In a spectacular self-own (one of many) by Scotland’s First Minister Humza Yousaf, he calls for an end to toxic masculinity in Scotland. It’s curious that he knows what a man is but not what a woman is, given his party’s laws in regard to gender self-identification and the allowing of men to be housed in the women’s estate in Scottish prisons. The only toxic masculinity in Scotland today is witnessed among the trans community; females ingesting copious amounts of testosterone in order to be walking around looking like a caricature of a logger, which is a parody and an affront to men. It is also truly toxic because testosterone injections can cause high blood pressure, breathing problems, acne, fainting, and more.
Scots have a reputation around the world, alongside the Irish, as being ferocious in nature when it comes to protecting their land. If outnumbered, ill-equipped and on the verge of seeming defeat on the battlefield, they would resort to other tactics against their enemies, using whatever items they had at their disposal: “The local tribes, however, had learned not to face Rome in a pitched battle. They used guerrilla tactics to grind down the Roman army.” These ‘toxic’ gentlemen have given us the Scotland that Humza is presiding over today, and which he berates for being too white and now too toxic.
Humza took to X recently (formerly Twitter) to denounce Andrew Tate, and to urge young males not to follow in his example. Andrew Tate has recently converted to Islam, but perhaps Humza isn’t aware of this, otherwise he could be using him as a poster boy for conversion, since Yousaf has such close allegiances to the extremes of Islam. He doesn’t get too deep into what he thinks Tate is saying that is so toxic; he simply bleats on and on about male toxic behaviour. He goes so far as to call Tate a “hate preacher,” and he advocates looking for a “brave space” where men can talk (formerly a safe space). My opinion is that he is looking to sissify the nation, although it’s guaranteed that Muslim males won’t be taking his advice.
Let’s compare Andrew Tate and Islam. Tate has allegedly been running a sex-trafficking prostitution ring, a behaviour some might say is toxic but permissible if a female is willing to be a sex worker and is looking for a pimp, which is empowering to today’s feminists, with sex work being promoted on American university campuses as a legitimate career choice. Prostitution (zina) is forbidden in Islam (Qur’an 17:32 and Sahih al-Bukhari 6810). Islamic ingenuity finds a way to get around prostitution by having an imam conduct a temporary marriage. Nikah Mutah is a pleasure marriage, sanctioned by Muhammad himself, although Sunnis say he revoked this permission and Shi’ites insist that he did not. Such marriage is temporary; both parties agree to it, and an amount of money changes hands. In other words, it is religious Islamic prostitution.
Tate famously stated: “I ain’t having my chicks talking to other dudes, liking other dudes. My chicks don’t go to the club without me, they are at home.” Sound familiar? It’s because a vast portion of Muslim women aren’t allowed to leave the house without a guardian accompanying them. This person is known as a mahram, and is usually a male: “Mahram comes from the word ‘Haram’… In Islamic law, Mahram means a person who you are not allowed to marry, and it is permissible to see them without a headscarf and shake their hands and hug them if you like.” David Cameron was berated as far back as 2016 for pointing out that a portion of Muslim women in the UK were being held almost hostage in their homes by their husbands and forbidden to learn English, which would have helped their education, career, and social performances.
“I think the women belong to the man.” Uttered by Tate, and in accordance with Islamic theology that a man is the maintainer and keeper of his women.
Tate is gloating on Twitter about the benefits of having 4 wives, which must be a conundrum for Humza since Islam permits this even in the UK, and the government goes along with it by giving them financial support. Muslim marriages aren’t recognised in UK law unless the couple register themselves. Many Muslims believe that the nikah ceremony performed by the imam is enough. That itself is a loophole for polygamy, since many Muslim couples aren’t also having the required civil ceremony, which would protect the woman’s rights in the case of divorce, as well as preventing marriage to more than one woman.
Tate encourages violence against critics (see Muhammad’s assassination of the poetess Asma bint Marwan, for starters). He states that “the universe has always ensured that the weak were conquered… if you allow yourselves to be constantly mocked… You will be crushed and replaced by Islam.”
