By then the only places in the world that believe in gender equality will vanish.
So much for the 5-year plans. Try a 300-year-plan. Unelected bureaucrats with lifetime sinecures have the time.
António Guterres, the United Nations secretary-general, said on Monday that the global progress on women’s rights has been disappointing, adding that worldwide gender equality appears to be centuries away.
During a General Assembly speech, Guterres said that progress in the women’s rights movement has been vanishing for decades, noting ongoing issues such as threats to abortion rights and the current state of women and girls in Afghanistan living under Taliban rule.
“Gender equality is growing more distant,” he said. “On the current track, the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women puts it 300 years away.”
Gender equality is largely a myth outside the western world. It’s barely a concept anyone takes seriously outside European and Asian nations. The United States and other western nations spend billions promoting it in third-world countries every year. Afghanistan is a prime example of how that turned out.
The UN’s 300-year estimate is optimistic in the wrong direction. As Islamic expansionism and third-world migration continue to demographically devastate western nations, the only places in the world that believe in any notion of gender equality will vanish from the face of the earth.
And if you think the idea that western nations will toss aside the rights of women is implausible, consider how in less than a decade, the entire existence of women was challenged by an interest group of men in dresses.
Freedom of speech and of religion went into the toilet once enough Muslim immigrants showed up in Brussels, London or at major universities in America.
300 years from now we’ll either have a much more vigorous America or have learned to accommodate sharia law. In the former scenario, the UN won’t exist. It probably won’t exist in the latter one either, but for very different reasons.
And the UN need look no further than the composition of UN Women where the council features Pakistan, South Africa and Afghanistan.
Walter Sieruk says
In the mid -1980’s In was visiting the citiy of London England and entered a Christian British bookstore and in it l bought a booklet about “Women’s rights movements in some Islamic countries.” which was printed in the late 1970’s
As alreadly made clear, it was a Christian booklet but it was still very fair to conscientious people who were involved in those movements who made a sincere effort in some Muslims nations to work to improve the human rights of women in those countries.
After reading about this ,it seemed to me that as earnest and those women’s rights workers are by just wouldn’t make any real progress in those countries because those nations are Islamic and therefore have the strong misogyny of Islam and Islamic “culture” that would strongly resist any effects for any genuine success in genuine reform in female rights.
Now in this year of 2023 time has revealed that sadly in turned out to be true, that that as I thought. after about some 45 years later no progress was made because of the oppressive spiteful misogynistic spirit of Islam.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
What these clowns invariably mean is gender equity, where the group equality b/w men & women, rather than individual equality of opportunity, is assessed. There is a significant number of women who choose to marry and become stay-at-home moms, and not pursue a separate career. Most Feminist movements have been opposed to that choice for them, instead wanting them to be in the career avenues of doctors, nurses, engineers, lawyers, accountants and so on. Despite the feminization of men, far fewer men go for being stay-at-home dads
Once one takes out the women who choose not to pursue a career and instead focus on their families, equality of men and women does exist. As Matt Walsh pointed out, when women complain about there not being enough women in management, they’re talking about themselves, not other women, since a lot of them have women bosses. Besides, once there are genuine free enterprise, women have the same opportunities as men to start their own businesses, partnerships and so on
The real enemy of women now is the LGBTQIA+ movement, which is quietly destroying women’s sports, privacy and so on by allowing men to pretend to be women and then invade their spaces, like their restrooms, locker rooms and so on. Maybe these ‘feminists’ could start a purge of LGBTQIA+ from their ranks, and then focus on taking on the latter
Hoi Polloi says
Never mentioned by activists is the number of corps actively displacing experienced men to install women in management in alignment with stated diversity goals. The original pitch was to select on merit, but that’s since gone by the wayside.
I’ve seen leftists apoplectically discuss countries in Northern Europe whose gender policies they laud but which have higher levels of traditional gender work roles. It’s as if they don’t want women to choose unless it inverts norms.
Jim says
Perhaps the only way of assimilating Islam to the West is if there are few immigrants at a time and if they are in some way cut off from the Islamist states. But this is not happening. The countries with oil money finance big mosques in the west and big cultural centers, infiltrate universities. There are many women who idealize Islam and refuse to even listen to historical or cultural critiques of Islam. So they become apologists of a religion that seeks to take away their rights. The same applies to feminists who support transwomen, as though these men were really women by choice. But they are not, when they take over womens sports. They should be denied the privilege of being honorary women and competing as women for status and awards.
