Hey, when are you posting last week’s “This week in jihad?”
࿗Infidel࿘says
Okay, now on this video:
Who is the singer along w/ the opening cartoon? David Wood – sounded like him? That was hilarious 😂 🤣
9:00 I thought that the best summarization of the meaning ‘struggle’ from ‘jihad’ came from Walid Shoebat years ago, when he said that he told his muslim friend, “Yes, you are right: islam does mean ‘struggle’. But so does ‘Mein Kampf’. ‘Jihad’ means ‘struggle’ in the same way that ‘Mein Kampf’ means ‘my struggle’
13:00 Speaking of the Turks, the exploits of the Turks go way beyond the Ottomans. It started really w/ the founding of islam, if one goes by the book “Did Muhammad exist?”, and the first people to really spread islam as we know it today were the Turks – the Ghaznavids and the Seljuqs. That was followed the the Khwarezmids and Timurides. It covers not just today’s Turkey, but today’s -stans, as well as Iran, India and as far as the Ottomans go, the Balkans as well
15:00 Why would RS feel bad about any criticism of the Ottomans? From what I understand, he may be of Anatolian descent but not quite Turkic i.e. not from the Seljuqs or Ottomans as Hatun is (not that there’s anything wrong w/ that)
Aside from all that, I wonder whether Hatun has watched ‘Diriliş: Ertuğrul’ – the Turkish teleserial that was not only a hit in Turkey, but also in countries like Azerbaijan, Pakistan and Bangladesh? Where the jihadi exploits of the father of the founder of the Ottoman sultanate were celebrated
24:00 Dhimmi style ‘protection’ is the same type of protection one gets from gangsters: they’ll ‘protect’ you as long as they can extort you. Not to mention all the intrusive rules of theirs (like the ‘Pact of Umar’) that one has to live under. As noted further, the mafia had more respect for their victims than muslims had: they didn’t spit into your mouth or slap you while collecting their money. I’ll bet that today’s mafia would be perfectly happy if one wired them the money, w/o even looking at their faces
25:00 It’s one thing for the average Westerner to be ignorant of history: it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. But it’s a different thing altogether for a museum, whose very existence is founded on history, to be ignorant of history
36:00 How is 2.5% the amount they tax for zakat, when it’s supposed to be 20%? Whereas jiziya was typically 50% or more. Dar ul islam is usually pretty highly taxed, while the oil-rich members are typically welfare states
42:00 Talking about Andalusia, if RS’ theory is correct that islam was designed by committee by the Abbasids in the halls of Baghdad and Buqhara, then chances are that during the Umayyad rule, there was no islam in Spain, and that only came after the Umayyads in Cordoba actually embraced the Abbasid designed islam
1:01:00 Fully agree w/ RS that the British government was evil throughout history (talking here about the British, not English i.e. after King James I). First of all, in the 18th century, they were the ones who saved the collective hide of the muslims in India, who were well on their way to being conquered by the Marathas, and they also overthrew the Sikh kingdom of Ranjit Singh, which had it remained, would have ensured that there would never have been a Pakistan. In their ‘Great Games’ against Russia, the Brits did what they could to prop up both Afghanistan and Iran. Russia, by contrast, was a major de-islamizing force at the time. In response to Russian citizens on the Turkistan frontier being kidnapped and sold into slave markets in Buqhara and Xeva, the Romanovs invaded Turkistan and destroyed the khanates of Buqhara and Xeva, and w/ it, the source of several jihads throughout history, from the Seljuqs to the Timurides to the Mughals. But back to RS’ point: the Brits made their alliance w/ the Ottomans b’cos they saw Russia as a threat to their eastern empires, which also explains their taking Turkey’s side in the Crimean war
1:02:00 Talking about Georgia, I have read that it was one of the countries conquered by Tamerlane. Not sure about other jihads waged against it, although parts of it were also under the Crimean Tatar empire which occupied much of the Black Sea coast, not just Crimea
Anyway, good interview
somehistorysays
the artwork is very simple, but it says so very much.
