The #UN envoy Pramila Patten: We found clear and convincing information that #Hamas committed rape, sexualized torture and cruel and inhumane treatment against Israeli female captives. #BringThemHome #IDF pic.twitter.com/4aBb31VzIO
— Faraz Pervaiz (@FarazPervaiz3) March 5, 2024
Those who claim that the Jews secretly run the world will point to this as new evidence. But they cannot explain why the UN has been so inveterately anti-Israel for so many years, and has issued so very many condemnations of the Jewish state on spurious grounds while ignoring genuine human rights violations of other states.
somehistory says
This is like when oj simpson was found …by the jury…as ‘not guilty’ of double murder.
Some people will never admit that he really is guilty, even after he said, “if I did it.”
hamas filmed what they have done…and to the captives they still hold, are doing…bragged about the atrocities, showed the films to the world, the un finally admits that the mozlums actually did those things to the innocent Jews, many will still deny.
Even hamas wants to deny as they demand the release of mozlum terrorists held in Israel’s prisons.
some just don’t like Truth.
Greg says
No shit Sherlock!
Mind watch says
yes I agree, the UN and the hidden agenda, ‘do-gooder’ extreme left are so determined to hold Israel accountable for 100% of the suffering in Palestine that they could see a militant raping a young Jewish girl and say ‘It’s not happening’, ‘you are just making up a story’.
It’s interesting the words UN envoy Pramila Patten uses ”They have found clear and convincing INFORMATION that sexual abuse and all its (animalistic) variations took place’. Why didn’t she say ‘evidence’. Simply because by using ‘information’ she is not committing herself by saying sexual abuse happened, even when there are truckloads of evidence. She has shown her true colours, supporting the ‘Pro-Pal’ brigade whilst simultaneously giving one the impression she sincerely condemns ‘alleged’ Hamas rapes. The word ‘information’ suggests the rapes took place but doesn’t actually confirm it. Hence her choice of this word.
In any case, Hamas have lived an unnatural, religiously indoctrinated life in which they cannot form natural sexual relations as one does in the West. They are full of testosterone, and are usually young. Also the repugnant religion they chain themselves to stifles every and any normal inclination to happiness. As such (my opinion at least) when they cross over into Israel, they are basically animals on the loose, full of hatred, lust, depravity, and ill-conceived vengeance. Hence the inhuman things they did.
Do not deceivingly forthright, virtuous and sincere like Pramila realize Palestinians have largely constructed themselves, their sad lot in life, which is thee cumulate effect of their character and all the choices they have made over the decades whilst in a state of anger, suffering, religious dogmatism, ‘foolishness’ and hatred. Israel may have arguably contributed to a percentage of suffering, but it surely cannot be held solely responsible. for all of it.
And of course since childhood they have been indoctrinated with hatred for Jewish people with the nonsense the mythical Allah spits out in the quran.
Their religion has been their worst enemy, a huge hoax and sham, deceiving brainwashing them and committing them to a life of suffering and delusion.
Has this highly placed, seemingly virtuous, sincere and respect-worthy Pramila Patten fallen for all of this nonsense as well? Or is it something even more dire, personal and obscure?. Pramila will know the answer, but will she reveal them – I don’t think so!
Lenorea says
Thanks for your excellent post.
abu taleb says
But, does the UN condemn Hamas and call it a war crime? Islam allows rape and sexual violence, so Islamists will never call rape as a war crime if it is done by muslims. Probably the UN will do the same.
Mike says
The Aztecs sacrificed people to appease the Aztec gods, and many of the Imperial Japanese soldiers murdered and raped people in the name of fanatical State Shintoism, so why should these brutal Islamists get off the hook, simply because they’re doing it in the name of a certain interpretation of Islam?