The Qur’an forbids Muslim men to marry “polytheistic” women: “Do not marry idolatresses until they believe, for indeed, a believing slave woman is better than an idolatress, even though she pleases you. And do not give your daughters in marriage to idolaters until they believe, for indeed, a believing slave is better than an idolater, even though he pleases you. These people invite you to the fire, and Allah invites you to the garden, and to forgiveness by his grace, and explains his signs to mankind so that perhaps they will remember.” (Qur’an 2:221)
Thus they are forcibly converted to Islam. Some find them preferable to Muslim women because abducting Hindu women and forcing them to convert to Islam increases the size of the Muslim community at the expense of the Hindu community.
“Pakistan: Three Hindu Sisters in Sindh Converted, Forced into Marriage with Muslim Men,” PTI, July 21, 2023 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Three daughters of a Hindu businessman in Pakistan’s Sindh province have been married to Muslim men who first kidnapped them and forcibly converted them to Islam, according to a leading minority rights group in the country. The head of Pakistan Darewar Itehad, Shiva Kachhi, said that the incident took place in Sindh’s Dharki area where Chandni, Roshni and Parmesh Kumari, daughters of a Hindu businessman, Leela Ram, were first abducted and then forcibly converted to Islam.
“The conversion was performed by one Pir Javed Ahmed Qadri and later they were also married to Muslim men,” he said. Kachhi said despite appeals and pleas from his organisation’s platform, the problem of forcible conversion of Hindu girls was continuing unabated with the police and authorities not apprehending the culprits.
He said that the three sisters were married to the same men who abducted them. Kachhi also claimed that the attacks on the Hindu community in the riverine areas have spiked since the Seema Haider incident. Seema Haider, a Pakistani woman and a mother of four, sneaked into India to live with a Hindu man, Sachin Meena, whom she befriended through an online game platform.
She was ostracised by her family and neighbours for daring to defy the societal norms of a conservative Muslim country. There have been daily threats from dacoits in the riverine areas to retaliate against Hindus because of this incident, Kachhi said….
Hoi Polloi says
Moroccan man snatches two-year-old girl TWICE on Ibiza beach before being arrested by off-duty officer who heard her mother screaming
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12335553/Man-tries-snatch-toddler-beach-kissing-cheek-screaming-mother-Ibiza-beach-cops-make-arrest.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton
I’ve been seeing this type report with increasing frequency.
Hoi Polloi says
“have been [passive voice] married to Muslim men who first kidnapped them and forcibly converted them to Islam”
Language evolves and the world needs a new word that encompasses all the evil described in that sentence. Only muslims consider this marriage and not long-term, ongoing criminality.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Maybe we should add words like “niqah” (which literally translates as “penetration”) to English to describe what muslims euphemistically refer to as a “marriage”, just like “allah” is now an accepted term in English to describe Muhammad’s imaginary sock-puppet. We don’t want to use wholesome terms like “God” or “marriage” to describe their islamic equivalents
Hoi Polloi says
Thanks and noted.
Open to suggestions. Maybe Hugh Fitzgerald has some, as he appears to be a wordsmith. Mr. Spencer, with your knowledge of the history?
It galls me to call this marriage.
Hoi Polloi says
The literal translation well describes the intent with respect to the “bride” (no love, respect, or consent involved) as well as her culture.
Wasim Akhtar says
First educate yourself about what you are talking.
Nikah (NOT Niqah) means “marriage” in Islam.
It DOES NOT mean “penetration” as you so ignorantly claim.
This is how historians and highly educated judges of US Supreme Court show their respect and adoration for what Mohammad SAW contributed to the modern social and legal systems of the world.
MOHAMMAD SAW – HONORED BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AS ONE OF THE GREATEST LAWGIVERS OF THE WORLD – 1935
https://www.hopenothate.info/the-holy-prophet-muhammad-recognized-as-a-great-law-giver-by-us-supreme-court-in-1935
Mohammad SAW image at US Supreme Court:
https://www.stripes.com/news/us/muhammad-s-image-at-supreme-court-shows-taboos-aren-t-eternal-1.326245
https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/prophet-muhammad-us-supreme-court
MOHAMMAD SAW – THE GREATEST MAN WHO EVER LIVED – 2000
The person who is ranked number ONE on the “List of Top 100 Most Influential People in the World.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfIREK_bWi0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxTMFNex5DM
https://www.biographyonline.net/people/100-most-influential.html
So, educate yourself by learning about the GREATEST MAN who ever lived.
gravenimage says
Infidel is quite right. Nikah means “intercourse”, which need not be consensual in Islam:
This, from a site on Islamic lexography:
“Nikkah literally means intercourse and union. In practical terms, it is a marriage contract that makes a sexual relationship between a couple permissible. In Islamic terminology, Nikkah is a marriage contract and with it, the couples can benefit from each other in a lawful way.”
