At the same time, Wikipedia smears and defames those who dare to oppose jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women.
“The worrisome smoothing of profiles linked to the Muslim Brotherhood on Wikipedia,” translated from “L’inquiétant lissage de profils liés aux Frères musulmans sur Wikipédia,” by Nora Bussigny, Factuel, February 1, 2024 (thanks to Medforth):
During the publication of our investigation into Safwa Center and its Islamist influences, Facteur was able to note that the Wikipedia page of its founder, having nevertheless incited the murder of the editorial staff of Charlie Hebdo, turns out to be laudatory, but also cleared of its influence within the Muslim Brotherhood. Investigation into effective rehabilitation led by a contributor known for his relentlessness towards French personalities.
“On the Wikipedia page of Mohamed Hassan Dadou, we can see in the history that the sourced information attesting to his proximity to the Muslim Brotherhood was deleted by the same contributor, which we also find on the page of another member recently expelled from France: Hassan Iquioussen,” explains Michel Sandrin, long-time contributor to Wikipedia and author of an investigation on the subject to be published in 2024 by Editions du Cerf.
“Muslim scholar,” “scholar,” the Wikipedia page of the mysterious “Mohamed El Hassan Ould Dedew” never stops praising the founder of Safwa Center, a new association which is reminiscent of that of BarakaCity, dissolved by the current Minister of the Interior, Gérald Darmanin. Although presented as a gifted young person capable of memorizing “the entire Quran” from the age of five, it turns out that this famous Mohamed El Hassan Ould Dedew is none other than Mohamed Hassan Dadou, an influential preacher within the Muslim Brotherhood and author of a call for murder against the editorial staff of Charlie Hebdo, as Marianne revealed in 2020.
Problem: on the Wikipedia page, available in seven languages, there is currently no trace of the danger represented by the preacher, even though his profile is the first proposition put forward by Google. “We can see in the history of modifications that the person who created the preacher’s page clearly specified that “This article is a summary description (embryo) of the Muslim scholar Mohamed El Hassan Ould Dedew. It is far from exhaustive, but you have to start somewhere.” And despite alerts about a lack of objectivity and attempts to modify its page, the file remains completely cleaned of crucial information,” explains Michel Sandrin. Because crucial information…
mike says
no surprise here. Lie to the people about the facts of what Islam represents
lie long enough until it’s to late for anyone to protect them selves
the real goal if Islam is Sharia Law
Where we and the western nation will have no freedom
Islam rule thru fear .
Hudders. says
Well said @mike. No surprises at all here considering their record.
Blatant lies & a subtle blasphemy law framework introduction by proxy.
I wonder just what % of Wokepeedos workforce are practicing muslims?
Everywhere we look, be it politics, big institutions, media or wherever speech was once possible; the islamic infection has taken hold & it’s deadly deception has spead it’s sharia inspired poison.
Jayell1 says
What concerns me is the fact that they’re so well aware that they have to conceal the true facts about these specimens. They must have some basic idea of ‘good’ and ‘evil’ and know that their ‘heroes’ fit into the latter category, hence the concealment. Everyone in islam is right beyond the pail.
Edel Smith says
The West is fast asleep, sadly.
Rob Porter says
If the West had leaders with true grit, spine and convictions, not least spiritual – which today it doesn’t have, its peoples would have no fears about Islam and sharia – a trash, medieval, justice system at best. Muslims would not be permitted influence within Western societies, sharia courts would be banned and those Muslims who do not abide by Western society laws, do not assimilate and integrate, would be deported. Imams who every Friday preach and pray for the victory of Muslims over the infidel, would be unceremoniously kicked out of the country.
Anyone with a brain their head and any knowledge of Islam knows that the Muslim goal is to take over and rule under sharia, so, don’t let them. Nowhere they go in numbers do they produce peace and harmony, and the reason is simple, their god is satan.
Hoi Polloi says
Only austere religious scholars to be found in islam when wiki and msm do the telling. Petrodollars.
