It has been 76 years since the creation of Pakistan, after India agreed to let go of a massive part of its land so that Muslims could build a country for themselves. One would like to believe that every Muslim in India who desired an Islamic republic, “the land of the pure,” a Pakistan, would have packed their bags and left in 1947. That Pakistan, in the past 76 years and after several wars and numerous terror attacks, has proved to be India’s arch-rival, a sworn enemy, is common knowledge. Hence, the occasional echoes of “Pakistan Zindabad” (Long Live Pakistan) from inside India stands unacceptable. Who are these loyalists of Pakistan who missed the train seven decades ago? One wonders. It turns out they didn’t mistakenly miss the train, but, exploiting India’s generous decision to grow as a secular state, they stayed back to create a thousand Pakistans inside Indian borders. The slogan of “Pakistan Zindabad” has always been heard from these undeclared little Pakistans scattered throughout India.
In recent times, however, this slogan has become more mainstream. Muslims celebrating Pakistan’s victory over the Indian cricket team, and men not just shouting pro-Pakistan slogans but also adding a few firecrackers to the celebration in Hindu-dominated states such as Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have become commonplace. Even children of Kashmiri Muslim traders who have lived in the Indian mainland for 50 years and have survived because the Hindus supported their business wholeheartedly do not flinch before chanting Pakistan Zindabad and publicly expressing their love for India’s Islamic neighbor. While at it, they also demand that ordinary Indians should not doubt their patriotism for India, and the liberal and secular supreme court also grants the protected minority its right to chant for Pakistan.
While the Indians have gradually learned to put up with the occasional chants, it becomes a severe threat to the nation and its people when such pro-Pakistan slogans are heard at public rallies of Islamic political parties. The victory of Muslim candidates in an election, the patience of Indians, was put to a fresh test when “Pakistan Zindabad” echoed in the Vidhana Soudha (the Legislative House in Bengaluru, India, which serves as the seat of the state legislature of Karnataka) on February 27, when Karnataka MLAs voted in the Rajya Sabha election.
The three individuals so far arrested for raising the pro-Pakistan slogans were supporters of Congress Rajya Sabha candidate Nasir Hussain, and were cheering their leader’s victory by shouting the slogan “Long live Pakistan.” They have been identified as Ilthaz from Delhi, Munavar from Bengaluru, and Mohammed Shafi from Karnataka’s Haveri. One may wonder why three Indian Muslims would celebrate the victory of Indian Muslim politicians at an Indian assembly by hailing Pakistan, but raising such logical questions is deemed more offensive in India’s pro-Muslim secular setup than shouting slogans for the enemy nation.
Though the Muslim-pandering political parties tried to dismiss the allegations as “fake news,” the findings of state police confirmed that pro-Pakistan slogans were indeed raised at the assembly, and the arrests came in only after the forensic reports attested the verity of the claims by investigating the videos from the venue.
While the city was only recovering, another unexpected terror activity sent tremors through India’s Silicon Valley. Just days after the Vidhana Soudha incident, the famous Rameshwaram Cafe in Bengaluru’s Whitefield area was jolted by a low-intensity IED blast. The blast that went off on Friday, March 1, injuring several people who were visiting the popular eatery during rush hour.
The investigative agencies have studied multiple CCTV videos from across the city and transportation to trace the suspect’s movement. As per reports, he had travelled on multiple public buses both to plant the bomb and to flee the scene, and made several stopovers, one of which was at a Muslim religious centre a few kilometres from the cafe. Sanatan Prabhat reports that the suspect had “changed his clothes at a mosque. Near this mosque, a cap was found, which has been identified as the one worn by the terrorist on the day of the incident.” These facts are also corroborated by the famous media house News18, but they have substituted the term “place of worship,” for “mosque,” in order to “protect the secular fabric of India.”
As per recent developments, the National Investigation Agency and the Central Crime Branch have detained a cloth merchant in Ballari, an active member of the banned Popular Front of India (PFI), under suspicion of being part of the plot.
England Invaded says
With the Indians recently announcing that they won’t allow in from pakistan anyone is a muzzi – a lesson for the West. Which won’t be heeded.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
They’ve announced nothing of the sort. Modi is another version of Sunak
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Speaking of India, the government there finally issued an order actually implementing the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) which was announced in 2019. Apparently, it took them 5 years to come up w/ this, when it normally takes at the most 6 months. A few things, when factored in, reveal why it’s not a good deal for Hindus, despite how the ruling BJP is trying to spin it
➤ The law only affects non-muslims from the neighboring countries (Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh) who have been living in India before 2014. However, as we all know, trafficking and rape of non-muslims in these countries have been happening since then. However, if anyone would have come to India since that year, they would not have been covered under this law. Something like 1,800 Hindus who came from Pakistan returned after living in refugee camps in Rajasthan for years w/o getting their cases heard
➤ Millions of illegal muslims from Bangladesh and Burma live comfortable lives in India, and that too in Hindu majority areas like Delhi, Jammu, et al. While the Paki Hindus suffer, these illegal muslims don’t, and they get their welfare directly from BJP governments wherever they live
➤ The announcement was made in wake of a Supreme Court order to a leading Indian government bank to reveal the donors of all political parties under an electoral bond scheme. The BJP desperately wanted to divert attention
➤ BJP is on record telling muslims that they’ll campaign for 1 year and govern for 4. During those 4 years, they do everything to pamper muslims to a scale that previous non-BJP regimes never did, and during the 1 year of electioneering, they are busy fooling Hindus into thinking that they are their party. Using stunts like the Ram temple (which is not remotely near complete, may take another 5 years), a universal civil code or now this CAA announcement
If the BJP is serious about protecting Hindus, they need to implement NRC, which would deport foreign muslims illegally in India
Ashish Joshi says
Well said, sir! Actually, Modi is just a much more insidious avatar of Aurangzeb. This biggest of Hindu-haters is running 300 schemes for Muslims while paying lip service to real Hindu issues, such as freeing temples from govt control, and repealing the Waqf Act and the Places of Worship Act etc. He has empowered the Muslims to such an extent that no Hindu religious procession is spared from stoning by the Muslims. No Muslim is ever punished for this. Dozens of Hindus have been beheaded ISIS-style yet nothing has been done to reign in such attacks with swift and deterrent state action. The Hindus are the true orphans of India with no country to call their own!
crown says
Ah, yes. Yesterday, today and tomorrow, always the same principle motivates Muslims: “What’s mine is mine, and what’s yours is mine”.
Sick. To. Death. Of. Those. People.
IQ al Rassooli says
The answer is very simple:
It is IMPOSSIBLE, and I must repeat IMPOSSIBLE for any Sharia compliant Muslim to be BOTH a Good Muslim and a Loyal citizen among Kuffar/ Non Muslims
Because every Muslim on the planet is mandated by Allah’s Sharia, to be the Mortal and Eternal ENEMY, of every non Muslim (80% of current humanity)
IQ
James Lincoln says
IQ al Rassooli,
Yes, mutually incompatible.
Charvak says
” Al wala wa al Bara”, that’s the reason in a nutshell.