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a719ae55-2a06-490a-a0fd-340e62f7e566#:~:text=Nikkah%20literally%20means%20intercourse%20and,other%20in%20a%20lawful%20way.
That Muslims like Wisam Akhtar keep lying about this is very telling.
And note that kidnapping, raping, and “marrying” Infidel women is lawful in Islam. The “Prophet” himself did this.
Then, let’s parse the rest of his claptrap.
Yes–the Supreme Court building has an image of Muhammed on it. He is known as a lawgiver–the idea that this means the US Supreme Court ergo approves of all Shari’ah law is just false. Claims that US court justices “adore” the vicious “Prophet” is quite false.
Then, pious Muslims have threatened Infidels for daring to have an image of the “Prophet” on the building. This has been covered here at Jihad Watch.
Then, the idea that being influential is the same as earning respect is ludicrous. Note that Adolf Hitler was once Time’s “Man of the Year”–he was influential, all right–that is not the same as approval.
Finally, the idea that a caravan raider, pedophile, kidnapper, rapist, slaver, and mass murderer is the “greatest man who ever lived” shows why grim stories like this one are so common among Muslims. *Ugh*.
Aum says
Would the OIC have to say anything about this?
or the U.N. or U.S.A. who usually makes statements about India.
Lauren says
They do not want to assimilate. They want to decimate anyone who isn’t Muslim. They are not compatible with American values of honoring diversity. I used to be anti-racist and then I got married to a Muslim and With certainty, even in America these people are evil. My sister in law, who is a doctor! Threatened my life and told me she would do whatever she could to kill her brother any possible way she could get away with it. These people are all beyond evil. The SIL kids are neglected and the boys play disgustingly violent video games I’m scared to death they will become future terrorists. It’s what the World Economic Forum wants, for us all to kill each other bc the vaccines are taking too long to kill us and reduce fertility. They want to rid the world of us so they are instigating these cultural wars by enabling murderers and giving them excuses to say, oh you’re culture was once oppressed, the answer is hate and hurt all white people etc.
Wasim Akhtar says
You have written nothing but BS. Muslims are PROHIBITED to FORCE anyone to accept Islam.
Holy Qur’an [2:256]: “There is NO COMPULSION in religion.”
Any Muslim who behaves otherwise does not remain a Muslim in the eyes of Allah SWT.
Muslims ruled India for more than 1,000 years, but there are still more than 1.1 billion Hindus living in India. Why didn’t the Muslims kill all those Hindus? 1,000 years is a long time to plan and execute any mass killings.
Muslims should have done what Hitler and Mussolini did and killed everyone they did not like.
gravenimage says
Wasim Akhtar wrote:
You have written nothing but BS. Muslims are PROHIBITED to FORCE anyone to accept Islam.
…………………………………….
This is of course untrue. Muslims regularly kidnap, rape, and threaten victims into converting to their foul creed.
And this is often winked at by Muslim polities, and Pakistan is one of the worst. Pakistani authorities are complicit in this barbarism.
Note that if he *really* had a problem with this, he would condemn these thuggish coreligionists, not the good Infidels here at Jihad Watch.
Then, he sneers at us because Muslims were not able to wipe out all Hindus. Disgusting.
Muslims *did* murder a minimum of 80 million Hindus.
More:
Muslims should have done what Hitler and Mussolini did and killed everyone they did not like.
…………………………………….
And now the mask comes off–that didn’t take long; Wasim here has only been posting here for a few days. That if Infidels object to kidnapping, rape, and forced conversion, that he then threatens genocide. Horrifying, but we have seen this many times.
OLD GUY says
If you beat e enough I will agree to your religion and ideology in word only, but not in my heart and soul. Everything about Islam is a false teaching.
gravenimage says
Grimly spot on, OLD GUY.