Sharia trumps women’s rights again for this fake feminist. My latest in FrontPage:
The facts at hand presumably speak for themselves, but a trifle more vulgarly, I suspect, than facts even usually do. Asmi Fathelbab, a former employee of the Arab American Association in New York when feminist heroine Linda Sarsour was its executive director, has accused Sarsour of dismissing her claims of sexual assault and harassment, and following through on threats to destroy Fathelbab’s attempts to get a job if she didn’t retract the charges.
Sarsour, says Fathelbab, “oversaw an environment unsafe and abusive to women. Women who put [Sarsour] on a pedestal for women’s rights and empowerment deserve to know how she really treats us.” Fathelbab charges Majed Seif, a Muslim who lived in the building that also housed the Arab American Association’s offices, “would sneak up on me during times when no one was around, he would touch me, you could hear me scream at the top of my lungs. He would pin me against the wall and rub his crotch on me. It was disgusting. I ran the youth program in the building and with that comes bending down and talking to small children. You have no idea what it was like to stand up and feel that behind you. I couldn’t scream because I didn’t want to scare the child in front of me. It left me shaking.”
But Sarsour had no interest in, or patience for, Fathelbab’s allegations. “She called me a liar because ‘Something like this didn’t happen to women who looked like me. How dare I interrupt her TV news interview in the other room with my ‘lies.’…She told me he had the right to sue me for false claims…. She told me I’d never work in NYC ever again for as long as she lived. She’s kept her word. She had me fired from other jobs when she found out where I worked. She has kept me from obtaining any sort of steady employment for almost a decade.”
Fathelbab got no more sympathetic a hearing from the president of the Arab American Association’s board of directors, Ahmed Jaber. “Jaber told me my stalker was a ‘God-fearing man’ who was ‘always at the Mosque,’ so he wouldn’t do something like that. He wanted to make it loud and clear this guy was a good Muslim and I was a bad Muslim for ‘complaining.’”
Another individual who was familiar with Sarsour, Fathelbab, Seif and the entire situation said: “It’s always going to be the woman’s fault over there. And Sarsour was there to protect the men. She’s not for other women. The only women she’s for is for herself.” Another added: “Sarsour is only a feminist outwardly. Her interactions toward women in that building were atrocious. She would protect the patriarchy and in return they would promote her.”
Asmi Fathelbab’s accusations at the Arab American Association played out in full accord with Sharia. In cases of sexual misbehavior (zina), only men can testify. Women can’t testify at all, even in cases in which they were involved, and four male witnesses are required (Reliance of the Traveller, o24.9). These witnesses must have seen the act itself. Consequently, it is very difficult to convict men of zina. As long as they deny the charge and there aren’t four witnesses, they will get off scot-free, because the woman’s testimony is inadmissible. Even worse, if a woman accuses a man, she may end up incriminating herself.
And so it was with Asmi Fathelbab. Now that she has come forward, expect Sarsour to react yet again in accord with the tried-and-true Islamic supremacist practice of claiming that Fathelbab is motivated by “hatred,” and that the whole thing is another “Islamophobic,” “racist” conspiracy designed to bring down a proud, hijab-wearing “Palestinian” Muslima.
And feminists will almost certainly fall for it again, hook, line and sinker. That Linda Sarsour is lionized as a feminist heroine, instead of identified as the promoter and enabler of Sharia oppression of women that she is, is an indication of how entranced by fantasy our public discourse has become.
mortimer says
It is well known to Muslim scholars that K.9.29 is about humiliating the kafirs by seizing the jizzya from them, thereby forcing them to acknowledge the political supremacy of Muslims as their overlords. Genocidal rape has important roles in jihad: 1) to demoralize the kafirs by showing them their helplessness 2) to create more Muslims and numerically increase Islamic supremacy.
