The outrage over a Qur’an burning in Sweden by an Iraqi man is increasing. The UN Human Rights Council has now “approved a resolution, introduced by Pakistan on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, on religious hatred in the wake of the desecration of the Holy Quran in Sweden.”
It’s a harsh and threatening resolution that has no jurisdiction over free societies, but yet seeks to assert such jurisdiction. Sharia is opposed to the fundamental principles of Western societies. The resolution calls for the “review” of Western laws and calls on Western nations to “plug gaps that may ‘impede the prevention and prosecution of acts and advocacy of religious hatred.’”
The pressure by the OIC and UN amounts to an effort subjugate Western countries. This is an international attempt by the UN, driven by Islamic countries, to advance the Sharia everywhere. The resolution was opposed by the US and EU, but “28 countries including China, India, South Africa, and Ukraine voted in favour.”
No Western country should be supporting any resolution to protect “religious symbols” or prevent insults. Supporting such a resolution should prompt questions. If any acts of religious hatred should be “impeded,” “prevented” and “prosecuted,” it should be the persecution of non-Muslims by Islamic jihadists, and the abuse of dissidents inside Islamic and communist countries.
It is long past time that the West stop wasting the tax dollars of their citizenry and pull out of the UN. The United States is the largest donor to the UN, contributing a fifth of the whole budget — over $12 billion in 2021 alone.
“Desecration of Quran: UNHCR approves Pakistan’s resolution against religious hatred,” Reuters, July 12, 2023:
The United Nations Human Rights Council on Wednesday approved a resolution, introduced by Pakistan on behalf of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, on religious hatred in the wake of the desecration of the Holy Quran in Sweden.
The resolution calls for the UN rights chief to publish a report on religious hatred and for states to review their laws and plug gaps that may “impede the prevention and prosecution of acts and advocacy of religious hatred.”
It was opposed by the United States and the European Union, who say it conflicts with their view on human rights and freedom of expression. While condemning the desecration of the Quran, they argued the OIC initiative was designed to safeguard religious symbols rather than human rights.
An Iraqi immigrant to Sweden carried out the vile act of Quran desecration outside a Stockholm mosque on June 28, sparking outrage across the Muslim world and demands by Muslim states for action.
As many as 28 countries including China, India, South Africa, and Ukraine voted in favour, 12 voted against, and seven countries abstained. Representatives of some countries clapped after the resolution passed…..
Jack Reynolds says
ISLAM is a political Ideology disguised as a Religion. Here is a hint why it works in some parts of the world. These are the average IQ scores for several North African countries …
.
• 80 – Libya
• 79 – Tunisia
• 78 – Egypt
• 77 – Algeria
• 77 – Sudan
• 75 – Chad
• 71 – Morocco
• 69 – Somalia
• 69 – Eritrea
• 69 – Ethiopia
• 61 – Ghana
• 60 – Mali
• 59 – South Sudan
• 45 – Liberia
.
Literacy, the ability to read and understand text, requires an IQ score of about 85 or higher. Children typically have IQ scores within 7 points of their parents. A parent with an IQ score of 90 who has 4, 5, or 6 children may have one or more with an IQ score that is problematic in a nation with an Advanced Western Economy. The is the context within which Europe’s current problems should be understood.
.
https://www.worlddata.info/iq-by-country.php
.
In 1982 the OPEC countries demanded that Western nations accept more immigrants in return for increased oil exports. Agreeing to that resolved a short-term difficulty, while creating a much larger long-term problem. Some still call it Immigration in France, but it should be called an INVASION.
.
What would the world look like if everyone acted like The Prophet ???
.
Qur’an 33:21 states: “Indeed, in the Messenger of Allah you have an excellent example for whoever has hope in Allah and the Last Day, and remembers Allah often.” So what did this ‘excellent example’ look like in practice? Well, based on impeccable Islamic sources Muhammad:
1) Ordered raids (razzias) on caravans (and took part in several) to steal their contents and to sell people for ransom
2) Forced several of his enemies (e.g., Abu Sufyan) to accept his prophethood or be executed. He forced his adopted son (by receiving a ‘revelation’ from God) to divorce his wife so that he could marry her (Sahih Muslim Volume 2 Number 2347; Sahih Bukhari Volume 3 Number 249; see also Qur’an 33:6-38).
