Demanding the annulment of sham agreements in a false peace process that was never anything but a means to wrest concessions from Israel and hasten its eventual destruction. The guiding principle of the “Palestinians” has always been “drive them out from where they drove you out” (Qur’an 2:191); negotiated settlements were always just a way to fool the Infidels into complacency, as well as to chip away at Israel’s strength and resolve.
“EXCLUSIVE – PLO Official: We Will Demand Cancelation of the Oslo Accords,” by Ali Waked, Breitbart, January 6, 2018:
TEL AVIV — The Palestinian Central Committee will convene in the middle of this month to discuss the formation of a Palestinian strategy in response to the historic decision by President Donald Trump to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Jamil Mizher, a politburo member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, the second-largest group in the PLO after Fatah, told Breitbart Jerusalem that during the meeting of the Central Committee, his organization will demand “the annulment of the Oslo Accords, a declaration to this effect and a declaration that the Palestinians are no longer bound by all the agreements, especially security cooperation and economic agreements.”
The Palestinian Central Committee is an institution within the PLO that connects the Palestinian National Council, which effectively acts as the Palestinian parliament with representatives from all over the world, and the PLO’s Executive Committee, which acts as the government of the Palestinian people and includes leaders from various factions.
According to Mizher, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine is trying to organize the committee meeting in Beirut or Cairo and not Ramallah in order to allow leaders and representatives of the terrorist groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad to participate.
“We really want the leaders of Hamas and Islamic Jihad and representatives of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, who can’t come to the West Bank, to be able to participate in the meeting because of the sensitivity and importance of the matter,” said Mizher.
He added that his group has taken action “so that all the organizations will be committed to the demand to cancel the agreements signed with the occupation, especially the Oslo Accords and all their clauses. As far as we’re concerned, in action and reality, this agreement is over and it no longer has any place in light of recent developments, especially Trump’s declaration regarding Jerusalem.”
“The occupation” is a derogatory and misleading reference to Israel. Palestinian factions refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist.
The alternative to the Oslo agreements, said Mizher, “is the obligation of all the Palestinian factions to unit around a national campaign for liberation and the removal of the occupation. There are no other options before the Palestinians besides coping with and confronting the Israeli-American project. We will need to handle them with all our power.”…
elee says
Any truce with Muslims lasts only until it is to their advantage to break it. When will the west do its homework? It’s not like this is hidden or secret knowledge.
Bodega says
Let’s call them Gazians…no more accessions to Palestinians as they don’t exist.
CRUSADER says
Well, that should be for anyone — seeking best advantage.
But yes, the Muslims seem to figure how to cheat and then to break treaties. Devious and Duplicitous and Deceptive as they are brought up to be. Can’t fully trust a Muslim, if one is a non-Muslim. So,the old 80-20 rule…..best to watch out for that 20% percent creeping up to the 80%….
They didn’t match up to nor meet up to the Accords all that much anyway,
except in ways to complain about things which they themselves were in breech of.
Like the pointing finger of fault with the hand pointing more backwards at greater self fault….
gravenimage says
This has been the pattern with Muslims ever since the “Prophet” violated the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah as soon as it was convenient for him to do so.
Westman says
“is the obligation of all the Palestinian factions to unit around a national campaign for liberation and the removal of the occupation. There are no other options before the Palestinians besides coping with and confronting the Israeli-American project. We will need to handle them with all our power…”
Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, Fatah, Hamas, and Islamic Jihad (all looking at each other), “uhh, you first!”
Lydia Church says
The PLO is full of a lot of BS.
J D S says
The Palestinians need to shut up, be glad israel lets them stay where they are and just STOP! The land where they live belongs to the Jews. God, not man,gave them this and much more land and the Jews should take back all the land that God gave them…God gave it, not the UN in 1948, but God, centuries before.
elee says
All truces with Muslims last only until it is to their advantage to break them. When will the West do its homework, this is not secret knowledge.
Ray Jarman says
This just reaffirms that the PLO has never rescinded the Cairo Accord where the raison d’être was the annihilation of Israel and the Jewish people living there. The Oslo Accord was a sham at best. As the leader of the cult of the pernicious pedophilic murdering thug said that allah said that perfidy was acceptable as demonstrated in the slaughter of thousands at Banu Nadir. No one should take seriously to anything that a follower of the cult swears.