Sufi scholar Ahmad Sirhindi (1564-1624) wrote:
“The honour of Islam lies in INSULTING kufr and kafirs. One who respects the kafirs dishonours the Muslims… The real purpose of levying jiziya on them is to HUMILIATE them to such an extent that they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain TERRIFIED and TREMBLING. It is intended to hold them under CONTEMPT and to uphold the honour and might of Islam.”
mgoldberg says
the 18th century Moroccan Sufi “master” Ibn Ajibah from his Koranic commentary. Describing unabashedly the purpose of the humiliating Koranic poll tax [6] (as per Koran 9:29 [6]) of submission for non-Muslims brought under Islamic hegemony by jihad, Ibn Ajibah makes clear the ultimate goal of its imposition was to achieve what he called the death of the “soul”, through the dhimmi’s execution of their own humanity:
[The dhimmi] is commanded to put his soul, good fortune and desires to death. Above all he should kill the love of life, leadership and honor. [The dhimmi] is to invert the longings of his soul, he is to load it down more heavily than it can bear until it is completely submissive. Thereafter nothing will be unbearable for him. He will be indifferent to subjugation or might. Poverty and wealth will be the same to him; praise and insult will be the same; preventing and yielding will be the same; lost and found will be the same. Then, when all things are the same, it [the soul] will be submissive and yield willingly what it should give. [Tafsir ibn ‘Ajibah. Commentary on Q9:29. Ahmad ibn Muhammad Ibn ‘Ajibah]
gravenimage says
Exactly, mgoldberg.
mgoldberg says
And when people try to soft peddle the ‘mystical’ version of Islam, the sufi’s, as some benign, wholesome, ethereal version of Islam, show them this quote. Let them wrap their brains around the theologic idea of total brainwashing, and breaking the emotional, intellectual, and spiritual backs of non muslims, as this ‘sufi master’ prclaims here as the meaning of the Jizya.
mortimer says
Sarsour is the ultimate example of the Islamic Stockholm syndrome. She takes the side of the perpetrators so they will promote and protect her from similar ill treatment. As soon as she stops complying with the patriarchy, Sarsour will be similarly ill-treated.
Terry Gain says
Sarsour is an ugly Sharia supporting woman who has obviously been bought. She would likely claim that houris are raisins.
Jaladhi says
Wow, what is this nonsense -“a good Muslims can’t commit sexual assault”! Au contraire a good Muslims is ordered by Quran to rape women, and specially the non-Muslim women!! The usual Muslim lies and deceit in dealing with kafirs!
Jayell says
Well, there certainly is one way to ensure that a (male) muslim, ‘good’ or ‘not so good’, cannot succeed in committing a sexual assault, and that involve a straightforward genital amputation procedure with the aid of a Stanley knife or similar, obtainable from any good hardware store. No medical training would be necessary since only rudimentary anatomical knowledge is required, and I don’t think one need bother with anaesthetics since the subject of the procedure would probably receive appropriate treatment from a paramedic (unfortunately free in the UK, insurance required in the USA, I believe?). If one cannot obtain a suitably sharp instrument, or if one does not like the sight of excessive blood, I believe that a similar outcome can be achieved using a method developed in the farming industry and by amateur veterinary practitioners, involving the use of two bricks around the same region of the male anatomy. This need not require any capital outlay, since the equipment necessary for this procedure could be obtained free of charge from a building site. The only drawback with these two solutions to the current Islamic problem in question is that they are not as yet legally permissible, and the defence that they represent perfectly reasonable preventive measures to obviate a greater social problem allegedly presented by our good fellow-citizens of an Islamic persuasion might not prove successful in court, particularly if an upstanding American citizen such the excellent Ms Sarsour can convince a jury that this alleged social problem does not in fact exist. However, perhaps Mr. Trump, in his infinitely greater wisdom, might consider suitable legislation on this matter.
Now, regarding the redoubtable Ms Sarsour………
PRCS says
The method we used–down on the farm: some very strong rubber bands made for that purpose.
As an adult, I believe it is cruel—-when performed on livestock.
Bodega says
I thought she was supposed to be deported? What happened to that? I really, really, really wanted her gone permanently. She is a perfect representative of Sharia.
