen, continue to carry Rushdie’s book, and to feature a wall of his books in every window–including the ones that were damaged in the bombing. My boyfriend–now husband–and I went there the day after the bombing to support the store and to buy a copy of Rushdie’s book. A lot of other people did the same. We later learned that all the time we were there there was another unexploded bomb about the information desk that would not be discovered until that evening.
Then I found out how many Muslims supported this death Fatwa–and to my disgust how many dhimmis (not a term I knew at the time) would instead blame the author for having said anything critical about Islam.
Never mind that the Satanic Verses comes from Islamic sources, *not* from “Islamophobic” Infidels. But no matter–just saying anything critical about the “Prophet” is “blasphemous”.
And these dhimmis have *not* gone away. The idea that this stabbing of Salman Rushdie has no known motive is just absurd–the New York police are not actually this stupid. It is just more whitewash of Islam.
And funny how that “tiny minority” who support this seems to be really large. **Awkward**.
And Muslims–and their dhimmi supporters–think that it is the fault of the victim. After a small initial shock over Rushdie being stabbed, we are seeing more thugs like Michael Warren Davis at the American Conservative blaming Rushdie himself for the attack. Just sickening.
gravenimagesays
And this is true–often Rushdie does get a pass from leftists because of his politics, where those more conservative or middle of the road do not. But freedom of speech, save for calls for violence, should be absolute, whether one agrees with the exact content of that speech or not. *No one* should be threatened with death for what they write.
And Robert Spencer notes that the NYT condemned him for daring to criticize the savagery of Islam–and Muslims responded by trying to murder him. Sounds familiar… So the NYT is hardly a champion of freedom of speech.
And this happens all the time that a Muslim becomes more religious, and he turns to violent Jihad. This is a common Jihad playbook. And murdering Infidels, especially those known for “insulting Islam”, is deemed the greatest of good deeds–one that wipes out any amount of past drinking and eating pulled pork sliders.
Christianity has a similar view–except of course for what actually is counted a good deed…murdering unbelievers does not count.
Then in France a Muslim screaming “Allahu Akbar” beheaded his father–and walked around Leon carrying it. Just horrifying.
Then on a flight to Manchester a woman started disrobing and screaming “Allahu Akbar!” and said her parents were in ISIS. I guess taking off your clothing is perfectly Islamic so far as you are terrifying Infidels at the time…
And this is the first time that I had heard of Jihadists’ attitude toward paradise after their “martyrdom”–very bizarre.
This part of her actions are a mystery. Her trying to harm the Kuffar, not so much…
P Kelleysays
Why is it that every time someone truthfully points out the dangers of totalitarian Islam, itās determined to be an insult to Islam?
gravenimagesays
It doesn’t matter if it’s true–all that matters is that it is impermissible to speak critically about any Islamic savagery.
gravenimagesays
Then in Britain a Muslim stabs his wife in the neck in front of their children–amazingly, she survived. But both beating your wife and beheading “apostates” is perfectly Islamic.
Then in Chad women have to pay a fine if they refuse to accept a marriage proposal. now, this is not in the Qur’an–but certainly women are regularly forced to marry in Islam–and often killed if they resist–so this is not so far off the mark.
Then after being inspired by the vicious stabbing of Salman Rushdie, a Muslim in Pakistan offers a $20 million reward to murder Geert Wilders. And now Jihadists are going after JK Rowling as well. Not sure why Jihadists hate Harry Potter–but they hate so many things.
I love David Wood’s reference to Rushie’s bragging about having a Fatwa meaning that he gets the girls. Not a big fan of the show Curb Your Enthusiasm, but that episode really was pretty funny.
Australia–a Muslim shoots up an airport in Canberra and yes, this strikes terror in the hearts of the Infidels, no doubt.
And a Muslim Twitter employee spied for the Saudis–this is likely Jihad as much as anything else.
Then in Canada we have the antisemitic and racist “anti-racism” consultant who turned out to be anything but anti-racist. And this was not just racist stuff, but *genocidal hate*. And this is not just about dumb Infidels–there are also non-Muslim “anti-racism” consultants who turn out to be pretty racist. This is pretty much a pattern.
Then the NYT also has a Muslim employee–a stringer–who turned out to be an embarrassment who wanted to murder Jews. He was a big fan of Hitler. And he also worked for the BBC and other major news outlets.
