pride
noun
- a feeling of great satisfaction derived from one’s own achievements.
Achievements.
Achievements.
Achievements.
It might be news to some, especially to the left’s useful idiots on the left and the right, but the “LGBT Pride movement” is a communist movement. Same with the “Black Lives Matter movement,” the “Feminist movement,” etc. Because a naked communist movement might wake up too many Americans, and leftists know that, they hide behind race, sex and sexuality to push communism.
And we really need to stop calling leftists “liberals,” as even so-called conservative pundits continue to do. Leftists aren’t “old school classical liberals”; they’re fire-breathing anti-American commies looking to do us in from within, and if the last few years didn’t convince you of that, nothing will. As for the “old school classical liberals” who still exist, however few of them there are, some of them are under the delusion that the answer to leftism is liberalism, when it was liberalism that was subsumed by leftism, which showed its Achilles heel.
With the left now openly communizing and sexualizing children, through “entertainment” and government schools, and no doubt even some private schools, Americans who are known for their tolerance and acceptance, no matter what intolerant leftists claim, have had about enough of the left. We can tolerate a lot, we can accept a lot, and adults are free to do what they want, so long as they don’t hurt others, but once leftists went after children in such an obvious way that no one can deny, an actual resistance to leftist madness began to take place, and is growing stronger. The left’s response to this resistance, particularly the resistance by fed up parents, is for our leftist government and its now KGB-like FBI to identify parents who object to gay pornography in children’s books, etc., as “terrorists.” “Terrorists.”
And then you have the left’s useful idiots on the left and the right who celebrate “Pride” as if were a celebration of actual pride, which isn’t the case, as pride is a personal thing for individuals, for their achievements, not one’s sexuality. Then there are also the “Pride” celebrations at churches, held by Christians who are also the left’s useful idiots.
We’re halfway through “LGBT Pride Month,” and have yet to see MAGA hat-wearing homosexuals being celebrated by the “LGBT community,” furthering my point that this is a leftist movement, through and through. We’re told that it is an “inclusive” movement, but can you think of any non-Democrat/non-leftist/non-communist gays being celebrated during “LGBT Pride Month”? But we did see trans boobs being flopped around on the White House lawn, with the boob-in-chief saying about “LGBT” people, that they’re “the bravest and most inspiring people I’ve ever known.” He doesn’t know them, but he does know his son, Hunter, and he’s called him “the smartest man I know.” And the YouTube video of trans boobs being flashed on the White House lawn was slapped with age restrictions by YouTube, even though the leftists at YouTube are all in on sexualizing and communizing children.
As for those who still think they can get away with saying that they have no clue as to why decent Americans are objecting to the “LBGT” movement, they need to be reminded that most Americans didn’t give a damn about gay people, trans, and drag queens until they targeted children. Americans truly have a live and let live attitude, but leftists in America, who’ve embraced the foreign idea, leftism, don’t have that live and let live attitude. They not only want to drive electric cars, but they want to force all of us to do that. They don’t only want to take covid “vaccines,” they want to force all of us to take them. And so on. Leftists crossed the line when they explicitly went after children, and they can’t now pretend that they haven’t done that. That was the flashpoint for Americans. And I see that even some gays, notably the group, Gays Against Groomers, understand that the communist gays simply cannot resist crossing the line and upending years good will from average Americans.
In sum, the LGBT movement is a gay communist movement that now expresses a triumphalist attitude about their position in 2023, where they moan about how “marginalized” they are, while shoving their lifestyle in our children’s faces. As one of these gay supremacists put it the other day, “Straight sex is just not natural. Those are biological facts.” I would tell this gay supremacist that without natural straight sex, he and billions of people wouldn’t exist.
Ivan says
I agree 100% – evil always has a cloak
Hoi Polloi says
Leftist is more appropriate, I agree. FJB is out with his pervert’s chant about the children belonging to everyone. Then again, maybe we should just head straight for pedophile.
