In certain respects, the real struggle between Islam and the West has less to do with an inherently weak Islam and more to do with subversive Western elements that cover up for and empower Muhammad’s creed.
Out-and-out censorship is one of these tactics. In a January 10 email titled, “We’re Suing Google – Here’s Why,” Prager University, which produces short videos on subjects “important to understanding American values,” explained that “YouTube has chosen repeatedly to restrict some of our videos for violating their ‘Community Guidelines.’ Those guidelines are meant to protect users against viewing sexual content, violent or graphic content, and hate speech,” even though “our videos contain nothing even remotely close to any of these categories.”
Prager U had “filed a complaint with YouTube, hoping that there was some kind of innocent mistake. That’s when we were told by YouTube that after reviewing our videos, they determined that they were, indeed, ‘not appropriate for a younger audience.’” Accordingly, several Prager U videos do not appear on YouTube accounts that block sexual or graphic content. (For more on this matter and/or to sign Prager U’s petition against YouTube’s decision, click here.)
To appreciate just how much YouTube’s decision is based on preventing Americans (especially its youth, its future) from understanding the threats Islam poses — and thereby empowering Islam vis-à-vis America — consider the videos I made for Prager U, which are among those currently being restricted by YouTube.
The first is called “Radical Islam: The Most Dangerous Ideology.” Although in it I distinguished between “radical” Muslims and those many Muslims in name only; although I (very conservatively) suggested that perhaps ten percent of the world’s Muslims are “Islamists,” and of those, only two percent are willing to take violent action to enforce their supremacist worldview; and although I said “Islamists have killed far more Muslims than members of any other group” — YouTube deemed that video “inappropriate” for younger audiences.
My other Prager U video, titled “The World’s Most Persecuted Minority: Christians,” is dedicated to shedding light on the plight of Christians, specifically in Muslim lands, where the overwhelming majority of persecution takes place. It, too, is censored. In other words, shedding light on what many Western authorities have referred to as a “genocide” of Christians, is, for YouTube, as “inappropriate” for youth as sexual, graphic, or hate filled videos. Needless to say, not only are there no real images in the video (sexual, graphic or otherwise), but I attribute the violence against Christians to “fundamentalists” and “fundamentalist interpretations” of the Koran, meaning there’s no “hate” either.
Meanwhile, “other videos on similar topics, but from a liberal perspective” — including those dealing with the alleged or real mistreatment of Muslims at the hands of non-Muslims (which fits the narrative well) — are not restricted by YouTube.
When both my Prager U videos came out, they each quickly reached over one million views. Once YouTube restricted them, their views dropped accordingly — meaning mission (keeping America’s youth in the dark about Islam) achieved.
This, of course, is one of many personal and impersonal examples of YouTube’s cover up efforts. Back on April 22, 2015, I came across a short Islamic State video that was only available on Arabic websites at the time. In it, IS members were videotaped destroying crosses inside and atop churches, while Koran verses against “polytheism” were recited in the background. I decided to upload it on YouTube — to show the people of the West what the people of the Muslim world were privy to. YouTube promptly took the video down and sent me a “warning” email.
By the perverse logic of YouTube, it is not the Islamic State that is engaging in hate by destroying churches and crucifixes, but rather me — for simply exposing it. This episode recently came to mind when President Trump retweeted (from an account since suspended) an image of an IS member holding a Virgin Mary statue (which he later smashed). If that rather innocuous image went viral, consider if Trump and/or others had seen and/or drawn attention to the much more graphic video and images of IS members destroying numerous crosses and desecrating churches? Thanks to YouTube censorship, this possibility was not allowed.
The people of the West need to wake up to the fact that they are involved in a war on two fronts: one with an alien civilization that wishes to subjugate or slaughter them, and another with smiley-faced, homegrown elements that go to great lengths to keep this ugly truth hidden.
MFritz says
Don’t hold YouTube accountable. It’s a private company and thus biased from the get-go. Just LEAVE YT and advertise the alternatives when you do. As there ARE alternatives – and better ones!
The very same goes for Twitter.
Terry Gain says
What is the better alternative to YouTube?
John says
do a search online for it
Terry Gain says
Thanks for all your help.
MFritz says
Try BitChute. Minds.com also offers you the option to post videos.
