Once again we see how threatened certain powerful groups are by the Zemmour candidacy, as well as by his supporters and by Zemmour himself. And there is no length to which such groups will not go.
“‘House n****r,’ ‘Wallah, we’re going to behead you’: an activist for Eric Zemmour harassed and threatened,” translated from “« Nègre de maison », « Wallah on va te décapiter » : un militant d’Éric Zemmour harcelé et menacé,” Valeurs Actuelles, December 6, 2021 (thanks to Medforth):
The threats have been increasing for a month. As reported by Le Figaro, the threat has escalated to a notch for Tanguy David, a declared supporter of Eric Zemmour, since he attended his meetings. In question? His skin color. Because in several images of the meeting held by the essayist in Villepinte (Seine-Saint-Denis) on Sunday, December 5, the young law student and head of a local Generation Z branch was seen behind the candidate. Obviously, his skin color and his political commitment do not mix.
On social networks, as early as October during Eric Zemmour’s first meetings, hateful and insulting messages poured in, such as “This n***a doing what here”, “But n***a, is there a problem? “Sunday, in Villepinte, Internet users insulted him as “sold” and “house n****r.” Other hateful messages threaten him with death, details Le Figaro: “Wallah, we’re going to behead you,” or “Your family in the village must be ashamed of you.” Some go further and swear to “find him.”
“Those who are embarrassed by my presence can leave”
On the evening of Sunday, the young activist also spoke on social networks to denounce this torrent of hatred. “The black man behind Zemmour was me. And I am proud. What fervor, what atmosphere, what awe-inspiring Éric Zemmour. Those who are embarrassed by my presence can leave, France will do without them.” Supported by many internet users this time around, he was once again insulted. In Le Figaro, he explains having received more than 3,000 racist or threatening messages. “I didn’t actually expect that, especially when I was threatened with beheading,” he admits.
In the past, Tanguy David had been reluctant to file a complaint, but he says all messages received will be the subject of a complaint. Guest of “Don’t touch my post!” ”On C8 Monday evening December 6, he will give new explanations. “I have been experiencing a surge of hatred for hours,” he emphasizes. He deems this “unacceptable hate campaign” and wants only one thing now, to stop it.
gravenimage says
France: Muslims barrage black Zemmour activist with racist messages, ‘Wallah, we’re going to behead you’
………….
And this is not just racist–bad enough–but *threatening murder*. Will any of these homicidal Muslims be prosecuted? Will any of them be deported? Don’t count on it…
mortimer says
If there were a ‘hate crime’, under any definition, this would be one. Namely, threatening someone with a vicious, bloody decapitation while chanting demeaning, racial epithets and religious insults.
The Muslim mob is the picture book image of ‘BIGOTRY’… the only thing missing is their hoods and they would be rivals of the KKK … and Islamic KKK.
JANET says
wILL CERTAIN GROUPS IN France take on these TERRORIST GROUPS OF BLACK zEMMOUR SAVAGES??
Then make them leave France. They don’t belong there in the first place. France is CATHOLIC-!
gravenimage says
Janet, how is Tanguy David, a supporter of Anti-Jihadist Eric Zemmour, a terrorist group? He is the one being threatened by homicidal Muslims. Please read the article again.
Doomer says
Muslims are known to be irrational, even highly educated ones like Hashmi, medical doctor,in his debate with Robert Spencer. He said Christians used the OT passage to kill the AMALEKITES
to justify the genocide of American Indians.
I had never heard about it. I decided to investigate.
According to Pennsylvania State University Professor Philip Jenkins, a contributing editor for the American Conservative, the PURITANS used this passage when they wanted to get rid of the Native American tribes.
Really?
I have looked and looked for specific books or writings by PURITANS and what I found shows Jenkins and Hashmi are wrong. This is all I have found.
First of all,the Puritans certainly knew that the central ethical message of the NT is the Law=love your neighbors like yourselves. The Law in the NT means “Law of God”.
COTTON MATHER was the most important Puritan leader of his time,he wrote a history called “Magnalia Christi Americana, considered Mather’s greatest work (1702).