Jim says
The leftists who have coopted our political parties are related to the communists in Russia and the Nazis in Germany who tried to alienate children from their parents and indoctrinate them in a state centered religion of the far left. They try to present themselves as liberators and compassionate reformers who want to end discrimination and hatred against people who are by nature different and deserve to be treaded as equal to people who accept the binary division of male and female and the permanence of sex as an inherited constant in peoples’ lives. They should be resisted, not tolerated. They are not equal in value and wisdom to traditionalists, they are perverters of reality and should not be allowed to make inroads on society in its tested traditions.
Rarely says
Bosch Fawstin.
I’d certainly be interested in hearing your definition of “Communism” since you use it so freely.
“Fire-breathing anti-American commies looking to do us in from within”. Really???
There are no “MAGA hat-wearing homosexuals” or “non-Democrat/non-leftist/non-communist gays” being celebrated. So what???
The LGBT movement, BLM, Feminist movement etc. are ALL communist movements. Does your “etc.” include the civil rights movement? They’re all looking to “do us in from within”?
“KGB-like FBI”. Really? Evidence please.
Bosch Fawstin says
Commie: those who take great exception to commies being called commies
Rarely says
That’s no definition.
You are calling me a “Commie”?
If I called you a table it wouldn’t make you a table.
I don’t know what you mean by commie. It’s a word that’s thrown around in a rather cavalier fashion.
Wellington says
I wouldn’t, Rarely, call you a Commie, but I would label you as a confused person who regularly runs interference for a great many who are presently in the process of destroying—let’s see here since there are so many categories—common sense, moral intelligence, Western Civilization, overall liberty, equality under the law, and as well passing off disorders as lifestyles and deviancies as normal.
Will you never learn? I doubt it.
Rarely says
Wellington.
I’m not as confused as you suggest. Very often I am simply trying to get commenters to clarify themselves. For example: in this article Bosch tosses around the word “communist” without being prepared to define exactly what he means by it. Apparently if one doesn’t support Trump’s MAGA movement he’s a “commie”
The “categories” you mention are very admirable on the surface but, when using them, it’s a good idea to define what you mean. For example, “equality under the law” is a great principle and I feel certain that BLM would not exist if it was actually practiced.
“Western Civilization” used to be very dependent on slave labour to build its economies. I suspect that many Americans at the time viewed the emancipators as “looking to do us in from within”. Western Civilization thankfully evolves.
That women, African-Americans and LBGT types seek to have “overall liberty” and be treated with “equality under the law” doesn’t mean they are Commies trying to take down Western Civilization from within.
For the record, I am very opposed to many of the demands made by the LGBT+ community and the concessions given. I believe strong resistance (non-violent) is in order and that, in due course, a reasonable middle ground could then be achieved.
Hoi Polloi says
Let me offer a more pungent characterization of Communism from my children who’ve have gone to school with more than one student whose family fled when the commies took over their countries (some only managing to get one child out):
The family lost everything they’d had and took turns getting the next egg from their single chicken. The next up, invariably nearly starving, would stick fingers into the chicken to see if anything was coming. The adult still remembers and warns anyone who will listen.
Wellington says
Rarely: I will address only one of your assertions and that is your statement that “Western Civilization used to be very dependent on slave labour to build its economies.”
This is almost entirely a fiction. The fact of the matter is that wherever free labor has existed it has proven to be far more productive for a society than slave labor. Aside from the fact that all corners of the Earth saw slavery and that Western Civilization was the first to realize how wrong it was, slave labor actually retards an economy. Yes, it can benefit certain individual slave owners but the society as a whole will suffer.
This helps to explain why on the eve of the American Civil War the North was far more productive economically than the South (and a chief reason why it won the war). Many historians through the ages have pointed to extensive slave labor in the Late Roman Empire as a major reason for the collapse of said empire. I’m currently re-reading Norman Cantor’s very impressive work on the Middle Ages, entitled “Medieval History,” and in the first chapters of this tome Cantor mentions several times how inefficient slave labor in the Late Empire was and why it was instrumental along with plague, debasement of the coinage, uncertain succession to the Emperorship and Germanic invasions in causing the Western half of the Empire to completely collapse by the end of the fifth century AD.