Tate is a kickboxer, and a pretty good one I’d assume, given that he won the world championship four times. He likes violence and trains for it. About converting to Islam, he stated: “I think it’s the last religion… It’s the last one, because no other religion has boundaries which they enforce. If you will tolerate everything, then you stand for nothing…” You can see the attraction – the jihad and the call to arms, the sword of Islam and the enforcement of laws.
Mostly everything about Tate sounds odious and toxic to me, but you can see why Islam is the perfect religious partner for him, his drives, his personality, and all of his traits. Humza’s call for less toxic masculinity in Scotland is actually Humza calling for less Islam, since the things he deems toxic about Tate are all Islamic, and are the things which drew Tate to becoming a Muslim. The very things Tate stands for and the ideas he espouses are the very fundamentals of Islamic masculinity. Tate, now that he’s a Muslim, is free to be more toxic than the West would allow by virtue of having religious protections that are encoded in law. He can participate in polygamy and his wives will be free to continue engaging in prostitution via the legal religious means of Islam. Humza, meanwhile, clearly means his call for non-Muslims, not for Muslims. Non-Muslims in Scotland should ponder that fact.
FYI says
Humza has muslim privilege.islam is not for intelligent people
It really isn’t!
It is a stone age cult STILL in the 7th/8th century.
Consider…. the awesome way of the Murtadeen{the “Apostates”}.It’t soooo much better isn’t it?
Look at the converts to islam in comparison.
Exactly
somehistory says
Every time I see his name, I think ramzi yousef….the terrorist of the WTC in the ’90’s
I have some Scot in my family history. I say, Sottish Men, stand up for the women, the girls, the little babies. Be real men and don’t listen to the miserable mozlum who wishes to completely take over your country for islam.
Neither listen to tate….the creepy slime who converted because islam fits his evil personality.
David M says
When the First Minister of Scotland is named Humza Yousaf, you know something is wrong already.
Hudders. says
Many of my scottish friends have become increasingly alarmed by the large scale take over of many areas in towns & cities in their country by entiled, beligerent & hostile muslims.
Like the rest of the UK, once ‘bonnie Scotland’ is now witnessing the dangerous disabling disease of islam & it’s evil impact on communities.
Humza Yousaf is a muslim. Politics be damned. His first loyalty is to that ancient abomination allah, the qur’an & the hate filled clerics who want to establish caliphatic dominance in the country.
He is a poisonous sand snake, who tries to hide behind sugar coated semantics.
But we see through him.
When will enough finally be enough for the people of Scotland the brave?
Andrew says
I heard Yousaf describing his Muslim father-in-law as an alpha male, a positive trait in his eyes. So he likes dominant males, provided they are Muslim. His hypocrisy is plain to see.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Fascinating. I was about to ask whether by “Scottish”, he includes people of his “Scottish” ethnicity – people w/ names like Mohammad, Ahmad, Zubair, Umar, Shoaib, Abdul, Sarfraz, Imran, Wasim, et al. From your post, looks like I have my answer 😈
Pray Hard says
The fact that he’s First Minister tells me that Scottish men have already lost ALL of their masculinity.
Troybeam says
First mistake Scotland, allowing Islam in..second mistake electing a Muslim.
Scotland, be tough and show your historic masculine traits always.
Your nations sovereignty depends on it.
Scotsman48 says
This wee muslim prick who somehow manged to be First Minister of the land I was born in though dont live in is the same wee prick that stood up in front of the Scottish Parliament and claimed there were too many white people in positions of power within Scotland and he is first generation born in Scotland so the arrogance is over the top.
His Parents In Law are all from Gaza and were ”stuck” there when his lovely mostly peaceful islamic buddies stormed into Israel on Oct 7th and now this wee prick wants half a million ARABS to come to Scotland from Gaza.
During the Campaign he used the Christian faith as an excuse against one of his female opponents when she stated she was against Gay Marriage while he himself did not vote either way as he was at his local mosque asking his turban headed teachers what he should do, so he abstained.
I was born in Glasgow 1948 but left in 1966.
Lenny Leaps In says
He wants Scottish men to be less masculine because that makes Scotland an easier target for Muslim takeover. He does not call for Muslim, Hamas or Palestinian men to be less masculine…
Who voted this guy in???