“We as a staff understand that the campus atmosphere has the potential to feel more stressful than usual, and even threatening for some.”
Threatening? Yeah, to me. But not to you snowflakes. Mind if I drop by for a slice of pizza?
Seriously, this is what universities have fallen to. They’re not in the least equipping students to deal rationally with opposing ideas, much less actual adversity. Imagine how these fragile dears will react if they’re ever confronted by an actual Islamic jihadist. They’d probably fall to their knees and beg his forgiveness for their white privilege.
“WE WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR THAT ALL RESIDENTS WILL BE RESPECTED REGARDLESS OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL VIEWS.”
Not really. I’m sure that anyone who supports my work would be most unwelcome.
This notice went out to residents of Stanford’s Murray House last night:
PIZZA IN THE LOUNGE TOMORROW NIGHT
As many of you know, Robert Spencer will be visiting Stanford tomorrow. We as a staff understand that the campus atmosphere has the potential to feel more stressful than usual, and even threatening for some.
We want you all to know that your space in Murray is indeed a safe space. Tomorrow night, our RF Matt as well as a few of the staff will be in the dining hall with Domino’s at 8PM, for those of you who’d like to decompress from tomorrow’s events, and for those who’d like to decompress period (week 8 blues, amirite).
WE WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR THAT ALL RESIDENTS WILL BE RESPECTED REGARDLESS OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL VIEWS.
Murray is your home away from home, and we as a staff want to be sure that everyone feels safe and welcome.
Adrian says
Nobody said cleaning The Swamp would be quick or easy…
This is much more difficult than de-programming Scientologists because SJWs have permeated the whole culture – Academia, media, books and films… cult members will present more resistance
mortimer says
So-called ‘safe spaces’ are nothing more than ECHO CHAMBERS where pseudo-intellectual snowflakes can be surrounded by likeminded people who will not challenge their unsupported claims, thereby insulating everyone inside such chambers from any thought or evidence that contradicts or disproves their claims or assertions.
A so-called ‘safe space’ is actually just a DEBATE-FREE ZONE or PROPAGANDA-INDOCTRINATION ZONE where no real education takes place. A ‘safe space’ is just an excuse for Marxists or Jihadists to indoctrinate everyone and not have to defend any proposition or claim they make.
Sandford is a university FORUM where scholars take a hard look at FACTS and test them open-mindedly. A university is not a Marxism incubator for little Marxist babies.
Dave says
Dominos ? Really? Keep me safe from Dominos .
Tjhawk says
Ha Ha!
It seems these students have an aversion to good food as well as to good ideas.
Georg says
The staff probably burp them, too.
“Awww, did that man rudely acknowledge the Prophet of the religion of peace beheading 700 Jews in a day? Now, now. Here’s a paci.” *Wipes pizza sauce from his mouth. 20-year-old’s belch*
Pablo says
They also changed their diapers.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Yep, sounds like kindergarten to me too:
” in the dining hall with Domino’s at 8PM, for those of you who’d like to decompress from tomorrow’s events, and for those who’d like to decompress period (week 8 blues, amirite).”
Such delicate babies there (amirite)
Georg says
“…decompress from tomorrow’s events.”
What a bizarre concept. Orwellian, but we’re getting used to it now. They are decompressing now from a future hypothetical speech where they could hypothetically be offended. Brings to mind an Australian journalist’s parody headline after the London tube bombings which read “British Muslims fear recriminations for tomorrow’s train bombing.”
These might not be geniuses, after all.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Hard life being so pent up that decompression is necessary before anything is even said, you’re right.
Deep sea divers need to decompress after they come up from working at depth because of the great pressure working on them from the outside.
For a delicate snowflake at stanford, it’s either something similar to that, in that they require breaks from the great pressure of reality relentlessly trying to force it’s way into their heads, OR, it’s the other way around, and they need a place to come and vent the great pressure of frustration they have built up within themselves upon hearing so many things they disagree with, but have no way to deal with through reasonable discourse.
again, hard life, poor darlings.
Westman says
The important lesson: Fake feelings of being “threatened” and a student can get FREE pizza and an excuse for not studying. Liberals keep teaching that entitlements should be demanded for perceived injustice.
mortimer says
They find it so stressful to debate ideas. Their minds are made up, so do challenge them with facts.
mortimer says
Correction: don’t challenge with facts.
