Authoritarian Leftist elitist calls for the forcible silencing of opposing political viewpoints. Fascism continues to descend upon us.
“Mayor Of London Calls For ‘New Regulation Of Online Speech’ After Trump Twitter Reinstatement,” by Steve Watson, Summit News, November 21, 2022:
Following Elon Musk’s decision to reinstate President Trump to Twitter, The Mayor Of London Sadiq Khan declared that it is time for “new regulations” to police online speech.
Khan, who seems to spend more time worrying about American politics than the safety of people living in London, issued a diatribe reacting to Musk turning Trump’s Twitter account back on.
He labeled Trump “a dangerous far right politician who has a history of inciting violence,” and proclaimed that “he must not be allowed to use social media,” before calling for more general regulation of “online speech.”
In the same sentence, Khan declared that “freedom of speech is vital, but it must be balanced.”
This is the same guy who boxed up Winston Churchill’s statue outside the British parliament, and World War II Memorials when BLM extremists decided they were racist….
Raja says
So funny, this naturalized brute is whining despite UK not having anything close to 1st amendment. Free speech remains islam’s number 1 enemy as it opposes and exposes islam. The countries that use other methods like Myanmar may not be bad per se. As islam is at everlasting war with the infidels it is worth emulating USA to provide some comfort to democracy if future Biden and his handlers can be reined in.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Also, not satisfied w/ stamping out free speech not just in London but in the UK as well, he’s now targeting the US. Sadiq mian, you (as in Brits, not Pakis) lost the power to order us around some 250 years ago. Live w/ it!
Raja says
Yes Infidel,
Thank you for the reply.
These supremacists want more and more of their hegemony. Unbridled enlightenment leads to this kind of outlandish demands. Being unreasonable is also an enlightenment, such is the intoxication of islam.
DHZ says
Don’t they know how much this sounds like the “thought police”? How can be people be so ignorant of the long term benefit provided by allowing the free exchange of ideas, even knowing that some of these ideas will be mean spirited and uninformed? It baffles me that so many people are supporting their own governments in this left leaning power grab that is nothing more than fascism wearing repurposed hand me downs.
tim gallagher says
This Muslim mayor seems loathsome to me. But I suppose that the people who inhabit London voted this Muslim barbarian into his position of power, so the people of London must have something very wrong with them to vote for such a piece of crap as Khan..
Michael Copeland says
“London’s not an English city any more.”
John Cleese
tim gallagher says
I’m sure that John Cleese’s observation must be spot on, Michael. To have put this piece of crap, Khan, into the position of mayor, there must be plenty wrong with the mentality of Londoners these days. From memory, I think Khan once said that we just have accept terrorism as part of our societies these days. I guess, since we do now have so many Muslims in our western societies, he was making an accurate observation, but I have loathed the scumbag ever since hearing that remark of his.
Wellington says
Seconded.
Raja says
Tim,
It is probably ingrained in the minds of people that globalization = welcoming all the poor standards of third world, including the cheap and mean conquerors.
david1508 says
Sadiq is desperately needing to change Britain into the Muslim crap hole called Pakistan his relatives came from.
Jayell1 says
Khan was elected through a combination of a fraudulently bloated muslim block vote in infested areas where the number of ‘registered electors” rose curiously in muslim households at the time of both elections, by corrupt practices whereby he and his Labour stooges fiddled the election by ‘losing’ opposing voting slips and sending out out-dated voting lists ‘by mstake’, and by conning traditional Labour voters into supporting him through blatant taqqyia such as telling the Press that he was an ‘agnostic’ then strangely rediscovering his muslim identity once on City Hall. The general opinion is that this specimen is a nasty llittle Third World crook and Khan knows this, which is why he is criminally defensive of his ill-gotten position in a previously proud Caitall city that is now a sordid reflection of his equally repulsve ilk
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the information, Jayell1, about how this scumbag, Khan, came to be the mayor of London. It all sounds very corrupt. Hopefully, they’ll vote him out reasonably soon.
Don McKellar says
A Muslim mayor calling to restrict the speech of those with differing opinions — what a shocker.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
That too in a country not his own!
Raja says
Don,
They loathe different opinions, “way things are done”, more often want to spit on white faces and also declare their intention of conquering the host nation through nasty methods. That is islam for you and loonies still love them.