PRCS says
Born in Brooklyn, New York City.
mike9a says
Where all that hate coming form then? Parents? Feminism? My, Myself & I, infected from internet? Husband? Where the hate evident and occupied by this woman is coming from?
gravenimage says
Mike, it’s coming from Islam.
mortimer says
mike9a … Please read about Al Walaa wal Baraa (Islam’s official hate doctrine which is obligatory.)
http://kanoonline.com/smf/index.php?topic=1992.0 “Al Walaa Wal Baraa’ is one of the Usul ud Deen. The Deen has three usul: 1- AL TAWHEED, 2- AL WALAA WAL BARAA, 3- AL JIHAD & AL HIJRAH; See also: http://www.geocities.ws/saeefulhaq/Aqeedah/AlWalaaWalBaraa.htm
Westman says
Don’t you suspect that if she wore one of those feminist V-hats there would be a piece missing?
Abdellah Choukri Ex Muslim says
hate this woman and her never stopping da’wa…
jewdog says
It’s all good, Linda. We know that you’re a victim of those bigoted Islamophobes. It’s probably a Zionist conspiracy too.
David Ramseur says
Muslims are taught to conceal sin. Revealing sin is forbidden. Anything that puts Islam in a bad light is forbidden. Questioning is forbidden. A Muslim is allowed to do literally anything as long as it benefits Islam.
gravenimage says
Very true. In fact, revealing sin if it harms Islam is itself considered a sin.
Pious Muslims do not care who suffers.
Eur says
Taharrus Linda, remember Taharrus.
. That macho game that consists of raping a girl who goes down the street without a veil. That is one of the ways that Muslims have to make women in their society have to be covered. The Islamic religion with its social model causes these behaviors
Charles says
Izlamic “religion” spewed forth directly from the lips of SATAN!
It takes no genius to know it’s true “Source” or “Goals”.
?
Charles says
Sarsour is an imbecile!
The very sight of her MAKES ME VOMIT!
Why she still has a platform in the media is a mystery!
Vile evil like this is usually surpressed way before it has reached a National level.
WHAT HAS GONE WRONG????
?
mortimer says
Islam is amoral because Allah is amoral. However, to their credit, most Muslims try to live by the Golden Rule even though it is not in Islam.
gravenimage says
Mortimer wrote:
Islam is amoral because Allah is amoral.
……………………….
Mortimer, Islam is not amoral–it is profoundly *immoral*, which is much, much worse.
More:
However, to their credit, most Muslims try to live by the Golden Rule even though it is not in Islam.
……………………….
Why would they do that? The Golden Rule is completely alien to Islam. And what possible evidence could you supply that this is so?
The truth is that even Muslims who are not raping and waging violent Jihad at the moment are largely exploiting the Infidels and each other whenever they can–we see this everyday.
DBM echo says
Only visual or audio proof can overturn this. And even then it’s a hill to climb.
Robert_k says
Since she wears a Hijab, Linda Sarsour is a woman of color. So to criticize her would be Islamophobic and racist.
Eur says
That is another way of doing dawah the Muslims. They try to associate Christianity with the religion of the upper and white classes and Islam as the religion of the poor and oppressed. It is no secret or anything new that Muslims try to capture black people.
gravenimage says
She has actually described herself as a “woman of color”when wearing a Hijab–but just a “white girl” without it.
Troybeam says
Needs to be gagged, She spreads non truths about Islam and is a danger to America, have an idea: send her into the Middle east, say Pakistan, Then theres Sweden
( Muslim migrants) and South Africa and see if good Muslim men do not rape her in a heart beat.
john spielman says
muslims cannot commit ‘sexual assault” because in islam ‘sexual assault” does not exist and what we, non muslims, consider is sexual assault is simply normal sanctified ( made holy by muhammed )behavior
gravenimage says
Spot on, John.
TKF says
Linda is a self inflating Islamist tool for Islamist oppression. I’ll pop a bottle of Dom when she is kicked out of the Left Wing Nutcase Club.
gravenimage says
I hope she is–I hope Leftists realize she is no feminist.
JawsV says
The “Cockroach” (Sarsour means cockroach in Arabic) is a sociopath.