A history of the English colonists in New England.
He called a specific Indian tribe by name “Amalekites” but as a LITERARY expression,
not Part of a Religious Doctrine advocating Genocide ( kill them all).
It is in his history, the events from 1620 to 1698.
In 1702 Cotton Mather, a Christian colonial minister, wrote ” Magnalia Christi Americana: Or the Ecclesiatical History of New England from its first planting in the year 1620 unto the year of our Lord, 1698″, a seven book work.
In this work, there are two statements viewing Indians as Amalekites.
1) The first statement is in book III, at page 64. This is in a section of the book which is about Thomas Hooker.
“Nor was the wonderful Success of his Prayer, upon special Concerns, unobserved by the whole Colony; who reckoned him the Moses, which turned away the Wrath of God from them, and obtained a Blast from Heaven
upon their Indian Amalekites,
by his uplifted Hands, in those remarkable Deliverances which they sometimes experienced. It was very particularly observed, when there was a Battel to be fought between the Narraganset and the Menhegin Indians, in the Year 1643. The Narraganset Indians had complotted the Ruine of the English, but the Monhegin were Confederate with us…”
This passage goes on to describe the defeat of the Narragansett Indians by the Mohegan Indians. In other words, the colonists allied with the Mohegan against the Narragansett, and the prayer of Hooker was being credited for the defeat of the Narragansett.
In the above passage, “who reckoned him the Moses, which turned away the Wrath of God from them, and obtained a Blast from Heaven upon their Indian Amalekites, by his uplifted Hands”, is a reference not to the bible verse indicated in the OP, but instead to Exodus 17:11 :
“And it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed: and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed.”
2) The second statement is in Book VII at page 116. It is in a section titled “The History of ten years rouled away under the great Calamities of the War with Indian-savages, repeated and improved in a sermon at Boston Lecture 27d.7m. 1698”:
“Let us keep our Hands lifted up in Prayer, for a
Total Dissipation of those Amalekites,
which have thus long and thus far prevailed against us !”
mortimer says
The basis of the US ethic is the Golden Rule. The American Civil War was fought for the universal enforcement of the Golden Rule.
Doomer says
Yes, that is true, the top leader of the abolitionist movement was a Christian WILLIAM GARRISON (1805 – 1879).
He was for immediate emancipation of slaves, not gradual. He is best known for his widely-read anti-slavery newspaper “The Liberator ”
(founded in 1831)
After the civil war he was for a) Women’s Right to Vote and also b)
supported the causes of civil rights for blacks.
In addition the LEADER of the Liberal ( I repeat Liberal) party ,founded in 1859, in the UK was also a Christian:
WILLIAM GLADSTONE (1809-1898)
He was a devout Christian and served as Prime Minister a total of 12 years.
1. During that time he was 100% against more colonial conquest by the UK in Africa,Asia,etc.
2. He was also for giving the Irish autonomy, “home rule” and tried twice to get Parliament to approve it ( 1886 and 1893 ), but failed.
gravenimage says
Good research, Doomer.
Doomer says
Thanks, one has to verify and verify just in case. Also Hashmi-Danios said,in the debate, something about the Spaniards committing genocide.
1.The almost only time the Spaniards really had to fight against a mass army of natives, in order to conquer anything, was against the Aztecs.
It was when they conquered the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan, with an army of 50,000.
But 95% of the soldiers were Indians who were his allies ,of non-Aztec tribes, against the Aztecs. They hated the Aztecs.
2.Before the attack on the city, HERNAN CORTES, read a series of rules of war to be obeyed by both, Spaniards and Indians,
and 2 of the rules were: a) forbidden to Rape Women, b) forbidden to Kill Women and Children.
In reality,during 300 years of Spanish rule in the Americas, they:
a.Had no interest in spreading their language, in imposing it on the Indians.
b. The government made them legal minors to make sure their land and property would not be taken from them by the colonists.
c. Exempted the Indians from the Inquisition.
d. Created “Republics of Indians” and “Republics of Spaniards”.
