Not global jihad violence. He doesn’t say anything about that. Just “Islamophobia.” And if what he claims about Muslims facing discrimination in Europe were true, why are so many Muslims trying to get there?
“Growing Islamophobia could affect global stability, security: Envoy,” Daily Sabah, September 17, 2021:
The increasing trend of Islamophobia could have an effect on overall security and stability in societies, Turkey’s Ambassador to Pakistan Mustafa Yurdakul said Thursday, expressing concern over the issue.
Speaking at an international conference in Islamabad on the “Significance of Regional Connectivity for Shared Prosperity,” Yurdakul said Turkey and Pakistan are raising their voices against this trend in the world.
“We have a bigger issue at hand: That is Islamophobia. Unfortunately, this is a growing trend around the world, especially in European countries and the West,” he said.
“Where the Muslim population, minorities who are simple workers, are just trying to earn a living, each and every passing day, they are facing increasing difficulties, harassment (and) discrimination.”
The conference was organized by the Center for Global and Strategic Studies, an Islamabad-based think tank, in collaboration with Bahria University in Islamabad.
Yurdakul praised his country’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan for raising their voices against the growing Islamophobia and discrimination against Muslims in those countries.
“I’m very happy that our President Erdoğan and Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan are raising their voices against this challenge,” he said.
He warned that if this negative trend continues, it could affect the overall security, stability and harmony in all our societies.
Racist attacks targeting Muslims or immigrants in Europe increasingly make the headlines as white supremacists become more efficient in an age where their ideals, or at least parts of them, are going mainstream. There is no single large group orchestrating these attacks against Muslims and immigrants. Rather, individual attacks lead to more copycat attacks.
Under the pretext of freedom of speech, the tolerant political climate has helped far-right sympathizers with violent tendencies expand their support….
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
Biting the hand that feeds them. Why isn’t Saudi Arabia taking in refugees? As the propagator of Wahabiism throughout the world you would think they would be the first to care for their bretheren, but, I suppose, they’re too Islamophobic. .
Eva says
They’re not stupid, that’s why.
They know what will happen in their country if they do take in these ‘refugees’, and they want no part of it.
If only our ‘leaders’ would do the same.
mortimer says
More non-empathetic, supremacist mirroring! Let’s change the names to test whether the Turkish ambassador’s principle holds water.
Let’s say, ‘Growing ‘ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM’ (from ISIS, Taliban, Pakistan and Al Qaeda) could affect global security, stability and harmony.
As usual, Muslim supremacists BLAME THEIR INTENDED VICTIMS and ACCUSE THEM of doing precisely what the supremacists are doing … religious discrimination. In Islam, RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Is always ONE-WAY … directed from the Muslims towards the dirty kufaar!
According to Sharia law, the dirty KAFIRS don’t have a right to either criticize or even ‘MENTION’ Islam without showing Islam perfect respect and honor. Anything less than that lands the kafir in hot water with the mullahs who soon discover the need for a fatwa (death sentence) to keep the uppity KAFIRS in line and in their proper, subservient places.
Punishment of Blasphemers from Sharia manual ‘Reliance of the Traveller’:
“The (DHIMMI) agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
-5- mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.” – Reliance of the Traveller’ Chapter ‘O’ 11.10.05.
Sharia permits anyone to kill those who verbally oppose Islam, since they are at war with Islam:
“There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593
“We have already discussed killing the person who, with intent, curses the Prophet, belittles him or slights him in any way. The judgement in this case is clear.” (i.e. death) – Qadhi Iyaadh in ash-Shifa, Volume No.2, Page No. 27
Spideyweb1 says
Here in lies the problem… they use a few words to discredit their enemies, US, “Growing concerns over (FAKE) Islamophobia”… and we have to to use about 10 paragraphs to defend ourselves.. you’ve already lost when those Islamic monsters got you on your heels going on and on about their real motives. Gotta reverse it..
Mount Zion says
A bunch of crap , that’s what I call it . Islamophobia (fear of Islam) may be true but never discrimination . And why fear of Islam , because of all the beheadings and rapes and knife attacks and vehicular jihad and suicide bombings
Have you ever seen real retaliation by Europeans or other western Countries after any of that ? Never . Have you ever seen real discrimination after any of that ? No way . They still keep pooring in unhindered and unvetted despite all these above mentioned jihad attacks . The real problem here is the plight of christians and jews and hindus and other minorities in muslim countries who are beeing attacked and forced to flee leaving everything behind including their homes with everything in it which then may be taken over by their neighbours with no recompensation whatsoever . This is the real issue here , certainly not Islamophobia . There is no one who keeps the most beautyful religion of peace in check . After the US has relinquished his authority on the world’s stage anyrthing mandated under sharija law is more and more blatantly and shamelessly enforced with no fear of reprisal no matter how much of a violation of human rights these enforcements may constitute .
mortimer says
Agree, ‘Islamophobia’ is nonsensical, so something else more secretive is obviously going on under cover of this slander word. The term is actually a Trojan horse for discriminatory Sharia blasphemy law. Muslims want to impose their blasphemy law, thus removing the human rights of non-Muslim kafirs.
mortimer says
More non-empathetic, supremacist mirroring! So, let’s just change the terminology to test whether the Turkish ambassador’s principle holds water.
