The Sharia culture of misogyny which dictates that women are inferiors and must hide their bodies and any display of overt femininity once again takes an innocent victim:
Iraqi social media star and model Tara Fares has been shot dead in Baghdad….The former Miss Baghdad, and first runner-up for Miss Iraq, was killed on Thursday after gunmen opened fire on her
Tara was a Christian and “famous for her bold clothing and posts on social media.” Those attributes sealed her fate, along with that of other women in her country who fly in the face of the Sharia, such as the human rights activist, Suaad al-Ali, who “was shot and killed in an outdoor market by an unknown gunman” two days before. Last month, “two well-known women in Baghdad’s beauty industry” were also murdered: Rafeef al-Yaseri, known as the “Barbie of Iraq,” and Rasha al-Hassan — owner of a beauty center — who was found mysteriously dead inside her home. Now the government is ordering a so-called “investigation” in the face of these highly publicized deaths. Nothing will likely come of it, since the deaths are tied to the larger problem of Sharia intolerance against any semblance of autonomous female identity.
Once again, the sound of silence is deafening among Western feminists who are too busy marketing their #MeToo movement and fanning the flames of public lynchings of Western males rather than caring about real female victims of a supremacist ideology.
Note: A black-and-white photo can be seen on Instagram, showing Tara Fares pouting. It was shared with her nearly 3 million followers shortly after her murder.
“Social media star, a former ‘Miss Baghdad,’ shot dead,” by Eliza Mackintosh, Mohammed Tawfeeq and Hamdi Alkhshali, CNN, September 29, 2018:
Iraqi social media star and model Tara Fares has been shot dead in Baghdad, security officials confirmed to CNN.
The death of Fares and other recent killings prompted Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi to order an investigation on Friday.
The former Miss Baghdad, and first runner-up for Miss Iraq, was killed on Thursday after gunmen opened fire on her in the capital’s Camp Sarah neighborhood, according to a statement by Iraq’s Interior Ministry, which is investigating the incident.
Ministry spokesman Maj. Gen. Saad Maan told an Iraqi TV station that two motorcyclists shot Fares while she was inside a vehicle.
The 22-year-old, a Christian whose father was Iraqi and mother Lebanese, was living in Erbil, but visited the capital occasionally. She was famous for her bold clothing and posts on social media.A black-and-white photo showing Fares pouting was shared with her nearly 3 million Instagram followers shortly after her death, along with the comment: “In a treacherous and cowardly incident, Tara Fares Chamoun, is with God. We asked God to accept her with His great mercy.”…..
mortimer says
The WOMAN-HATING, MISOGYNISTIC, DEATH CULT has struck again, revealing its true nature.
Islam is 22 cults in one: a DEATH CULT, an HONOUR-KILLING CULT, a RAPE CULT, an EXTORTION CULT, a PLUNDER CULT, a CENSORSHIP CULT, a MISOGYNY CULT, a LIE CULT, a PEDOPHILIA CULT, a SADOMASOCHISM CULT, an OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE CULT, a SUPREMACISM CULT, a JEW HATRED CULT, a CHRISTIANOPHOBIA CULT, a MALE CHAUVINIST CULT, an INBREEDING CULT, an OBSCURANTISM CULT, a SUPERSTITION CULT, a PERSONALITY CULT, a CRUELTY TO ANIMALS CULT, a GROUP-THINK CULT, a SUICIDE CULT.
Wow! 22 cults in one! Where do we sign up? (sarc/off)
Message to Iraqi Muslims: TAKE A LOOK AT THE WOMAN-HATING TEXTS and then LEAVE ISLAM.
TruthWFree says
Message to all Muslims: TAKE A LOOK AT THE HATING TEXTS against mankind by the allah god, AKA Satan, and then LEAVE ISLAM. If you stay in,. you are complicit with the Jihadist killers
shosh says
to their god allah, the merciful it is necessary to die killing someone while killing yourself in order to claim the 72 houries or black eyed perpetual virgins and of course the little pearls..boys of great delicacy
Carol the 1st says
Wow! A jihadi scores another death of a female maverick. This time she was “Christian and famous for her bold clothing and posts on social media.” Her proud and heroic killer is doubtless heaven bound and up on a cloud pounding the flesh at this very moment. He likely fantasizes about the enshrining effect he’s had on muslim virtue. Big dramas like this always tip his kind over the edge.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
Another woman is terrified that she’s next:
“‘Slaughtered like chickens’: Former Miss Iraq gets ‘death threats’ after fellow model’s murder”
https://www.rt.com/news/440097-miss-iraq-death-threats/
gravenimage says
Looks like they want to claim another victim, Flavius.