Learning islam says
those muslims act like wearing the burka and loose robes proves moral conduct . morality cannot be guaranteed by the clothes you wear or female genital mutilation . high moral standards exists within the individual . it is respect for yourself , your mind and your body . muslims pretend they are so much better , but that is not true . they have prostitution , little boys and girls for sex objects , even animals . there is nothing to admire there . they seek to destroy all other religions . no good here
+Hamid Shahbaz Thighing: Fatwa Number 41409 dated 7-5-1421 or August 8, 2000 The permanent committee for scientific research and religious sanctions [in Saudi Arabia] are: • Abdel Aziz ben Abdullah ben Mohammed Aal Sheikh, Chairman • Bakr ben Abdullah Abu Zeid, Member • Saleh ben Fozan Al Fozan, Member Praise The permanent committee for scientific research and religious sanctions [in Saudi Arabia] has looked onto the request of Abu Abdallah Mohammed Al Shamry which was sent to the committee from the general secretariat of the Committee of Higher Scholars number 1809 date 3/5/1421.
The requester asked the following: Lately, it has spread on a large scale, especially in weddings, the habit of thighing little boys; what is the ruling of the Quran on this? Especially, that Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) has thighed Ayesha (may Allah be pleased with her).
The committee, after studying the request, has ruled the following:
As for the thighing of the messenger of Allah to his fiancée Ayesha, she was six years old and he could not engage in sexual intercourse with her because of her young age, therefore he used to place his penis between her thighs and rub it lightly. In addition, the messenger of Allah had full control of his penis in contrary to the believers. Therefore, it is permitted to practice thighing,
whether in weddings, or at homes, or schools, due to its benefits. And may Allah curse the infidels who highlight these practices to our countries. – Faith Freedom, Sept. 23, 2011. That Self Proclaimed Rasool of Allah, Mohamed bin Abdullah already has 11 other wives and dozens of Sex Slaves to enjoy himself Sexually but he still Thigh 6 year old Aiesha. This certainly proves that Mohamed is a Paedophile, Sex Maniac and a False Prophet… Turn to Jesus the Way, the Truth and the Life… I rather follow Jesus, He has risen from the grave but Mohamed lies dead in his grave… Mohamed says it’s OK to masturbate on little girls.
Karen says
“Therefore, it is permitted to practice thighing,
whether in weddings, or at homes, or schools, due to its benefits. And may Allah curse the infidels who highlight these practices to our countries.”
Heh heh heh, yes, curses upon the truth seekers and truth speakers. The truth is certainly painful and embarrassing, if you want to keep your dirty crimes secret.
gravenimage says
Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Linda Sarsour: A “Good Muslim” Can’t Commit Sexual Assault
……………………….
Because the victims are either “filthy Infidels” or “bad” Muslim women.
More:
Sarsour, says Fathelbab, “oversaw an environment unsafe and abusive to women. Women who put [Sarsour] on a pedestal for women’s rights and empowerment deserve to know how she really treats us.”
……………………….
I hope every fool who lauded Sarsour as a “feminist” learns about this.
Learning islam says
72 Virgins(Houris): 2 earthly wifes , 28 Boys and 80,000 servants, golden bed
All these pervert Qur’anic verses are the Creation of the pervert mind of the prophet of Islam. A MAN IS AS HE THINKS.Period
It seems then that this promise of sensual happiness and sexual bliss in paradise, not only is the motivator for the Islamic terrorists but it may even be a motivator for our secular evolutionists to join the rank of Islam.
UGLIEST: (beside 65:4 for little girls), ‘… will serve, (devoted) to them, young male servants (handsome) as Pearls well-guarded.’ http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=52&verse=24
Muslims are motivated to terrorism because the Quran tells them that fighting non-believers is a duty of every Muslim and the only way to be certain of going to heaven to enjoy untold sensual pleasures is to die fighting in the cause of Allah.
If they can make it to heaven, one of the rewards all Muslims are promised is 72 virgins. The number of virgins is not specified in Quran, it comes from a quotation of Muhammad recorded in one of the lesser known Hadith. (“Hadith” is an Arabic word meaning traditions. After Muhammad’s death, several collections of his deeds and sayings were assembled. These collections are called Hadith and form the second most authoritative document is Islam, right after the Quran.)
