“If she was in her room, in her home, in her Hijab, no problem would have occurred.”
Yesterday, February 1, was World Hijab Day. The annual Islamic event commemorates the return of the Ayatollah Khomeini and the beginning of the mandatory ‘Hijabization’ of women in Iran.
While women in Iran are risking their lives to remove their hijabs, facing arrests, beatings and even death, the media in this country, much like the media in Iran, continues promoting the hijab.
The origins of the hijab are ugly and you won’t hear about them on World Hijab Day.
The Prophet Mohammed had to recruit a gang of rapists with promises of capturing and raping young girls.
Since the various rapists also had wives, and since Islam frowns on Muslim men assaulting each other’s wives (the wives of non-Muslims however are fair game, as Koran 4:24 states, “And all married women are forbidden unto you save those captives whom your right hand possess”), the hijab, the burka, the abaya and all the other exciting ways to repress women arrived to distinguish the women that could be raped from those who couldn’t.
“O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks all over their bodies that they may thus be distinguished and not molested,” Koran 33:59 states.
A commentator on the Koran adds, “It is more likely that this way they may be recognized (as pious, free women), and may not be hurt (considered by mistake as roving slave girls.)”
It’s always awkward when you confuse your wife, or somebody else’s wife with one of those roving slave girls.
Muslim women cover their hair and elbows to show that they’re the property of a Muslim man.
In response to a gang rape, the Chief Mufti of Australia said, “If she was in her room, in her home, in her Hijab, no problem would have occurred.”
By wearing the Burqa or Hijab, women participate in a narrative that gives rapists a pass for sexual assaults on women who don’t dress the way the Mufti or Imam says they should.
That’s what World Hijab Day is really about. Just ask the women of Iran or Afghanistan.
somehistory says
It’s the “she was asking for it by the way she was dressed.” At one time, rapists in non-mozlum areas used that line to get off during jury trials when accused of rape. It sometimes worked. Until the laws in the U.S. were changed, it could work to get rapists off with a not guilty verdict when they were clearly guilty.
In mozlum dominated lands, the laws will not be changed to reflect the fact that women should be able to dress as they wish and not be subjected to sexual assault and rape because some mozlum beast can’t control his lust.
After all, the rulers in these lands where even baby girls must be fully covered, are all lusty mozlum beasts and they don’t want to control their own lust, much less have open riots by the gangs, hordes of lusty males, who would demand the freedom to rape at will.
If, suddenly, the U.S. reversed the laws and went back to the old days, where women and girls had to be pure as the driven snow to get a fair chance of winning when accusing a male of rape, these idiots who are having their good feelings about pretending it is a woman’s **choice** whether to wear the scarf , and or garbage bags, would surely be screaming about “justice.”
the beasts of islam are probably grinning ear to ear for all of this recommendation of sex slavery.
Walter Sieruk says
That sick “joke’ of a “World Hijab Day” might as well be called “World Islamic Misogyny Day”
An example of this was on March 11, 2002 in Saudi Arabia a girls dorm caught on fire, the girls naturally rushed out of that dorm that was on fire. In their hast to escape the flames they forgot to take and put on their face veils. Those Islamic state police of Saudi Arabia with this totally unreasonable and heartless Islamic mindset forced all the girls back into the dorm that was on fire. Only because they didn’t have their face veils. So all those girls did a horrible painful death .This is worse than tragic and sad, this is the murderous misogyny of the Islamic kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Furthermore that tragedy of the terrible burning to death of those young girls because of the cruel oppression of Islam’s “values” is a brutal reminder of the harsh reality is a reflection of the information revealed in the book by Brigitte Gabriel entitled THEY MUST BE STOPPED
Which informs the reader on page 171 “Control of behavior and disregard for human life are key elements in Islamic ideology.”
Walter Sieruk says
Sharia which denies basic human rights is viciously harsh oppressive to girls and women. For Sharia supports forcing females to wear the hijab which is symbol of the misogyny of Islam with its Sharia.
So it should be made known that the actual origin of Sharia is revealed in a Time –Life book with the title MESOPOTAMIA: THE MIGHTY KINGS copyright 1995 ” For that future history book about the ancient pagan world of Mesopotamia informs the reader that “many Islamic laws resemble the Babylon and Assyrian forebears.” .page 150.
Therefore Sharia has no value or worth.
OLD GUY says
The Hi Jab that is being celebrated is equivalent to celebrating the white KKK robe as a male symbol of love and peace. Both represent the repression of human beings. You can wear either if you want to, but it should be your choice not forced upon you. And certainly not a celebration.
Walter Sieruk says
Sharia which denies basic human rights is viciously harsh oppressive to girls and women. For Sharia supports forcing females to wear the hijab which is symbol of the misogyny of Islam with its Sharia.
So it should be made known that the actual origin of Sharia is revealed in a Time –Life book with the title MESOPOTAMIA: THE MIGHTY KINGS copyright 1995 ” For that future history book about the ancient pagan world of Mesopotamia informs the reader that “many Islamic laws resemble the Babylon and Assyrian forebears.” .page 150.
Therefore Sharia has no value or worth.
Scotsman48 says
The Wife of Assad, the PM of Syria does not wear a hijab, so I don’t know why the women in Syria are burning theirs unless its just in support of the women in Iran who are forced to wear it.
I have seen in Malaysia wee girls as young as 5 covered from head to toe and it was over 40c/100f and I wondered what kind of sick fuc8er sees a wee 5 year old girl as a sexual object, but her father walked alongside her while her mother was also covered from head to toe in a black garbage bag.
islam is THE most sexually uptight ”religion” in the whole World.
It is in fact a Fascist Religious Cult from Satan that teaches revenge rather than forgiveness…
I guess the Western ”feminists” havent learned that as yet.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Actually, the Alawites – which the Assads are – are very different from not just sunni, but shi’a muslims as well. They have beliefs that include transmigration of souls, celebrate certain ceremonies w/ wine and unlike the shi’a who simply consider Ali the first legitimate successor to Muhammad, the Alawites actually consider Ali a prophet, putting them in the same category as the Ahmadiyas: violating the rule that Muhammad was the last prophet
Syria – particularly a Baathist Syria where sunni islam has been effectively defanged over the last half century – is therefore a bad example to hold as representative of islam