The major reason to object to slavery has to be a moral one but there is a very sound secondary reason to object to it—it’s stupid. And Western Civilization to its great credit realized all this more so than any other civilization and why free-market capitalism became so instrumental in making the West, even with all its faults, still the greatest civilization of all time but which civilization the modern Western Left is foolishly presently trying to destroy, with the Islamic sphere of mankind and authoritarian thugs like Putin and Xi salivating at the prospect.
Hoi Polloi says
Are you willing, Rarely, given this asserted desire for “equality under the law” to see all unequal practices in Western Civ abandoned? No more inequality in hiring, admissions, grants, contracts, or any other area?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Rarely
The original version of Communism almost died w/ the Soviet Union, except that Cuba and North Korea retained it, Venezuela adapted it, and Nicaragua returned to power the Ortegas but this time w/o dismantling the election system there, since they’ve figured out how Leftists can remain in power. Also, Beijing has taken over what used to be the Soviet role
What is new in Communism is the endorsement of LGBTQIA+ and Climate Change. That is a change from the Soviets, who were rank misogynists and champion polluters, but that doesn’t mean that these movements ain’t communist. All of them depend on complete government control on both the economy as well as all human freedom – be it expression or self defense. So Faustin is pretty accurate when he calls these groups communist
Rarely says
Infidel.
You’re suggesting that all these groups seek “complete government control on both the economy as well as all human freedom”? Surely not. They each want changes in a specific area that gives them each more of the freedom the rest of us enjoy. It’s an expansion of freedom. They are all mute on the economy.
Now what does Faustin mean by Communist?
BTW. Climate change is a communist plot? Al Gore is a Communist?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Rarely
Why does Canada now take away kids from parents who won’t “affirm their preferred gender” i.e. sign off on the sex change surgery? California too is headed in that direction. That is a totalitarian seizure of power, something that Communists didn’t hesitate to do, under either Stalin nor Mao
As for the economy, the only reason these movements are not asking for the nationalization of various segments of the economy is that they have their comrades in the boardrooms of most of Corporate America, and also, the Corporate West. Woke leaders are just as enthusiastically cracking down on free speech, limiting what their customers can or can’t do w/ products that they pay for, and doing things that please the members of these movements. Otherwise, just a decade ago, these were the same people in the various Occupy movements. Had Corporate America still been based on shareholder, as opposed to stakeholder capitalism, these companies would have been loathed by these movements. They’re only loved for having converted to wokism
It is also very Orwellian of you to claim that they want “more of the freedom the rest of us enjoy”. They want the freedom to castrate minor kids, over the objection of their parents, and the freedom to toss those parents in jail should they come in the way. These are people just begging to be shot, so that they can accuse the other side of violence, and you ought to be ashamed of supporting these degenerates
As for Climate Change, it’s an attempt to take over the world economy by a select few plutocrats. If carbon emissions were really the goal, all these countries would be championing nuclear and hydro-electric power. Instead, they’re championing 2 power sources that have large real-estate footprints, that are incapable of supplying the world’s power needs but have companies that are owned by the leading elites in the West. In the US, they’re forcing state governments to choose b/w solar farms and crop farms: either people have the energy they need but starve, or they have the food they need but can’t power their appliances. They’ve caused electricity prices to skyrocket in Britain and Europe, thanks to shutting down every viable source of power
That’s what Communism does: creates artificial shortages of everything. A desert country under communism would have a shortage of sand: it explains why Venezuela, which was one of the richest countries in this hemisphere, now has to import oil from Iran. The Climate Change movement is simulating Communist-style shortages of energy in the West, and the LGBTQIA+ movement is simulating Communist-style control of children and separation of them from their parents
Whoever supports these 2 are evil, and belong in a tribunal at Nuremburg, as one former poster Mortimer used to reference
Viktor Smith says
All those filthy ideals are effectively destroying the very idea of civilization. The L*BT movement with its filth, vulgarity, obscenity, debauchery ; the fe*inist movement with its false ideals, and the Black Lives M*tter movement with it’s horrible narrative are all contributing to the weakening and the ultimate decline of civilization.
Goes without saying that they are communist/marxist in nature. At this point, it is only Islam which is combating these vulgar ideologies.