VIRGINS (Houris):
Mohammed knew that sex would sell very well among the group of his followers who were motivated to fight battles by the promise of sex slaves and booty. By constantly emphasizing to his followers that they would get untouched virgins in Paradise, Mohammed is clearly expressing his “high” opinion of the institution of marriage and his fairness to women. Once the followers go to heaven, they can conveniently ditch their wives for the fresher and more pleasurable sexual encounters with ‘Houris’ (beautiful virgins). The poor wives who gave up their virginity for the pleasure of their husbands do not get anything. But wait, Allah is all merciful! He gives the wives the rare honour of watching their husbands deflower those 72 Houris (virgins) and 28 young pre-pubescent boys.
The specific Hadith in which the number of virgins is specified is Hadith Al-Tirmidhi in the Book of Sunah (volume IV, chapters on The Features of Paradise as described by the Messenger of Allah, chapter 21, About the Smallest Reward for the People of Paradise. The same hadith is also quoted by Ibn Kathir in his Quranic commentary (Tafsir) of Surah Al-Rahman:
“The Prophet Muhammad was heard saying: ‘The smallest reward for the people of paradise is an abode where there are 80,000 servants and 72 wives, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine, and ruby, as wide as the distance from Al-Jabiyah [a Damascus suburb] to Sana’a [Yemen].”
(QURAN 37:40-4 : “In the Gardens of Paradise, Facing one another on thrones, Round them will be passed a cup of pure wine; White, delicious to the drinkers, Neither they will have any kind of hurt, abdominal pain, headache, or sin, nor will they suffer intoxication from it. And with them will be chaste females, restraining their glances, with wide and beautiful eyes.”
(QURAN 44:51-55): “Verily! The righteous will be in Paradise. Among Gardens and Springs; Dressed in fine silk and also in thick silk, facing each other, and We shall marry them to Houris with wide, lovely eyes.”
(QURAN 52: 17-20): “Verily, for those who fear Allah there will be Gardens in Paradise, filled with Delight. Enjoying in that which their Lord has bestowed on them, and the fact that their Lord saved them from the torment of the blazing Fire. The Lord will say: ‘Eat and drink with happiness because of what you used to do’. They will recline with ease on thrones arranged in ranks. And We shall marry them to Houris with wide lovely eyes.”
(QURAN 55:54-59): “Reclining upon the couches lined with silk brocade, and the fruits of the Gardens will be near at hand. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? Wherein will be those houris, restraining their glances upon their husbands, whom no man or jinn has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse before. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? In beauty they are like rubies and coral. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny?”
(QURAN 55:70-77): “Therein gardens will be fair wives good and beautiful; Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? Houris restrained in pavilions; Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? Whom no man has opened their hymens with sexual intercourse before. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny? Reclining on green cushions and rich beautiful mattresses. Then which of the Blessings of your Lord will you deny?”
(QURAN 56:37-40): “…We created the houris and made them virgins, loving companions for those on the right hand….”
(QURAN 78:31-34): “As for the righteous, they shall surely triumph. Theirs shall be gardens and vineyards, and high-bosomed virgins for companions: a truly overflowing cup.”
Two points need to be noted. First, there is no mention anywhere in the Quran of the actual number of virgins available in paradise, and second, the dark-eyed damsels are available for all Muslims, not just martyrs. It is in the Islamic Traditions that we find the 72 virgins in heaven specified: in a Hadith (Islamic Tradition) collected by Al-Tirmidhi (died 892 AD) in the Book of Sunan (volume IV, chapters on The Features of Paradise as described by the Messenger of Allah [Prophet Muhammad], chapter 21, About the Smallest Reward for the People of Paradise, (Hadith 2687). The same hadith is also quoted by Ibn Kathir (died 1373 CE ) in his Quranic commentary (Tafsir) of Surah Al-Rahman (55), verse 72: “The Prophet Muhammad was heard saying: ‘The smallest reward for the people of paradise is an abode where there are 80,000 servants and 72 wives, over which stands a dome decorated with pearls, aquamarine, and ruby, as wide as the distance from Al-Jabiyyah [a Damascus suburb] to Sana’a [Yemen]’.”