Again in Britain, Afghan Muslims are being sent to Scotland and Wales–they rejected it on the basis of these places being too cold and not speaking English. Never mind that Wales and even Scotland are *warmer* than Afghanistan, and that the vast majority do speak English–the main point is the incredible ingratitude of so many Muslims–as well as their sense of entitlement.
And in New Mexico the supposed “white supremacist” or other “Islamophobe” who was supposed to be responsible for the killing of Muslims turns out to be another Muslim. In this case, Sunni on Shia violence.
And this is no loner–first, this may well be a family affair, then, he is well known in his community and at his Mosque.
And more Muslim-on Muslim murder in Afghanistan where a Muslim cleric was killed. The Jihadist hid the explosives in his artificial leg. “War is deceit” indeed…
And I’m sure Robert Spencer and David Wood will be back next week with more Jihad reports.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Infidel says
Looking at that YouTube thumbnail, I initially thought that you had a third guest on yesterday. On the technical issues, I think one day, both you and David should just try using the computers without any external peripherals, be it speakers, headphones or anything else, and see how it performs: I think a part of the issues are due to the computer not managing device conflicts very well
Patrick Kelley says
We need to refer to Muslims as Jewphobes, Christianphobes, non-Muslimphones.š„·š
Infidel says
But that won’t distinguish them from the Woke Leftists
mortimer says
Reply to Infidel and PK: If you add that Muslims hate atheists, Buddhists, Bahai’is and Hindus, then you will have identified Muslims. They hate 80% of all humans according to the doctrine called ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’.
-Imam Abdul-Latif ibn Abdur-Rahman Rahimullah said, āIt is not possible for someone to realize Tawheed (Islamic faith) and act upon it, and yet not be HOSTILE against the mushrikeen (i.e. wrong worshippers). So anyone who isnāt HOSTILE against the mushrikeen, then it cannot be said that he acts upon Tawheed nor that he realizes it.ā [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 8/167]
– “The Muslim should regard the Kuffaar as ENEMIES and HATE them because of their kufr (wrong belief), just as he HATES their kufr (wrong belief) itself.” – from Umar Sulayman ‘Abd-Allaah al-Ashqar, āBelief in Allahā
-“The doctrine of al Walaa wal Baraa is the REAL IMAGE for the actual practice of this faith.” – source āAl Walaa wal Baraa According to the Aqeedah of the Salafā, by Sheikh Muhammad Saeed al Qatani, authoritative Saudi Sharia lawyer and imam at the Abu Bakr and Al Furqan Mosques in Mecca.
gravenimage says
All true, Mortimer.
Patrick Kelley says
Woke Leftists are anti-Americans, anti-Constitutionalists, anti-freedom, anti-liberty, so who gives a damn about them. Iām more concerned with average American citizen, defining for them, what Islam is in one or two words. Jewphobes, Cheistianphobes, kaffirphobes, all in just a few words. When you reverse the roles we become the victim, much like Muslimās are always the victim. You canāt argue with the victim.
mortimer says
Reward for Salman Rushdie’s murder boosted by Iran cleric – increase of $500,000
https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/reward-for-salman-rushdie-s-murder-boosted-by-iran-cleric-1.1203616
An Iranian religious foundation has increased its reward for killing British author Salman Rushdie as part of its response to a film that mocks the Prophet Muhammad.
Rushdie, an Indian-born British novelist, has nothing to do with the U.S.-made film Innocence of Muslims, which has sparked violent protests in Muslim countries.
He spent 10 years in hiding after being condemned to death in 1989 by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran’s late leader, over his novel The Satanic Verses, which Khomeini claimed was blasphemous.
Iranian media quoted Hassan Sane’i, a cleric heading the 15 of Khordad Foundation, as saying if Rushdie had been killed the anti-Muslim film Innocence of Muslims would never have been made.
“I am adding another $500,000 to the reward for killing Salman Rushdie, and anyone who carries out this sentence will receive the whole amount immediately,” said Sane’i in a statement carried by the Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA).
The total reward for the authorās death offered by the foundation stands at $3.3 million, with Sanei saying “these days are the most appropriate time to carry it (Rushdie’s murder) out.”
Khomeini’s original fatwa on Rushdie was condemned in the West as incitement to murder and an assault on freedom of speech.
