For decades, ever since President Roosevelt talked with King Saud on the USS Quincy on Feb. 14,1945, the United States has labored under the delusion that the primitive kingdom, in thrall to Wahhabi Islam and largely owned by a single family, was our loyal ally. This fiction was maintained because we didn’t want to look too closely into the nature of Saudi society, and didn’t want to find out about the Saudi effort to spread a particularly malignant form of Islam throughout the world. All we cared about were the colossal deposits of oil that American geologists found in the Kingdom, and that we, along with the rest of the Western world, relied on for much of our energy. The public beheadings, the spreading of antisemitic propaganda through the Saudi-controlled World Islamic Congress, the crushing of the slightest political dissent in the Kingdom – no one in Washington much cared, as long as the oil kept flowing.
And Saudi Arabia liked to spend its money – lots of it – on American weapons, which the Americans were happy to sell, earning them hundreds of billions of dollars. The defense industry became Saudi Arabia’s most effective lobby in Washington. On May 20, 2017, President Trump and King Salman signed a series of letters of intent for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to purchase arms from the United States totaling US $110 billion immediately, and $350 billion over 10 years. The intended purchases include tanks, combat ships, missile defense systems, as well as radar, communications, and cybersecurity technology. It is the largest arms deal ever made.
There have been times in our complicated relations with the Saudis when It might have been fitting to look more critically at the Kingdom. The most obvious of those moments was just after the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001, when it was discovered that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens, and the leader of Al-Qaeda, which had been behind the attack, was Osama bin Laden, the son of a billionaire Saudi contractor with close ties to the Saudi royals. But the Saudi lobby in Washington, including defense contractors, stood firm in defense of the Kingdom, and the US-Saudi “alliance” continued, undamaged.
The killing and dismemberment of Jamal Khashoggi in 2020, at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, on the orders of Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman, did cause many Americans to rethink our ties with such a regime; it was not so much the killing but the horror-movie dismemberment, that caught people’s attention and elicited such revulsion. Joe Biden made much of the Khashoggi killing, and during his presidential race he said he would treat Saudi Arabia as a “pariah” because of that murder. And for eighteen months he did so, until he finally decided to attend a summit of the GCC held in Jeddah this July. He met with King Salman, and with the Crown Prince, too. He took care not to shake hands with MBS, but deigned to deliver a fist bump; that was enough to garner furious criticism at home. His fellow Democrat Congressman, Adam Schiff, said the fist bump was a “visual reminder of the continuing grip that oil-rich autocrats have on U.S. foreign policy.”
In Jeddah, Biden spent two hours talking to MBS, mainly on matters – we are told – related to energy security. But he also discussed the ceasefire in Yemen, Saudi participation with American companies in major infrastructure projects around the world, and Iran.
Fast forward to today and the war in Ukraine, which has taken much of Russian oil and gas off the market. The price of oil, and of gasoline, has skyrocketed. Biden knows that if the price of gasoline at the pump does not soon decrease, this could spell disaster for the Democrats at the midterm elections. So he has been trying for months to persuade the Saudis not to cut production at the October meeting of OPEC+. He failed. Instead the Saudis, and the greatly increase the cost of heating oil and, especially, gasoline.
Biden feels personally betrayed by the Saudis, which seems strange, since it was he who proudly proclaimed that he would treat the country as a “pariah.” Some commentators seem to think that Saudi Arabia has decided to form a geopolitical alliance with Russia, to replace the Saudi-American one that the Saudis have lost faith in, given the ballyhooed American “pivot” away from the Middle East to East Asia. I see no signs of this supposed alliance. The Saudis made a perfectly rational decision to maximize their profits from the sale of oil. And that’s what the Russians, and 20-odd other oil producers, also did. That’s all that they, and the Russians, and the other members of OPEC+, were after: more money. American capitalists ought to be able to understand that.
Biden’s “re-evaluation” of the American relationship with Saudi Arabia is reported on here: “Biden reevaluating US relationship with Saudis after OPEC decision,” by Omri Nahmias, Reuters, October 11, 2022:
President Joe Biden is re-evaluating the US relationship with Saudi Arabia after OPEC+ announced last week that it would cut oil production, White House national security spokesman John Kirby said on Tuesday.
“I think the president’s been very clear that this is a relationship that we need to continue to re-evaluate, that we need to be willing to revisit,” Kirby said in an interview with CNN. “And certainly in light of the OPEC decision, I think that’s where he is.”