The Spaniards (except regarding religion) had NO interest in WESTERNIZING the Indians. To make rule easy and efficient they
simply kept the existence of the local Indian elite, aristocracy, chiefs, nobles, in their positions. Those people would rule the common Indians in the Spanish king’ s name ( paying taxes ).
Those areas ruled by native chiefs were called Republics of Indians: they kept their languages, customs. While the cities, where almost all the Spaniards lived in,
were ruled according to Western culture,those areas were the Republics of Spaniards. In those areas ,between the 16th and 18th century, the Spaniards created
23 universities. And as for the Philippines,they had the University of Santo Tomas (1611) and University of San Felipe de Austria (1640)
And the main cities had hospitals,where ,according to law, were free, it was for all the inhabitants, even the poorest.
From what I have read, the universities had no racial barrier, Indians could also study there. It is significant because the PORTUGUESE ( who were in BRAZIL
from 1530-1822), almost 300 years, Never Created a University, and only introduced PRINTING there in 1724.
And the first Brazilian university appeared in 1912. It gives Portugal a bad image, while neither Belgium nor Holland ever created a university in their colonies.
Lavéritétriomphera says
@Doomer
Conquistadors imported deceases that decimated the Indians
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2019/05/05/columbus-brought-measles-new-world-it-was-disaster-native-americans/.
Doomer says
To comment a bit on the link by La Verite Triomphera, that is true, about 90% of natives in the Americas died due to smallpox and measles. It was unintentional. Robert Spencer said so in his debate,he said 80 to 90%.
It happened regarding the Polynesians ( 80% of Hawaians died due to contact with English sailors,because of smallpox and measles).
The same when the English went to Australia.
In Canada, the Huron nation of 30,000 ,in the 1640s, allies of the French, lost 70% of its members due to smallpox.
mortimer says
Racism is systemic in Islam and is enshrined in discriminatory Sharia law. In Sharia, one white slave is worth the price of two black slaves.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
“In Sharia, one white slave is worth the price of two black slaves.” Citation, please.
gravenimage says
Mark, the “Prophet” Muhammed traded two black slaves for one white one. It is unclear whether this was just this one case, or if it is to be taken as the norm in Islam.
Here is one Hadith on the subject:
Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported:
There came a slave and pledged allegiance to Allah’s Apostle on migration; he (the Holy Prophet) did not know that he was a slave. Then there came his master and demanded him back, whereupon Allah’s Apostle said: Sell him to me. And he bought him for two black slaves, and he did not afterwards take allegiance from anyone until he had asked him whether he was a slave (or a free man)
https://sunnah.com/muslim:1602
Egor says
Quoting ahadeeth is a little like quoting the story of Santa Claus. Santa lives in this magical place at the North Pole. He promises the children if they are good they will be visited by him on Christmas eve. We cannot really say where exactly at the North Pole Santa lives and does business but we know it is there. this part of the story is a great deal like Mecca in the Hejaz. We were told it was there in the centuries prior to the 8th Century but we do not exactly know where. Muhammad said if the Muslims were good they would inherit Jannah. On Christmas eve Santa takes off with his flying reindeer and sleigh and travels the skies at the speed of light – or faster. Muhammad flew on his winged donkey from Mecca (which did not exist) to Jerusalem and then o to heaven to debate with Allah the number of times the people should pray per day. Allah was very amenable, as he obviously had nothing else to do, and agreed that praying five times was agreeable. That Muhammad was a great negotiator. You cannot compare Santa to Muhamad. The story of Muhammad was carried down by word of mouth for 300 years before being put to paper in the Sirah and the Sunnah. Well the story of Santa has been passed down by word of mouth as well. Funnily, as I grew up I realised Santa was a legend and still I passed it on to my children. yet Muslims are too indoctrinated to see that Santa has just as much credibility as Muhammad. We know Mecca did not exist until the 8th Century. Gibson’s work has been a great indicator of that. If there was no Mecca until the 8th Century there was no Muhammad as depicted in the Ahadeeth.