Noel says
pewtube.com
Januk36 says
” It’s a private company and thus biased from the get-go. ”
—
I would like to see their numbers once they ban “non-liberals” from buying their products. Even better “non-liberals” should adopt leftitst tactics and expose those companies in order to affect their sales.
Green Infidel says
So, given that they’re a “private company” , are they also free to ban channels due to them being run by blacks or gays?
MFritz says
There are laws against that (in many Western countries). Though YT are also trying to suppress free speech which is only guaranteed in a few nations (i.e. the US) by the constitution.
But there’s obviously a lobby “protecting” YT from prosecution if their censorship-victims are white, right or critical of the government, islam etc.
Blangwort says
Yes, hold YT/Alphabet accountable. They pay people to put up video. They make money from advertising. It’s a business.
If states can force bakers to bake a wedding cake for a homosexual couple, even though their religion forbids it, then I see nothing wrong with forcing Alphabet to post a video about Islam even though they don’t agree with it.
CRUSADER says
Alphabet/Google/Youtube owned and run by Sergey Brin ———————-
The Economist referred to Brin as an “Enlightenment Man”, and as someone who believes that “knowledge is always good, and certainly always better than ignorance”, a philosophy that is summed up by Google’s mission statement, “Organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful,”and its unofficial yet sometimes controversial motto,
“Don’t be evil”.
tzioni says
I believe Jeff Bezos owns Amazon, youtube, google and whole foods, among other online companies. Oh yeah, and WaPo
LeftisruiningCanada says
Unlike NGO, Government or personally operated websites, which are not biased?
arauna palm says
Give the alternative names. That will help people to move over.
I have NO problem with any person – I daily preach the bible to arabic speaking refugees. I just have a love for the truth and like to speak the truth where ever I go and I also like to be informed. I do not have any political agenda or hate in my heart towards anyone even though they may have hate in their heart towards me. I have found many Muslims who have been deceived about their own book.
I do not agree with what the Qur’an teaches and therefore I like to find out how it affects some of its adherents. I do think we are living very deep into the time of the end (on our way to Armageddon) – this phenomenon of governments hiding the truth about certain religions or condoning race hatred will cause the west to explode in peoples killing each other – just like the Bible predicted. Satans propaganda is being preached all over the world (REV 16: 14- 16) Governments will eventually turn against ALL religion – as predicted. Even true Christians will suffer as it will be the worst tribulation ever. God will then step into mankind’s affairs. Human government cannot solve this problem any more and neither can the populace – modern philosophies have taken the place of the Bible.
krishna says
i dint find the videos restricted
mccode says
Raymond Ibrahim, Robert Spencer, Bill Warner, David Wood, Pamela Geller, Ibn Warraq, Bat Y’eor, champions all.
Michael says
To paraphrase President GW Bush: Every social media platform now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.
Richard says
Raymond Ibrahim says only 2% of Muslims would commit terror acts. That’s 2% of a billion people! If each of those 20,000,000 managed to take out five people on average, that’s a hundred million non-Muslim casualties.
David George says
Maybe a mass posting of videos that are compliant with Youtubes absurd standards but proven to cause censorship might overwhelm their system. Sort of a DOS attack. I do hope some law suites are successful.
David
Lydia Church says
They hide the real news and post the fake news to support their twisted narrative, that they want everyone else to swallow. Funny how the persecution of all the Christians never comes up on regular news media, hardly, but it does on other alternative sites, Christian online news networks, etc.! And many of the terrorist attacks are not broadcast either. They just want to paint a certain picture but the real story is behind their utopic painting. They don’t want the rest of the world getting alarmed. Then they won’t panic, think all is well, until the army shows up at their door, and then unprepared… it will be too late.
Ed Lee says
If a Muslim quotes violent verses from the Koran, verbatim, he is just exercising his right to freedom of religion. If a kafir quotes the very same verses, it is hate speech. Most social media companies are bending over backwards to appease Islam. They need to review history and examine how appeasement worked out for Neville Chamberlain.
Xero_G says
Exactly! I tried to post verses from the Koran on my local newspaper’s website but was rejected for being “against policy to post material that could be considered incitement to hatred or violence”.
Peter Buckley says
Thanks to the Internet, muslims can now read online the first biography of Muhammad, by the devout muslim Ibn Ishaq:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq
If you read the biography, you will understand why so-called “extremists” do what they do (they are copying Muhammad), and why so many muslims are leaving Islam now they are finding out the truth.