Biden is willing to work with Congress on the future of Saudi relations, Kirby added.
Bob Menendez, the Democratic chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, on Monday called for a freeze on cooperating with Saudi Arabia, including on most arms sales, accusing the kingdom of helping to underwrite the Russian war in Ukraine after OPEC+ announced last week that it would cut oil production.
Biden was disappointed in the OPEC+ decision, Kirby said, and “he’s willing to work with Congress to think through what that relationship ought to look like going forward.”
“And I think he’s going to be willing to start to have those conversations right away. I don’t think this is anything that’s going to have to wait or should wait, quite frankly, for much longer,” Kirby added.
The issue does not only concern the war in Ukraine but it is a matter of US national security interests, Kirby added.
Does it make sense to weaken our ties to Saudi Arabia, to treat it as a “pariah” not because of the killing of Khashoggi, but because the Saudis want to maximize their profits from the sale of oil? Suppose we were to downgrade our ties with Saudi Arabia. What then happens to the $350 billion deal for American weapons that the Saudis signed in 2017? Isn’t it likely that the Crown Prince would cancel that deal, and then do the very thing we fear, which is to go to Russia, or China, or both, for weapons, providing both countries with hundreds of billions of dollars from such sales? And what would be the consequences in Yemen of our withdrawal of support from the Saudis? If the Saudis can no longer count on American support, diplomatic or military, they might then be compelled to yield more territory to the Iran-backed Houthis in that theatre of war. Yemen might be partitioned, with the Houthis controlling part that would then be made available to Iranian military bases, similar to what Iran has had in Syria. These bases would pose a constant threat both to the Saudi oil installations, and to the Israelis, whose ships travel to Asia through the Red Sea, and would pass perilously close to any Iranian outposts in Yemen.
Another effect of Biden’s choosing to downgrade relations with Saudi Arabia would be that the vast infrastructure projects now underway in Saudi Arabia – just one of his planned megacities, NEOM, is estimated to cost upwards of $500 billion, and may go much higher – could be declared off-limits to American companies now hoping to take part in the building bonanza. South Korea, China, Japan, Russia, Germany, France, Italy, the U.K., are the countries whose contractors could most likely replace the Americans. What a colossal loss that would mean for the American economy.
Biden has had his anti-Saudi fit, and now he should relapse into studied silence. Let the cooler heads among his handlers prevail. There’s a lot of money at stake, and the U.S. is in no condition to let already agreed upon weapons sales of $350 billion be canceled by an angry Crown Prince, or to let itself be locked out of a trillion-dollar market for building Saudi infrastructure.
We don’t have to “reevaluate” our relations with Saudi Arabia. It’s a despotism. It’s a nasty place. The Crown Prince is most unpleasant. Its only claim on the world’s attention is its oil, and what its oil revenues can buy. But that, I deeply regret having to admit, is more than enough for us to keep relations with the Saudis on an even keel.
PMK says
There’s another way to deal with Saudi Arabia. Unleash our own domestic energy companies. Let American energy companies drill and explore and maximize the energy we produce domestically. Then we will have no need of Saudi Arabia.
Don’t blame Russia and Ukraine for the rise in domestic energy prices. Joe did that all by himself in the first weeks of his presidency. Trump tried to warn Europe that it was too dependent on Russian energy, but they wouldn’t listen.
Are we supposed to sell our souls to Saudi Arabia for the sake of global contractors who are busy destroying this country? They had no problem with Saudi donors who funded the mosques in this country that preach jihad or with the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11. The arguments for maintaining cordial ties with Saudis just don’t hold water anymore.
Wellington says
Agreed, PMK. There is no need of SA by America. Actually, if we didn’t now have a complete fool as POTUS—and an illegitimate one at that—and Trump were still in office we could supply not only America but all of Western Europe with its needs, thus undercutting both the Saudis and Putin. But we are now led by very stupid people and so this is not occurring—but it should.
And thanks again to all the fools or worse who ACTUALLY voted for Biden. They did so much harm.
milo minderbinder says
PMK says
Oct 14, 2022 at 11:54 am
There’s another way to deal with Saudi Arabia. Unleash our own domestic energy companies. Let American energy companies drill and explore and maximize the energy we produce domestically. Then we will have no need of Saudi Arabia.
…………………………
That is not part of the overall plan of the “global elite.” They have to take the USA out in order to bring about their “New World Order.” Donald Trump was an impediment to their agenda and had to be taken out, which they so successfully accomplished.