Westman says
Where is the OIC? Why is it not calling this another attack on the image of Islam that demands universal blasphemy laws?
Ohhh(slapping forehead), yes, for a moment I forgot that these murderers were not REAL Muslims and the life of an unbelieving woman has no value to the OIC.
David M says
Where is Linda Sarsour’s comment on this? I don’t think we’ll be hearing one.
PRCS says
So, how many coalition soldiers were killed or wounded in the ridiculous belief that Muslims would willingly cast their “religious” beliefs aside and adopt the kind of government practiced by “filthy unbelievers”?
And how much of the coalition’s treasure was wasted in attempting to accomplish that?
mortimer says
VIGILANTISM is intrinsic to Islam. The leading Islamic exegete supported vigilantism.
Ibn Taymiyya approved of vigilantism, because it is established by Allah and the Sunna/Example of Mohammed.
The Sword Of Ikhlaas – (i.e. … Muslims may kill without permission of an Islamic state)
.Some deviants say we cannot apply the Hukm of killing unless we have an Islamic State (Khilafah) how ignorant is the one that talks like this.
Umayr ibnu Adi (ra) (who was a blind man) said he heard that Asma the daughter of Marwan insulted Muhammad (saw) in the battle of Badr. He said Oh Allah I have a vow on my neck if I return I will go to Medina to kill her. He went to Medina without the permission of Muhammad (saw) and killed her whilst she was suckling her child. He came back and told Muhammad (saw). Muhammad (saw) said to his companions IF YOU WISH TO SEE SOMEONE WHO SUPPORTS ALLAH AND THE MESSENGERS BY THE GHAIB (WITHOUT INFORMING OR ASKING OR TELLING ANYONE) LOOK AT UMAYR IBN ADI. [Ibn Hishaam and Ibn Saads Kitaab Al-Tabaqaat Al-Kabeer].
In other words, you need Allah’s (swt) permission which has already been established and that is all you need.”
b.a. freeman says
thank U for that, mortimer; it’s easy to find the quran, but harder to get copies of the kutub alsittah. they are accessible at a university library to which i can get access, but i can only borrow them, and i don’t like visiting nazi territory, where truth is hated.
Carol the 1st says
Very true. More advanced nations have to figure out how to stomp out this depraved ideology while at least sparing our OWN fine flesh. Amil Imani has some interesting things to say about muslim psychological dynamics in a recent JW article. He names no sources however and so we must ponder if most of his comments come from personal insight gained from reaching adulthood in Iran. At a distance we hear of their mindset but we don’t *quite* believe it’s bedrock real and incorrigible. Maybe our first aim should be to recognize *if* human brains are so plasticine-like, and, once we accept that sad possibility, ask ourselves “what* can be done about those venal creeps who century after century continue turning their people-products into dispensable tools and weapons used against their fellow humans?
Likely half the world’s troubles would quickly be over if we developed a “mullah/imam real estate bomb”. It would be a really good start. Failing that, we could start with the mosques and madrassas.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, PRCS.
Krishna says
Islam can’t even let women to live herself
Japetto Danatelli says
I looked into her eyes, and they seem to be saying, “Please, don’t let this happen again.”
We know what causes murders like this by muslims, it’s the misogyny and narrow-minded bigotry of their religion which is more political than spiritual. Politicians and the media can’t be indignant enough about some “bacon” graffiti painted on a mosque, but how often do we hear those same folks condemning the unceasing brutalities and crimes of islam? Well, practically never. And the reason for this is obvious, they aren’t about good morals, peace, or patriotism, they are about votes, money, and power. They are unscrupulous to the point of criminality, their complacency and complicity is a facilitator of islamic murder and terror in our nations and islam’s. For god’s sake! condemn these islamic crimes against innocents, stop calling it a religion of peace! We owe it to each other to be morally responsible when needed, and not pretend that what causes crime and evil is good and peaceful. And that’s what the left does, they totally ignore the hate crimes of islam and have instead criminalized speaking against it. These people seem so compassionless and phony to me, without a heart. I understand you have a political agenda, but in the name of god, please try and temper your enthusiasm with compassion for the murdered and suffering. You’ll become a better person and your kinder heart will make the world a better place.
Carol the 1st says
In a recent thread Wellington complained about time “wasted” in arguments about whether or not Islam should be considered a “religion”. He argued that efforts to just inform people about its specific WICKEDNESS would bear more fruit. Frank Anderson countered by suggesting that taking legal steps using the “Form versus Substance” argument would produce more tangible dints on the monolith.
