Recently, the Georgetown School of Foreign Service hired one Aneesa Johnson to be a “primary point of contact” between master’s students and “everything academic.” God knows what that means, but it is clear that her crude subliterate antisemitism ought to have disqualified her from consideration. After having hired her, Georgetown discovered that she has a long history of making antisemitic remarks on social media. Those statements were not hard to find; a moment’s searching of the Internet would have led to their discovery. The failure of the school to have done so before hiring her is deeply disturbing. More on the cautionary tale of Aneesa Abdel-Fattah Johnson, proudly antisemitic — hating “Zio b–ches” — by her own admission, and subliterate, by ours, can be found here: “‘They’re Dogs’: Georgetown University Places Staff Member on Leave Over Antisemitic Posts,” by Dion J. Pierre, Algemeiner, November 3, 2023:
Georgetown University in Washington, DC has placed a recently hired staff member on administrative leave after new reports revealed her antisemitic social media posts.
“We were recently made aware of hateful, antisemitic social media commentary alleged to have been made by a recently hired staff member who started working at the School of Foreign Service earlier this week,” Joel Hellman, dean of Georgetown’s Walsh School of Foreign Service (SFS), said in a statement. “The employee has been placed on immediate administrative leave, pending an investigation of the comments … We strongly condemn antisemitism in all its forms.”
Aneesa Johnson [who also uses the name Aneesa Jamila Abdul-Fattaah Johnson] was hired by SFS to be the “primary point of contact” for master’s students on “everything academic.” Antisemitism watchdog groups were quick to flag that Johnson has a history of antisemitic social media posts and involvement in anti-Israel activity. Canary Mission, a group that tracks antisemitism online, has a lengthy profile on Johnson’s history, documenting her anti-Zionist activity.
According to social media posts published by Canary Mission, in July 2015, Johnson tweeted, “Ever since going to [Northwestern University] I have a deep seeded [sic] hate for Zio [sic] b—ches. They bring out the worst in me.”
No hidden hate here: she proudly declares herself an antisemite: “I have a deep seeded hate for Zio b–ches.” “Deep-seeded” is not a typo, but a subliterate rendition of “deep-seated.” Should someone who is subliterate be hired by Georgetown to be the “point of contact” for master’s students about “everything academic”? Is basic literacy no longer required?
Zio is a derogatory reference to Zionists that is often used as an antisemitic slur.
Johnson also posted, “You know why I call them Zio b—ches, because they’re dogs.”
A week later, according to the Canary Mission, Johnson retweeted an unflattering picture of an Orthodox Jew that was captioned, “When the whole world hates you bc you a thief and you grow up looking like shaytan [the devil] #GrowingUpIsraeli.”
Why did no one at Georgetown think to look at the social media posts of Johnson before hiring her? Or to find out about her role, at Northwestern, in promoting BDS as a member of the Students for Justice in Palestine? Not only the appalling antisemitism, which she proudly admits to, but the crudity and illiteracy of her language — “Zio b–ches,” “deep-seeded,” “the whole world hates you bc you a thief” — ought by itself to have disqualified her.
Georgetown did not respond to a request for comment for this story. However, Hellman said in his statement that the school was “not aware of the alleged social media comments, many of which date back to 2015,” when Johnson was hired. The Canary Mission’s profile of Johnson is currently the second result that comes up when searching her name on Google….
Why wasn’t the school “aware of the alleged social media comments” by Johnson? Why does Hellman call her past comments on social media as merely “alleged” when he can see them for himself in a few seconds of searching the Internet? And what does he mean by mentioning that some of her comments “date back to 2015”? Is that so far back that Georgetown can be excused for not having looked into her social media comments at that time? Or does he mean that Aneesa Jamila Abdul-Fattaah Johnson may now have very different views from what she held in 2015? But her views did not change. In 2021, she was still denouncing the “powerful Zionist lobby” that in her view explains American support for Israel, and not American sympathy for a tiny state that shares our democratic values, has had to fight repeatedly — in 1948, 1967, 1973, and 2023 — for its very existence, and still faces a huge gang-up of Arab and Muslim states and terror groups intent on removing the only Jewish state from the map and replacing it by a 23rd Arab one?
Her presence on the staff is an embarrassment. Georgetown surely knows this by now. Get rid of her. She’ll fit in quite well at CAIR, or at Al Jazeera, or on the staff at Students for Justice in Palestine, as a “media coordinator.”
FYI says
Should we tell the muslima sweetheart?
koran 3:106-107
allah does not even like muslim women .Especially those who look like they will be on the wrong side of allah’s judgement. in koran 3:106.
Never Mind.She gets the exciting challenge of wearing the hijab on allah’s recommendation:allah..who in the same koran,whose author exhibits an amazing lack of omniscience reveals.. he doesn’t understand human Biology
islam is not for intelligent people.
Lisel Sipes says
Just another turd muslima like Omar. I wonder if she married any of her family members yet?
CogitoErgoSum says
The fact that she is a Muslim should be the first clue that she hates Jews. It’s easy to find out what Muslims are supposed to think of Jews by simply reading the Quran. It’s also easy to find out what Muslims think of Christians and, in fact, anyone who is not a Muslim (the Infidels) – and what Muslims are supposed to do about Infidels.
Jews are at the top of the Muslim’s hate list but Christians follow closely behind. This just proves that the people at Georgetown are even dumber than this ignorant Muslim woman is.
Betty Harrison says
good comment she should immediately fired
James Lincoln says
It should be assumed that a muslim hates Jews unless proven otherwise.
And if they don’t hate Jews, they are not a devout muslim.
Lee Schmidt says
Academic elites, pandering to Muslims, believe that this will protect them from the depravities of Islam…it will for a while, they will be the last to die.
Eva says
Actually, they might be among the first, after the politicians.
They’ve proved that they’re traitors to their own.
islam doesn’t leave traitors hanging around. I guess the reasoning is, ‘if they betrayed their own, they’ll betray us’.
Mateen Elass says
Actually, they often do leave them hanging around, often from cranes or makeshift gallows.
OLD GUY says
No Academic elites want to keep the CASH flow from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and other foreign countries flowing into the endowment funds of their beloved schools.
Scotsman48 says
islamic teachings sure embraces hate an awful lot whereas other main stream religions all teach love, compassion, tolerance, peace.
Try and find those words in the Quran.. I dare you..
Check Burry says
Media coordinator. Yes, OK she can move the copier paper around.
JOHN LLOYD SCHARF says
Time to declare Gaza/Hama/”Palestinians” to be an enemy, if not to declare war on them, so those support them further can be tried for treason.