Non-Muslim women in Britain, France, and Germany will need a certain period of adjustment. But they’ll learn, just as Iranian women did after 1979.
A video obtained by @IranIntl shows morality police forces violently beating a little girl in Fadak Park of Boroujerd, western Iran, because she was wearing a t-shirt with short sleeves. The people finally managed to save the girl, an eyewitness told us. pic.twitter.com/7NS847csPg
— Iran International English (@IranIntl_En) May 11, 2024
“Iranian Police Assault Girl for Hijab Non-Compliance,” Iran International, May 12, 2024:
A video surfaced from Boroujerd, western Iran, depicting hijab enforcement police violently assaulting a young girl in Fadak Park for wearing a short-sleeved t-shirt.
The footage, obtained by Iran International, shows the police’s harsh enforcement of mandatory hijab. According to an eyewitness, bystanders eventually intervened and rescued the girl. It is unclear how old the child is, but in Iran girls start to wear hijab as young as six or seven years old.
The incident is part of a pattern of aggression associated with hijab enforcement in Iran even against children. Just last year, another young girl was recorded being struck in the face for not wearing a hijab. The video showed her bleeding from the nose, sitting by the roadside in distress….
Crusader64 says
These people of the suppose it peaceful religion of Islam. Are Evil who beat people in the name of GOD.
bill says
AS i OFTEN SAY, Iran is the nearest thing today to Nazi Germany, leaving aside N Korea. Sorry about caps. My keyboard has problems
somehistory says
Demonic ***immoral**** and disgustingly evil.
And these are the people who inspire, fund, back and support hamas. And so they are people who are now supported, encouraged, and on whose behalf riots, scaring little kids, abusing ill children, and preventing people from catching planes, going to work, picking up their kids from school, are happening across this nation.
Seriously physically abusing small children for their evil false god, evil fake prophet and equally evil book of demon filth.
It’s good some people intervened, but she still is not safe from the immoral, demon-possessed ghouls. May the ghouls soon find out what they will harvest from all of their evil crops.
Ron says
Sex with animals is OK, but short sleeves,,,, whoa.
somehistory says
because all of the old slugs and the young ones too, wish to rape the children; beating them is almost as satisfactory for the ghouls of islam. And they can call it ‘good.’
PRCS says
Old Christian slugs and young ones too, wish to rape children.
Surely you know that.
Whomever engages in that behavior is an immoral person.
somehistory says
There is no such thing and surely any palestinian would make that claim.
Not surprised that you would. You have expressed that desire for yourself, on JW in the past.
Palestinian Red Cross Society says
Sure there is.
There are plenty of old and young slugs whov’e done those things. Christians, too.
And, regarding your hysterical falsehoods about me being a Palestinian and wanting to rape children: prove them.
somehistory says
You said it, and gravenimage responded and you said you were ‘joking.’ Of course you deny it now. Just as other mozlums deny what they say.
Like your misunderstanding of hypocrite, you also have no clue about the meaning of hysterical
It’s a waste of my time to respond to your continual nonsense.
Palestinian Red Cross Society says
1. “You have expressed that desire for yourself, on JW in the past.” Quite a smear. But now, “You said it, and gravenimage responded and you said you were ‘joking.’ Uh, huh. Must be Satan whispering in your ear.
2. Yes, despite your delusional denial: Christians do rape little children.
3. “It’s a waste of my time to respond to your continual nonsense.” Yet, you keep responding.
PS Tell us how you came to the hysterical conclustion that my final US Navy Rate and Rank, (PRCS) makes me a member of the palestinian red cross society.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
It’s Palestinian Red Crescent Society, as you would know if you didn’t pretend that Christians are as evil as muslims, and that all muslim countries/entities use the Red Crescent instead of the Red Cross
That said, I have never heard of any Pali Red Crescent either. After all, they are the “You love life, we love death” crowd
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
The issue is
1) her ridiculous conclustion that my handle (PRCS) labels me a member of a Palestinian oraganization.
It’s actually the second acronym from the bottom of this webpage:
https://www.acronymfinder.com/PRCS.html
2) Her pretense that Christians do not also engage in child sexual abuse.
3) The idea I’m pretending Christians are as evil as Muslims deserves a piss off response.
somehistory says
“The Palestinian branch of the movement was founded in 1968 by Yasser Arafat’s brother, Fathi Arafa”
Palestine Red Crescent Society
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
Which, despite her hysterical conclusion, has nothing to do with me.
https://www.acronymfinder.com/PRCS.html
Second from the bottom.