Patrick Kelley says
Do Muslimās have a bottomless resource of money to fund jihad, mosque construction, millions of Islamic organizations, enough to conquer every continent in the world?
gravenimage says
All of that unearned oil wealth needs to go for something…
gravenimage says
Hopefully this thug will never be able to claim this reward.
mortimer says
Reward for Salman Rushdie’s murder boosted by Iran cleric
https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/reward-for-salman-rushdie-s-murder-boosted-by-iran-cleric-1.1203616
An Iranian religious foundation has increased its reward for killing British author Salman Rushdie as part of its response to a film that mocks the Prophet Muhammad.
Rushdie, an Indian-born British novelist, has nothing to do with the U.S.-made film Innocence of Muslims, which has sparked violent protests in Muslim countries.
He spent 10 years in hiding after being condemned to death in 1989 by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Iran’s late leader, over his novel The Satanic Verses, which Khomeini claimed was blasphemous.
Iranian media quoted Hassan Sane’i, a cleric heading the 15 of Khordad Foundation, as saying if Rushdie had been killed the anti-Muslim film Innocence of Muslims would never have been made.
“I am adding another $500,000 to the reward for killing Salman Rushdie, and anyone who carries out this sentence will receive the whole amount immediately,” said Sane’i in a statement carried by the Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA).
The total reward for the authorās death offered by the foundation stands at $3.3 million, with Sanei saying “these days are the most appropriate time to carry it (Rushdie’s murder) out.”
Khomeini’s original fatwa on Rushdie was condemned in the West as incitement to murder and an assault on freedom of speech.
somehistory says
OT
Jerusalem Post
“Palestinian Islamic State leader in Sinai killed by Egyptian forces – report”
“The leader of Islamic State in Sinai responsible for the death of 305 Egyptians in a 2017 mosque massacre has been killed in fighting with the Egyptian Armed Forces, the Sinai United Tribes announced on Monday.”
gravenimage says
Jihadists killing other Muslims–very common.
staffsgt7 says
al qaeda put out some orders in their Inspire magazine to do fire and vehicular jihads. ISIS put out orders to do fire jihads. They probably are all getting the message to do things like the knifings, vehicular and fire jihads, plus other things.
From what I am gathering – the ones that are old probably do their violent jihad because they probably are dying and need to get rid of their sins and are afraid that they might die before they get rid of those sins.
VICE is owned by a moslem. And I hid that channel on my channel lineup.
As for the other moslems being ‘shocked’ about the killer – that is for us – a big show. They were acting like a non-moslem was the killer and telling us they were very fearful. No apology from them, no accusations that they are non-moslemophobes, etc.
gravenimage says
Video: This Week in Jihad with David Wood and Robert Spencer (Rushdie, Naked Attackers, More)
……………………………………….
I love the “Tick tock, time to Rock!” opener. But I think that no one can do that quite like David Wood (no offence to Robert Spencer, of course).
Then, the terrible Jihad terror attack on Salman Rushdie. This poor man has been under a death Fatwa *for 33 years*. This was when I first realized that there was a serious problem with Islam (I had realized that Iran was a problem a decade earlier, but like so many in the West assumed that the Ayatollah did not represent any sort of normative Islam).
But Muslims firebombed a bookstore in Berkeley–Cody’s–for daring to showcase Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses. Staff took a vote and despite the danger decided to reopen, continue to carry Rushdie’s book, and to feature a wall of his books in every window–including the ones that were damaged in the bombing. My boyfriend–now husband–and I went there the day after the bombing to support the store and to buy a copy of Rushdie’s book. A lot of other people did the same. We later learned that all the time we were there there was another unexploded bomb about the information desk that would not be discovered until that evening.
Then I found out how many Muslims supported this death Fatwa–and to my disgust how many dhimmis (not a term I knew at the time) would instead blame the author for having said anything critical about Islam.
Never mind that the Satanic Verses comes from Islamic sources, *not* from “Islamophobic” Infidels. But no matter–just saying anything critical about the “Prophet” is “blasphemous”.
And these dhimmis have *not* gone away. The idea that this stabbing of Salman Rushdie has no known motive is just absurd–the New York police are not actually this stupid. It is just more whitewash of Islam.
