New Zealand has gone from a woke female prime minister who trampled upon the civil rights of her citizens using a violent incident as a pretext, while putting them in harm’s way of jihadists due to her reckless immigration policies, to having a male prime minister who professes not to know what a woman is. He won’t be able to define what a man is, either.
Shame on Hipkins. It’s understandable that his confusion went viral. Piers Morgan, among many others who mocked Hipkins, tweeted:
BREAKING: New Zealand’s new Prime Minister doesn’t know what a woman is, despite replacing one as Prime Minister. pic.twitter.com/3Gj39RhXDX
— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) April 3, 2023
Hipkins kept on emphasizing that he was not expecting the question, which only compounded his dilemma. His emphasis merely exposed his lack of abilities and weak character even more, since these unexpected kinds of questions expose the truth, unscripted. The confused prime minister is unfit to rule New Zealand.
Like so many failed leaders, Chris Hipkins serves whatever agenda that he deems to be popular at the time, not the interests of New Zealand. He cannot think for himself.
“New Zealand’s prime minister goes viral for struggling to define the term ‘woman’: ‘People define themselves,’” by Aubrie Spady, Fox News, April 3, 2023:
Chris Hipkins, New Zealand’s newly elected Prime Minister, refused to define the term “woman,” arguing that “people define themselves” when pressed by a reporter.
During a press conference Sunday, New Zealand media company The Platform asked Hipkins how he, and the New Zealand government, define what a woman is.
“To be honest, that question has come out of left field for me. The biology, sex, gender,” he said before taking a long pause. “People define themselves, people define their own genders.”
When asked about the term again, Hipkins diverted the question and said that “people identity for themselves.”
“I wasn’t expecting that question, so it wasn’t something I pre-formulated an answer on. But in terms of gender identify, people identity for themselves,” he said.
Despite being unable to define the term woman, Hipkins replaced female Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in January 2023.
In April 2022, Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., asked Biden nominated Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson during her nomination hearing if she could provide a definition for the word woman. Jackson answered, “I cannot.”
“Men and women are already equal under the law, but they have real biological differences that we must respect and celebrate…By insisting that men can become women, the left is destroying what it means to be a woman and is pushing women and girls out of sports, public life, and positions of leadership,” Blackburn told Fox News Digital after International Women’s Day. “Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson showcased this absurdity for the American people and proved how far the left will go to promote their anti-women agenda.”…..
tim gallagher says
It is amazing how this trans mob seem to have gained so much power that politicians can’t just say that a woman is an adult female human being because the angry trans mob and their left wing supporters might get stuck into them. It is insane. There is a website here in Australia run by a journalist named Michael Smith and called “michael smith news”. I find some of the comments there on many issues, by a bunch of people, are often very funny. On this Hipkins garbage, these were a couple of comments.
Julie of Gellong says:
As a woman I can say that
a woman has tits for breast feeding.
a woman has a vagina for giving birth.
a woman menstruates.
I’d like to see the BLOKE with any of these three points.
wal1957 replies to Julie.
Geez..I wouldn’t.
I thought it was pretty funny. This trans nonsense is anti-woman, demeaning to genuine women, and is insane.
Dave Fife says
Dead right , but then the boy PM is not a proper bloke anyway . So, how would he know?
somehistory says
The time will come when someone commits a crime, is found, arrested, charged and brought to trial and his defense will be “I define my actions, and I identify myself, I define myself as law-abiding; therefore I didn’t commit any crimes.”
If one can “identify for themselves,” then they can “identify” when they have committed a crime or not.
And if a male is said to have robbed a bank, the police look for a male to arrest for the robbery, all males can then identify as female or whatever…maybe a bird, or small building, etc. and who can contradict the claim?
How can this idiot possibly believe that he is fit to run a country when he says people “identify for themselves.” If that’s true, who needs a prime minister?
James Lincoln says
The feature article video is one minute and two seconds long.
And that is how long it took for me to ascertain 100% that Chris Hipkins has NO business being the Prime Minister of New Zealand.
Wellington says
+1
PRCS says
The fly in that ointment: enough NZ citizens thought–foolishly–that he does.
Brian Ozzy says
Adern was an abomination. Looks like she has a worthy successor.
nicholas tesdorf says
Chris Hipkin’s parents failed to explain the Birds and the Bees to him and so he is not aware of the existence of men and women. The inability to distinguish between men and women will not serve him well in life.
tgusa says
By the look of him he probably has never been with a real woman so he may deserve our pity. He must be a leftist and as we all know men make the best women in their world.
Why is it when archaeologists find human remains they always determine that they are either male or female and none of the other hundreds of genders? Because…biology is not fake science and no matter how hard these loony tunes try they cant change that.
tgusa says
I must assume that he likes men who transition to fake women because he is anxious for that first date.
Wellington says
What a wuss.
abu taleb says
He is not a man, he doesn’t have balls.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Honestly, New Zealand should have a Maori revolution and let the Maoris restore whatever system they had prior to the Brits coming in. It would be an improvement
Ken Birtwistle says
Why has the media wasted so much time and effort giving a platform to these woke transgenderists? Did they never learn the facts of life? For humanity’s sake get a grip and watch some porn, it’s obvious!
James Lincoln says
Just what New Zealand needs: a woke Leftist Prime Minister.
Does anyone here honestly believe that Chris Hipkins would “protect and defend” the citizens of New Zealand?
Can a man who cannot even define “what a woman is” recognize the real threats to his country?
somehistory says
Perhaps it would happen like this: a horde of mozlum males descend on the country and say loudly, “we are here to take all of your (whatever word they use for females who are infidel) “and the new pm asks, “what do you mean” and someone says, “they want all our women” and the new pm says, “Ok” because he doesn’t know what a woman is; it could mean they want all of something he sees as useless or harmful…
after all, when someone doesn’t know the meaning of a word, why would they care whether they have what is being described?
James Lincoln says
Interesting point, somehistory.
libertyORdeath says
I love how he acts like the question is some kind of brain-teaser that he would have needed to “pre-formulate” an answer.
Keep asking obvious questions like this and it might become even easier to idetify the enemies within.
Some suggestions –
What is a woman?
What is jihad?
Do you still wear a mask?
How many “vaccines” have you taken?
Do you believe that “hate speech” is free speech?
Is diversity strength?
Should people be judged based upon their skin color or religion?
Should women be forced to compete against men who are playing out an autogynophilic gender fantasy?
somehistory says
+100
Question: why is no one asking “what is a man”? Or “define man.”
Dyspeptic Curmudgeon says
A follow-up question for the Prime Minister: “Do you now have or have you ever had a pair of balls?”
Aussie Infidel says
A woke joke for this useful idiot:
A man is ill and goes to see a doctor,
And the doctor asks, “How can I help you sir”?
The man replies, “It’s not ‘sir’ doctor. It’s ‘ma’am’ “.
And the doctor replies, “Oh, so you’re a woman”?
“Yes”, says the man.
“Well, let’s examine you and see what the problem is”, says the doctor.
After the examination and tests the doctor announces, “This is a first for medical history. A woman with prostate cancer”!
Major Tom says
I’d like to see him explain the difference between a slice of bread and a hot cross bun!