.
I think we need to be more pragmatic in our own culture. “Monikers Matter” and usage of “religion” orients our native sons to give Islam the benefit of the doubt (just in case our leaders have more wisdom than we do). But what significance does it really have if some misguided souls here and there manage to scrounge some interior “spiritual” buzz out of Islam and its Deen? (I contend that if they get any spiritual growth from Islam it’s in spite of it rather than because of it). Meanwhile their fellow muslims (in their infinite and arrogant wisdom) are not only supporting but physically working for the defeat and death of others. It’s a farce to call this a “religion” as it is *not* in any worthwhile sense of the word. There should be no confusion in the minds of the masses if we are to make quick enough progress in exterminating this shameful blight on our actions and intelligence.
Language can and does change and we may need to set aside our reluctance to make a *judgment* call and instead FLAG and halt this extremely bad apple with all due haste.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Carol,
There’s truth in what you say, calling it a religion probably does cause some “confusion in the minds of the masses,” as you put it. People who accept islam wholeheartedly as a religion will probably grant it more sanctity and intellectual latitude than it deserves. So, they might argue, in the unfettered magical world of religion who’s to say that islam’s “divine” revelation is any less legitimate than any other religion? If muslims think their god told them to kill unbelievers then naturally some will compare that to Yahweh commanding the Jews to conquer Canaan, for example. If the Judeo-Christian god can issue murderous commands and punishments (The Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, the murder of Egypt’s first born), then some will say that’s no worse than what allah said and did. Islam’s murderous Jihad intent is often lost in the muddled confusion of our average intellects, not everyone can be a religious scholar like Spencer, nor may they desire to be. So what many people do, I believe, is simply shrug their doubts away and accept–quite wrongly in my opinion–that islam is just one more collection of supernatural kookiness that must be accepted in the name of religious freedom. But people like you and me and other JW fans “get it,” we see the bigotry and hatred in those doctrines and how it negatively impacts their culture and interactions with others. We see how islam’s bigotry and open-ended commands to kill or enslave unbelievers inspires murder, homophobia, antisemitism, misogyny, war, and terrorism, and we aren’t fooled for one minute by that absurd moniker, “religion of peace.”
So I guess I’m agreeing with you, we have fully grasped the threat but there’s a lot of people out there that haven’t, and calling it a religion doesn’t help any even if technically it can be called one. People may be hesitant to confront islam’s violent doctrines because religion is granted almost unlimited boundaries for expression where free expression is allowed, like in America. The vast amount of respect bestowed on religious freedom and the difficult world of religious learning have compelled many, wrongly I believe, to error on the side of grudging tolerance when they should be condemning with all their might islam’s violent supremacist agenda, 1400 years old. Spencer’s latest book is a perfect teacher for this, I hope it ends up a super best seller and the talk of the nation. We can only overcome this ignorance through education, and right now Spencer seems to be the best teacher in town.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
(By the way, I’m Japetto under a new name.)
Notabigot says
‘Allah’ is the Arabic nane for God. Just as Dieu is what the French call him. Christians in the Middle East pray to ‘Allah’. Are you saying they can’t be Christians, then?
Carol the 1st says
Hi Japetto/Agostino…i can’t see us living side by side and having any real rapport EVER (nor would I want one) with people who do the things muslims do. Their attitudes and practices are an AFFRONT and gross infringement upon the society we’ve chosen to create – a very successful, compassionate, non-coercive, and functioning one.
If we shallowly accept that the sentiment/word *religion* makes vile behaviour to us and our fellow creatures worthy of acceptance (though this inevitably compromises us) in our own milieu then we are bonkers and almost as primitive and lacking as the shrewd and callous DEEN called Islam. Time for the world to put away childish things.
Mortimer posted a Koranic verse which reveals Moe’s fancy footwork for ensuring the “sabre-fodder” continued on for his ROP:
“Prophet Muhammad said; It is expected that the nations will call other nations to share them against you (Muslims) as the eaters call each other to eat from the food in front of them in a large wooden plate A person asked, Will that happen because of our small number on that day? The Prophet said, No. Your number will be great, but you will be *rubbish* like the rubbish of flood-water. And certainly Allah will remove from the hearts of enemies the FEAR of you and surely Allah will throw WAHN in your hearts. A person asked, What is Wahn, O Messenger of Allah? The Prophet said, Wahn is to love this world and to hate death.” – Abu Dawud 4284
Absurd necrophilia!
brane pilot says
Any other totalitarian ideology in the last 100 years would have had its face rubbed in the gore of the daily slaughter antics of Islam. The borders of every civilized country would be firmly closed to them. But Muslims get a pass.