Joe says
The Hadith says that the perfect man, Mo, liked to give BJs to his infant grandson. But, Jesus said that the person who does this is better off to have never been born. So the two religions don’t agree on this issue, do they?
PRCS says
“The Palestinian branch of the movement was founded in 1968 by Yasser Arafat’s brother, Fathi Arafa”
Palestine Red Crescent Society
Which, despite your hysterical conclusion, has nothing to do with me.
Second fromt he bottom:
https://www.acronymfinder.com/PRCS.html
PRCS says
Infidel,
Since you’re attempting to pick fly shit from the pepper, it’s Palestine Red Crescent Society, as you would know if had you not been so quick to misrepresent my post:
No, that Christians can be as evil as anyone else is not pretense.
gravenimage says
PRCS, there is *nothing* in Christianity that teaches the rape of children–whereas in Islam the “perfect man” “Prophet” Muhammed ‘married’ a girl of six and began raping her are nine. Surely you know this? Pedophilia is illegal in every Christian-majority nation–would that this were the case in Dar-al-Islam.
gravenimage says
Somehistory, what desire has PRCS expressed in the past? *Certainly* not abusing children.
I have disagreed with PRCS on certain points from time to time, but he has *nothing* to do with Hamas–he is a staunch Anti-Jihadist. This on this thread is just sarcasm from him.
Walter Sieruk says
Those hooligans in power in Iran actually treated that poor little girl in that horrifically awful brutal cruel ways , not really because she was wearing short –sleeved shirt but because, as it has truly , been said that “Evil is always looking for an excuse.”
Those vicious bullies and thugs in uniform who have the inappropriate title of “morality police” in the extremely cruel, brutal and demonic misogyny of this hideous Islamic regime. Not only against women but even young girls.
As explained by a former Iranian Revolutionary Guard member who defected to the West and now lives in America his book also informs the reader about the malicious and murderous affront girls in Iran’s Evin prison which reads that those in power ,the “paraded teenage girls in front in front of me as they led them to their deaths. These girls were barely out of their childhood, barely old enough to think of themselves, much less form thoughts against the state. They knew nothing about the machinations of politics. They were innocent in every sense of the word and certainty innocent of trumped –up charges that led to their imprisonment. Yet they suffered fates too brutal for even the most vicious criminal. ..Their few remaining moments of life had been filled with the level of abuse that few can imagine…The author further states “They tortured and killed young girls, in God’s name and before their execution they raped them because they believed that if a girl dies virgin, she will go to heaven, and they wanted to deny them this reward.” [1]
This affront against human rights is as malice -filled and viciously wicked as can possibly be.
In addition, such brutal cruel oppressive misogynistic as well as murderous tyrannical Islamic regime of Iran is based on Sharia which denies females basic human rights is viciously harsh on all people, especially girls and women. That mandatory hijab m ament that is a symbol of the oppressive misogyny of Islamic misogyny is upheld and supported by Sharia
Therefore, it should be made known that the actual origin of Sharia is revealed in a Time –Life book with the title MESOPOTAMIA: THE MIGHTY KINGS copyright 1995. The point is this what an outright liar Rasis is, for he said that he is “a defender of human rights.” For that future history book about the ancient pagan world of Mesopotamia informs the reader that “many Islamic laws resemble the Babylon and Assyrian forebears.” .page 150.
Therefore Sharia is of no value or worth.
There is the above and other such references imply that such pagan teachings were incorporated into the religion that Muhammad manufactured and then started. Thus this further reveals that a lot of ancient paganism is part of the whole religion of Islam.
In other words, ancient paganism makes up much of Islam and it’s a hoax. Therefore the Islamic “Republic” of Iran is based in Islam and Sharia has its entire foundation build on a hoax.
[1] A TIME TO BETRAY by Reza Kahlili. Pages 2,3. 117.
FYI says
One of allah’s famous Scientific errors is his misunderstanding of Human Biology in the same book where he insists women wear hijabs.Coupled with allah’s lack of omniscience it is quite nonsensical but religous authoritarians are like communists,using ridiculous man made rules to make life a misery for people.
islam{=the kaaba cult of hu baal} is like a religious form of communism
Walter Sieruk says
That was tragic, this is not even and isolate incident when it comes to the brutal cruel abuse by the so called “morality police” of that horrendously evil tyrannical Islamic of Iran.
