The Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) indefatigably pushes the notion that Muslims are victims of widespread harassment and discrimination in the U.S. This is in order to deflect attention away from jihad terror activity and to buttress the notion that counter-terror scrutiny of Muslim communities is simply more of this persecution. But actual “hate crimes” against Muslims are so thin on the ground that they have to be manufactured, as in this case. Those who are being booked are asked to remove headgear because their photo is taken for purposes of identification, as well as because weapons or drugs could be concealed under a hat or a hijab. The rule applies to everyone, not just to Muslim women, and is for security reasons, not due to “Islamophobia.” But in December 2019 in Minnesota, a Muslim woman was awarded $120,000 for having to remove her hijab for a jailhouse mugshot. These lawsuits are a cash cow for Hamas-linked CAIR and its clients, and a means by which CAIR advances the idea that Muslims are a special class that deserves privileges that other groups do not enjoy.
“CAIR-MI files federal lawsuit after Muslim woman forced to remove hijab for booking photo,” by Gabrielle Dawson, CBS Detroit, January 3, 2024 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
CANTON, Mich. (CBS DETROIT) – The Michigan chapter of Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR-MI) announced Wednesday it filed a federal lawsuit against Kent County, Kent County Sheriff’s Office, and the Kent County Sheriff, Michelle LaJoye-Young.
CAIR-MI, a local chapter of the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization said the lawsuit is over the forcible removal of a Muslim woman’s hijab in 2023 when she was arrested and detained in the Kent County Jail.
Jannah Hague was arrested and taken to jail where she was told to remove her hijab for a booking photo that was published on the Kent County Sheriff’s Office public website, CAIR-MI said….
CAIR-MI said it issued a notice of claim after the arrest to the Kent County Sheriff’s Office to inform them of the civil rights violation by Hague and requested compensation….
Hague’s booking photo without her hijab remains on law enforcement databases where it was uploaded by Kent County, creating a permanent public record, CAIR-MI said.
“The filing of today’s federal lawsuit on behalf of Ms. Hague is an attempt to protect her from further harm should her image be once again publicly released,” CAIR-MI Staff Attorney, Amy V. Doukoure said. “We are going to hold Kent County responsible to the fullest extent possible for not only their violation of Ms. Hague’s rights but their continued disregard for the harm that it caused her when her photo was released, as well as for their insistence on a policy that so clearly threatens to violate the rights of any religiously-observant woman that the Sheriff’s Office may encounter and detain.”…
FYI says
Yet on allah’s judgement day…
“On the day when some faces will be whitened and some faces will be blackened:and for those whose faces have been blackened,it will be said unto them:Disbelieved ye after your profession of belief?Then taste the punishment for that ye disbelieved Koran 3:106
Mind you,if your face turns white…you are in luck
“And as for those whose faces have been whitened,in the mercy of allah they dwell forever”
koran 3:107
White face Good
Black face Bad
I guess black folk are not allowed into allah’s paradise..he thinks they are slaves like muhammed did
{Sahih Musllim 3901}allah judges by complexion and not by character.I am not sure about Indians etc.
Mean allah,mean.
Westman says
Who will win the minority grift sweepstakes in 2024? The front runners are expected to be CAIR, SPLC, and Al Sharpton. Place your bets.
somehistory says
Never “reverend,” dull as dirt, sharpton was photographed with the ny gov when she said she would create the commission to explore reparations.
c.a.i.r will make sure some mozlum is on that commission because bo said that mozlums had help make America right from the start….but they didn’t get their “fair share” of the goods….due to the phobia.
Westman says
Yes, and how is suing going to bring good relations for Islam in America? If CAIR gets the money, then there will be an entire community that now thinks, “Muslim law breakers aren’t under the same law requirements as the native community”. The Sheriff’s office will lose, not gain, respect for Muslims as will much of the community from the obvious law-theft of taxpayers money.
Perhaps that is the point, in a complete reversal of its supposed role, maybe CAIR is intending to ruin American-Islamic relations, enhancing the movement of Muslims into a parallel society with its own laws. If so, it is wildly successful.
somehistory says
Any other women who commit crimes and are arrested, go through the same thing. Some infidel women wear scarves and some wear hats and caps. They are made to remove these for having a driver’s license photo taken, when in a court of law, and if arrested.
Why should the mozlums be treated any differently, esp the ones like this lawbreaker who commit crimes?
She needed to remove her makeup so everyone could see her real face.
She must be a convert….worried that some mozlum male will see her without her scarf and think she’s ‘fair game.’
And a question What harm was done to her because she had her pic taken sans scarf?
PRCS says
“What harm was done to her because she had her pic taken sans scarf?”
According to the lawsuit:
“Requiring a Muslim woman to remove her hijab in public is akin to demanding that a secular person strip naked in front of strangers.”
A bullshit analogy that so many have bought into.
somehistory says
““As (Hague) was being processed into the jail our female corrections officer took her out of view of all male officers and inmates….and then she was allowed to put it back on before entering the booking area,” said Lt. Eric Brunner.”
https://www.michiganradio.org/criminal-justice-legal-system/2024-01-04/kent-county-sheriffs-office-being-sued-for-forcibly-removing-hijab-of-detainee
so it’s just the “public records”….to which we are all subjected…that has supposedly “harmed” her. Because the sheriff’s office has video and audio of the process. She can’t claim that males saw her during the time she was searched for weapons and contraband.
Namer says
It appears that we must treat this woman in the same Islamic way that she would be treated in Iran or Saudi,
PRCS says
“As (Hague) was being processed into the jail our female corrections officer took her out of view of all male officers and inmates…”
Note to Kent County Sheriff’s Office: per Qur’an 33:59, that hijab (veliing) distinguishes free, chaste Muslim women from unbelieving riff raff–including your female corrections officers.
It is a hateful, discriminatiory message which no non-Muslim woman should have to endure.
Do your homework and “just say no”.
BTeboe says
Don’t break the law and you don’t have to worry about having your hijab/burqua or any other head covering removed.
Kenneth Johnson says
How terrible, Forced toi act like any other women who has a r un in with the law.
A Muslem asked to obey the law . Wow,that’s really asking a lot. KEN
.
bagsgroove says
Teach these muslimas that they are living in a non muslim country. Feed her nothing but pork and force to wear clothes that completely cover her eyes nose and mouth so that no one has to look at her ugly muslim face. And force her to wear that for the rest of her life.
Huapakechi says
They do not want to live under the rules and laws here, they can leave.
Lisa T. says
I can understand them not wanting to show cleavage, but I don’t understand what is so objectionable about showing her hair or her neck that they must be covered up? The amount of eye makeup she is wearing and the two nose rings aren’t exactly modest.
Lisa T. says
And I forgot to mention the false eyelashes.
somehistory says
The expression on her heavily made-up face says, “I’m special as I am very well aware.” The scarf says for the males to rape the one with no scarf and the makeup says, “I know you wanna’.”
mozlum females say they are “modest,” but that is as far from the Truth as are the lies about islam and peace.
JOHN LLOYD SCHARF says
SO, So, I should be able to wear my hat or my yamlike? Maybe I should be able to dye my hair blond, but wear a Hijab….
somehistory says
I have been told by doctors that I should wear a hat to keep light off my face…(I am allergic to light)…but I am not allowed to wear it inside certain places, by order of the law in those places.
Getting a pic taken for a DL and in courtrooms.
Should I sue?