Let’s substitute ‘Islamo-supremacism’ for ‘phobia’, ‘Growing ‘ISLAMO-SUPREMACISM’ (from ISIS, Taliban, Pakistan and Al Qaeda) could affect global security, stability and harmony.
As usual, Muslim supremacists BLAME THEIR INTENDED VICTIMS and ACCUSE THEM of doing PRECISELY what the supremacists are doing … religious discrimination directed against non-Muslims.
In Islam, RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION Is always ONE-WAY … directed from the Muslims towards the dirty kufaar! Muslims are required to hate kafirs ‘for the sake of Allah’, so this hatred towards KAFIRS is as natural and spontaneous to a Muslim as the Ottoman slap.
According to Sharia law, it is the dirty KAFIRS who don’t have a right to either criticize or even ‘MENTION’ Islam without showing Islam perfect respect and deferential honor. Anything less than that lands the KAFIR in hot water with the mullahs who soon discover the need for a fatwa (death sentence) to keep the uppity KAFIRS in line and in their proper, subservient and silent places.
When we ask Muslims what sort of critique of Islam would NOT be ‘Islamophobic’, they are never able to think of something that would pass. In other words, EVERY criticism of Islam uttered by a DIRTY KAFIR is unacceptable and ‘IMPERMISSIBLE’ … and punishable by death.
(But Muslims don’t want to explain that … that would defeat the ‘narrative’ of ‘benign’ Islam.)
Punishment of Blasphemers from Sharia manual ‘Reliance of the Traveller’:
“The (DHIMMI) agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
-5- mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.” – Reliance of the Traveller’ Chapter ‘O’ 11.10.05.
Sharia permits anyone to kill those who verbally oppose Islam, since they are at war with Islam:
“There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593
“We have already discussed killing the person who, with intent, curses the Prophet, belittles him or slights him in any way. The judgement in this case is clear.” (i.e. death) – Qadhi Iyaadh in ash-Shifa, Volume No.2, Page No. 27
Infidel says
Pakistan’s alliance w/ Turkey is a continuation of the Mughal-Ottoman alliance in the 17th and 18th centuries
born saturday says
https://nordicmonitor.com/
born saturday says
way things are going in europe there is talk from whats left of the sane people here about the lust for islam the islamolusting left and the rest of the mannequins of islam… i am sure in countries like france hungary poland austria but in several other countries we are fed up with the parrots of islam advogating… but for the first times in the world the great sultan erdogan and his friends have started stating where this propaganda derives from and that its only purpose in another form of jihad…. information jihad….
tim gallagher says
So what we have been living through with 1400 years of murderous Muslim invasions in so many different countries, and the 40,000 Muslim terrorist attacks since the 9/11 attacks is this maggot’s idea of “harmony”. There has never been any peace or harmony or stability from islam towards non-Muslims. Islamophobia merely means telling the truth about evil islam’s nature, I say the more truth telling islamophobia the better. Islam should be hammered constantly by people telling the unvarnished truth about the foul ideology.
gravenimage says
Turkey’s Ambassador to Pakistan: Growing ‘Islamophobia’ could affect global security, stability and harmony
…………………..
Just claptrap–all he really means is that openly expressed concerns over Islamic violence may retard rampant Islamization.
OLD GUY says
Have you ever heard a politican point out the bad things their party support? Just maybe if muslim/islamic ideology didn’t support terrorism around the world, slavery and forced conversion to islam there would be no islamophobia. Islam is an ideology of world domination by ruthless dictators. It’s all about POWE an GREED.
SAFI says
lmao meanwhile actual refugees from Syria are getting beaten and terrorized by turkish lynch mobs, same with Ahmadis(never mind all the non-muslims) in P*kistan, Kurdish villages are being destroyed by the turkish military but sure lets talk about “islamophobia” and “white supremacy” in some far away land to appeal to the SJW crowd while also agitating the islamic extremists there, clearly what these two regimes were thinking… cynical and malicious propaganda from two regimes the West should long have recognized as enemy states.