It should never be forgotten that the heinously cruel and murderous Islamic tyranny of Iran is very brutal and vicious to the Iranian people. Especially regarding females. Both girls and women.
As observed in in this news report about how terribly they treated that poor little girl and before that the vicious murder of Mahsa Amini is very sad and tragic and that horrendous evil of her being murdered is because of the oppressive vicious brutal cruel and deadly misogynistic Islamic regime of Iran.
That action of male Muslim who are officials murdering defenseless, helpless women in cold blood is a heinous and hideous has occurred before and if that murderous Islamic regime isn’t overthrown such wicked killing will continue
Another example of such callous despicable heartless anti-female evil is when a teenage girl in Iran was talking to her boyfriend on the phone and then the Islamic state “police” walked over to her and shot her dead. They did that wicked and malicious thing to her because she was talking to her boyfriend and they also didn’t like her clothing. [1]
That was a clear cut case of murder and vicious Islamic madness by Iran’s Islamic state “ police”, who call themselves the “morality police”, they got away with their hideous and malice –filled evil because the mullahs as well as other villains in power in that tyrannical Islamic regime.
[1] A TIME TO BETRAY by Reza Kahlili page 240
Tony Rice says
I suppose they were getting her ready for what happens in Sharia law to girls when they are aged 8 or 9 , as Muhammad had set the example. And so fervently authorised ever since. What evil,.
bagsgroove says
It’s time for Iran to be made into a “I Ran Away ” dump. Why isn’t Iran being sent to the World Court of Justice for all of it’s crimes and terrorist support. Or is the World Court only there to condemn non-muslims and Israel.
gravenimage says
Good questions.
PRCS says
Something more than meets the eye in that scenario, I suspect.
Too young to be forced to “veil” herself per Qur’an 33:59 and 24:31, but so-called morality poiice–all women it appears–have a problem with the tee-shirt a likely pre-pubescent girl is wearing?
From the gaze of what men is she supposed to be guarding her “ornaments” from?
B Teboe says
There is absolutely no love in Islam. None.
somehistory says
For no one. Not even their own families. Certainly not for the children of strangers.
gravenimage says
Grimly true. There is no love in Islam.
tgusa says
“Sharia police beat little girl for wearing a short-sleeved t-shirt”
Who would do that? What kind of so-called man would beat any little girl for any reason? Oh yeah, those guys. There is something deeply wrong with those people. Disturbingly wrong. If you are against beating little girls you might be an islamophobe. I know I would enjoy giving them the same thing back. I would have to check myself once I got started lest I get in to big trouble.
PRCS says
PRCS says
May 17, 2024 at 5:15 pm
Something more than meets the eye in that scenario, I suspect.
Too young to be forced to “veil” herself per Qur’an 33:59 and 24:31, but so-called morality poiice–all women it appears–have a problem with the tee-shirt a likely pre-pubescent girl is wearing?
From the gaze of what men is she supposed to be guarding her “ornaments” from?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Was this girl a minor? That then raises a couple of questions:
➤ Do Iranian parents just allow their kids to decide what to wear? Don’t they impose their own choice of attire on their kids, like most parents all over the world do?
➤ If the answer to the above question is no, then why are the shariah cops going after minors, instead of their parents?
Every time one thinks they can’t exceed their previous limits on how evil they can be, they surprise us!
tgusa says
First they came for the bikinis and now they are going after t-shirts. I say, get a life assholes, but they won’t listen.
Gurek says
The Holey Qur’an al-Qarim:
“Do not let your sense of compassion prevent you from fulfilling Allah’s command. Strike those who commit adultery with 100 lashes.”
Even though there is no adultery, Allah the great forbids you to use your own conscience and promises eternal Hell as your reward if you oppose Him! You must only obey Allah’s command!
One of the greatest horrors ever invented in human history.
tgusa says
In other words, if you don’t do hellish things, you are going to hell. What in the hell is that all about?
somehistory says
I would rather take my chances on going to hell, than to do hellish things.
