It has been nearly three weeks since Ismail Haniyeh, the leader of Hamas’ “political wing,” was killed in his room at a heavily-guarded guesthouse in Tehran, when a bomb planted two months before exploded. While Israel has remained silent on the matter, this feat is widely ascribed to the Mossad. Iran has threatened a terrible revenge, but it may be trying to find an excuse not to follow through, because Tehran understands that any attack on Israel would provoke a devastating counterattack, almost certainly including the destruction of Kharg Island’s oil terminals, through which 90% of Iran’s oil exports flow, bringing Iran’s economy, already suffering, to its knees. Iran has said that if a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza can be established, it will no longer feel compelled to attack Israel. Despite the braggadocio of its leaders, Iran knows that in any major conflict with Israel, it will lose, and disastrously. The likely damage to its economy would push the Iranians into even deeper distress, perhaps leading to an uprising against the regime that has ever since 1979 has brought them a world of woe. More on Iran’s weakness can be found here: “Iran is weaker than we think. It’s time to take advantage.” By Saeed Ghasseminejad and Richard Goldberg, The Hill, August 14, 2024:
The Islamic Republic of Iran is weak and vulnerable, far more than the regime would have us believe.
That’s the biggest takeaway from last week’s suspected Israeli assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran — and it delivers important messages to the ayatollah, his terror proxies, the Iranian people and Washington policymakers.
Haniyeh’s killing while under maximum protection by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps tells Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic, that Israel has deeply infiltrated the ayatollah’s intelligence and security establishment. Furthermore, unlike in previous years, Israel is now prepared to use its power to strike the Islamic Republic at the highest levels within Iran.
In recent years, Israel has conducted several covert operations in Iran, the most significant being the 2020 elimination of Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the godfather of the Islamic Republic’s nuclear weapons program.
But the elimination of Haniyeh, both in terms of his political position and the operation’s complexity, which required planning in a very short time, indicates the extraordinary level of Israel’s infiltration inside the regime and its increased resolve to target its enemies — even if such strikes come with the risk of strong retaliation….
The Iranian government must be wondering what other targets Israel may be able to strike at, given its ability to breach the security around Haniyeh. Will it resume assassinating Iran’s top nuclear scientists, the way it did in the past, when five of them were killed? Or could the Mossad, with its Iranian collaborators, somehow manage to cause explosions inside the underground nuclear facilities at Fordow?
Yahya Sinwar has been slithering from one underground tunnel in Gaza to another for the past ten months. He knows that many hundreds of those tunnels have been blown up, and the IDF noose is tightening. He’s a dead man walking. As for the braggart warrior, and leader of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, he has for many years been terrified of being killed by the IDF; he almost never appears in public, and has said that he moves every few days, saying that “even I don’t know where I will be sleeping tonight.” Haniyeh’s death reminds those leaders of Iran’s proxies that Israel is able to strike at the highest officials, and that now Israel’s gloves are off.
The killing of Fuad Shukr, Hezbollah’s second-in-command, after a airstrike on the apartment he was living in, smack in the middle of the Shi’a group’s stronghold in south Beirut, shows that no one, including Nasrallah himself, is safe from the IDF and Mossad.
The Iranian regime is widely unpopular, and every atrocity it commits — like the recent shooting of Arezou Badri, a 31-year-old woman, by Iran’s police on July 22 for allegedly violating mandatory hijab laws, leaving her a paraplegic — deepens the popular rage.
According to David Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and International Security, and the world’s foremost expert on Iran’s nuclear program, Tehran is now “within weeks” of being able to produce a nuclear bomb. Given this information, what does Washington intend to do about it? Will the Bidenites leave it up to Israel, now fighting a seven-front war, to stop Iran’s nuclear program before that breakout can occur? Or will it assume its responsibilities as the world’s greatest military power and do the job itself? What if a fleet of American planes were to drop bunker-buster bombs, which Israel does not now possess, on Fordow? There is nothing Iran could do to the United States in response.