Blangwort says
This is exactly why I couldn’t care less what the PLO thinks of the Oslo Accords. They never made good on their side of the deal to begin with. They never rescinded the part in their charter that denies the state of Israel a right to exist.
So now they want to rescind the Oslo Accords?
They wouldn’t do their side of the deal from the very beginning. This just frees up Israel from the pretense that there ever was an agreement to begin with.
eduardo odraude says
I would not say the guiding principle was “to drive them out from where they drove you out.” For the most part it was not Israel who drove them out. At any rate I had thought what happened was that much of the Arab world made war on Israel in 1947-48, and before attacking, told the Arabs in the area to leave, and said they would be able to return and take possession of the region after Israel had been destroyed. Many Arab “Palestinians” thus left freely, and then perhaps during the course of the war some were driven out by Israeli soldiers as well. But “to drive them out from where they drove you out” gives too much an impression of moral equivalence, does it not? Obviously Robert Spencer does not intend that impression. After all, is it so bad to drive someone out from where they drove you out? This is not one of the egregious Qur’anic verses (though with more context no doubt it gets ugly).
elee says
Islam clearly and unequivocally aims to subjugate the world. There are various theological justifications for this plan of action. Sometimes they assert that the verse quoted earlier in this thread directs them to take over every place that was once subject to a Muslim sovereign, like say Spain or India. Other times they claim that originally everyone in the world was Muslim, slandering for example the Patriarchs. And sometimes they enunciate the delusional theory that peace lives in the Islamic states (“dar-es-salaam”) and war lives everywhere else (“dar-al-harb”) so that offensive warfare is actually defensive because iot protects the “peace” of Islam by killing or incapacitating everyone else. Some people say this theory originated with Omar, the third caliph, who also gave the world the protocols of Omar defining what protections dhimmis get from their Muslim masters (and also stating clearly that, as with other pacts, the Muslims get to revoke any and all of it anytime it’s to their advantage.
In the end, who cares what their theory du jour may be? They’re armed and dangerous and clearly regard themselves as commanded to kill destroy and enslave..
eduardo odraude says
I agree that Islam is a fundamentally expansionist totalitarian doctrine bent on subjugating the world, if not under the full establishment of sharia law, then at least to a sharia ethos that discriminates against non-Muslims and women legally, socially, and often violently and provides little or no means of redress. Obviously, not all Muslims subscribe to or even know anything about the totalitarian program in the Qur’an, Hadith and Sira, but the more religious a Muslim is, the more likely the Muslim is to know and support that program, and to be deceptive about it when necessary.
You explain how the Quranic “drive them out from where they drove you out” is not as fair and balanced as it sounds. On other occasions Spencer has perhaps made points similar to yours about that verse. But such points were not made in the intro to the article at the top of this thread and lots of people who know little about Islam can therefore look at the “drive them out from where they drove you out” and say, well, that sounds fair. In other words, quoting “drive them out from where they drove you out” makes Islam sound only fair and reasonable. That was my beef. Because I know that Islam, on the whole, is about as fair and reasonable as communism or fascism, that is, not at all. In fact, quoting the verse in question could almost be read as an affirmation by Robert Spencer that Israel was the aggressor in the first place and that Muslims are only responding in kind after provocation. Yet anyone who has a bit of knowledge of Spencer’s work knows he does not see the situation that way at all. So quoting that verse, at least without some sort of explanation of why it is not as fair as it sounds, does not seem the best way to make the Islam-critical case.
Linde Barrera says
I swear, I wish I knew Arabic because then I would tell these jihadi-loving Palestinians the following:
1) Israel’s lands were purchased not stolen, and any “Palestinians” also known as Arabs from Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, or Saudi Arabia living on those lands without owning it had to move once the Jews came in, just like if a person buys the small apartment building I live in and says “I bought this for my family members and all the tenants must leave;” 2) “Palestinians” would be able to make a good living if they owned a food truck near where the US Embassy will be in Jerusalem, because other countries will follow suit and place their embassies nearby and these food truck owners will have a following; and
3) please get over it! You “Palestinians” need to spend your time getting educated to help others, since you claim “Islam is the Religion of Peace” and not waste your time fighting with other groups or among yourselves. I wish I would be able to understand Arabic to learn what their replies would be.