Doing hellish things is a guarantee that the future will be a very dark one…and very, very, very short.
tgusa says
For all I know I could end up in hell according to religion (depending on the religion and their contradicting rules at many and all times) but never for doing what my God would consider, hellish things. Yeah, I’m not perfect but according to God none of us are. I along with you will take my chances as well.
somehistory says
Oh, to be perfect! But then we’d have one of the problems that faced Jesus…having to deal with the imperfections of others, having to “put up with” all of the wrong thinking and actions.
Now can be frustrating, dealing with stupid people and evil people. Imagine seeing it from a perfect standpoint….
gravenimage says
Yes–what other faith warns their followers from *being compassionate”?
somehistory says
“Iran’s regime slated to execute innocent young Jew on Monday”
“Ziona Ghahremani lives in the western Iranian city of Kermanshah and is believed to be either 23-years-old or 24-years-old. Sabti posted a picture of the man on his X feed.
Why is Iran murdering the young man?
Sabti wrote “This Iranian Jewish man is going to be executed due to act of self-defense against a Muslim man who attacked him with knife but was killed himself.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/iran-s-regime-slated-to-execute-innocent-young-jew-on-monday/ar-BB1mzTyI
somehistory says
“2023.”Amnesty International issued a recent report that revealed the clerical regime carried out at least 853 executions in the past year. The number of executions has reached the highest number in eight years.
Amnesty wrote that Iran’s regime conducted a wave of executions in 2023 that targeted demonstrators, dissidents and users of social media on charges including “insulting the prophet” and “apostasy” as well as vague charges of “enmity against God” and/or “corruption on earth.”
The London-based human rights organization Amnesty added Last year also marked a shocking escalation in the use of the death penalty against child offenders.”
tgusa says
Wow.
US Constitution Second Amendment.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
That was made in times none of us lived in for the times we now live in. Today, is needed more and more all over the west, the world, each and every day.
Iran has it this way.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security State, with no right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall always be infringed.
Under the Second Amendment people having the right to have knives guns and such was protected not because the people would be able to go homicidal but so the people could protect themselves from knife or gun wielding homicidal maniacs among them.
Rarely says
And here I thought the right to bear arms was really set up to ensure a militia would be available and ready to defend against any further British incursion. Oh well. I’ve been wrong before.
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
*
tgusa says
Independent Palestinian Red Crescent Society
As you well know there is nothing independent in islam and that goes even among each other so what is your objective here? Independence, thought, reason. questions, changes? No, forget all about that. So what and why are you here? Are you working for the betterment of all people in the area or just your own? Your Independent Palestinian Red Crescent Society? Those guys (you know who) just wont have it any other way, no matter what anyone says or does including you.
PRCS says
tgusa,
As you know, shipmate, I’m a retired Senior Chief Parachute Rigger.
In a recent hysterical attempt to deflect from another “hand in the cookie jar” deceit about which I had challenged her, somehistory made the ridiculous assertion that my screen name identifies me as a member of the Palestine Red Crescent Society.
PRCS, in my case of course, is the second definition from the bottom of what may be the webpage she used to create that fiction:
https://www.acronymfinder.com/PRCS.html
I have have responded to her with that moniker since to remind her of the idiocy of that conclusion.
**As of yesterday, within this thread, she has now accused me of wanting to rape children.
Enjoy your weekend.
tgusa says
I always thought PRCS was a variation on Senior Chief Parachute Rigger, Parachute Rigger Chief Senior. Well that’s what I thought.
Enjoy your weekend too.
somehistory says
As usual, the pali is wrong about where I got the words to fill in his moniker.
And then, he goes along with my usage…almost….so I must be right.
And he did, in fact, say something positive about raping children…and then excused it as a kind of (sick…my feelings) joke. He may not have meant it, but he said it and now denies it.
and so it goes. He’ll continue to equate Christianity with islam, but that’s also how he is wrong.
James Lincoln says
PRCS says,
“As you know, shipmate, I’m a retired Senior Chief Parachute Rigger.”
I didn’t know that – and I thank you for your service.
I have logged hundreds of hours in all types of naval aircraft (helos, props, jets) and had put my faith and trust in you guys.
Luckily, I have never had to bail out – or eject, but I have good friends who have.
And my Navy buds are alive because of people like you.
tgusa says
As I think I have said. I joined the Navy to see the world. They sent me from Southern California to Northern California. So much for seeing the world. Oh, in my years I never set foot on a ship. Saw a few from a distance down in San Diego though.
tgusa says
Much of what I learned about boating sailing water related stuff etc I learned way before I joined the Navy. I learned from my Dad, an avid water sports guy and Army. Ocean or freshwater. In a storm or on a clear day. It didn’t matter to him. My Mom was a college swimmer so I learned how to swim and survive quite early. So most of that training I went through back then was, well, boring.