Over and over, hundreds of times, outrage after outrage, decade after decade, Muslims get a pass.
Why?
That is the great question that future historians of our era will wrestle with.
At present, that question has no answer.
Liamjq says
You don’t get it.. there won’t be any future historians
b.a. freeman says
unfortunately, Liamjq, very true if islam conquers civilization.
Leon Degney says
You say brane pilot “But Muslims get a pass.” I will add they get a pass and more. They also get handout’s and housing when they flee and make it to bleeding heart territory even after passing, in some cases several times through compatible countries. Like you I ask the same question “Why?” But never yet have I received a sensible answer from the powers that be. Notice the silence of the so-called “leaders” when called out on these atrocities, it’s so silent it’s deafening.
The Judge says
Why? The unelected leaders of the EU have decided that destruction European culture is a good thing. https://www.un.org/pga/72/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2018/07/180713_Agreed-Outcome_Global-Compact-for-Migration.pdf
James Lincoln says
Tara Fares, a beautiful and wonderful Christian woman, senselessly killed because of Islam.
As a Christian, I will say special prayer for you.
gravenimage says
+1
Hector says
As a Christian with a money-making career, she should’ve left Iraq if and when she had the chance and moved West, possibly the USA or Canada, where Shariah law is not the law of the land. If you have the means to escape and seek refuge and asylum in the West (true refugees), do it; Don’t remain enslaved to Muslims and shariah law, even if it is your homeland; Especially if you’re a Christian. The USA will gladly accept you with open arms.
Peggy says
She would’ve been rejected by the west. She was the wrong religion.
Robert Meacham says
Hector means American citizens would accept her. Peggy means the government bureaucrats and immigration workers would not accept her. The West commonly accepts Muslim refugees from Syria while Christians are very rarely accepted from Syria where they are truly oppressed/killed.
Mo says
So sad. Where are the “feminists”?
gravenimage says
I believe in equal rights for women and I am sickened by this.
Guy Forester says
Meanwhile,
The so called feminists and supporters of alleged victim Ford (no corroborating evidence, no corroborating witness, so called witnesses contradicting her accounts, fake polygraph, inconsistent testimony, and incredulous story of how she recalled the alleged incident) harass and threaten those supporting the SCOTUS nominee.
A series of “senseless” (actually well thought out targeted assassinations) of women seeking to live in the modern era in the country we supposedly liberated and brought into the 21st century goes unnoticed by the rabid left. The rabid left can only tolerate and celebrate fake victims. Real victims, with real lives that were really ruined are worse than sewage to the leftist cabal that hate people that actually accomplish something, stand for something, and have meaning apart from a government program.
My deepest sympathies to the families of these victims of hatred and evil.
StellaSaidSo says
+1
Malcolm Jackson says
Nigel Farage does not have a problem with Islam.
UKIP is now totally divided.
We have 2 UKIPs.
There is the Islam supporting UKIP of Nigel Farage and Steve Crowther, which is happy to see the UK enslaved by Islam.
Luckily we have the Patriotic UKIP of Gerard Batten which wants to preserve a 1000 years of British History and remain a free, democratic and sovereign Kingdom.
It is time that UKIP split apart.
The UKIP of Gerard Batten and the vast majority of UKIP members should be allowed to thrive free of Nigel Farage and Steve Crowther’s Islamic 5th Column and interference.
The UKIP of Nigel Farage and Steve Crowther should go its own way to wither and die.
StellaSaidSo says
+1
notabigot says
What a load of bollux! Especially from the comments. It’s obvious none of you have ever been in the Middle East, let alone ever read a Muslim text.
In the first place, sharia law (whatever that’s supposed to be, because every country that even pays lip-service to ithas different ideas) is not the law of iraq.
Secondly, as a Christian, even if it did she would be exempt (‘let there be no compulsion in religion’ is enshrined in the Koran.)
Third – although some more ‘backward’ countries have managed to treat women (in violation of the Koran) as less than equal, just as we did a century ago or less, murder is not and nevert was part of the deal.
When I read of people killing in the name of Islam I am reminded of those ‘Christian’ who say ‘God told me to do it’. Why do you call such people – unless of course they’re evangelists – ‘deluded’, but if they’re Muslims call them ‘terrorists’?
Why not be honest and just admit you hate humanity?