Frank Anderson says
Suggestion: Consider the intellectual level of many who use Arabic. Can it be *that*hard?
Emilie Green says
So when the Palis give back Gaza upon the annulment, will they restore the destroyed green houses beforehand?
http://www.zionism-israel.com/ezine/Dscn5049.jpg
As John McLaughlin would put it, “WRONG, Muslims only destroy, not create.”
6woods says
BUILD greenhouses? Firstly, they won’t have the technical know-how. Secondly, even if they did know how, they’re not going to rebuild anything originally built by those “evil Jews”. Muslims’ expertise lies in these areas: lying, stealing, raping, killing, destroying, whining, and blaming.
LeftisruiningCanada says
IF they built any greenhouses, they wouldn’t be able to stop themselves throwing stones.
6woods says
Lol. Right? Muslims are masters at the fine art of Cutting off One’s Nose to Spite One’s Face.
gravenimage says
The greenhouses were built by Israeli Jews, and then largely purchased by charitable American Jews and donated to the “Palestinian” Muslims in Gaza to give them a nice head start on building an economy.
The Muslims trashed the greenhouses within days of the Israeli retreat from Gaza. What a bunch of barbarians.
duh swami says
Peace…Every attempt has failed…I wonder why that is?
IQ al Rassooli says
It should be obvious that ALL UN resolutions since 1949 are legally INVALID for the simple reason that the Arabs who were given the chance for a TWO states solution in Mandated Palestine by UN Resolution 181 in 1947 decided to start a war of EXTERMINATION against the newly born state of Israel
This was the FIRST ACT of WAR that the UN was created to avert, thus the Arabs ABROGATED (made Null and Void) the UN resolution and its terms and conditions allowing the creation of a Two States solution including all articles regarding Jerusalem
The Arabs started the war and LOST and now they (like ALL Muslims) whine and pretend to be VICTIMS of aggression
What Arabs call NAKBA / Catastrophe (their failure to exterminate Israelis) and the ‘refugees’ resulted because the Arabs acted in AGGRESSION against the State of Israel and lost; but of course from the WARPED and illogical minds of Arabs, this must be overlooked and they should absurdly be allowed to go back once again to UN resolution 181
Had the Arabs NOT started the war of annihilation against Israel, there would have been NO Refugees problem; the Arabs have only themselves to blame for their utter defeats, humiliations and stupidity and no one else
For those who are more impressed with numbers than FACTS, I would like you to ponder the following:
The UN rejected Trump’s declaration regarding Jerusalem by 128 votes in a UN of 192
Of these there are 57 Muslim states that must be discounted because they are the usual Biased, Racist, Mendacious and Intolerant states that will always vote to bring humanity under Sharia
9 With USA
35 Abstained
20 No vote = 64
Hence out of 128 votes only 71 non Muslim states colluded with enemies of humanity
By any standard of logic, this was a resounding DEFEAT for the Muslims
WHY no one is bringing these crystal clear FACTS to the fore front of these spurious and illegitimate ‘resolutions’ beggars belief especially by Israelis and Americans
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTuFA1fQ-yg&feature=youtu.be&a
IQ al Rassooli
Kafir & Proud!
http://www.alrassooli.com
gravenimage says
And the destruction of Israel are right in the charters of Hamas and Fatah. Of course they are not “partners for peace”.
DogOnPorch says
Baby wants his bottle.
elee says
The people in Hell want ice water.
Norman Moffatt says
This whole issue is very simple, they will follow the Islamic text, the rest is just empty rhetoric.
Rob says
Arafat rescinded the Accords immediately after he returned home. Basically chanting to the crowds ‘This means Jihad, Jihad, Jihad!
If Bill C was capable of feeling embarrased he should have been at that moment.
Guy Forester says
Bill was too busy with Monica to care.
Peter says
Low BLOW
LeftisruiningCanada says
I think they train that out of you during the first few rituals.
gravenimage says
So true, Rob. The “Oslo Accords” were just the occasion for the First Intifada.
CRUSADER says
Israelis are smart to keep walling up and filling in tunnels.
Best to keep the Kuffar far away from Muslims.
Keep the Dars separate:
Dar al-Harb separate and un-encroached upon by Dar al-Islam.
Walls and Fences make for good, better behaved neighbors.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Too bad they need them, but yes, they are doing the right thing in their difficult situation.
