There’s ambiguity to what the far-left Labour government may decide to label “terrorism” and treat accordingly under its two-tier system. How does anyone determine “extreme misogyny”? Laws already supposedly exist to protect human rights and punish crime and violations. The problem is that laws in Britain are and have been heavily applied to British non-Muslims, but not to illegals and Muslims. The red-green axis has been tight and operational for decades. Jihad Watch published in 2017 a story showing that Sharia courts in Britain were operating beyond the reach of British law and oppressing women. According to a Daily Mail report at the time, there were about 85 Sharia courts in the UK. And a Channel 4 documentary showed that a Sharia court handed down a sentence approving of honor killing, and another ordered a traumatized woman to return to her abusive rapist husband.
Sharia law, which regards women as inferiors, should certainly fall under the UK’s new “extreme misogyny” guidelines. But instead, the Labour government could be set to target traditional (“far-right”) men: “The Labour government intends to tackle violence against women and girls in the same way as ‘Islamist and far-Right extremism.'”
Jihad (stealth and violent) is terrorism, as it seeks to subvert citizens and countries by whatever means possible — from deceit to violence — but “far-right extremism” has not even been explained by the far-left Labour government, other than to refer to dissidents who are tired of being exploited by their traitorous governments, which condoned illegal open-door immigration.
“Extreme misogyny to be classed as terrorism under UK government’s new plans,” WION, August 18, 2024:
The UK government under its new plans to combat radicalisation will treat extreme misogyny as terrorism, according to multiple media reports.
The Labour government intends to tackle violence against women and girls in the same way as “Islamist and far-Right extremism”. Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, has ordered a review of the counter-terrorism strategy to address the issue as the current guidance might be too narrow in its outlook.
“For too long, governments have failed to address the rise in extremism, both online and on our streets, and we’ve seen the number of young people radicalised online grow. Hateful incitement of all kinds fractures and frays the very fabric of our communities and our democracy,” Cooper was quoted as saying by The Telegraph.
England Invaded says
Not misandry though. Our home secretary is a silly cunt.
Steve Brown says
Nothing silly about her, I’m afraid. She is an evil globo/communist tool, simply carrying out their bidding. Expect to see a great deal more of this sort of thing.
Phil Copson says
Allow me to translate the words of our “Dear Leader” Kim Jong Starmer :
“Anyone who refuses to accept that a man in a dress is a woman – will be accused of “extreme misogyny” and treated as a terrorist.”
FYI says
The British police have warned US citizens to be wary of what they post on the internet..or they’ll come and get you..
So I did think about it..
1}How many fingers am i holding up?
2}when I see a chief constable I always get “Freemason?”.Creepy crawlies come not here!
I also get ” Nonce?”..sorry,sorry!..I meant Ponce.I am dylexic.I cofuse p with n sometimes.Sorry about that.
3}Did the constables know that it is surely out of their jursdiction and did they ever hear of the 2nd amendment?Good look trying to enforce it..Of course they will try..
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Not just that, they are upset at X b’cos Elon Musk interviewed Donald Trump. One American interviewing another on an American platform, and those pompous, pretentious, sanctimonious busybodies send them a notice! Why don’t they just block X in the Ummah Kaliphate, if it so gets their knickers in a twist?
FYI says
The uk Norice{sorry Porice} should be more concerned about all those unvetted military aged men coming in but then I guess the lefties will accuse them of “islamophobia” or “racism”.
It is easier to blame the “far right”:: This deflects from their incompetence.
Anyway,how would the Uk police enforce such a silly diktat in the Usa?
{Knock knock knock}
“Open up.I order you,by Royal Command, by the authority of His Majesty King Charles III,how dare you have a contrary opinion!How dare you..”
“Marsha.The redcoats are here.Lock and load?”
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Normally, that should be enough to rebrand islam as terrorism. But would the British Reich dare do it?
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Also, in other news about the Ummah Kaliphate
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/08/19/emergency-measures-enacted-in-england-to-hold-rioters-as-prisons-stretched-thin
somehistory says
If they catch someone hating a woman….beating, kicking, etc….and treat it as they do other “islam-mist terrorism,” more doctors will be called upon to examine the perp for mental problems, and the victims will be seen as asking for it (as the young White rape victims were).
John Smith says
Keir Starmer has only been prime minister for 5 weeks yet there are already several petitions asking for him to step down. I’ve a horrible feeling (and I’m not the only one) that him and his party are going to be an absolute disaster for the UK.
somehistory says
John, you are closer to the situation than we here in the U.S., but from what has been posted, it seems the “disaster” has already begun.
Like the outer-band winds of a hurricane, signaling that the destruction is only hours away….the disaster there may only be days away.
John Smith says
Somehistory, yes the disaster has begun, and this Labour party is going to put the final nail into the UK’s coffin. I hope I’m wrong but I believe the damage this administration is going to do in the next 4 or 5 years will be irreparable.
somehistory says
John, it appears you are right, and it means a lot of hurt for so many people.
Secret Squirrel says
If some “American” was doing the bidding of a foreign entity to infringe upon my 1st Amendment rights, no real courtroom in the country would be able to convict me.
I am fighting a traitor and seditious criminal organization (US Government) defending my sovereign rights.
I say, “Let them come. Bring trash bags.”
rick says
Isn’t Islam based on “extreme misogyny”? 50% of every Muslim country has less rights, dress codes that are not made for the male population, to say nothing of men legally able to have 4 wives but women can only have one husband. Women have less inheritance rights than do men. In Saudi Arabia, even driving a car was a restricted right for a woman ( needed a licensed male to be present in the car with her). The list of lesser rights take pages. If this isn’t misogyny at the extreme, than what is?
David M says
I was thinking the same thing, They now have to ban Islam, which treats women as third class citizens. Let the legal battles begin if we can find a good lawyer.
Felix says
Hear, hear! One comment, however: ‘(…) dress codes that are not made for the male population (…). That’s not correct. There definitely is a dress code for mohamedan men. They are not allowed to wear shorts, whatever the temperature.
somehistory says
They may not be “allowed to wear shorts,” but some do. I’ve seen them with my own eyes at a Florida park. The woman and the little girl in their head to toe garbage bags of slavery, and the males…adult and little boy….in shorts and skimpy shirts.
James Lincoln says
Does the UK Labor government see any misogyny in the koran – and the other islamic source texts?
somehistory says
they don’t ‘see it,’ James, when the male beats his wife to death because she wanted to work, not wear the suffocating clothing or she wanted a divorce.
It’s just that the scum ‘lost it’ and didn’t know it was not wrong since his ‘culture’ said he could do it.
James Lincoln says
Understand, somehistory.