Muhammad orders his son-in-law Ali, to behead Al-Nadr bin al-Harith on page 136.
Muhammad says that those who follow him will be given paradise; those who refuse will be slaughtered and sent to hell on page 222
Muhammad approves the stabbing of Uqba bin Abu Muayt on page 308.
Muhammad arranges the beheading of Kab bin al-Ashraf on page 364-9.
Muhammad personally beheads over 600 Jewish prisoners of war on page 464
Muhammad orders the torturing of treasurer of Khaybar tribe, Kinana on page 515
Muhammad orders the killing of Abdullah bin Katal’s and one of his singing-girls on page 550-1
Muhammad approves the murder of Asma bint Marwan on page 675-6.
Muhammad arranges the assassination of the old man Abu Afak on page 675.
Muhammad approves the murder of an old one-eyed Bedouin man, by Amr bin Umayya, one of his Jihadist thugs on page 674-5.
http://www.justislam.co.uk/images/Ibn%20Ishaq%20-%20Sirat%20Rasul%20Allah.pdf
You can post this online wherever relevant. No comment is necessary. Islam is dying, and will die, of shame.
Kepha says
A real Lucky Luciano, bugsy Siegel, or Meyer Lansky of the 7th century, no?
Hugo Hackenbush says
And don’t forget the murder of Umm Qirfa who was pulled apart at the legs by 2 camels (done by one of his “generals”) because she dared to lead her people in defense against the hordes of Muhammad. She is noted in the biography to have been a “very old woman”.
CRUSADER says
“Muslim Mafia” — read the book
and note more at
Understanding the Threat
(John Guandolo’s informative site)
StellaSaidSo says
Another useful title is Andrew McCarthy’s THE GRAND JIHAD: HOW ISLAM AND THE LEFT SABOTAGE AMERICA.
Charlie says
Youtube, Facebook and Twitter are receiving exhorbitant amounts of money from Islamic interests earmarked to censor free speech that criticises Islam. They couldn’t do it by law, so they are resulting to stealth and proxy financing with certain strings attached that give them power to censor. Money has overtaken principle in the struggle of power in social media.
Jacqueline Robnett says
Are you saying that Youtube, Facebook and Twitter (U.S. corporations/organizations) are selling out our national principles for money? Are their officers closet Muslims? I cannot fathom the Left’s (read Socialist/Communist) affinity for Islam. Don’t they realize they will be subjected to dhimmitude along with the rest of the apostates?
Indiana Tom says
Surprised they have not banned David Wood yet as he hits Islam hard and backs up his statements using the Quran, Hadith, and Sirah quotes and documents.
CRUSADER says
Sssshhhhhhhhhhh
😉
eduardo odraude says
Yes, youtube’s censorship decisions are arbitrary and unpredictable.
But recall what happened to David Wood and some colleagues in Dearborn a few years back. The Dearborn police arrested Wood for discussing the Gospel with Muslims at an Arab festival. The whole business was caught on camara and Wood and others sued the Dearborn police, the Dearborn mayor, and the city of Dearborn, and won. Basically, I think what happened was that the Dearborn police were afraid that young adult Muslims at the festival were going to get violent, and there were a lot more of them to arrest, so the police decided to arrest Wood and his colleagues instead.
CRUSADER says
Imagine if people were fearful that Christians would get violent…..
Manny says
It’s apparently true. Free speech is controlled by the conglomerate media corporations.
Kepha says
Our powers that be in the gummint, media, a-cad-meme-ia and the like believe that if the truth gets out, there will be uncontrollable lynch law across the land. Further, they’ve managed to cow thousands into silence, even though they know the truth. Someone near and dear to me confided her dislike and mistrust of Muslims due to assault suffered in college; but I know she’d never open up about it in public for fear of being labeled a bigot.
CRUSADER says
Damnable Stanford University tie to Google raises its intolerant head.
Just because Sayyid Qutb visited Stanford, that started the Islamofornication of LSJU.
Peter Thiel should do/say something about this—-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFVsVnczYqY
“Peter Thiel was right”
eduardo odraude says
This sort of crap should stop — and it has been happening a great deal, including YouTube demonetizing stuff that is not PC — or else Youtube and Google and Facebook should be turned into public utilities where everyone gets heard. It’s really stupid for indispensable public venues to censor important parts of the debate: that is just encouraging revolution and revolutionary movements.