Carol the 1st says
Aggressive homogeneity is the Deen’s “bag” (sanctified group looting of the petrified and befuddled). Terror attacks alone (not the body count) since 9/11 are at the very least THIRTY THREE THOUSAND, SEVEN HUNDRED AND FORTY-FIVE. So what’s the score for the Christians notabigot?
And BTW way we don’t call the very rare “God told me to do it” Christians “deluded” since we know that no one has deliberately attempted to delude them toward dark pathways. They’re accurately considered “mental” and they act out based upon their own turmoil and stresses..
notabigot says
33,745 Terror attacks since 9/11? When – where? I think we should be told. How about some evidence instead of just assertions?
As for those ‘Christians’ you descrbe as ‘mental’ – I was trying to be nice when i called them deluded. But you say ‘they act out based upon their own turmoil and stresses.’ I wonder what you think is the motivation for Islamic ‘terrorsits’.
Carol the 1st says
Try reading JW for clues.
And regarding the motivation for Islamic “terrorists” it’s likely an inability to cleanse their minds of pretentious ossification (: a tendency toward or state of being molded into a rigid, conventional, sterile, or unimaginative condition). They are caught in their own trap and are frustrated and looking for someone to blame pretty well sums it up. Oh, and don’t forget the spoils!
b.a. freeman says
thereligionofpeace.com has a list of attacks, under the “terror attacks” heading; go check it, notabigot. it would actually be a good thing for somebody who loves islam to actually go through the list looking for mistakes.
—
It’s obvious none of you have ever been in the Middle East, let alone ever read a Muslim text.
—
really, notabigot? here’s one for U, from sahih muslim book 1 hadith 142:
It is narrated on the authority of ‘Abdullah b. Umar that
the Messenger of Allah observed: O womenfolk, you
should give charity and ask much forgiveness for I saw
you in bulk amongst the dwellers of Hell. A wise lady
among them said: Why is it, Messenger of Allah, that
our folk is in bulk in Hell? Upon this the Holy Prophet
observed: You curse too much and are ungrateful to
your spouses. I have seen none lacking in common
sense and failing in religion but (at the same time)
robbing the wisdom of the wise, besides you. Upon this
the woman remarked: What is wrong with our common
sense and with religion? He (the Holy Prophet) observed:
Your lack of common sense (can be well judged from the
fact) that the evidence of two women is equal to one man,
that is a proof of the lack of common sense, and you
spend some nights (and days) in which you do not offer
prayer and in the month of Ramadan (during the days)
you do not observe fast, that is a failing in religion.
here’s another one, this time from the quran (the word of allah, and allah *ONLY*); quran 4:3:
And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly
with the orphan-girls, then marry (other) women of your
choice, two or three, or four but if you fear that you shall
not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or
(the captives and the slaves) that your right hands possess.
here “the captives … that your right hands possess” means slaves, more politely referred to as “concubines.” a concubine is a *SEX SLAVE*. no, i have never read arabic, because i don’t speak the language and don’t know the script; that does not mean that i can’t read translations. from what i have seen, however, the legacy media and most government officials in most republics don’t even bother reading translations.
—
sharia law (whatever that’s supposed to be, because every country that even pays lip-service to ithas [sic] different ideas) is not the law of iraq.
—
first of all, “sharia” means “law,” so saying “sharia law” is like saying “law law;” U might want to drop the english word next time U discuss it. secondly, there aren’t many nations that actually implement *all* of sharia, and when there are differences between sharia and what is in place, the ulema promptly points it out in khutbah, after which the ummah goes out to implement sharia locally, usually with incidental deaths of local non-muslims. finally, sharia is a *very* well developed system, with which the ulema is intimately familiar; there is nothing that is unknown about it. U might want to check out the english translation of “umdat al-salik” (“the reliance of the traveler,” and written by ahmad ibn naqib al-misri in the 14th century; nuh ha mim keller published a fairly-reliable english translation in 1991, and the translation was approved by al-azhar university in cairo, egypt, which has been _the_ leading institution of islamic study (for sunnis, who make up ~93% of all muslims) since the end of the 13th century. none of sharia is new, and none of it is unknown. check it out for yourself.
—
as a Christian, even if it did she would be exempt (‘let there be no compulsion in religion’ is enshrined in the Koran).
—
obviously, U are unaware of the doctrine of abrogation, which allah established in quran 2:106:
Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate or cause
to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it.