Fitna says
As Robert once quipped, “if you’re getting flak, you know you’re over the target.” So when Muslims are screaming to silence a certain person like Trump, it’s because they know he sees the Devil in each of them and they are terrified. Trump stated Muslims hate us and rightly called for a ban (it should’ve been total).
This is what Muslims do to every person who figures out that Islam is our mortal enemy. They know the masses of non-Muslims are largely clueless and asleep, which means they can conquer us without too much trouble. They fear the ones who know the truth and speak out. Ofc that is also why they viciously oppose the freedom of speech.
This rotten little mayor needs to be shipped back to Porkistan along with his fellow terrorist invaders. Too bad the British are so “polite” to the point of allowing themselves to be conquered by this hideous death cult.
James Lincoln says
Fitna says,
“Trump stated Muslims hate us and rightly called for a ban (it should’ve been total).”
Agree, the ban should have been total.
The only exceptions being muslims conducting *very brief* official government business – while being escorted 24 / 7 by US law enforcement.
Fitna says
Indeed James, I recall some cowards in the media later parsed his words and said “he didn’t mean total.”
They should show some backbone…Muslims killed almost 3,000 people on 9/11, not to mention the 40,000 other terrorist attacks since then. Banning Muslims is a slap on the wrist compared to what America could’ve done to Muslim populations around the world.
Ofc this fight is far from over, Muslims will continue giving us more and more reasons to hate them as we show laxity and weakness in the meantime.
It’ll probably take a bunch of 9/11s until we (as in the western masses) finally wake up and fight back.
I suspect the battle will happen sooner in Europe where Muslims populations are getting more violent and aggressive.
James Lincoln says
Fitna,
Thank you for your reply – and excellent post.,
Scotsman48 says
The Mayor of the Capital City of Britain is a muslim, the Prime Minister of Britain is a Hindu, many towns and Cities up and down the country have muslim Mayors or Town Council leaders as well as Principals in Schools…
What could possibly be the end game for the UK.
Please do not call me a racist while you rape my daughter…
Fitna says
Unfortunately Scotsman, you’re making the mistake that sadly far too many people will make by putting Hindus together who are innocent and are not responsible for any gang rapes, with the Muslims who are actually responsible for nearly all of them.
But it’s not just Pakistanis, it’s also Somalians and others groups that have engaged in this terrible behavior. The common thread with them is not race, but they all belong to the same religion that says it’s ok to rape/enslave infidel women, obviously Islam.
So we all love to get fired up about innocents being raped, killed, abused, etc and wanting to punish the bad guys…but let’s make sure our ire is directed at the group that deserves it and not target innocent people whose only connection is having the same skin color.
Say we’re in the 1930s and we’re going to go after Nazis for the Holocaust and other reasons. Would it make sense to also attack France, because they’re white and look like Nazis? (Any collaboration aside).
The problem has always been the evil religion of Islam and most of its followers. There’s also nothing wrong with hating and opposing an ideology/belief system, because we’re attacking bad ideas and those who follow them, the same as with Nazism.
Otherwise we could simply trigger an ugly race war and I’m sure the Hindus would never want to find themselves on the same side as the Muslims. Let’s be intelligent about this and focus on dealing with the actual problem. I believe the only solution is to ban Islam and deport Muslims.
Now if the Hindus start acting the same way, then obviously they’d deserve the same treatment, but ofc they’re not because their religion is genuinely peaceful.
Raja says
It is high time the West called out the genocide agenda of islam. Banning is a distant diream.
Fitna says
Ya people need to organize and call for the banning of Islam, then the Muslims will go apeshit as usual and the media will pick it up, which can start the discussion.
Maybe it is a longshot but at least the idea will be in people’s minds. There is no happy ending when it comes to Islam it will be us or them and most likely we’ll get civil war if we do nothing.
Better to focus on deportation and banning if we can. Otherwise people need to consider a stealth war.
Raja says
Scotsman48,
They are strangling you like python. Anyhow the Brits have lost the will to live, nor do they know the purpose of life. Long live Britain.
NoBurkas says
We desperately need new regulation to force the adherents of the MURDEROUS IDEOLOGY of ISLAM back to their shitholes, where they can’t kill us.
Fitna says
+1