Houellebecq was talking about armed action against Muslim institutions, as “resistance” after “entire territories are under Islamic control.” At least from the looks of the report below, he was not advocating violence or vigilantism, only noting that it would likely come. That may be Houellebecq’a view, but as far as the L’Union des Mosquées de France (UMF) is concerned, he may not hold it. Their criminal complaint is only going to make people in France think that Houellebecq was right, and that some Muslims are trying to shut down all negative speech about Islam and impose an intellectual conformity that would conform to Sharia speech restrictions.
As for me, I do not support any violence or vigilante action. Nor do I believe that Houellebecq should be prosecuted or punished in any way for expressing his views.
“French Mosque Union to File Complaint Against Controversial French Novelist,” Global Influence Operations Report, February 1, 2023 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
French media is reporting that the L’Union des Mosquées de France (UMF) has decided to file a complaint against French novelist Michel Houellebecq, philosopher Michel Onfray, and the publication Front Populaire on the grounds of public insult and “incitement to racial and religious discrimination.” According to an article by Actualitté:
January 14, 2023 After the withdrawal of the complaint from the Great Mosque of Paris — and probably in reaction — the Union of Mosques of France decided to attack the novelist. In a press release, the organization considers that the latter has exceeded the limits of freedom of expression. [Translated from French original with Google Translate.]
Read the rest here.
This action is in response to a November 2022 interview in Front Populaire given by Houellebecq, during which he made controversial statements about Muslims, saying:
When entire territories are under Islamic control, I think that acts of resistance will take place. There will be attacks and shootings in mosques, in cafés frequented by Muslims, in short Bataclan in reverse.
The UMF’s reasons for the complaint differ from those cited by the Great Mosque of Paris, which had previously filed and then dropped a complaint against Houellebecq for “provocation to hatred against Muslims.” Houellebecq had apologized and made changes to the interview in question in an effort to calm tensions, but the UMF is now calling for the suspension of circulation of the interview….
somehistory says
He should not have apologized. That was blood in the water.
If things keep going the way they are, there will eventually be resistance. And there should be resistance to the takeover by mozlums. One can resist without being violent.
A “union”….ah, yes, the mozlum’s barracks, the soldiers within, the army without, all gathered in a union for satan the devil to “steal, kill and destroy,” beginning with the Freedom to speak, the Freedom to have an opinion, the Freedom to dislike everything mozlums say, do and stand for. islam is from satan and there is no value in that, no virtue, nothing worth tolerating, much less, accepting.
James Lincoln says
somehistory says,
“One can resist without being violent.”
Unfortunately, that is true unless muslims reach a “critical mass” in a Western country.