Gen Jones says
Crap pizza aside, I wonder if Stanford knows that Domino’s was founded by Republican Tom Monaghan who is Catholic, pro-life and anti-same sex marriage. He’s retired from Dominio’s now but his conservative philanthropy continues.
Georg says
Now they’ll need some other therapy to recover from their safe-space pizza party.
gravenimage says
I hope they serve those little cartons of milk with straws and graham crackers along with the pizza, as well…
Jaladhi says
With this kind of behavior of of our younger generation, it is clear that they will convert to Islam meekly! The liberals are raising a generation of morally corrupt cowards with their brain dead propaganda!
Jaladhi says
Ha, ha,.. this generation needs safe spaces to hide form the truth. Truth is a bitter pill to swallow and this generation has no stomach for it. Disgusting – more so the teachers who are teaching them disgusting values, if you can call them values!
Eeee says
Invite muslims to have pizza. They will behead you for ordering pepperoni.
Keys says
Good one. Don’t forget about the Canadian Bacon pizza option with pork sausage.
LeftisruiningCanada says
“Canadian Bacon”? Is that named along the same lines as “Bombay Duck”?
Soon it’ll just be a joke people say when they are really wanting to order halal chicken or something….
duh swami says
For your own safety…If Spencer shows up, leave the area immediately, , take cover and stay thee til you hear the all clear siren…
Benedict says
Spencer-oh-phobia conquering Stanford before Spencer’s arrival.
mortimer says
Fact-o-phobia. Logic-Argument-o-phobia. Evidence-o-phobia. Counter-argument-o-phobia.
Norger says
Very good Mortimer. This from a supposedly elite university is frightening.
Tjhawk says
I’m pretty sure a large % of the non-dhimmi student body will be at the lecture, but I have a good idea for a free thinking student.
Get a hidden GoPro camera and go to the safe space. Get some pizza then announce yourself and explain how unsafe you feel on Stanford campus. Use buzz words like threatened, marginalized, othered, etc. let the mayhem commence and capture it on the hidden camera.
I somebody could capture some classic YouTube material.
mortimer says
Agree.hawk. I would LOVE to see such a video. Their intolerance and hypocrisy would soon be evident.
The staff at Sanford are saying that the Young Republicans should shut up and leave the campus so that the neo-Marxists can rule it unopposed.
This is a complete denial of first amendment rights by the communist crew. They must not be allowed to succeed.
jewdog says
Yes, put them all in a safe space, and then throw away the combination.
mortimer says
Good little dhimmis. The ‘sisters’ can watch the safe space via closed circuit TV from a ‘sisters only’ room in the attic (unheated).
(sarc/off)
Georg says
It seems like white people and East Asians are the only groups mature/secure enough not to refer to one another as “brother” or “sister”. At least as far as I could tell on Facebook (before I deleted it). Ironically, I’d be call racist for noticing as much despite their being the ones infatuated with race… What a world.
ed says
Hope all the pizza has bacon .
Dum Spiro says
As we await Robert’s presentation, here’s a little video to help learn more about those on campus who choose to oppose him:
The ride of campus fascism (with Ben Shapiro):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGwq5NHDV94
Food for thought…
— Spero
Jan Sobieski says
I’t s unreal. If you were a novelist and you wrote about a ‘safe space’ phenomena on campus, everyone would say it was ridiculous, lame, hokey, etc.
St. Manuel II Palaiologos says
It’s everything Aldous Huxley predicted would happen in the totalitarian future. Perfectly happy and protected saps who are completely controlled by the elite for nefarious purposes.
gravenimage says
Jan and St. Manuel, good points.
Even at a place like Berkeley in the 1970s and ’80s–when I attended–the idea of “safe spaces” to guard students from hearing any opinions they did not agree with would have been considered laughably ludicrous.
Georg says
What a complete embarrassment. Putting aside their obscene disdain for the first amendment and craven self-indulgence, do any of them consider not being so incredibly rude and unwelcoming to what is simply a difference of opinion?! So Robert doesn’t care for the tenets of a religion. Obviously we here all know Islam is thoroughly offensive and dangerous, but say one knew nothing of Islam except that it is a religion. People can’t discuss the merits of a religion without being brow-beaten and worse on the grounds of what’s historically been a center for debate? It’s frightening to see America being sapped of its spirit. Our ability to debate rigorously and without fear has historically been what’s differentiated us from so many horrible regimes and ideologies.