PRCS says
Yes, James and tgusa, USN (1968-1989).
VP-31 NAS Moffett Field
VQ-3 NAS Agana
NAS Cubi Point
HSL-31 NAS Imperial Beach and NAS North Island
VS-38 NAS North Island
NAS Alameda
VP-9 NAS Moffett Field
And three aircraft Carriers (Enterprise, Constellation, and Carl Vinson).
The real issue here: somehistory came to the ridiculous conclusion that PRCS defines me as a member of the Palestine Red Crescent Society—and continues to to so.
Of course, PRCS–in my case–is technically Parachute Rigger Chief Senior (colloquially Senior Chief Parachute Rigger).
The last to let you down.
The following website shows Palestine Red Crescent Society at the top of that list and, of course, Senior Chier Parachute Rigger near the bottom.
https://www.acronymfinder.com/PRCS.html
She has also now accused me, several times, of wanting to rape children–and continues to do so–as her posts repeatedly assert.
somehistory is NOT the pious Christian she would have JW readers believe her to be.
tgusa says
Man you have been all over the place.
What a lucky man you are.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ds55ii0wqc
Above all, I always knew I could count on the Chiefs in anything.
tgusa says
Back in my day I would have refereed to you as SCPO (PRCS) which back then would have been official Navy designation. As you know, rate and rating are two different things in the Navy.
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
somehistory says
May 18, 2024 at 7:34 pm
As usual, the pali is wrong about where I got the words to fill in his moniker.
And then, he goes along with my usage…almost….so I must be right.
NOPE
“I have have responded to her with that moniker since to remind her of the idiocy of that conclusion.”
I will continue to use the Palestinian Red Crescent Society screen name when responding to you, for that reason.
PRCS says
Yes, SCPO (Senior Chief Petty Officer) is used when only the rank is needed.
E-8
Which is what my retired ID lists me as.
tgusa says
Why should somehistory respond to you when, after many days, you haven’t responded to my questions in my follow-up comment to you? Do you want to have it both ways? I hope not because you wont get it. Not anymore.
gravenimage says
Thank you for your service, PRCS.
tgusa says
PRCS and James Lincoln,
What do you guys think about the new Navy vs the one we used to have? You dont have to answer that as I think I already know.
PRCS says
Yes, SCPO (Senior Chief Petty Officer) is used when only the rank is needed.
E-8
Which is what my retired ID lists me as.
tgusa says
Yes I know Chief. You weren’t my Chief so I never knew you but back in the day I would have referred to you as Chief. Back in the day, even in a crowd my Chief could recognize even my voice. Ya’ll always looked out for the rest of us so enjoy your retirement. You earned it.
PRCS says
Yes, as a PRC, I was called Chief.
When I made PRCS, I was called Senior Chief.
I didn’t”t want to wait around for the possibility of making PRCM (Master Chief), so I retired.
I forgot what years you were in VP-31 (I believe)? And did you say you were an AE in a previous conversation?
And thanks for the Emerson, Lake and Palmer song.
Forgot to mention: during my VS-38 squadron’s 1980 Westpac in Constellation—did 93 consecutive days at sea.
Somethings I miss about th Navy. Some I don”t.
PRCS says
One Aircrewman actually survived that P-3/NASA Convair 990 midair collision over the golf course on the other side of Hiway 101.
Saw an interview with him recently. Send you a link if you want.
tgusa says
Hey shipmate PRCS. Yeah, please send me the link. The crash, before my time. 83 to 87 VP-31 Moffett Field. I went in at twenty cause I was bored where I was at and what I was doing. Never got transferred anywhere else. I expected to but I figured it was a dog ate my paperwork kind of thing. Interesting story. Shortly after I arrived there I met a girl who happened to be working as a temp at the exchange. I went in to buy some civilian clothes and she was working in the department. Yeah I know, on a base of 99 percent men I met a girl. Pure chance. We hit it off right away and soon fell in love.