Know you not that Allah is able to do all things?
your quote is quran 2:256, which was “revealed” shortly after the muslims made hijrah to medina, and were still fairly weak. one of the final revelations was quran 9, in which we find quran 9:5:
But when the forbidden months are past, then fight
and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize
them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every
stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish
regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open
the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
in other words, convert or die. in islamic logic, *2* things can be true at the same time (since *everything* in the quran came from allah, who is always right), but here we have the dude himself saying that when a revelation conflicts with earlier revelations, the earlier ones are no longer incumbent upon muslims. maybe U should find out in which order the surahs of the quran were revealed.
—
although some more ‘backward’ countries have managed to treat women (in violation of the Koran) as less than equal, just as we did a century ago or less, murder is not and nevert [sic] was part of the deal.
—
as we have seen, women are only worth half what a man is worth. and yes, murder is *indeed* part of the deal, and does not even need the approval of the (presumably sharia) State. in sahih al-bukhari 9:84:64, “… Allah’s Apostle [said], ‘During the last days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection.'” in sunan abu dawud 38:4349, we find that “Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib: A Jewess used to abuse the Prophet (peace be upon him) and disparage him. A man strangled her till she died. The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) declared that no recompense was payable for her blood.” in keller’s translation of “umdat al-salik,” section o1.2, which lists those who are *NOT* subject to retaliatory killing (i.e., it is a list of people who may *NOT* be killed by any muslim, even though they have killed somebody), includes a muslim for killing a non-muslim (-2-), anybody for killing a muslim apostate (-3-), a father or mother for killing a child or grandchild (-4-), and a husband for killing his wife. lest U think that “umdat al-salik” is just a book, keep in mind that the ulema spent *centuries* distilling sharia so that is based, as closely as possible, on the quran and the sunnah. finally, killing is *required* when allah or the profit (sp. deliberate) are “slandered.” this is the case even when the truth is told, because the intent is to prevent *disparagement* of them. *that* is why every prominent non-muslim critic of islam eventually ends up under a death sentence.
i am truly sorry that U know so little of islam. i, too, was once uninformed; in fact, i spent the better part of my life in ignorant bliss, only learning the truth over the past few years. now i’m nearing the end of my life, and it is beginning to look as though civilization is also nearing its end. U appear to be angry, and also appear to care about muslims, and probably all people as well, and have tried to defend muslims against what U consider evil attacks. i completely understand being angry about folks being mistreated, and i encourage U to continue to care. i am just a faceless voice on the internet, and U don’t know me from adam, so why not take this a step further in your defense of muslims? learn what islamic scripture teaches, and use that *first-hand* knowledge to rebut the arguments of knuckle-dragging fools like me. remember to consult the *scriptures*, not what muslims U know say or do, because very often, what people say and do does not line up with what their purported religion teaches. is not truth the *best* argument?
gravenimage says
The ludicrously self-styled “notabigot” wrote:
What a load of bollux! Especially from the comments. It’s obvious none of you have ever been in the Middle East, let alone ever read a Muslim text.
…………………………..
What utter rot. The texts of Islam are full of threats against women who do not adhere to Islamic diktats of ‘modesty’–how can “notabigot” claim otherwise?
And the Middle East and other parts of the Muslim world are *rife* with violence against women. how can he pretend this is not so?
Note that he does not say how opposing the murder of this young woman is ‘bigoted’.
More:
In the first place, sharia law (whatever that’s supposed to be, because every country that even pays lip-service to ithas (sic) different ideas) is not the law of iraq (sic).
…………………………..
This is, indeed, the whole point. If Shari’ah–which differs only in the degree to which it is imposed, not in its diktats–is *not* the law of the land in Iraq. If it were, then the state would have gone after this woman.
But in instances where the Islamic state is *not* imposing Shari’ah, pious Muslims believe that they themselves have the right to “enjoin the right and forbid the wrong”–how can “notabigot” think we don’t know this?
More:
Secondly, as a Christian, even if it did she would be exempt (‘let there be no compulsion in religion’ is enshrined in the Koran.)
…………………………..
What utter crap–there is no Shari’ah state where Infidels are not subject to its barbarism.
As for quoting Qur’an 2:256, this means *at best* that no one is forced to convert to Islam–it does *not* mean that Infidels are not subject to Islamic laws in Islamic states. (Never mind that this is also an abrogated verse).
More:
Third – although some more ‘backward’ countries have managed to treat women (in violation of the Koran) as less than equal, just as we did a century ago or less, murder is not and nevert (sic) was part of the deal.
…………………………..
Wait–how is wife-beating–enshrined in Qur’an 4:34–equal rights?
What crap. And over 90% of “Honor Killings” in the world take place under Islam. The idea that murder was “nevert” part of the deal is sadly untrue.