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.” ~ John F. Kennedy
LeftisruiningCanada says
“should be turned into public utilities where everyone gets heard”
Because the State would never restrict our freedom of speech regarding islsm…..
eduardo odraude says
You have all heard of shadow banning, right? That’s where one of these media companies makes a comment of yours invisible to others, but you can still see the comment and you have no idea that others cannot see it. You are not told that your stuff has been made to disappear. You get the impression that other people are just not engaging with your content, when in fact they never saw your content in the first place. Shadow banning is creepy.
CRUSADER says
No, haven’t heard that. Perhaps your comment is not being seen or read, Eduardo Odraude. 😉
LeftisruiningCanada says
Heard what?
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Raymond Ibrahim, you are a great liar and dishonest inspired by thé Satan (holy spirit). The bunches of lies against Islam are available all over western media. what is in darkness against islam not virel there ? . If you are honest, you should have produced a documentary on genocide killings of muslims during crusade wars, First ,and series of atrocities being committed by mithraist christians for centuries and conclude with killings of muslims by christians in Iraq where more than 3 Million Iraqis killed by evil united states when It led invasion, genocide killings of muslims in Bosnia, That of central African Republic and when Libya was Again invaded. The misguided terrorists like Isis sponsored by evil united states and fascist evil zionist state killed more muslims than christians, more than 98% of their victims are muslims. prior to the advent of Isis, such things like targeting indigenous christians were known in Arab world.If you never stayed in the Arab world, ask Indigenous Arab christians in Iraq, syria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, they Will tell you. In fact Christians in those countries have enjoying privileges over muslims. As such persecutions of christians by Muslims being alleged by Christian evangelist liars you are disseminating are imaginary. The truth is that it is filthy mithraist christians Who are persecuting muslims ,but claim that It is Muslims. Eg, in Nigeria, Birom christians carried out genocidal killings of Hausa muslims in plateau state, some even fried and eatened dead bodies of muslims. Later the wild Birom christians extended such genocide killings to nomadic Fulani cattle rearers in the forest Who are not fully practicing muslims, raping their women and taking away their cows. The Fulanis ,as people of the forest are as wild as Birom christians ,retaliated. Then sinister Christian Association Of Nigeria (CAN) started spiting fire of Propaganda that muslims are persecuting christians in Northern Nigeria. The predominant Igbo christians carried similar genocidal killings of nomadic Fulanis ,burying dead bodies in mass graves,raping their beautiful ladies and t’aking away their cows. Naturally ,the Fulanis have to retaliate. Hence, Propaganda cries by CAN and even falsely alleging that président Buhari and sultan of sokoto Who are City Fulanis were backing the retaliatory actions by nomadic Fulanis. Also boko haram (an affiliate of Isis), operating mostly in North-Eastern Nigeria in Borno and Yobe states inhabited by Idigenous Arabs of Shuwa Arabs and kanuri neighboring Arab part of Chad and not far away from failed state of Libya ,have been targeting mostly muslims ,very few are Christian victims. But vicious Christian Association of Nigeria passed informations that Boko haram has been organised by Muslims to persecute christians in the same way Raymond Ibrahim is alleging that killings of christians represent muslim agenda of persecuting christians in the middleast, which are bunches of lies.
StellaSaidSo says
Anybody who can produce a word salad like this latest offering by Ibby the Ignoramus is almost literate enough to be a member of a scholarly outfit like Boko Haram.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Ï mean prior to evil Isis, killings of christians were unknown in the Arab world
Jack Diamond says
So, the Christian civilizations of Asia Minor, of Africa, of Syria-Iraq-Lebanon-Egypt that were annihilated by Islam, involved no killings of Christians? When Islam has the “upper hand” you have the killing and persecution of Christians (and any other non-Muslims). The “Arab world” just happened to be dominated by Western powers in recent centuries, tyrannis interruptus. But let’s ask the Copts or the Lebanese Christians about their privileges, or the targets of the Islamic attempt to wipe out Christianity from Iraq, long before there was any ISIS, about their privileges.