An Hamas spokesman correctly uses the word martyr (shahid) and not suicide bomber, since those who blow themselves up almost daily in Israel and those who died on September 11 were dying in the noblest of all causes, Jihad, which is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Quran and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined for the purpose of advancing Islam. While suicide is forbidden, martyrdom is everywhere praised, welcomed, and urged: “By the Being in Whose Hand is my life, I love that I should be killed in the way of Allah; then I should be brought back to life and be killed again in His way…”; “The Prophet said, ‘Nobody who enters Paradise will ever like to return to this world even if he were offered everything, except the martyr who will desire to return to this world and be killed 10 times for the sake of the great honour that has been bestowed upon him’.” [Sahih Muslim, chapters 781, 782, The Merit of Jihad and the Merit of Martyrdom.]
Eternal erection and virginity
Modern apologists of Islam try to downplay the evident materialism and sexual implications of such descriptions, but, as the Encyclopaedia of Islam says, even orthodox Muslim theologians such as al Ghazali (died 1111 AD) and Al-Ash’ari (died 935 AD) have “admitted sensual pleasures into paradise”. The sensual pleasures are graphically elaborated by Al-Suyuti (died 1505 AD), Quranic commentator and polymath. He wrote: “Each time we sleep with a houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal; the sensation that you feel each time you make love is utterly delicious and out of this world and were you to experience it in this world you would faint. Each chosen one [ie Muslim] will marry seventy [sic] houris, besides the women he married on earth, and all will have appetising vaginas.”
simpleton1 says
This partly explains why muslim families want to bring up their children to sacrifice themselves and believe in being a shaheed. [martyr]
And their familial loss on earth is assuaged believing in that he will be having a good time in paradise.
gravenimage says
Yes–this is a big part of it. The only ways a Muslim can be sure of getting to paradise is by either dying while murdering innocent people in Jihad, or else by having a close family member do so.
Learning islam says
28 BOYS.
Homosexuality was and is widely practised in Islamic countries. To please the homosexuals among his followers he promised them pre-pubescent boys in Paradise. So after committing plunder, loot, rape and murder in this life, the followers of Islam get “rewarded” by untouched virginal youths who are fresh like pearls.
Sodomy is quite common in the Muslim countries because they keep their women locked up indoors .Then there is also shortage of females when they marry more than one and up to four .Hence ,Muslim men have no choice and it is also a status symbol to have a boy for sex beside the number of wives. They believe: NO JOY WITHOUT A BOY which to them is a sweet dish after the main course .Thanks to the holy prophet who made Islam so lovely and delightful in this world and the next.
In Afghanistan and elsewhere in the Islamic world, this kind of behavior is broadly tolerated. Women are so devalued, men look to other men and boys for sexual pleasure. Also, the Qur’an promises not just virgins to the blessed, but boys like “scattered pearls”:
(QURAN 52:24): “And there will go round boy-servants of theirs, to serve them as if they were preserved pearls.”
(QURAN 56:17): “They will be served by immortal boys.”
Qur’an 56:11-18 : “Those are the ones brought near in the Gardens of Pleasure, a company of the former peoples and a few of the later peoples, on thrones woven, reclining on them, facing each other. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal with vessels, pitchers and a cup from a flowing spring.”
(QURAN 76:19): “And round about them will (serve) boys of everlasting youth. If you see them, you would think them scattered pearls.”
Qur’an 76:17-20 : “And they will be given to drink a cup whose mixture is of ginger, a fountain within Paradise named Salsabeel. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them scattered pearls. And when you look there, you will see pleasure and great dominion.”
It is common in Arabic poetry to glorify homosexuality, take their famous poet Abu Nuwas:
O the joy of sodomy!
So now be sodomites, you Arabs.
Turn not away from it–
therein is wondrous pleasure.
Take some coy lad with kiss-curls
twisting on his temple
and ride as he stands like some gazelle
standing to her mate.
A lad whom all can see girt with sword
and belt not like your whore who has
to go veiled.
Make for smooth-faced boys and do your
very best to mount them, for women are
the mounts of the devils
An “old Arab proverb” ……..
“For sex, a woman.”
“For pleasure, a young boy.”
“For ecstasy, a melon.”
…… or a passing donkey?
The koran endorses every sin and that is their form of ‘holiness’ and ‘entitlement’. the Koran elevates sin and sinners above the righteous because it’s the worship of Satan. Their idea of heaven is the carnal pit of hell.