CogitoErgoSum says
In what world would it be a biological fact that straight sex is not natural? Someone who would make such a statement is either not living in the same world as most of us or else has a mental problem. I’m thinking the reason some people are attracted to the same sex or think that they are in the wrong body is because of some sort of defect in the brain. It’s pretty much the same reason some people are attracted to communism.
Phil Copson says
” But we did see trans boobs being flopped around on the White House lawn, with the boob-in-chief saying about “LGBT” people, that they’re “the bravest and most inspiring people I’ve ever known.”
—————————————————————————————————————-
The White House lawn is the obvious place, isn’t it?
( I assume that “LGBT” does stand for: “Let’s Go – Brandon’s Trotskyites!” ???)
PRCS says
+1
Wellington says
Homosexuality traditionally has been looked upon as deviant behavior by almost all societies. The vast majority of societies throughout the millennia have concluded this. So, the fact that homosexuality and other “traditional” deviancies (e.g., bisexuality) are now passed off as normal means one of two things: 1) Either mankind throughout the vast majority of its history has been wrong on this issue and bigoted; or 2) mankind got it right through the centuries and we now live in the first absurd age in man’s history whereby abnormalities are now proffered to us as normal.
As an example, either the traditional Judeo-Christian view of sexuality is correct and the modern “assessment” is wrong, or the traditional Judeo-Christian view of sexuality is incorrect and the wonderful and enlightened age we now live is has it down pat. It’s an either/or. No dodging here. Can’t have both.
And why I consider gay marriage the tip of the iceberg in the descent of the modern West because I have chosen sides in an age which no longer believes in absolute values—but I still do. And the fact that a natural rogue like me has to state this servers serves as ipso facto evidence of how how just awful matters presently are.
If you can have gay marriage, then expect anything because if you alter the basic reason why the basic institution of society exists i.e., marriage, then don’t be surprised by anything that thereafter ensues, including drag drag queens performing before 1st graders, puberty blockers being given to 8 year olds and breasts cut off of 14-year old girls who think they are male. Open Pandora’s Box and please don’t be surprised by anything thereafter. For all those in favor of gay marriage, will you not reconsider how “altering” this monumental change has been? Yes, please do so—if you are able and true to yourself.
somehistory says
Excellent comment once again, Wellington.
Rarely says
I don’t understand the concept of gay marriage past the point where it gives each party various property rights. Also, I don’t know whether it ushered in the absolutely idiotic activities you describe. A stop MUST be put to them and similar outrageous activities. Hopefully the current backlash will have that effect and wake up the fence sitters. I don’t feel they’ve received enough press but they will.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
What you are describing is “civil unions”, which I’m actually okay w/, if a line could be drawn b/w that, and marriage, which is the institutions under which families are created and raised. I might be okay w/ gays adopting orphans, but other than that, their civil unions should just allow them things like hospital visits, claiming partners as tax dependents and inheritances
But I’m against making those the complete equivalents of marriages, which are more important for raising kids. Anyone who disagrees w/ that – just look at the Black community, where fatherlessness is the prime reason for poverty & crime among their youth
Viktor Smith says
Wrong. There should be no civil unions based on filthy vulgar ideals. Only normal families. Plain and simple.
Neto says
Excellent article. Keep them coming
Hoi Polloi says
+1
Hoi Polloi says
+1 to Wellington, to be clear. The sneering from the alphabet people when prescient individuals warned where an opening would take us and the fact that we’re now seeing what they warned against, has the populace pushing back.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
There was also something that Michael Knowles noted when he appeared on Megyn Kelly’s show a few days ago. Megyn Kelly said that she was supportive of LGB w/o the T, and pointed out LGB people like Dave Rubin who does likewise. But Michael Knowles pointed out that ideas have consequences
Essentially, in traditional societies, there were set gender roles b’cos of the recognition that the genders were different. But when feminism emerged, their argument was that those roles were interchangeable. On the surface, not much wrong w/ that, but the result of that was that as a result of the gender roles being interchangeable, the genders themselves became interchangeable, which was the birth of the LGB part of the movement. Once one came to the point where men & women were always interchangeable, the next thing was that men could be wives and women could be husbands. Ultimately leading to gay marriage. But now, since men & women were interchangeable, the next thing was that men and women were changeable – the “T” part of the movement, where we are now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-kD35zt6rk
Incidentally, this blows up one of the logical fallacies out there – the “slippery slope” argument. This trend from assigned gender roles to homosexuality to now the TQIA+ part of the LGBTQIA+ just proves what Andrew Wilkow, a host on Siriux XM Patriot and Salem News channel pointed out: that the slippery slope ain’t a logical fallacy, but rather, a trend line
I recall years ago, when the Texas Supreme Court overturned an anti-Sodomy law, my reaction then was okay, since the libertarian part of me suggested that what adults do in private is nobody else’s business. But that opened the floodgates to demands for various same sex partnerships, culminating in gay marriage. If it were possible to draw a line, that’s where I would have drawn it: I’d have allowed civil unions, which would have allowed a gay couple things like hospital visits, inheritances and so on, but disallowed things like marriage and kids (maybe allow them to adopt orphans). But failing all that, knowing what we know today, I’d probably have stood w/ that anachronistic anti-sodomy Texas law, despite my libertarian side revolting against it
Viktor Smith says
You are so so correct !