3) ‘Married’, and had sex with, a woman on the same day that her husband, father, brother, and most of her family were slaughtered by his followers (Sahih Bukhari Volume 2 number 68 and Volume 4 number 143,280)
4) Instead of only taking four wives (the amount he allowed his followers) he received a special revelation allowing him to take as many as he wished (Qur’an 33:50). Prompting his favourite wife Aisha to exclaim that it seems that God sent down revelations merely to suit the prophet (Sahih Muslim Volume 2 Number 3453)!
5) Married Aisha when she was six and consummated the marriage while she was only nine (Sahih Bukhari Volume 7 Book 62 Number 64) One tradition even states that she was still playing with dolls at the time the marriage was consummated (Sahih Muslim Volume 8 Number 3311).
6) Committed genocide by allowing the slaughter of 900 unarmed male members of the Banu Qurayzah (Jewish) tribe after they refused to embrace Islam and received ‘divine sanction’ for it (Qur’an 33:25-26).
7) Ordered the assassination of several people who were of him (e.g., the poets Asma bint Marwan and Abu Afak).
8) Ordered the torture of Kinana al-Rabi to with a red-hot iron to ‘encourage’ him to reveal the whereabouts of a hidden treasure.
9) Broke a treaty (The treaty of Hudabiyyah) which committed him to live in peace with the people of Mecca. Again, he conveniently receives a ‘revelation’ justifying his actions (Qur’an 60:10).
10) Allowed his followers to rape captive women (Sahih Muslim Book 8 Number 3371)
.
.
72 percent of French citizens favour stripping those who participated in the riots and looting of their right to citizenship. A more likely outcome is that the No Go Zones in France will be the beginning of APARTHEID.
.
https://t.me/GalliaDaily/5042
.
NOTE: Justin Trudeau wants to increase Canada’s population from 40 to 48 million by 2030. That implies fitting about 3 million more people into Toronto within 8 years. There is not a lot of empty land in the GTA. The Green Belt will be targeted.
.
libertyORdeath says
This is why trying to peacefully convince people of the reality we face will never work on the invaders. Most of the time they don’t even understand the most basic of concepts.
You think someone who can’t read cares about a free press? All they really want is free stuff and preferential treatment. You’ll never convince them to assimilate into the society they have invaded. It’s not immigration, it’s conquest by colonialism.
Just wait until the hordes of illiterates have enough numbers to force their “values” on YOU.
Pray Hard says
It’s not religious hatred. It’s moslem hatred.
Derek says
Pakistan and other Islamic countries can’t talk about religious rights or hatred. They’re the worst offenders! You can’t make this up…lol They’re hypocrites!
And will this resolution extend to other religions? Or does Islam get special treatment? Indeed the world does nothing whilst Christians and other people get persecuted in Islamic countries. The UN, WHO and others are not worth contributing money to. They’re a joke! But this resolution is serious business. Islam relies on crying racism and hurt feelings to advance it’s agenda. And the more you give into them, the stronger they get.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
This was an islam only resolution. And shamefully, it passed, despite only 50 members being muslim countries
PRCS says
“Sharia is opposed to the fundamental principles of Western societies.”
Not merely opposed to. Antithetical to and incompatible with.
Mary Jo Pierce says
Absolutely 💯 true.
Jack Reynolds says
Liberals hate Facts.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Ukraine – our new torchbearer of democracy – voted Yes? Why exactly are we backing them again, since both Ukraine & Russia are in favor of sharia bans on freedom of expression?
Oh, and India – f🤬k ya 🖕
libertyORdeath says
Is there anything more preposterous than muslims crying about supposed religious intolerance?
Maybe.
China voted yes despite locking up millions of muslims in re-education camps and persecuting Christians, Buddhists, and Falun Gong members for decades.
Ukraine voted yes despite the large groups of neo-nazis in their government and military and the outlawing of the Russian orthodox church.
South Africa voted yes despite their avowed atheism, communism, and hatred of religion.
Just like police shootings or “white supremacy” in the West, I guess “hatred” only matters when it is politically useful.
alexreid says
Just a tad hypocritcal – Islam & Muslims hate Everything non-Islamic!