“The number of Christians martyred by Islam is 9 million [David B. Barrett, Todd M. Johnson, World Christian Trends AD 30-AD 2200, William Carey Library, 2001, p. 230, table 4-10] . A rough estimate by Raphael Moore in History of Asia Minor is that another 50 million died in
wars by jihad. So counting the million African Christians killed in the 20th century we have:
60 million Christians.”
–source, Bill Warner “Tears of Jihad”
CRUSADER says
Looks like Mr Irritates’ comments are shadow-banned.
Never seem to hear or see or read Mr Irritates any more on this site.
Hmmmmm….
😉
LeftisruiningCanada says
He likely never ‘sees’ anything anyone ever replies to him, that’s for sure.
UNCLE VLADDI says
This is nothing new.
Cicero on government:
“The safety of the People Shall be the highest law.”
— Cicero, The Laws. –
Cicero on traitors:
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
– Cicero –
CRUSADER says
Interesting how Cicero later lost his tongue.
He was appreciated by Julius Caesar, even though Cicero’s criticisms were a bit too hard to take for the massive changes (Trumpian) which Julius was implementing, Cicero was seen as a valid contributor by the other great orator of the day — speaking of Julius, of course.
Jacqueleen says
“Prager University, which produces short videos on subjects “important to understanding American values.,”
The key words here are AMERICAN VALUES…….NOT ISLAMIC VALUES…If you come to a country that allows Religious Freedom but also has a Constitution with Laws, you must put your Sharia laws aside and follow the laws of the land or go back to the land you came from and practice your faith without disruption.
Islamists come here and do not assimilate into our culture and society but rather shove their laws and doctrines down our throats that we must do things their way….THERE IS SOMETHING VERY WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE! EVICT AND BAN EVERY MUSLIM TO THE MIDDLE EAST…Let them go back to their caves and tents and kill one another and they will!!!!! Ban them from entering any civilized nation. Enough is enough…..They are animals..period.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Jack Diamond, it iss all concocted lies by Christian Evangelist liars like moore you made reference to his creative stories.Refer to credible and unbiased historical evidence to tell us when and at where such killings of christians by Muslims and under whose leadership in muslim nations ? supply the statistics supported by archeological materials as to the dead body remnants plus data and analysis of scientific testing of such data for us to verify scientifically.
without such evidence, you gabages has to be dismissed as mère creative fastasies. Note :some commentators even alleged that muslims killed more than 270 million non-muslims. Some even put the number killed by muslim rulers in India alone at 800 million ,and by then thé whole population of India was less than 150 million. Those mughals Who ruled India were not foreign invaders like British, théy were Indians. How can they slaughter the population they were leading ? If they kill the population, it means their sphere of influence has to reduce and be threatened by rival powers then.
Jack Diamond, ï know that you dont have ideas, but have chosen to post lies you imagine. If you have not ideas, why posting rubbish. Idiot !!
LeftisruiningCanada says
Incredible that you make such demands for sources when, not only has Jack Diamond provided you with three good quality citations, but that you yourself have such a fantastic record of avoiding providing any of the same.
You need to give us more than just “i dun like ur quotz”.
How about some interaction with and refutation of the information contained in the citations you were offered. That would require you to go look at them, for a start, something i doubt you have done.
No one here expects you to do this, because we all know that you don’t care about truth at all.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Leftruinigcanada, the works cited by Jack Diamond contain no credible historical evidence . They contain nothing more than biased fastasies. They are just like moore’s theory of “Allah a moon-god “,dismissed as rubbish because there was no Idol worshiped by pagan meccans known as “Allah “or worshiping moon as Allah.
Note :i prefer to quote the substance rather than mere citation, which May not tally with what is asserted as learning Islam has been doing. morever, such citations may be superfluous in this forum, especially when what is referred to is of commonly knowledge among discussants. It Will be too cumbersome to make It as if we are writing a full article. Eg, when i refer to verses calling for violence or genocide in the Bible, ï assume that you know their contents, and then ï go on evaluating them to make a point. Likewise i idont expect you to merely cite a number assigned to a Quranic verse, you go direct to the substance for me to See if it is relevant to the issue being discussed.
Thank you
Champ says
States Mr.Credibility himself …dat’s damn funny, lol!!! 😀
LeftisruiningCanada says
“the works cited by Jack Diamond contain no credible historical evidence . They contain nothing more than biased fastasies”
Again, you just say this, as if you expect us to believe you even bothered to check out the book itself.