A salaf’s vow to avenge Uthman’s murder through sodomy
We read in al-Muhadharat, volume 3 page 253 chapter 15:
“ A drunk man was crying and said:”If only I have to apprehend a killer of Uthman”.A homosesual asked:”what would you do?” He replied;I would sodomisehim”, The homosexual then said: “I killed Uthman”, The homosexual said from underneath; “ if the executors of Uthman are going to avenge the killing of the Uthman in such a manner then I killed Uthman every day”
Sick.There is no way in hell that these savages can assimilate to western culture. I wish there would be a PERMANENT BAN on anyone who lives by the Quran and the teachings of Mohamed. Very sick society and a disgrace to humankind. Actually it’s a disgrace to the animal kingdom as we
God you have to wonder at a religion that is JUST SO sexually obsessed on every level, to every degree.
How anyone can read the Quran, the Hadith – any of the Islamic ‘literature’ and convince themselves that this religion is heaven sent, is beyond me?
Raping little boys. Raping women and little girls. Eternal sex slaves and eternal virgins. Eternal servitude, for others to worship and prostrate themselves at your hairy feet, while you lounge back on thrones, guzzling milk and honey and have your tiny little penis played with all day every day.
What kind of Heaven is that? What kind of filthy pig aspires to this? What kind of unutterably stupid man or woman is plain IDIOTIC enough to believe in this waffle?
It just cannot be more obvious that Mohammed created this crapfest of a religion so he could gain power, wealth and sex. Looooooots of sex. And in order to get others to do his bidding – and die fighting for him – he had to promise them the most outlandishly exciting things that he knew would please their innermost desires.
Its so obvious that its embarrassing to realize that there are 1.6 billion dipshits on this planet today, who actually call themselves Muslim. They’re all to a one, not safe to operate a potato peeler unsupervised. (Sarah)
Homosexuality is a sad and regrettable fact of life, but it doesn’t call for verbal abuse or attacks on gays in public places and certainly not for the throwing off from tall buildings or similar cruelties
Tjhawk says
It’s well known that only white people can be racist, oppress others, and rape. I hear it all the time.
PRCS says
You, too?
DogOnPorch says
Every teenage boy’s dream-girl…not.
Roger says
You were never were an ‘ordinary’ white girl, because if you were you would have at least cultivated some form of intelligence in that skull of yours…In fact, when that ugly thing sitting on your shoulders comes to a festering head, you really should consider having it lanced.
nicholas tesdorf says
In Arabic “Sarsour” ( صرصور ) means “Cockroach”.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Yes, sarsour is right. A good Muslim cannot engage in such rascality like sexual assault unlike pious filthy christian priests having anus sex and vaginal sex with kids and he is still a good Christian religious leader. No wonder, the mithraist Bible is a book of pornography where parents can dip their fingers into vaginas of their daughters to prepare them for free sex.
Wellington says
You’ve stumbled into the truth, Ibrahim. Here’s why: When a “good” Muslim male engages in so many kinds of sexual activity, whether it be with one of his wives (N.B, polygamy is an absolute guarantee women cannot be equal to men in this world but then that’s exactly what Islam wants) or the rape of a kafir who does not cover herself (a la Sura 33:59), there is no possibility of wrongdoing per Muslimthink. However, when a Catholic priest engages in any kind of sex they are violating the tenets of their creed and are indeed hypocrites if not heinous.
All rather like Islam v. Christianity in general. When Muslims engage in what essentially the rest of mankind thinks objectionable, such as waging war upon those who don’t think like a Mo follower, it is still good per Muslimthink. When Christians and so many others engage in what is generally considered wrongdoing, they are violating the tenets of their faith or mores of their society. The difference would be deuce difficult to be greater.
You see, being Muslim is like living in Bizarro World. Not being Muslim is like living in the real world. You don’t get this. If you did, you’d cease being a Muslim, but of course that could be dangerous in its own right because ceasing being a Muslim is itself worthy of death, even your warped prophet said so (Bukhari Hadith 9.84.57}. But I digress.
PRCS says
And he’d have to give up all those benefits.
Paddy says
there are quite a few who seem to accept these accusstions against the Catholic priesthood and many more evil people who make the accusations as if all priests were guilty and the whole religion evil.
