New in PJ Media:
It’s no surprise that people whose life work is to enforce the principles of “diversity, equity and inclusion” (DEI) would have only a glancing acquaintance with the truth. And so it has now come to pass in our green and pleasant land that DEI officials are warning the “intelligence community” that it must not speak accurately about the jihad threat, or even refer to “jihadists” at all. To do so would — you guessed it! — offend Muslims, and with Muslims in the U.S. already enraged at the Biden regime for its ostensible and vanishing support for Israel, we can’t have that.
The Daily Wire reported Thursday that “an internal newsletter sent by diversity, equity, and inclusion officials in the Biden administration’s top intelligence agency warns personnel not to use ‘problematic phrases’ when discussing Islamic terrorism.” In this Orwellian age, “problematic phrases” are those that are true and accurate, but are offensive to pressure groups that the regime wishes to court.
It seems that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence puts out an internal newsletter, appropriately entitled “The Dive,” and that a recent issue “argues in its cover story that the intelligence community needs to focus on ‘changing terminology related to counterterrorism,’ because ‘words matter.’” Yeah, they do. That’s why so much of the Biden regime’s manual for governance, George Orwell’s 1984, is about the manipulation of the language so that the wretched inhabitants of the book’s totalitarian regime aren’t even capable of thinking thoughts that the regime doesn’t want them to think. Old Joe and his henchmen tried to establish an agency for this with their abortive Disinformation Governance Board, and they’re still at it.
The author of the article in The Dive says that “one of our goals” is “disentangling Islam from words and phrases used to discuss terrorism and extremist violence.” Never mind that it is Islamic jihadis themselves who have explicitly and proudly entangled Islam with “terrorism and extremist violence.” We are forbidden to notice: the article explains that woke DEI operatives are trying to remove “certain phrases to identify international terrorism threats that are hurtful to Muslim-Americans.”
Some of the allegedly hurtful phrases are “‘Salafi-Jihadist,’ ‘Jihadist,’ ‘Islamic-Extremist,’ ‘Sunni/Shia-Extremism,’ and ‘Radical Islamists.’” Islamic jihadis themselves frequently speak about Islam and jihad as the motivation and justification for their actions, but never mind. This newsletter was “created by ODNI’s Intelligence Community Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility Office and sent out to personnel throughout the Intelligence Community, which includes the country’s most powerful executive agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Department of Justice (DOJ), as well as intelligence components within each branch of the military.”
There is more. Read the rest here.
mike says
all to cover the truths don’t talk about it until it’s to late
we will spread the truth
Wellington says
Came across this just recently and passing it on, to wit, DEI = Didn’t Earn It.
Put another way, anything that someone wedded to the DEI rubbish, which is so anti-American, should never be taken seriously. Never.
Rich says
IS THERE ANYTHING challenging the Center for Countering Digital Hate?
somehistory says
It was also in 2011 when h.clinton met with the members of the oic to discuss how they could get Americans to stop telling the Truth about islam and the goals of its mozlum adherents.
The oic ghouls wanted clinton and her ‘boss’…bo…to make a law which would keep Americans from telling the Truth. clinton said that couldn’t be done due to the First Amendment (she would likely have agreed to it, if not for that fact), but that they would need to “shame” Americans into not telling the Truth.
Make Americans…not those who call themselves *mozlum American*…ashamed to speak about mozlums in a way that mozlums don’t like.
One cannot tell the Truth if there are no words allowed which describe the Truth.
And thus, the campaign to hide everything about islam from the public, and the public square. Absolutely everything must be hidden if the evil Truth must be hidden because everything about islam is ***evil**** and the worship of evil.
Snake worshippers wouldn’t like for those afraid of snakes, or who just knew all of the dangers associated with snakes to talk about snakes if it meant they would be looked at as *different* and especially if *different* meant not liked, or even actively disliked.
And if the snake worshippers could keep all people….except them….from talking about the dangers of snakes, then snakes would not be feared or hated. If the snake worshippers could convince non-worshippers that all snakes are really their friends and that none are poisonous or dangerous, then everyone would put their guard down and allow any and all snakes to make their homes next door; or even live inside the homes.
So, 2011 is just as important as 9’11 when it comes to the ***jihad*** of islam and the mozlums who are so very eager to carry out *****jihad terror***** attacks on an unsuspecting public. And to get elected to public office so they can begin to make laws that benefit their ***jihad goals**** and enforce their brand of “law” which is really lawlessness pretending to be law, as their war pretends to be peace, and their lust pretends to be love.
All who know the Truth about islam and are not trying to bury it….should shout it to all who will hear. Because if mozlums and their cohorts get their way, we will all be silenced.
Ken Birtwistle says
Well said, agree with you totally!
John Smith says
Agreed Ken absolutely spot on.
somehistory says
Thank you, John.
somehistory says
Thank you, Ken.
James Lincoln says
According to Robert Spencer’s excellent feature article:
“In this Orwellian age, “problematic phrases” are those that are true and accurate, but are offensive to pressure groups that the regime wishes to court.”