When in college, I took courses on Islam and one in Near-Eastern Studies where I heard things which were exceedingly offensive. It never crossed my mind to shout down the professors or sycophantic students. My profound disagreements were put into writing and carry over into how I vote and where I make donations. A quote from Areopagitica comes to mind:
“Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously, by licensing and prohibiting, to misdoubt her strength. Let her and Falsehood grapple; who ever knew Truth put to the worse, in a free and open encounter?”
A society which abhors and suppresses debate is one moving toward a living hell, as history has shown time and time again. It seems Americans and even the broader West have become complacent and lulled into a sense that our values and quality of life are inevitable and eternal — but history shows it is the opposite: This quality of life is an exception which has always fallen away in the past. Although the United States and Europe have proven resilient, democracy is far from inevitable and is always vulnerable to corruption and usurpation without a populace aware of its nature and origin and willing to defend it. Just look at the shrinking culture of capitalistic liberal democracy in so many places where Islam grows.
These Leftists carry themselves as though their ideology is so effortlessly sound and preferable, yet become hysterical when presented with a counter-opinion. That doesn’t stack up. It brings to mind how it is often so difficult to get them to plainly state their intentions. Many of their positions rest on specious reasoning, sophistry, and even bigotry; these are the true grounds of this fear even if they’ve long since convinced themselves otherwise. They veil their fear of debate as virtue. They avoid debate with any particular opponent with accusations that amount to defamation. They will talk about anything but what we’re talking about. It cannot be reasonably argued that Islam is a defensible doctrine, so their only choice is to not defend it by not ever talking about it. For them, Robert is guilty of the crime of speech. As was Charlie Hebdo. As was Theo Van Gogh. As was Pim Fortuyn. Salman Rushdie (who, notice, has gone from cause celebre to pariah).
Westman says
Very astute, Georg.
Our present pattern seems to follow that of Rome: corrupt governnent, a voluntary army, the loss of cohesive core values, an unwillingness to serve or sacrifice for the nation, an obsession with distractions (our version of the circus), a delusional expectation of unending prosperity, and immigration by those who reject the declining core values and have their own, “culture” to plant.
Georg says
Very well said, Westman. The other day I was referencing much of what you mention to someone and remarked that to explain it is almost to sound insane but that’s because it is all insane.
Getting a bit off topic, but an interesting and frightening thought-experiment. Put yourself in the position of Saudi Arabia or any other Islamist ideology. You want to subvert and take over the West. How would you do so? To my mind, what they are doing is precisely what I would do. Obviously a frontal assault is untenable. The locals, despite how craven too many are, aren’t going to convert en masse. The best thing to do is what is outlined by the Muslim Brotherhood and is precisely what they are doing. Not only the left, but the West in general are in mass denial that things are getting worse every day. And we’ve been so demoralized through Leftist and enemy propaganda that people are too ashamed to recognize a hostile foreign actor for what it is.
There are plain facts which strongly support the reality of Islamization as tactic. A good example is Saudi Arabia taking zero “refugees” but sending large sums of money to Germany to build additional mosques to accommodate the “refugees”. When pressed on why it is they haven’t take any Saudi Arabia said it was due to “cultural differences”. So they build mosques in the Saudi image for these people who are irreconcilably different… It’s beyond parody the extent to which we are welcoming our own demise.
It will be interesting to see in the decades to come when native citizens of urban centers in Belgium or even Britain spend a weekend in Prague or Budapest and come to not just realize, but feel what has been done.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Apart from spiking cosmetics which produce terrible reactions when mixed, like Jack Nicholson playing the Joker did in the 1989 Batman movie, the OIC are playing it pretty much as logic dictates they should.
And how little the west has resisted.
Good posts G and W by the way.
Norger says
Georg, you may have already read it, but in his book “Catastrophic Failure,”Stephen Coughlin discusses e strategic implications of this type of “stealth jihad.” Make no mistake about it, shuttling down criticism of Islam is one of the first steps in the process of civilization jihad.