Would they have ever gone to the trouble of building the Jerusalem light rail system before the security wall was built?
CRUSADER says
Get ready for more Green-Red Axis actions as the Muslims join with Leftists to protest and act up.
B. L. M. will hook with proPalestinians and start the BLaMe game ….prior to them doing some BLaM.
Guy Forester says
Pali flags showed up at BLM rallies in Ferguson.
Years ago I bought an interesting little paperback at an airport while traveling out of the US for a job. It described in great detail how terrorists world wide would work together, trade expertise, and even “rent” or exchange operatives to complete missions. It pointed out that Neo-Nazi, other right-wing, far left wing, anarchist, drug cartels, mafias, and jihad groups were doing this. They all hate the western governments so much that they will work together to destroy us.
With our left open borders, unenforced immigration laws, and acceptance of so-called refugees from certain countries, the US is now in far greater jeopardy than it was when I bought that book so many years ago. Nothing surprises me anymore, except for the willful blindness, petty politics, and outright greed of our so called leaders.
Guy Forester says
Like that agreement was worth anything? Only an idiot would think that agreement would lead to anything other than more conflict.
Peter says
Somewhat off topic.
Can someone suggest a good PDF copy of the Qur’an that I can download.
Preferably one that has lots of annotations (sans the ones with an Islamic spin ) and explanations.
Thanks
LeftisruiningCanada says
Tommoy Robinson did something a bit like that. Not so much on the commentary, but the suras were put in in reverse chronological order, latest first. There is also a clear system of indicating which parts are abrogated by later verses.
It’s called ‘Mohammads Koran” or something like that, and has quite a decent introduction.
gravenimage says
Peter, if you want good commentary, you can check out Robert Spencer’s “Blogging the Qur’an” series:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/quran-commentary
You can also find this in book form.
eduardo odraude says
Peter, check out
http://chronquran.blogspot.com/
Each Qur’an chapter there includes a link to Robert Spencer’s explanation of that chapter.
LeftisruiningCanada says
https://sunnah.com/
Useful online reference for most hadith collections and koran.
elee says
Thanks also for sharing this research resource.
Wellington says
Annulment of the farcical Oslo accords?
How about annulment of the farcical term, “Palestinians?”
LeftisruiningCanada says
The UN would never go for that.
StellaSaidSo says
EXACTLY!
LeftisruiningCanada says
” Hamas and Islamic Jihad and representatives of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine,”
Sounds like a fun party, can i come?
6woods says
I’ll bring the booze and Doritos.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Oh, never mind, decided not to go – they said the entertainment will include a bacha bazi room, a performance by an all girls dancing troupe called “The Many Little Faces of Aisha”, and some kind of Jewish themed arabic pinata.
gravenimage says
PLO official says “Palestinians” will demand “the annulment of the Oslo Accords”
……………………
Given that the “Palestinians” violated these accords before they were ever enacted, and have been doing the same ever since, how would we notice?
tgusa says
Forget an annulment, how bout a divorce instead?
6woods says
Cuz the West will have to pay alimony, aka jizya.
tgusa says
Not paying. I already pay at the office every two weeks to support adult children of the democrat party. My wallet is bare for any other non worthy charities.
Gamaliel says
Annulment of the Oslo Accords means Israel gets back all the territory it gave to the Palestinian Arabs.
WPM says
It is rich a make believe nation Palestine ,run by a make believe government the PLO will not follow the Oslo Accords. Who do Western leaders talk to about this the PLO ,Hamas ,the Democratic Front for the liberation of Palestinian who is the head gangster in charge who is the Mack daddy pimp for the Palestinian people ? The UN wants to know were to send its” bagmen” with Western dollars to keep whoever running the shit show living in style ,keep the “natives ‘quiet till new demand are brought up .
WPM says
PS
The United States of America has a leader that has decided to stop paying protection money that” take” will be smaller for the gangster pimps “leaders for Life” in Palestine the bag will be a lot lighter. Will the gangster families PLO , Hamas , and other associated thugs start fighting over a smaller monthly pie we can only hope.
elee says
Thank you for using the right words here—-gangsters, for example. These purported governments use western humanitarian money for gang wars and promo9ting hatred. No gang wars, no hatred, they might have to work for a living. Of course ISIS is interested in muscling in, it;s a good racket. Defund the whole rat race.