My first orders were to NAF Bermuda but when I came in the pick them up they had changed them (always thought it was some Chief who took them, lol) to the USS Ranger. Came back later and they had been changed again to Moffett Field. I didn’t know what I wanted to do when I went in so I didn’t go to an A school. I became a striker for AT, aviation electronics tech. I did my TAD at the line shack, ground support, where I met a Chief and we became friends. He liked to fish and so did I so every one in a while he would come by my shop and take me out early to go fishing. A few of my workmates didn’t like that but oh well.
I never re-upped because she and I had built a life together and I knew the Navy would transfer me somewhere else. After meeting her I threw away my dream of traveling the world. It was easy to do. Excepting work and watch I spent every minute off base with her. I had it pretty easy compared to you. I’m surprised they transferred you out of the P-3 community. They told me that once in that’s where you would stay.
I joined because I wanted to go to computer school but my parents thought it was too expensive. So one day I came home and told my Mom, guess what, I joined the Navy. To say the least the look on her face was not a happy one as she remembered the Vietnam years and was worried for me. After I got out I put myself through computer school (BTI, before the internet) never looked back and the rest is history.
tgusa says
“And thanks for the Emerson, Lake and Palmer song.”
Sure thing, anytime. Music used to be geared toward us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2zurZig4L8
abu taleb says
Islam says it is ok to have sex with prepubescent girls, so of course small girls must be protected from the pedophile rapists in shariah countries (another word for devoted muslims). So, small girls not wearing hijab must be taught by beating that she could get raped by muslims who are not guilty from raping because the girls are tempting them for raping..
That is the beauty of Islam, you rape a girl for not wearing hijab, it is the girl’s fault, not you. You beat a girl with hijab, you get reward from Allah for protecting the girl from being raped. And if you marry a small girl, then you rape her, it is not a rape because she is halal.
Troybeam says
Acceptance of Islam is destroying nations. People who defend Islam need a crash course on sharia law and adherence to it.
Jesus stated in the bible that everything that was “old” was made clean again whereas in sharia law nothing has changed for thousands of years and that people should be enough to defend your nation and its sovereignty from Islam.
Islam will never assimilate it goal is to destroy and create a one world caliphate (only Islam) and nothing else will exist.
OLD GUY says
Diversity in Islam means there are many diverse ways for Islam to PUNISH you for NOT following THEIR leaders rules.
Those cute cut off shorts won’t make it in Islam, nor your PINK and Blue hair or your GAY lifestyle.
somehistory says
“hys·ter·i·cal
[həˈsterək(ə)l]
adjective
deriving from or affected by uncontrolled extreme emotion:
“the band was mobbed by hysterical fans” · “hysterical laughter”
Similar:
overwrought
emotional
uncontrolled
uncontrollable
informal
extremely funny; very amusing:”
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
overwrought
emotional
uncontrolled
uncontrollable
Yep, as in “a recent hysterical attempt to deflect from another “hand in the cookie jar” deceit”
Yeh, I called her ugly but was really referring to her demeanor. Really. I really was.
somehistory says
poor, poor palestinian. Can’t understand a blooming thing, but keeps on with his nonsense.
and I’ve wasted enough time on the pali today.
But I will find the statement the palistenian made about wanting to rape little kids here on JW and when I find it, I’ll copy and paste it for all to see that his denial means less than nothing.
Fill the jar with macaroons and peanut butter/chocolate.
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
poor, poor palestinian
Well, there you go again:
1. More hysterical nonsense
and
2. You keep responding
gravenimage says
Somehistory, PRCS is not Palestinian.
Scotsman48 says
Three grown ”men” walked into this video wearing a short sleeved shirt but they are all freaking out and attacking a wee girl for wearing a short sleeved shirt..I guess some ”men” got sexually excited..
islam is really a sexually uptight fascist religious cult of oppression and death, even their famous Iranian guru fella once said there is no laughter in islam… Only to worship a dude that shagged a 9 year wee girl and wants to kill those who disagree… And this is the sort of people coming into Europe by the thousands… islamism is the new nazism.
The silence of the Western ”feminists” and their BS #metoo movement is so loud it gives me a headache while they all scream in support of a gang of thugs that raped defiled and beheaded young girls like themselves last Oct 7th in Israel.
Madness is the norm of today..