The Haniyeh assassination is a window for the U.S. to seize. This is not a time for restraint or de-escalation. This is a moment to maximize pressure on Khamenei, increase support for the Iranian people and improve the odds that the Islamic Republic crumbles into the ash heap of history.
What would “maximizing pressure” look like? Putting back the sanctions on Iran that the Biden administration has so foolishly removed. Freezing the assets of all Iranians connected to the regime that have not yet been frozen. Doing the same with the assets of non-Iranians helping the regime. Moving nuclear-powered submarines into the Persian Gulf, positioned right off the Iranian coast, near Kharg Island, as a permanent threat. Publicizing, on social media and at every international forum including the UN, the violent attacks by the Iranian police on women who appear in public with “wrongly” tied hijabs or without hijabs. Stepping up anti-regime broadcasts funded by the American government. Supplying weapons to the Baluchi separatists in eastern Iran. Encouraging Azerbaijan to help separatist Azeris in Iran obtain weapons and money. That’s a start.
Walter Sieruk says
The “Islamic “Republic “of Iran” is indeed very weak because it’s based on the “holy book” of Islam the Koran which is a hoax.
There are some people who will ask a good question which is ‘How can we be sure that the Quran is really a hoax ?”
The answer to that question is clearly provided on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Quran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Quran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical.
Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Quran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.” Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Quran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Quran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.”
In addition in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet and Eethi Caner has shown that the Quran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’
Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Quran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax, therefore the underpinnings of the “Islamic Republic of Iran is does rest on the religious fraud that is the Quran .Therefore that Islamic regime of Iran is weak because it’s built on a foundation of sand.
JimJFox says
EVERY RELIGION IS A HOAX. People here don’t seem to understand that. Belief without evidence is widespread and foolish.
Mike says
Jim: well, that’s your opinion, and you’re entitled to it. I respectfully disagree with you, however.
There is stronger evidence for Christianity and Judaism than there is for Islam.
I recall someone who saw Michelangelo’s magnificent statue of King David during a visit to Italy, and wrote, “When you see it, you don’t doubt the existence of the Biblical hero at all. It’s stronger than any other piece of evidence.”
Walter Sieruk says
That brutal cruel oppressive c as well as murderous tyrannical Islamic regime of Iran is, indeed, very weak .
One of the reasons why this is based on the Quran with its Sharia
Therefore, it should be made known that the actual origin of Sharia had been revealed in a Time –Life book with the title MESOPOTAMIA: THE MIGHTY KINGS copyright 1995 ” For that future history book about the ancient pagan world of Mesopotamia informs the reader that “many Islamic laws resemble the Babylon and Assyrian forebears.” .page 150.
Therefore Sharia is of pagan origin and therefore has no value or worth ,therefore, that “Islamic Republic of Iran” is weak because the foundations of is the religious fraud that is the Quran and a ancient pagan law system that is Sharia.
cornelius says
HUGH: It has been nearly three weeks since Ismail Haniyeh, the leader of Hamas’ “political wing,” was killed in his room at a heavily-guarded guesthouse in Tehran, when a bomb planted two months before exploded.
I just read an article in which Iran continues to insist that Haniyeh was killed by a missile fired from within Iran. I tend to believe the version put forth by Hugh, but since Israel has yet to claim responsibility, I can’t help wondering where this version of events come from?
If it was indeed a planted bomb, the only conclusion would be that the Mossad has penetrated Iran’s intelligence service….not just in typical fashion, where intelligence information is extracted, but where an operative of Iranian intelligence was actually recruited to plant a bomb to kill a foreign “dignitary”.
This astonishing state of affairs would be reason enough for Iran to deny the planted-bomb theory. But I can’t help wondering….could the planted-bomb theory be an Israeli psy-ops operation to sow disarray and cannibalism in the Iranian intelligence service?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
The Trump administration, once it returns, should just blow up Kharg island. That’s one way nobody can buy oil from Iran, whether they want to or not. It’s a way of snapping back the sanctions w/o trying to alter everything that’s happened since 2021
OLD GUY says
The left Green Team should support that also.