Rajasays
Infidel,
I barely miss your comments as they are objective.
I would bring your attention to para 1:01
The Brits had their own share of evils like propping up Islamic regimes at the cost of indigenous empires, not to mention their plunder under the guise of trade etc. Their lack of knowledge of islam is no excuse, they possibly didn’t bother to know the evils of islam or maybe it was pure exigency.
What we need to remember is that the Islamists of 20th century made it a point to always boycott Hindus is every forum, making Hindu-Muslim unity impossible. Even leaders had a terrible time with that. I used to hate Dr. Ambedkar for making a cocktail of a useless constitution. Not anymore, as I stumble upon his expertise on islam and also the fact that the Indian constitution itself has been tinkered beyond redemption. The prime example is removal of right to property.
To come to the point, Greece too faced the same crisis of uprooting as was the case with India, where millions were uprooted/killed because of islam. It easier to say that Pakistan should have never been created but islam by itself is all for creating Pakistans across the globe as its war machine has been let loose for about one and a half millennia.
࿗Infidel࿘says
Dr Ambedkar was a mixed bag. While he did lead a whole community out of Hinduism and into Buddhism, he also wrote very explicitly about the evils of islam, and why it was not an ally that the Dalits should pick. All his present day fans on the left conveniently gloss over that point of his while promoting muslim-Dalit alliances
Thankfully, Dalits in India are waking up and recognizing themselves as Hindus, particularly in light of muslims targeting them in society. In fact, just like most of the anti-Semitism comes from muslims, similarly, most of the Dalit-hatred comes from muslims as well, not Hindus of other castes
Scotsman48says
muslims just cant take a joke…
If you dont have a sense of humor then it just aint funny
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
somehistory says
Kind of OT , an article from Mr. Daniel Greenfield
“Justice Sotomayor: Any System That Isn’t Socialist, Isn’t Fair”
https://thewashingtonstandard.com/justice-sotomayor-any-system-that-isnt-socialist-isnt-fair/
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Hey, when are you posting last week’s “This week in jihad?”
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Okay, now on this video:
Who is the singer along w/ the opening cartoon? David Wood – sounded like him? That was hilarious 😂 🤣
9:00 I thought that the best summarization of the meaning ‘struggle’ from ‘jihad’ came from Walid Shoebat years ago, when he said that he told his muslim friend, “Yes, you are right: islam does mean ‘struggle’. But so does ‘Mein Kampf’. ‘Jihad’ means ‘struggle’ in the same way that ‘Mein Kampf’ means ‘my struggle’
13:00 Speaking of the Turks, the exploits of the Turks go way beyond the Ottomans. It started really w/ the founding of islam, if one goes by the book “Did Muhammad exist?”, and the first people to really spread islam as we know it today were the Turks – the Ghaznavids and the Seljuqs. That was followed the the Khwarezmids and Timurides. It covers not just today’s Turkey, but today’s -stans, as well as Iran, India and as far as the Ottomans go, the Balkans as well
15:00 Why would RS feel bad about any criticism of the Ottomans? From what I understand, he may be of Anatolian descent but not quite Turkic i.e. not from the Seljuqs or Ottomans as Hatun is (not that there’s anything wrong w/ that)
Aside from all that, I wonder whether Hatun has watched ‘Diriliş: Ertuğrul’ – the Turkish teleserial that was not only a hit in Turkey, but also in countries like Azerbaijan, Pakistan and Bangladesh? Where the jihadi exploits of the father of the founder of the Ottoman sultanate were celebrated
24:00 Dhimmi style ‘protection’ is the same type of protection one gets from gangsters: they’ll ‘protect’ you as long as they can extort you. Not to mention all the intrusive rules of theirs (like the ‘Pact of Umar’) that one has to live under. As noted further, the mafia had more respect for their victims than muslims had: they didn’t spit into your mouth or slap you while collecting their money. I’ll bet that today’s mafia would be perfectly happy if one wired them the money, w/o even looking at their faces