James Lincoln says
Wikipedia is very accurate with sports scores, DJIA history, specs on a 64 GTO, etc.
Interestingly, this very same Wikipedia takes a very hard Left turn regarding anything political.
Rob Porter says
You are right, Wikipedia also supports the left. I long ago read the account of the war in Angola in 1987/88. A Russian-led army of 27,000 advanced into south-east Angola to finally destroy the pro-Western UNITA movement based in Jamba. South Africa supported UNITA, so sent in barely 4,000 soldiers with artillery, armoured cars and a handful of tanks. It was mostly those South Africans that smashed the communist army with at lest 4,800 dead, 94 Russian tanks destroyed and millions of dollars of Russian equipment lost to South Africa, yet Wikipedia sides with the idiotic notion that “both sides claimed victory”. It just cannot bring itself to state the obvious, that the communist army was smashed and the war was brought to an end with Russian, Cuban and South Africa forces withdrawn from Angola.
James Lincoln says
Thank you for your reply and added info, Rob.
somehistory says
When professors assigned papers, one of the things they stressed were the sources….they must be reliable…and the wiki was not acceptable. It was not considered worthy as anyone can write just about anything on its pages.
I have often looked up things and found the invitation to help with the information if I had something to share. I have also read things on wiki which I knew were untrue.
Many times, there will be written word for word (without quotation marks) information found on more reliable sources.
wiki may be fun to read if one is unable to find things of value to do, but as a Truthful source it should not be trusted for anything of real importance.
tharmon says
“Islamic scholars.” Same as “Fairy dust scholars.” What a bunch of inbred idiots.
Jayell1 says
In the West, the term ‘scholar’ has always been taken to denote a person of superior intelligence, intellectual and moral integrity. That makes the term ‘islamic scholar’ oxymoronic, since you wouldn’t normally expect a person of superior intelligence, intellectual and moral integrity to waste their time and energies in the study of a heap of transparently ignorantly contrived, pretentious, incoherent, morally bankrupt and totally dishonest pseudo-intellectual garbage.
Rob Porter says
Oh well said, Jayell1, !: ” since you wouldn’t normally expect a person of superior intelligence, intellectual and moral integrity to waste their time and energies in the study of a heap of transparently ignorantly contrived, pretentious, incoherent, morally bankrupt and totally dishonest pseudo-intellectual garbage.” The late Christopher Hitchens would be proud of you. He summed it up with: “it’s all bullshit”. Others have summed it it up with: “There’s just one book”, no reference, no history. Robert Spencer destroys all the Muslim rubbish, but too few, buried in their political correctness and spineless woke nonsense, are not heeding.
Reziac says
Wikipedia has become entirely Woke. Have noticed a lot of articles being altered to favor the leftist slant. Just as disturbing, there’s been a proliferation of overtly sexual content (such as details of various fetishes), with needlessly graphic photos.
Mick says
I rely on Wiki for demographic numbers. I assume they are estimated (in good faith), from opaque (dare I say obfuscatory) official stats.
I will pay more attention.
Rick Olsha says
Wikipedia is always crap AM ISRAEL CHAI !!!!!
jerry glenn says
Rampant Islamopandering
Joe says
They also don’t list Huma Abedin who was on the masthead of the Muslim Brotherhood magazine before serving as chief of staff for HRC. That is a poor the security investigation, to say the least. According to what Huma told the press, Huma and HRC violated espionage laws by transferring tens of thousands of secret documents to Anthony Weiner’s computer which was left on all the time, and was repeatedly accessed various accounts from Muslim majority countries according the NYPD.
terry says
Idiot-pedia is a more accurate definition! Made by zombies, for zombies, at the behest of the Crooked Crime Syndicates of the Globalist Elites of the West, the Marxist, Islam, and the hordes of criminal organizations affiliated with Narc states and their cartels! Make up the facts you demand and fill in the blanks at command!