On October 7, the West finally saw what Muslim Brotherhood (MB) offshoot Hamas is: that is, that it is no different from the Islamic State. Switzerland’s pending legislation demonstrates its recognition that Hamas has no place in the West. Neither do other Muslim Brotherhood offshoots, for that matter, because their modus operandi involves resorting to violence under certain conditions — such as a solid base of support and an infidel enemy that is perceived to be weak and/or unprepared.
The Muslim Brotherhood promotes the idea that jihad is “a mandatory religious duty,” and teaches that “this is followed by the power of arms and weapons… This is the role of Jihad.”
The Swiss government is living up to its obligations to protect the security of its citizens, and to preserve the rule of law and peace in the country.
“Switzerland moves to ban Hamas and supports Israel’s self-defence rights,” by Greta Ruffino, Euro News, November 23, 2023:
The Swiss government says it will pass a new law by the end of February to ban any “Hamas activities” or “support” for the Palestinian group.
The Swiss Federal Council recently designated Hamas as a “terrorist organisation” and considers this new policy as the “most appropriate response” to the events that have been unfolding in the Middle East since Hamas fighters launched a deadly cross-border raid from inside Gaza to Southern Israel on 7 October.
Switzerland will terminate contracts with three Palestinian NGOs found to have “instances of non-compliance” while maintaining contractual relationships with eight other NGOs….
Hoi Polloi says
Gut gemacht, Schweiz!
When a country has constitutionally binding referendums, we get this and a niqab and minaret ban. Let’s hope for more.
We’ll see if the EU begins its interference again, as they did on Swiss immigration.
࿗Infidel࿘ says
Isn’t Switzerland not a member of the EU? In which case, it shouldn’t matter to them what the EU think of them
Hoi Polloi says
Switzerland did not join the EU. Swiss who wanted to join said they’d try the vote again at a later date, that they’d see it pass then. Doesn’t seem so prescient now.
The Swiss held a constitutionally binding referendum on immigration. The EU overrode the will of the Swiss people by threatening to block all trade.
Many Swiss, including their officials, have complained openly and loudly that they are de facto EU because the EU threatens them continually and has forced backdoor acceptance of the preposterous EU legal system on so many fronts.
That immigration referendum has never been written into binding Swiss law as constitutionally required and it’s been years.