The goal is dependance, not independence, for the United States of America, dependance is control. It’s all about “money, power and control.” That is why ole Joey boy is the fraudulent POTUS, he is content to be a puppet and wear the title of POTUS, while the real movers and shakers work in the background taking this country down.
The powers behind the scenes have their hands full keeping ole Joey boy somewhat cognizant. I think their goal is to keep him going until shortly after January 20, 2023 when the 22nd Amendment kicks in, then he will either step down voluntarily or be forced out.
Doesn’t matter who the next puppet is, little will change for the better.
CogitoErgoSum says
Looks like the Saudis have decided to treat Joe Biden like he’s a pariah.
Jefffixler1 says
Mr. Fitzgerald makes the case , undoubtably a necessary one, that we maintain good relations with the Saudis. Certainly, the strongest facet of this case is the potential price increase in oil prices . Of course , we’ve already seen alarming rises in oil prices earlier this summer with some respite lately , but also talk of an imminent price spike by winter. It seems to me that our current relationship with the Saudis haven’t been of much benefit to us of late. The Biden administration’s policies on drilling and exploration have contributed to the unstable oil market. The fact is we have plenty of oil here in the U.S. albeit much of that oil is costlier to drill than the relatively easy to drill sweet crude that comes from the Saudi fields. Perhaps we could accept a higher price , learn to live with, but a STABLE one. One that did not require us to be enthralled to Saudi whims. To overlook the role in Saudi money in spreading fundamentalist Islam
( normative Islam, as we all know) around the globe.
As for our arms sales to the Saudis, I’m not so sure it serves the best interests of the American people, although it has certainly made the Arms manufacturers rich beyond all reason. And what have the Saudis done with those mega billions in arms? We know the sniveling cowards dared not respond to the attack on the Abquiq-Khirais oil fields by Yemeni proxies working for Iran and supplied with Iranian made missiles and drones. Instead, they only look to the infadel Americans or Israelis to solve their problems with the hated Shiites. Good for the Saudis that the Israelis have an even bigger problem with Iran , and might have to do just that!
But it is something deeper with this Saudi regime that troubles the consciousness and subconsciousness of Americans in particular. It is the almost total acquiescence to this horrific regime. I might say criminal regime. A regime whose citizens bear the primary responsibility for the 911 attacks, and the regime itself bears that responsibility as it has been spreading Wahabbi Islam ( normative Islam) since the regime’s inception. The problem is the regime was never held to account for these crimes, and this has had a desultory effect on American policy towards the regime ever since. Remember, it was we, the American taxpayers, who paid the $10 billion September 11th victim compensation fund — not to mention the $3 trillion in economic costs the attacks are said to have caused. The Saudi regime would not be hauled into a court even to pay monetary damages. In fact, the September 11th fund guidelines require those receiving
Compensation to forgo any future lawsuits against Saudi Arabia. Few had any real choice but to agree to this requirement, as either they took the compensation or engage in a lawsuit against a wealthy and powerful regime that at the least would take many years with an uncertain outcome.
I find it laughable that so many , particularly on the left, found the Khashoggi killing so objectionable. Khashoggi, a friend and supporter of Bin Laden, and a member of the Muslim Brotherhood himself, was the least of Saudi crimes. But I guess if you work for the Washington post, even if your a supporter of Bin Laden, your life is sacrosanct.
I only wish the Post , and a litany of other media outlets, found 3,000 other lives as sacrosanct.
This obsequiousness, this servility to the Saudis , and not only the Saudis (see Qatar)
has made a chump of the U.S. , and can only lead to future disasters for us and the “West” in general.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
I think that the country that’s in a better predicament to ‘re-evaluate’ the relationship is Saudi Arabia. I’m no fan of that country, but one thing to be said for them: they’re not punishing their people w/ inflation, starvation and the like, and even the shariah punishments have laxed
gravenimage says
Biden ‘Re-evaluating’ US Relationship with Saudi Arabia
……………………………………………..
Saudi Arabia is a Shari’ah craphole and funder of Da’wa and Jihad terror. But Biden just seems mostly pissed off because SA has cut oil production before the midterm elections–as though a foreign nation is supposed to base their policy on whether it benefits the Democrats or not…
James Lincoln says
According to the feature article:
“Biden ‘Re-evaluating’ US Relationship with Saudi Arabia”
Actually it’s the Saudis who were first to reevaluate their relationship with the US.
Biden is being reactionary…