And no–the idea that Infidels were murdering immodest women in the streets a hundred years ago is just claptrap.
More:
When I read of people killing in the name of Islam I am reminded of those ‘Christian’ who say ‘God told me to do it’. Why do you call such people – unless of course they’re evangelists – ‘deluded’, but if they’re Muslims call them ‘terrorists’?
…………………………..
The horrors of Jihad and Shari’ah are what Islam teaches–these are not contrary to Islam at all, as “notabigot” pretends. And where have Christians committed over 33,000 acts of religiously inspired terrorism? Of course, they have not.
More:
Why not be honest and just admit you hate humanity?
…………………………..
No–condemning the murder of this woman is *not* indicative of ‘hating humanity’–just the opposite, in fact.
More, in reply to Carol the 1st:
33,745 Terror attacks since 9/11? When – where? I think we should be told. How about some evidence instead of just assertions?
…………………………..
Actually, as of right now there have been 33.898 Jihad terror attacks just since 9/11. Here’s more at the Religion of Peace site, which keeps this grim tally:
https://thereligionofpeace.com/
More:
As for those ‘Christians’ you descrbe (sic) as ‘mental’ – I was trying to be nice when i called them deluded. But you say ‘they act out based upon their own turmoil and stresses.’ I wonder what you think is the motivation for Islamic ‘terrorsits’.
…………………………..
Islam teaches Jihad terror–Jihad murder is, in face, considered the most praiseworthy of actions, and the *only* action that guarantees Muslims a trip to paradise.
And why is he pretending that Carol misspelled terrorists as ‘terrorsits’? A single minor typo would not make her comments any less apt, in any case–but this simply is not true here. Instead, it is his own posts that are riddled with typos.
don vito says
itace, this is what I’ve been warning you about. You think you are safe from the saracen cretans, because you honour your prophet. However, someone at your mosk could want something of yours and decide to expose what you have posted, about pious and devout moslems killing other moslems, and you post calling such moslems agents of USA and zionist Israel. itace, you could be accused of not being moslem enough. A warning from a kufr.
Carol the 1st says
Itace wouldn’t likely be scared. He’s left clues many times that smart people shit their drawers when they see him coming
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Beauty context is too barbaric and degrading to women advertising them like goods. Look at this Arab lady, despite Arab ladies being exceptionally beautiful and attractive, she looks like monkey. However i am not in support of killing her because the punishment for exposure is not death penalty under sharia, it taazeer (discretionary punishment) to be determined by the state and to be carried out on the order of Sharia court, not by the individuals. As such her killers will face death penalty for taking the law into their hands and exceeding the limit prescribed by the sharia.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
I mean beauty contest
Carol the 1st says
Self-correction!!??
don vito says
itace, you are going to argue sharia law with the killers of this innocent kufr life? Watch your six, they would kill you too, for their faith. Do you say what you posted, at your mosk? What’s it’s twenty?
gravenimage says
The hideous Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Beauty context is too barbaric and degrading to women advertising them like goods.
………………………….
Beauty “contexts” are barbaric–but, as Ibrahim itace muhammed would have it, child “marriage”, forced marriage, rape, and sex slavery are all perfectly Islamic.
More:
Look at this Arab lady, despite Arab ladies being exceptionally beautiful and attractive, she looks like monkey.
………………………….
She isn’t immured in a garbage bag, which is the way Ibrahim itace muhammed prefers them…
More:
However i am not in support of killing her because the punishment for exposure is not death penalty under sharia, it taazeer (discretionary punishment) to be determined by the state and to be carried out on the order of Sharia court, not by the individuals.
………………………….
But since the state here is *not* punishing women for not wearing the Burqa, Muslims have the right to take Shari’ah into their own hands. Ibrahim itace muhammed has himself confirmed this.
More:
As such her killers will face death penalty for taking the law into their hands and exceeding the limit prescribed by the sharia.
………………………….
Yeah, right. In fact, Shari’ah enshrines women being of less worth than men, and Infidels of less worth than Muslims. In fact, under Shari’ah no Muslim can be executed for murdering an Infidel.
*At best* he would be instructed to pay some token amount to her family–and I would not hold my breath expecting even this.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
I mean beauty contest
don vito says
itace, square what you just posted, with sex slaves, and pedophilia. both sanctioned by sharia. What this women was doing was consensual on her part, and something she wanted to do. Your opinion on modesty was not hers, and not being a moslem, sharia law didn’t pertain to her. Watch your six, a warning from kufr. Your brother believers would kill you, easy.
gravenimage says
Iraq: former Miss Baghdad shot dead for violating Sharia modesty rules
……………………..