Why don’t you pick some claims from the table, and show us why we shouldn’t trust them? Wh don’t you use your obvious knowledge of all things to discredit the source, instead of simply declaring it to be so?
(The answer may be that you really believe that muslims never did anything wrong, ever? Ibrahim, do you believe that muslims ever attacked anyone? If you ignore this question, i’ll know you are being deceptive.)
“when i refer to verses calling for violence or genocide in the Bible, ï assume that you know their contents, and then ï go on evaluating them to make a point”
Wrong, Ibrahim, because as i have noted when you have referred to specific verses, you are not to be trusted in how you are defining “calls for violence”.
It’s hard to comprehend how you actually believe what you are saying to be true, such is the emptiness of your understanding of how to back up your statements.
Too bad that you are proving to be worthless as someone to discuss things with. I thought that you might have enough respect for your own professed ‘faith’ to put some effort into defending it, but i see that all you are interested in is proving you can shout the loudest. Im guessing this trait is noticeable to those you associate with in real life.
Shame that there are not honest muslims willing to talk…..
Noel says
The Bible describes violence, the Koran prescribes violence.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Here, i even found the book and table for you Ibrahim.
https://books.google.ca/books?id=IMRsJ1gnIYkC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA238#v=onepage&q&f=false
Jack Diamond says
I know facts aren’t really your thing, but it was 80 million killed by the Muslims in India, not 800 million, and the source is one of the world’s most respected historians of India, K.S. Lal.
Furthermore, most of the records of Muslim atrocities, like those perpetrated in India, were recounted lovingly by Muslim historians themselves. Much as the crimes of Muhammad were lovingly reported by Muslims in the ahadith. They were PROUD of it.
There is a reason the historian Will Durant wrote “the Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and peace may at any time be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying from within.” Do you know who he means by barbarians? Here’s some quick examples of what barbarians are:
Amir Khusrau writes “The whole country by means of the sword of our holy warriors, has become like a forest denuded of its thorns by fire…Islam is triumphant, idolatry is subdued. Had not the law granted exemption from death by payment of poll-tax, the very name of Hind, root and branch, would have been extinguished.”
From the Muslim histories: Mahmud Ghaznavi (997-1030CE) “Sultan Mahmud…departed towards the country of the Hind, in full reliance of the aid of Allah, who guided by his light and by his power…gave him victory in all expeditions. On reaching Purshaur (Peshawar) he pitched his tent outside the city. Noon has not arrived when the Musulmans had wreaked their vengeance on the infidel enemies of Allah, killing 15,000 of them, spreading them like a carpet over the ground, and making them food for beasts and birds of prey…Allah had also bestowed upon his friends such an amount of booty as was beyond all bounds and all calculation, including five hundred thousand slaves, beautiful men and women.” –Tarikh-i-Yamini of al-Uthi
Alauddin Khilji, sets upon Kambayat: “the most celebrated of the cities of Hind in population and wealth…with a view of holy war, and not for the lust of conquest… the idolators were awakened from their sleepy state of carelessness and were taken by surprise…the Muhammadan forces began to kill and slaughter on the right and on the left {note: civilians, women and children} unmercifully, throughout the impure land, for the sake of Islam, and blood flowed in torrents. They plundered gold and silver to an extent greater than can be conceived, and an immense number of precious stones…they took captive a great number of handsome and elegant maidens, amounting to 200,000 children of both sexes…in short, the Muhammadan army brought the country to utter ruin, and destroyed the lives of the inhabitants, and plundered the cities, and captured their off-spring.” –Tarikh-i Wassf, A. Wassaf
Timur. “My principal object in coming to Hindustan and undergoing all this toil and hardship, has been to accomplish two things. The first was to war with the infidels, the enemies of the Muhammadan religion; and by this religious warfare to acquire some claim to reward in the life to come. The other was a worldly object; that the army of Islam might gain something by plundering the wealth and valuables of the infidels: plunder in war is as lawful as their mother’s milk to Musulmans who war for their faith, the consuming of that which is lawful is a means of grace.” -M. Habib “The Comprehensive History of India”
Champ says
YouTube: Keeping Americans in the Dark on Islam
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is so shameful.
Another reason to support Jihad Watch for bringing us the unvarnished truth about islam and company. Thank you, Robert Spencer, et al!