Let that sink in…
FYI says
DEI should really be DIE .That is more inclusive especially as it considers dylexics.
Endless Lefty inclusivity and diversity!Postively communist.We will all own nothing and be happy.
All communists are equal but some communists{the Globalists} are more equal than others
It seems pope Francis is creating a more inclusive Church ….so inclusive that it excudes Trad Catholics
Such inclusivity is actually excluding lots of people.
the God of the Bible is inclusive
allah of the koran is NOT inclusive as he does not believe all people are equal:us non-muslims are the worst of created beings koran 98:6
Walter Sieruk says
It’s best to get real and call things and people for what they actually are.
Therefore, call a feline a “cat” and a K-( a “dog”and a Muslim terrorist a “jihadist.”
Mike says
Exactly. Also, just because one talks about the Sicilian Mafia doesn’t mean that all Sicilians or Italians are Mafiosos. There are also Mafia-like groups in Russia, India, Mexico, China and elsewhere.
Not all Muslims are fanatics, but there does seem to be a fairly bad problem with Islamist fanaticism at the moment.
James Lincoln says
Mike,
Muslims who commit jihad are not “fanatics”.
They are devout muslims.
OLD GUY says
Yes lets not tell the truth, it will hurt our political contributors feelings. [Islam is a religion of peace and love] what a big LIE. ISLAM IS A DEATH CULT OF RAPE AND VIOLENCE.
DIVERSITY and OPEN BORDERS; Allowing our ENEMIES and CRIMINALS access to our communities and neighborhoods. They say it’s GOOD for US, but don’t bring those illegals to their neighborhood.
The 2nd Amendment, take. the guns away from the average citizen so they can’t defend themselves, BUT allow their security and body guards to carry guns and weapons to protect them because they KNOW the CRIMINALS will still have guns.
The BORDER WALL, We don’t need a wall to keep illegal migrants and others out of our country. And the American tax payers just paid a million dollars for a wall around Bidens personnel home, and these so called elites all live in gated communities or security apartments.
So our POLITICIANS are looking out for US, maybe NOT, maybe they are looking out for themselves and their big money contributors FIRST and we get an occasional dog biscuit.
Sandra says
How about if we just use the words “psychopathic, murderous, Permanently Enraged Muslim nutter”
Walter Sieruk says
As for those Western terms “radical Islam” as well as “Islamic extremism” it’s really not fitting term as the following explains.
For the terms Islamic extremism” and “Islamic extremist” as well as “Radical Muslim” is actually a misuse of terms. “Moderate Muslim” are actually Western term and not that well known in the Islamic Middle East.
This is because what In the Islamic mindset in the Muslim Middle East as well as in Indonesia and other Muslim controlled countries what the non-Muslims of the Western nations view as “radical and “extremist” the Muslims of those places in the world see as “Normal” and even Devout and committed to the Cause of Islam.”
In addition, those “Moderate Muslims” are those of the Islamic worldview and non-devout and non –committed Muslims. The violent jihadists even see them as “hypocrites.” Therefore, this explains the jihadist chant of those jihad-minded Muslims in different Islamic terror organizations. When they chant aloud “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” Meaning Death to people who and not Muslims and people who are non- jihadist Muslims.
Concerning the last part of this above essay, the violent spirit of that vicious jihadist chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites.” The later word of the chant “hypocrites” in the jihad –minded Muslim worldview is further explain in the book titled JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH by Jamie Glazov , for on page 42 the reader is informed that “Islam mandates that devout and real Muslims must punish , and in some circumstances kill, those Muslims whom they regard as neither legitimate nor properly devout.”
Walter Sieruk says
One lie about the religion of Islam that the Western news media keep telling the public is that there are to different kinds of Islam which are “Radical Islam” and “Moderate Islam.”
Many scholars on Islam ,such as Brigitte Gabriel and Robert Spencer, had explain that the terms “Radical Islam” and “Moderate Islam” Western terms and are unknown to the Islamic world. As one of their leader said “Islam is Islam”
Furthermore, a Muslim in an Islamic country would view that a Westerner would call a “Radical Muslim” in a Muslim nation he would be seen as a “devote Muslim” who is totally committed to the cause of Islam by the way of the violent jihad,
By contrast what a Westerner would call a “moderate Muslim’ many Muslims in Asia as well as the Middle East call a Muslim who is not really living up to his faith in Islam by not taking up arms in the violence and killing of the jihad for Islam.
Therefore many of Muslim, overseas , would call him a “hypocrite” This is way many devote Muslim who are violent jihadists gather together in a group and chant “Death to infidels and hypocrites ” Meaning “Death to non-Muslims and non-violent, jihadist Muslims.
James Lincoln says
If we cannot tell the truth about evil, from whatever cause, it can never be confronted.
Violet says
Nuts!
Petr says
I don’t understand why not to use the term Jihad if “My Jihad” only means to do better in the Gym. 😉