This *poor young woman*.
God, I hate Islam.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Liar Gravenimage, you hate Islam because your satan god you call Holy Spirit inspired that women shall be degraded to the extent of being advertised like merchandise. O my God Allah, I hate the satan mithraist christians Call Holy Spirit!!
6woods says
Hey Ibby the islamic piece of trash – your god allah doesn’t exist. And you’re being a typical filthy muslim when you call “beauty contexts” barbaric, but don’t use the same word to describe the horrific acts of child rape (and other horrendous things) perpetrated by your disgusting prophet, and by millions upon millions of fellow muzzies since mohammed slithered on the earth.
Women who enter beauty pageants in the west do it out of their own free will. I’m a western woman, and I’ve never been forced to “display” myself, have never been forced to wear something I don’t want to wear, and would raise holy hell if someone tried.
Muslim women in the middle east (and increasingly in the west), on the other hand, are told what to wear on pain of death (literally). Islam is foul, you are foul, and there’s no reasoning with brainwashed slime like you. Stories like this one make me ill, and underscore what I’ve known for years: that islam is depraved, rotten to the core, and a cancer on this earth.
gravenimage says
Fine post, 6woods.
Ibrahim itace muhammed says
Liar Gravenimage, you hate Islam because your satan god you call Holy Spirit has inspired that women shall be degraded to the extent of being advertised like merchandise. o my God Allah !!I hate the satan mithraist christians Call Holy Spirit the father of all evils
gravenimage says
The foul Ibrahim itace muhammed wrote:
Liar Gravenimage, you hate Islam because your satan god you call Holy Spirit has inspired that women shall be degraded to the extent of being advertised like merchandise.
……………………………
I am actually not a particular fan of beauty contests, which I consider rather silly. But compared to the horrors of Islam they are perfectly innocent.
Of course Ibrahim itace muhammed considers beauty contests–which are completely consensual–to be “degraded”, but is fine with all the Islamic abuse of girls and women.
More:
o my God Allah !!I hate the satan mithraist christians Call Holy Spirit the father of all evils
……………………………
Note that Ibrahim itace muhammed does not consider the murder of this poor young woman to be evil. But he has said that it is the Holy Spirit that leads Infidels to oppose with forced marriage, child marriage, and Muslims selling women to the highest bidder–as well, of course, of sex slavery. How telling.
Dean says
Polygamy, rape, keeping women in body bags, terrorism, conquest, forced conversions, slavery, female genital mutilation, antisemitism, anti-humanity, anti-Christianity, repression, submission, etc., are all the modus operandi of Islam. Take your beliefs and shove them. We want none of it.
b.a. freeman says
i agree, Dean, but is not ibrahim entertaining? it’s rather funny the way he goes off like a hand grenade. as Carol the 1st has noted, “smart people s**t their drawers when they see him coming,” and he’s likely well-versed in the use of same.
Linde Barrera says
Rest in peace, brave Christian lady. God bless you.+
James Hanrahan says
Why in the world would we invite these, “Killers” into our country?
kiran says
Islam is hopelessly evil
Dean says
America spent thousands of lives and billions of dollars and what did they get for rescuing Iraq from Saddam? – They got an Islamic state ruled over by a joint authority between Iran and Iraq.
Leaders in Western countries are part of the problem by spreading Islam through open borders. We have a Prime Minister in Canada, Trudeau, who also proudly declares that he is a feminist and an Islamophile often seen at mosques and Islamic Spiritual Revival meetings. We even have an official “Islamic Heritage Month.” There are hatefests involving Islamic groups connected with Iran and others by the MB (especially on campus); all supported by leftists on the campuses and in the streets of Toronto like the annual Al Quds Day abomination.
Trudeau lures them to Canada – and now he is luring them from the United States as security agents at the border demonstrate their dhimmitude by carrying their bags across to assist in the illegal storming of the Canadian border. Trudeau tweets how open Canada is to an invasion which he welcomes with open arms. George Soros met with Trudeau early in his PM position to promote Soros’ open borders initiative. He works with the UN to promote the pro-Islam agenda and flooding the West with the same people who murder women and scream allah akbar after, for example, the recent hog-tying of a Jewish woman in Israel before killing her.
As the world becomes more globalist and borders erased, Soros and his associates intend to take over and Soros in particular finds ways to profit from his investment in communism, Islamic conquest and anarchy. There are many leftists and some weak centrist leaders who have bought into this dangerous movement.