It is around the latter reign of Abd Al-Malik ibn Marwan that we see the onset of Islam in Mecca. I believe the actual history joins folklore around this time. Caliph Marwan’s youngest son was called, Muhammad. Marwan’s mother was called Arminah – the same as Muhammad’s. Two of his wives were name Zaynab and Aisha. Now that sounds familiar.
When you look at the authors of the Sirah and the Sunna have a look at where they were born. The majority of them were born no where near Mecca.
So who are the canonised folk who presented the narrative and where were they born and when? I submit the following for discussion
Ibn Hisham – Born (?) Basrah, Iraq – (1800 kms from Mecca) Died – Fustat Egypt 833 CE
Al Waqidi – Born 747 CE in Medina Died 823 CE
Al Bukhari – Born in Bukhari Born 810 CE in Bukhara, Uzbekistan – (4200 kms from Mecca) Died 870 CE . In Xo’ja Ismoil, Ubekistan.
Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj – Born (?) Nayshabur, Iran – (3200kms from Mecca) Died 875 CE Nayshabur, Iran.
Al Timidhi – Born 824 CE Termez Uzbekistan – (4428 Kms from Mecca) Died 884 CE Termez Uzbekistan
Ibn Mayah – Born 824 CE Qazvin, Iran – (2516kms from Mecca) Died 887 CE Qazvin, Iran
Abu Dowad – Born 817 CE Sistan East Iran – (2200 kms from Mecca) Died 889 CE Basra, Iraq
An Nasai – Born 829 CE Nisa, Turkmenistan – (2160kms from Mecca) Died 915 CE Mecca ,Saudi Arabia (Hello Mecca gets a mention for the first time in the 10th Century – outside of the three phantoms you raised)
Al Tabari – Born 839 CE Amol, Iran – (2777 Kms from Mecca) Died 923 CE Baghdad Iraq.
It is interesting that Al-Tabari died in Baghdad (1783 Kms from Mecca) as that is probably where all these Hadiths were constructed. Everything to do with the construction of the Hadiths appears to come from people who were born in East Iran, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan. Sorry Imam, the Hejaz hardly gets a look in . So what you are trying to tell me is that all these people who recited these Hadiths ie statements made by the Prophet and his companions and trekked 1000s of Kms to let the canonised few write them down. It tends to remind me of salmon swimming up stream, breeding and then dying. You have got to be questioning all of this. So when I say the Ahadeeth are constructed stories I am not only questioning the space in time bit also, now, in distance.
We then have the question of the number of hadiths. I believe the story is that Al-Bukhari inherited 600,000 or so hadiths and selected 7339 for publication. He deemed the rest too weak. Based on what experience? So if we assume Mecca did exist and one person remembered one hadith, then Ibn Hisham, and his predecessor, would have needed 600,000 people to memorise. I would really like to see what was in those other 592, 661 hadiths if they were true.
The fairy tale continues with the Abbasids. We are told that they form their caliphate out of Mecca. The third (I would argue second) caliphate named after Muhammad’s uncle Al Bassa. So if it was founded in Mecca, why wasn’t Mecca it’s capital? I mean it was such a large and well known place. Instead we see its capital, for five hundred years, being in Baghdad. I would argue that was where the whole narrative emanated from and all those in the know, who worked out of there, used the Umayyads as the link between fact and folk lore.
Hank says
+10
Conclusion: Muslims still believe in Santa
gravenimage says
Egor–with all respect–you are missing the point.
I do not cite the Hadith as history, and certainly not to indicate what I believe. This is what *Muslims* believe, and what motivates them.
In the same way, in opposing the Nazis it was important to learn about concepts like the master race, lebensraum, and the Thousand Year Reich–not as facts, but in order to understand the mindset of the enemy who is attacking you.
And Islam may not be any more factual than is Santa Claus (which, incidentally, few over the age of eight believe in in any case), but it is certainly a lot uglier.
Norbert F. says
“Quoting ahadeeth is a little like quoting the story of Santa Claus. Santa lives in this magical place at the North Pole”
We don’t care that Qur’an and ahadith are fabricated stories. They’re the basis of the Shari’a. People interested in the fight against Islam have to know the ahadith and to take them as if they were authentic.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Norbert.