25:00 It’s one thing for the average Westerner to be ignorant of history: it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. But it’s a different thing altogether for a museum, whose very existence is founded on history, to be ignorant of history
36:00 How is 2.5% the amount they tax for zakat, when it’s supposed to be 20%? Whereas jiziya was typically 50% or more. Dar ul islam is usually pretty highly taxed, while the oil-rich members are typically welfare states
42:00 Talking about Andalusia, if RS’ theory is correct that islam was designed by committee by the Abbasids in the halls of Baghdad and Buqhara, then chances are that during the Umayyad rule, there was no islam in Spain, and that only came after the Umayyads in Cordoba actually embraced the Abbasid designed islam
1:01:00 Fully agree w/ RS that the British government was evil throughout history (talking here about the British, not English i.e. after King James I). First of all, in the 18th century, they were the ones who saved the collective hide of the muslims in India, who were well on their way to being conquered by the Marathas, and they also overthrew the Sikh kingdom of Ranjit Singh, which had it remained, would have ensured that there would never have been a Pakistan. In their ‘Great Games’ against Russia, the Brits did what they could to prop up both Afghanistan and Iran. Russia, by contrast, was a major de-islamizing force at the time. In response to Russian citizens on the Turkistan frontier being kidnapped and sold into slave markets in Buqhara and Xeva, the Romanovs invaded Turkistan and destroyed the khanates of Buqhara and Xeva, and w/ it, the source of several jihads throughout history, from the Seljuqs to the Timurides to the Mughals. But back to RS’ point: the Brits made their alliance w/ the Ottomans b’cos they saw Russia as a threat to their eastern empires, which also explains their taking Turkey’s side in the Crimean war
1:02:00 Talking about Georgia, I have read that it was one of the countries conquered by Tamerlane. Not sure about other jihads waged against it, although parts of it were also under the Crimean Tatar empire which occupied much of the Black Sea coast, not just Crimea
Anyway, good interview
somehistory says
the artwork is very simple, but it says so very much.
Raja says
Infidel,
I barely miss your comments as they are objective.
I would bring your attention to para 1:01
The Brits had their own share of evils like propping up Islamic regimes at the cost of indigenous empires, not to mention their plunder under the guise of trade etc. Their lack of knowledge of islam is no excuse, they possibly didn’t bother to know the evils of islam or maybe it was pure exigency.
What we need to remember is that the Islamists of 20th century made it a point to always boycott Hindus is every forum, making Hindu-Muslim unity impossible. Even leaders had a terrible time with that. I used to hate Dr. Ambedkar for making a cocktail of a useless constitution. Not anymore, as I stumble upon his expertise on islam and also the fact that the Indian constitution itself has been tinkered beyond redemption. The prime example is removal of right to property.
To come to the point, Greece too faced the same crisis of uprooting as was the case with India, where millions were uprooted/killed because of islam. It easier to say that Pakistan should have never been created but islam by itself is all for creating Pakistans across the globe as its war machine has been let loose for about one and a half millennia.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Dr Ambedkar was a mixed bag. While he did lead a whole community out of Hinduism and into Buddhism, he also wrote very explicitly about the evils of islam, and why it was not an ally that the Dalits should pick. All his present day fans on the left conveniently gloss over that point of his while promoting muslim-Dalit alliances
Thankfully, Dalits in India are waking up and recognizing themselves as Hindus, particularly in light of muslims targeting them in society. In fact, just like most of the anti-Semitism comes from muslims, similarly, most of the Dalit-hatred comes from muslims as well, not Hindus of other castes
Scotsman48 says
muslims just cant take a joke…
If you dont have a sense of humor then it just aint funny