John says
Iran is not nearly as strict as Saudi Arabia. Interesting that you always give the Saudis a passs
gravenimage says
Who gives Saudi Arabia a pass? Certainly not Jihad Watch.
somehistory says
Just in
“Iranian president ‘missing’ after helicopter crash”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/iranian-president-missing-after-helicopter-crash/ar-BB1mFjVW?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=45df2d9020914be4811da5bffca05c54&ei=10
And for any who may care to know, the palestinian red crescent society was in the news feed recently….supposedly helping the injured in gaza. There were photos of ambulances, and flashing lights and the “story” of helping
There was, therefore, no need to do a “google search” for the letters prcs
It was just a matter of making use of the fact and returning some of the needle.
The supposed “hysteria”, is just in his imagination; what he wishes to be the case.
Just as mozlums wish we all were deathly afraid of them.
Palestine Red Crescent Society says
No matter the search engine or website you accessed in your hysterical search for the acronym prcs, in my case it means Parachute Rigger Chief Senior (aka Senior Chief Parachute Rigger).
Read it and weep.
You’re not getting under my skin, dear. But I’ve surely gotten under yours.
Have a psychologically troubled day.
somehistory says
Now you see, you don’t pay attention. There was no “search.” I was reading the news and saw the Palestinian Red Crescent Society working along with the red cross in gaza.
and the letters just jumped out….like a lightning bolt from the blue sky.
But it doesn’t matter. You just go on in your deluded …belief….almost wrote *thinking.**
I don’t believe a word you write. There is no law that says I have to believe you are navy retired and the letters ***mean**** something special to you. they mean nothing to me.
You can repeat them until the sun sets on your back yard, and it will not affect my life in any way. In fact, I don’t remember what they are…oh ,yes, palestinian red crescent society
I don’t wish any kind of day for you. and I’m just fine, here laughing “hysterically” at your continued foolishness and eating from the cookie jar..
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
Nope. No law. Can’t legislate stupidity.
Unlike what James Lincoln and tgusa, fellow Navy vets, have said counts. You? Not at all.
James Lincoln says
May 18, 2024 at 7:44 pm
PRCS says,
“As you know, shipmate, I’m a retired Senior Chief Parachute Rigger.”
I didn’t know that – and I thank you for your service.
I have logged hundreds of hours in all types of naval aircraft (helos, props, jets) and had put my faith and trust in you guys.
Luckily, I have never had to bail out – or eject, but I have good friends who have.
And my Navy buds are alive because of people like you.
tgusa says
May 19, 2024 at 3:21 am
Yes I know Chief. You weren’t my Chief so I never knew you but back in the day I would have referred to you as Chief. Back in the day, even in a crowd my Chief could recognize even my voice. Ya’ll always looked out for the rest of us so enjoy your retirement. You earned it.
gravenimage says
Somehistory, PRCS is *not* a member of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society. Really, this is silly.
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
And, as you brought up “law”, yes I am an admitted atheist–which isn’t a crime.
So, you know, get over yourself.
somehistory says
Baaaaawaaaaa/ I said it first…so you get over yourself…first.
Dr. James Lincoln and tgusa are both gentleman. Begin calling them names, insulting them for what they write, order them to change what they write because you don’t like what they write, and see what reaction you get.
and what does your navy service….if you really served….have to do with anything? And for that matter, what does your disbelief have to do with anything?
to me, you are the same as a devout mozlum; Your arrogant way is the only way.
And I’m not buying it.
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
Oh, you said it first. What an immature response.
Yes, they are gentlemen. But you are no lady.
So, explain to them why you–someone who has likely never served–aren’t buying what they know is true.
“and what does your navy service….if you really served….have to do with anything?”
It points out how unintelligent your brain-dead conclusion that I, per my screen name, am a member of, or am somehow affiliated with the Palestine Red Crescent Society is. That you did that, effing stupid as it was, did not surprise.
“And for that matter, what does your disbelief have to do with anything?” Given that you think it’s a crime in the U.S., or perhaps a sin–which is clearly irrelevant to me–to “admit” I’m an atheist: that ball is in your court.
No, you whiny psychopath. YOUR arrogant religious fanatacism epitomizes why so many are turned off by Christian supremacists–like you.
somehistory says
And was it your parents who ‘turned you off Christianity”?
After all, you became a non-believer long before this website was established….according to your own words.
And again….you can’ t read with understanding. I never said, nor even implied or inferred that disbelief is against the Law.
You can have any opinion about any subject you choose to slaver, drool or slobber over.
You know the two Gentlemen in person? they’ve seen your service record and your discharge papers?
Or are they just taking you at your word….which is most likely.