PRCS says
So, if as we’re told, homosexuality is an immutable characteristic not a choice, what are gay people proud about, exactly?
As straight men and women don’t publicly shout about their sexuality, I guess we’ll never have a month of our own.
somehistory says
An Excellent article, Mr.Fawstin
You hit it right about the targeting of the children. Our children, not their own. Behaving as they do, makes them unable to reproduce; so they make every attempt to take the children of others. Not to care for them, but to abuse and mutilate.
There was a story in yesterday’s news feed about a young girl named Keely. Her teacher keeps calling her Kelly, even after the student told her time and again how to pronounce her name.
The girl’s father got involved and told the teacher how to pronounce his daughter’s name and was told by the school that he was “interfering with the authority.” The teacher and school admin are saying how her name is pronounced isn’t important, but they keep on saying it wrong.
Now, if she decided she wanted to be called something stupid, such as “them, or they or xi,” …they’d be sued if they refused to go along with that.
Several weeks ago, Glenn Beck had one of his Wednesday night specials on and discussed some of the things going on in the U.S.
He had copies of documents which showed that back …I think it was the 60’s, but it could have been earlier…later…too many things to remember…a KGB officer explained how the communists planned to take over America.
They knew they couldn’t just come storming in; so they set up a scheme whereby they would destroy Christianity by infiltrating the churches with their operatives who would introduce different ideas, get into positions of power, turn people away from God, destroy faith, feminize God, etc.
Beck also explained that other social devices would be used to foment trouble and gradually turn the majority of people to communism.
One of the many ways was to get people to become homosexual.
Their plan has worked out well for them.
Rarely says
LOL. You’re joking…right?
somehistory says
No. And in my opinion, “lol” is dumb. no one really believes the loller is laughing “out loud” or even aloud.
WCM says
To “Rarely says:”
In 1984 (clearly a good year for your type) Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov, Soviet defector, gave the interview “somehistory” refers to. It is described in the linked article, which includes a well-known video containing excerpts of Bezmenov’s description of the Soviet plan for the West’s (America’s) destruction.
From the Soviet horse’s mouth, to you, one of their “useful idiots.”
Don McKellar says
I still don’t understand why “regular” gays support trannies. They are trying to reject being what they are — gay. And not successfully, while they anger and grow pushback among normal people. It seems like the worst thing the “average” gay person has ever done. It’s hurting them more and more.