I have no love for the Cat.Church but I do have a love for the facts ; and those who know the facts are the insurance people who must pay out hard cash on abuse claims.Said insurance companies say all 3 major religions have roughly the same % of claims and this % is about 3% .Compare with Islamic madrasses,etc and % of homeless boy abusers among Pakistan’s truck and bus drivers which is 90%.
No Fear says
Your “prophet” encouraged rape of non muslims. Hadith Abu Dawud 2150 tells the story. Have u even read it? Mohammed is a criminal and a killer.
gravenimage says
The appalling Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Yes, sarsour is right. A good Muslim cannot engage in such rascality like sexual assault unlike pious filthy christian priests having anus sex and vaginal sex with kids and he is still a good Christian religious leader. No wonder, the mithraist Bible is a book of pornography where parents can dip their fingers into vaginas of their daughters to prepare them for free sex.
………………………..
Of course, there is nothing like this the in the Bible. Ibrahim itace muhammed has been called on this many times before; but he cannot conceive of the need to provide proof for his assertions.
And in the West, sexual misconduct is *illegal*. Rape and sexual assault are prosecuted here.
As for being a good Muslim, Ibrahim itace muhammed has himself affirmed that Muslims can rape Infidel women and use the as sex slaves.
AleX says
Ibrahim itace mohomot;
You make imbecilic remarks.
Your level of intelligence is telling of the gross intellectual incompetence an inbred musselman displays.
Your function on this planet serves no purpose other than that of a parasite enabling more antibodies.
Your mind is not functional, you have no morality nor sense of measure.
Shame on you and on your kind.
Z says
She also think she’s a ‘woman of color’ I wouldn’t listen to her even if she said the earth was round
Karen says
My sympathy to Ms. Fathelbab and the injustice she has suffered at the hands of Sarsour for a decade now. I hope that some employer sees this article and reaches out to her with a good employment opportunity.
Ms. Fathelbab’s story is the best argument I can think of against the use of Sharia law in any context whatsoever, legally binding or not, anywhere in the West. Women will clearly not be given a fair shake. A few will be given some status, like Sarsour, since they act as Sharia enforcers.
Ren says
Linda Sarsour: A “Good Muslim” Can’t Commit Sexual Assault.
Linda Sarsour: “If I think I am black, I am black”.
No Fear says
Mohammed was always at the mosque and he loved sexual assault. He encouraged his soldiers to do it:
The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)
Raping the wives of enemy (non muslim) soldiers ……. how charming of Mohammed to encourage that.
CRUSADER says
Sarsour ACTUALLY means “bug” / “roach” !
Tremendously appropriate name for …her (?)
Someone rid us of this bug!!!
“RAID!!!!”
FYI says
“A good muslim can’t commit sexual assault”
What about the “prophet” muhammed and rape?
Abu Dawud 2150
sahih muslim 3433
sahih muslim 4345
You see,according to islamic teachings mo and his band of savages
had a tendency… to rape women.
Does linda sarsour not know that muhammed{sbuh} was a fan of sexual assault?
.
I guess that means he was not a “good muslim”…
gravenimage says
Nope–it just means that that Muslims don’t consider rape of “filthy Infidels” to be sexual assault.
Charles says
Sarsour is an ABOMINATION!
An actual agent of the truely Satanic forces of izlam! The woman refuses to speak the truth!
And, unlike allah (SATAN!) The one true GOD (YHWH) HATES LIARS!
She, like so many others, will end up in HELL, with her putrid, pagan “god”!
?
Madeleine says
I live in the neighborhood. I do not know the accuser, Asmi, but of course, I know of Sansour. I think an attorney might get involved now to support the accuser to find out through discovery what is what.
Ade Fegan says
a “good” muslim has to !
Mitch says
Asmi Fathelbab’s accusers are right to call her a “bad” Muslim. Linda Sarsour and Majed Seif are “good” Muslims. Hopefully Fathelbab figures that out.
Madeleine says
Okay. Asmi states that an NYPD detective came to speak with her. That record and conversation is key. What Sarsour gave to the Press is not a formal record. How could it be, in my opinion.
Why aren’t Sarsour and the man accused seeking a lawsuit for libel? Perhaps because they have no case?
Just asking.