As for your definition of Lady, it’s no better than any other word you’ve attempted to define by usage. And matters just as much as your claim of what your ‘moniker’ means.
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
No, not a non-believer. An atheist.
“or are they just taking you at your word….which is most likely.
Ask them.
I don’t read well?
“a crime in the U.S., or perhaps a sin”
My assertion, drven by your behavior, stands. You’re no lady
somehistory says
palestinian, I don’t have to “ask them.” unlike you, I read with understanding and can tell by what they wrote, they don’t know any more about you than what you claim.
the part you have put in quotes means nothing as you have not included anything identifying when written, the subject or who wrote it.
and I could not care less what you think about whether or not I’m a lady. I don’t use language that would describe the ‘palestinian’ of the red crescent. but you are no gentleman.
Palestinian Red Crescent Society says
Or are they just taking you at your word….which is most likely.
I don’t have to “ask them.”
Afraid they’ll tell you what you don’t want to hear?
And, of course, as you well know, I’ll keep responding to you as Palestinian Red Crescent Society to remind of your idiotic “out of the blue” bullshit.
You still haven’t explained why being a “previously admitted atheist” is any concern of yours. As it’s not a crime in the U.S., perhaps a sin—in your mind? Do read that with understanding.
“No, you whiny psychopath. YOUR arrogant religious fanatacism epitomizes why so many are turned off by Christian supremacists–like you.” Yes, of course, I and my Bhuddist classmates at that time, were pleased daily prayer (read: Christian prayer) in school was ruled unconstitutional.
To me, you are the same as a devout Muslim; Your arrogant way is the only way.
And, recalling your crazed tirades about “primordial soup” vs the fictitious Adam and Eve, no, you’re neither rational nor a lady.
gravenimage says
Islamic Republic of Iran: Sharia police beat little girl for wearing a short-sleeved t-shirt
……………………………………..
How *sick is this*? Bloody thugs.
God, I hate Islam.
somehistory says
g,
this is the last on this thread I am going to take time to write. so please don’t expect me to read or respond again here.
Some time back, the guy who uses an acronym, wrote about sex with children. I didn’t respond to him about the sickness and evil of such a thing, but another poster did and I recall ….perhaps incorrectly….that you also commented on it, re: that he was not serious, and he indicated that it was a ‘joke.’ ( a sick joke if)
Whether or not he meant it at the time, he wrote it.
Then on this thread, he called Christians “scum” who rape children.
True Christians do no such thing. some people who **claim** to be Christian do all sorts of things Jesus and His Father condemn. Claiming to be Christian is not the same as actually obeying Jesus’ Commands.
One day while reading the news, I saw a report about the “Palestinian Red Crescent Society,” helping the injured in Gaza. The acronym “prcs” was in () in the article and it reminded me that I had seen those letters often.
so, the next time your friend slammed Christianity, I used that acronym’s Red Crescent words.
He claims I’m hysterical, which is just too stupid. He’s said a lot of other stuff too, but not “sarc” against Christianity, Jesus, and me. What he writes about those subjects, he means.
As for his comments, going back several years ago, I recall that he said some very nasty and uncalled -for things to you. They weren’t said in ‘sarc” or joking, either.
so, I will continue to refer to him as he comes across….no different in behavior on this site than a mozlum….arrogance and insults and not always truthful.
gravenimage says
Somehistory, thanks for your reply.
I have to admit I don’t recall PRCS *ever* joking about having sex with children–and you’d think that would be something I’d remember, having been a victim of just that myself.
There are some matters I disagree with him on, certainly, and I have said so.
But I see no reason to suppose that he is any sort of Muslim jihad supremacist–just the opposite, in fact. And the letters “PRCS” stand for a lot of things. I have no reason to doubt that the reference is the one he himself claims it is.
I dug back through some of his posts–through early 2022–and his replies to me were always reasonable, even when we disagreed on (usually fairly minor) points.
I could find *nothing* implying that he is pro-Jihad and Shari’ah in general or for pedophilia specifically. If you can find such a reference I would certainly be interested in seeing it.
I do wish he wouldn’t twit your religious views–but that is far from being pro-Jihad. I’ve certainly had other posters here who have disagreed with me on some points–political, religious, cultural, or what have you.
Generally I believe in the “big tent” idea, though–if someone is Anti-Jihad, then I don’t insist that they agree with me on every other issue.