S G Martin says
There is no hope of assimilation when the Laws of The Land of the receiving nation are overridden by a priestly caste of misogynists. When those laws are swept aside in favour of the slaughter of the indigenous people (back to RC Church). When they place one mosque in a land, they claim it for Islam. Mind you, these prerogatives fit nicely with the EU/WEF/UN/WHO Agenda. Oh, must be coincidence like most every female presented in film, TV, print is actually a trans misrepresenting the silenced majority, neither seen nor heard.
Valhella says
Great Post Jim
Mario says
Forgot to include that women are not poorly treated at all in Hispano-America and Brazil thanks to its Catholic roots.
Gurek says
Yes, that’s very true. I hope Islam never destroys Latin America as it mercilessly destroyed Europe. Muslims should stay away from there.
Hoi Polloi says
Correction to Islamic UN pronouncement:
Women’s rights are 1400 years away and receding quickly.
OLD GUY says
Under Islamic rule women will NEVER have equality with men. Maybe the women of the world should consider Islamophobia as a fight for equality.
Hoi Polloi says
Agreed. The 1400 years refers to the onset of islam.
tim gallagher says
The UN should have said that there will never be equal rights for women until islam is gone, because that is obviously the truth. Therefore islam has to go. But the gutless UN would never say anything like that about islam. It will continue to pander to islam.
Hoi Polloi says
They will continue and they should speak that truth, but it’s a wholly owned subsidiary and past time for us to leave. They are indeed gutless.
tim gallagher says
I agree, Hoi Polloi. The UN does seem to be a puppet of the Muslim cause. generally, it seems to be an enemy of western values and is definitely also a gutless bunch of clowns. One thing is for sure, girls’ and women’s rights are never going to get anywhere in any islamic country. islam is the most misogynistic ideology around. Still stuck back in 7th century arabia.
Valhella says
Sadly true Tim
Walter Sieruk says
When a Taliban spokesman in referring to the question of the basic human rights of females, both girls and women, he declared” We guarantee all their rights within the limits of Islam.”
All aware people who understand Islam know that the last four words of that statement has an obvious meaning.
Which is that with Islam the rights of females are very limited. As in within the Islamic view, they have little to no rights at all. .
As this has been so well explained by Brigitte Gabriel in her book, entitled THEY MUST BE STOPPED in Chapter 9 of the title “Islam’s Contempt for Women” which informs its reader on page 171 “Control of behavior and disregard for human life are key elements in Islamic ideology.”
In addition, on the next page it further reads” Women in Islam are considered unclean, deemed inferior even to dirt.”
The tragic and sad reality is that Islam is a religion of brutal, cruel, harsh and even, at times, murderous misogyny.
Valhella says
Well said Walter!
S G Martin says
Man is the term used to include all men and all womb-men, including their offspring. The sexes are equal with females having ‘that little bit extra’ – the ability to grow and sustain Man, not exclusively ‘men’ or ‘for men’s pleasure only’. This is corruption.
Equal in status as ensouled images of their progenitor, the highest expression of Being. To reduce Man to beast, it was necessary to reduce Wombman to slave and control all through the whims of the beastly priestly class. This is how we have a degenerate horde of savages renowned throughout their history for transforming the abundance of nature into deserts. Overgrazing and destruction of civilisations for material, sexual and bloodlust gratification. Perhaps most of the world’s religious slaves are possessed.
There’s not an ounce of high-minded or spiritual teachings in either The Talmud or Islamic counterparts.
They do say that ‘Islam is the broom of Israel’ and collusion between the priestly cults of the three strands of control cannot be ignored. there’s Ishmael and Israel of Hagar and Sarah. There’s Sabbatae Tsevi and his conversion to Islam. I can’t see much between the two, they each end with beheading the hapless pascal lambs of Christ. Seems like a huge set up to me. Albert Pike laid out the skeleton plan in ‘Three World Wars’. What does Islam mean to me? Three little letters: F M G.
It has been said and written that the bloody RC Church of Rome created Islam to unite the Arab bandits for the purposes of recapturing Jerusalem which was then ransomed back. We see the ultimate costs with interest, like the sword of Damocles over our heads. And each A-Bra-Manic strand will blame and vilify Man’s life bringer, Wombman for all his dreadfully ignorant deeds of destruction. Now, how insane is that?
Valhella says
Wow!