And funny how that “tiny minority” who support this seems to be really large. **Awkward**.
And Muslims–and their dhimmi supporters–think that it is the fault of the victim. After a small initial shock over Rushdie being stabbed, we are seeing more thugs like Michael Warren Davis at the American Conservative blaming Rushdie himself for the attack. Just sickening.
gravenimage says
And this is true–often Rushdie does get a pass from leftists because of his politics, where those more conservative or middle of the road do not. But freedom of speech, save for calls for violence, should be absolute, whether one agrees with the exact content of that speech or not. *No one* should be threatened with death for what they write.
And Robert Spencer notes that the NYT condemned him for daring to criticize the savagery of Islam–and Muslims responded by trying to murder him. Sounds familiar… So the NYT is hardly a champion of freedom of speech.
And this happens all the time that a Muslim becomes more religious, and he turns to violent Jihad. This is a common Jihad playbook. And murdering Infidels, especially those known for “insulting Islam”, is deemed the greatest of good deeds–one that wipes out any amount of past drinking and eating pulled pork sliders.
Christianity has a similar view–except of course for what actually is counted a good deed…murdering unbelievers does not count.
Then in France a Muslim screaming “Allahu Akbar” beheaded his father–and walked around Leon carrying it. Just horrifying.
Then on a flight to Manchester a woman started disrobing and screaming “Allahu Akbar!” and said her parents were in ISIS. I guess taking off your clothing is perfectly Islamic so far as you are terrifying Infidels at the time…
And this is the first time that I had heard of Jihadists’ attitude toward paradise after their “martyrdom”–very bizarre.
This part of her actions are a mystery. Her trying to harm the Kuffar, not so much…
P Kelley says
Why is it that every time someone truthfully points out the dangers of totalitarian Islam, itās determined to be an insult to Islam?
gravenimage says
It doesn’t matter if it’s true–all that matters is that it is impermissible to speak critically about any Islamic savagery.
gravenimage says
Then in Britain a Muslim stabs his wife in the neck in front of their children–amazingly, she survived. But both beating your wife and beheading “apostates” is perfectly Islamic.
Then in Chad women have to pay a fine if they refuse to accept a marriage proposal. now, this is not in the Qur’an–but certainly women are regularly forced to marry in Islam–and often killed if they resist–so this is not so far off the mark.
Then after being inspired by the vicious stabbing of Salman Rushdie, a Muslim in Pakistan offers a $20 million reward to murder Geert Wilders. And now Jihadists are going after JK Rowling as well. Not sure why Jihadists hate Harry Potter–but they hate so many things.
I love David Wood’s reference to Rushie’s bragging about having a Fatwa meaning that he gets the girls. Not a big fan of the show Curb Your Enthusiasm, but that episode really was pretty funny.
Australia–a Muslim shoots up an airport in Canberra and yes, this strikes terror in the hearts of the Infidels, no doubt.
And a Muslim Twitter employee spied for the Saudis–this is likely Jihad as much as anything else.
Then in Canada we have the antisemitic and racist “anti-racism” consultant who turned out to be anything but anti-racist. And this was not just racist stuff, but *genocidal hate*. And this is not just about dumb Infidels–there are also non-Muslim “anti-racism” consultants who turn out to be pretty racist. This is pretty much a pattern.
Then the NYT also has a Muslim employee–a stringer–who turned out to be an embarrassment who wanted to murder Jews. He was a big fan of Hitler. And he also worked for the BBC and other major news outlets.
Again in Britain, Afghan Muslims are being sent to Scotland and Wales–they rejected it on the basis of these places being too cold and not speaking English. Never mind that Wales and even Scotland are *warmer* than Afghanistan, and that the vast majority do speak English–the main point is the incredible ingratitude of so many Muslims–as well as their sense of entitlement.
And in New Mexico the supposed “white supremacist” or other “Islamophobe” who was supposed to be responsible for the killing of Muslims turns out to be another Muslim. In this case, Sunni on Shia violence.
And this is no loner–first, this may well be a family affair, then, he is well known in his community and at his Mosque.
And more Muslim-on Muslim murder in Afghanistan where a Muslim cleric was killed. The Jihadist hid the explosives in his artificial leg. “War is deceit” indeed…
And I’m sure Robert Spencer and David Wood will be back next week with more Jihad reports.