Muslims are carrying out “Land Jihad” by illegally occupying large swaths of land in the northern Indian state of Uttarakhand, a leading politician from India’s nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has warned.
Muslims were illegally talking over public land and building religious structures on them, Uttarakhand state’s Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami said Friday. He vowed to reverse the Land Jihad by demolishing all illegal structures.
The mass encroachment by Muslims is largely taking place near India’s border with China, threatening country’s security amid growing military tension with the hostile Communist neighbor, the Uttarakhand chief minister disclosed.
The warning comes as Indians are increasingly alarmed by the Love Jihad being waged by Muslim grooming gangs aimed at vulnerable Hindu and Christian girls across the country, the Indian media reports.
“Uttarakhand: Illegal encroachments in name of ‘land jihad’ will not be allowed, says Dhami,” First Post, May 26, 2023:
Amid an ongoing statewide drive to remove illegal structures on government land, Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami said on Friday said that illegal encroachments will not be allowed in the name of “land jihad” in the state.
“Uttarakhand shares its borders with two countries (China and Nepal). A particular community had illegally encroached land and raised structures in the border areas of the state which are being removed as part of a drive,” Dhami said while addressing a meeting of the Vishva Hindu Parishad’s (VHP) Kendriya Margadarshak Mandal.
He said the state government has already appealed to encroachers to remove such structures on their own or the administration will demolish them.
Last month, Dhami warned occupiers of illegally built mazars (tombs) to remove those on their own and reiterated that his government would not allow “land jihad” in the state.
Under a conspiracy, thousands of shrines have been built illegally on public and forest land without permission, he had said. “Not a single illegally built religious structure will be allowed to remain standing in the state. All illegal structures will be completely demolished,” Dhami said on Friday.
somehistory says
mozlums use ever dirty trick in the book to take what belongs to others. Land, family members (by abduction and forced “conversion”…money, and allowing any of these, encourages them to wage war even harder.
Illegal structures…if they are barracks for meetings and storing weapons, these are “forward installations”…like forts in enemy territory. Like the big, ugly barracks in Israel.
Tearing them down seems to be the best solution for those who want to resist the spread of islam’s evil, demonic filth.
Uma says
India needs to take the matter seriously
somehistory says
Yes!
࿗Infidel࿘ says
You need to get behind Ekam Sanatan Bharat. BJP has proved that it’s not gonna do anything, which is why they got voted out in Karnataka
davidafoot says
This is relevant to any territory with Moslems because of their laws. It is good that it has been brought up. One of the three reasons given in Islamic law for migration is to expand the reach of Islam and then there are fatwas about voting and consolidating the power of Islam
Islam expands by the sword or by love jihad or any method conceivable, there is no mention of democracy, equality, equity or freedom in Islam which the Marxists defend so doggedly and try to bring more of it to England
Christianity lacks anything like this, it is no longer a crusader religion, and is now at the stage of being labelled as “extremist” and is being cancelled. Only a “doctored” Christianity is acceptable to the Marxists who have infiltrated everything in England. They left laws indoctrinating everybody and everything like the Gordon Brown “Equality Act 2010” (or White Privilege Act). The Marxist Conservatives have been paying the indoctrinators!
Democracy doesn’t have the tools to support freedom of speech and democracy in Batley or Wakefield etc. we all have seen this in our news in different publications. Democracy can’t handle the violence of Marxism or Islam: jihadi warriors or Marxist guerrillas, these extreme expressions of Marxism and Islam are incompatible with democracy so it will die or it will have to find the way of dealing with these ideologies through military force.
In those places swamped by Islam, the police of England wouldn’t even defend little white English girls, thousands of them raped, the police not willing to protect them from the Moslem mass “rape of the unfaithful!” Did the Marxists allow this for the Moslem family vote? Or to achieve the Marxist destruction of England? It is not clear what Gordon Brown at that time and Kier Starmer who had a lot to do with this were trying to do. However, now they are tireless pursuing those who eat cake or who try to sort out other trifles like resolving speeding tickets! Totally irrelevant in comparison because they want to come back and do even more damage to England.
PRCS says
Good post. Many important points.
“Islam expands by the sword or by love jihad or any method conceivable, there is no mention of democracy, equality, equity or freedom in Islam which the Marxists defend so doggedly and try to bring more of it to England.”
Not just to England, of course.
Hard to believe it’s been two years since the Batley school situation:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-56537585
A place truly “swamped by Islam”.
A caveat:
“these extreme expressions of Marxism and Islam are incompatible with democracy”
Both Marxism and Islam are indeed antithetical to and incompatible with democracy.
No need to qualify that with “their extreme expressions”.
PRCS says
Good post. Many important points.
“Islam expands by the sword or by love jihad or any method conceivable, there is no mention of democracy, equality, equity or freedom in Islam which the Marxists defend so doggedly and try to bring more of it to England.”
Not just to England, of course.
Hard to believe it’s been two years since the Batley school situation:
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-56537585
A place truly “swamped by Islam”.
A caveat:
“these extreme expressions of Marxism and Islam are incompatible with democracy”
Both Marxism and Islam are indeed antithetical to and incompatible with democracy.
No need to qualify that with “their extreme expressions”.