somehistory says
some interesting stories at https://washingtonstand.com/
“Most Americans Say Transgenderism Is ‘Morally Wrong’: Gallup”
“With Order Making Maryland a Gender Transition Sanctuary, Governor Aids Sex Traffickers”
“Opposition Grows as Biological Men Continue to Claim Women’s Sports Titles”
“Far-Left Jurisdiction Appalled When Middle Schoolers Revolt against Pride Day”
Hank says
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gnpCqsXE8g
The subversion from within is well explained by Yuri Bezmenov in a lecture he did in the 80’s
Stewart Davies says
As with most things, the problem begins to take root with the abuse and manipulation of language. In former times, everyone knew precisely what was meant by the terms “homosexual” and “homosexual”. The homosexuals knew full well that these terms defined the unnatural. (as in contrary to our God-given human nature) degrading and vile sexual practices that characterise homosexual behaviour. Language is the vehicle for the expression of thought. (If a word no longer exists, the original thought is no longer expressed. The solution was to insinuate into our thinking that vile little euphemism “gay.” Gradually, most people forgot what it was that was actually being referred to; as per the intention. Enthusiastically assisted by those “public opinion manufacturers, the media, the attitude of the general public was gradually changed. Now, even “gay”” is old hat. Now it’s officially “LGBTQI+++++++” and the most people have become completely oblivious to the full implications of the word “sodomy.” The inevitable result of a growing public indifference and complacency to a particular evil that has the potential to utterly undermine and corrupt civil society. And this is where we now find ourselves.
somehistory says
All that you say is correct. On an old I Love Lucy, Fred said he was once a “gay young blade.”
He did not mean he was homosexual, but a happy guy who liked girls.
The intention, as you point out, is to make the rest of us ignore the evils they are producing, and accept them as normal and even good.
James Lincoln says
somehistory,
I just watched an old newsreel about the 1939 New York World’s Fair.
The newscaster mentioned the “many gay flags from many nations”.
Naturally, nothing to do with homosexuality.
Yes, times have changed…
Wellington says
“…times have changed…”
You bet they have, James, as I know you know. And for the worst.
We are now living through an era (error?) that is eviscerating traditional standards.
Have sometimes these traditional standards been too harsh? Yes, surely, an example being a young female some 75 years ago becoming pregnant outside of wedlock and thereafter designed as a pariah as often too would be her child.
As usual, establishment virtues are not anywhere near to perfect. But the alternative in our age is far, far worse and demonstrating again that mankind is ordinarily either deficient or, even worse, massively deficient. No wonder we need enlightened religions, even if fictional, to keep the human species “on course.”
somehistory says
I take that to mean, James, that they were colorful and caused some smiles.
Many words have been ruined, but gay has been degraded more than some others.
abu taleb says
I think LGBT+, BLM, Antifa, communism etc basically not much different from Islam, they are just tools for a certain small group of people to satisfy their greed and lust for power, money, sex or blood. That is why, for example, Islam and LGBT+ group can work together when the situation requires them to work together, even though they are exactly the opposite in principle.
Evil has many different forms, because evil can (and always) lie. But goodness is only one.
Patriotliz says
Agree.
“LGBT Pride movement” is a communist movement. Same with the “Black Lives Matter movement,” the “Feminist movement,” etc. Because a naked communist movement might wake up too many Americans, and leftists know that, they hide behind race, sex and sexuality to push communism.”
Also add to that the “Climate Crisis hoax” as a naked Communist attack on Capitalism.
We should routinely refer to the “Democrat Communist Party.” (Their retort will be “McCarthyism!!”)
To that we should pile on even more labels and refer to the Commies as “Fascists” or FascistCommies and the Commies will object even more because they have hijacked “Fascists” and “Nazis” to apply to Constitutional conservatives.
Therefore, I say we apply our own labels to identify the Democrats and call them CNFWM+ (i.e., Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Wokeism, Marxism) and the + is Socialism, Progressivism, Globalism, Statism, Deep State and any Big Government Tyranny. Victor Davis Hanson wants to call them Jacobins and others want to compare them to Bolsheviks…we can throw those labels into the Democrat identity caldron too because we acknowledge that the identity of the totalitarian Democrat is “fluid.”
OLD GUY says
Gay pride month is a joke. Whats to be proud of? Next thing you know we will have masturbation month or how about bestiality month. Just where do we as a society draw the line.
We should be celebrating family month for those who have a male and female adult raising their children as a family unit.
But instead we honor the deviant?
WCM says
To “Rarely says:”
In 1984 (clearly a good year for your type) Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov, Soviet defector, gave the interview “somehistory” refers to. It is described in the linked article, which includes a well-known video containing excerpts of Bezmenov’s description of the Soviet plan for the West’s (America’s) destruction.
From the Soviet horse’s mouth, to you, one of their “useful idiots.”
The link to the Bezmenov article and video.
https://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/