Georg says
Norger, I have not read Coughlin’s book but am familiar with the concept of stealth jihad and have seen him speak about it. It is frightening and obviously rolling out as we speak.
Thanks, gravenimage. The fall of the Roman Empire definitely comes to mind, particularly with the Goths/Huns. We’re literally seeing raping and pillaging (mostly through benefits claiming).
gravenimage says
Agreed, Georg.
Georg says
gravenimage,
Today I came across footage of [political/cultural/religious] violence in Brussels which brought to mind your comparison of historical violence between goth violence/encroachment is Rome and that within Europe’s capital today. We have all long-since predicted this, but here it is:
http://www.straitstimes.com/world/europe/rapper-video-shoot-sparks-fresh-riots-in-brussels
Infidel says
+1 million The same disease is affecting the Hindus of India.
Norger says
Hear hear.
gravenimage says
Fine posts by Georg and Westman. Thank you.
And I also worry we are following the path of the Roman Empire. One salient point regarding this–immigration into the Roman Empire was a great strength, for cernturies–until it wasn’t.
Greeks, Gauls and others generally had a great deal to contribute to Rome–the Goths much less so, and the Huns were nothing but destroyers of civilization.
It is much the same now with Islam–even worse, in some ways.
gravenimage says
centuries
Benedict says
Safe spaces are incubation chambers for a crippled, barren humanity. What happened to the survival of the fittest?
St. Manuel II Palaiologos says
The truth is too terrifying for anyone, in University or not. That’s why these people need protection. The truth is just too hard to take.
Karlee says
Is this a university or a kindergarten? What the staff is doing to these students is borderline criminal.
Georg says
“Is this a university or a kindergarten?”
Was thinking the same.
SAM says
This is NUTS. However, very dangerous. If youth can not hear the truth or can not differentiate good from evil, bloodshed of people on American landscape is right around the corner. Like tomorrow.
This campus stupidity has no happy ending. I am truly scared for the future of USA.
PRCS says
How will these fragile dears react if they’re ever confronted by an actual Islamic jihadist?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_GYLxe3Vuk
Georg says
That is literally the direction we are going in. Just look at Britain allowing in 425+ Islamic State jihadists and jailing 14.
PRCS says
Yup.
LeftisruiningCanada says
Funny.
Because it’s true.
gravenimage says
+1
mortimer says
REVISED NOTICE:
WE WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR THAT ALL RESIDENTS WILL BE RESPECTED REGARDLESS OF THEIR INDIVIDUAL VIEWS… (addendum) as long as you don’t assert your right to discuss views that the staff of Stanford have categorized as counter-revolutionary, bourgeois or Republican.
ALL HAIL THE REVOLUTIONARY HEROES!
(sarc/off)
Georg says
You can order a Model T in any color so long as it’s black.
samdav7 says
Jeez .. what’s the story with this horror movie that’s going on in Stanford .. people are horrified .. frightened to death .. and the bloody movie hasn’t even started yet !
Ashley says
I won’t feel safe unless hummus and gluten-free falafel is being offered up in the dining hall this evening…
Fred H says
I’m stressed that they’re stressed. Where’s my pizza?
LeftisruiningCanada says
Quite.
And to think that the USA was once the safe space for people fleeing this stanfordian kind of thinking.
It still is of course. I hope it stays that way, or it might be no exaggeration to say that hope shall be gone from the world.
PRCS says
“and even threatening for some”
The “threat” which Stanford Muslims fear-like Muslims in every “unIslamic” country–is not so much that yahoos will physically intimidate or actually assault them for their beliefs, but that their useful idiots and other “unbelievers” will learn that Islam is really just another man made belief, what Qur’an and Sunna actually teach and command–especially about others, that it is a supremacist, theocratic “complete way of life”, and that the carefully crafted “Islam is a religion of peace” line will be exposed for the lie it is (as many a Yazidi woman can attest) and that they have been lying.
Infidel says
Very well said..
rubiconcrest says
Andrew C. McCarthy on Robert Spencer: “Without question, Robert is correct that the political and supremacist aspects of Islamic doctrine, which flesh out the ideology many of us call “Islamist,” trace their origins to Mohammed. As he further observes, they are taught by the classic schools of Islamic jurisprudence, which undoubtedly explains their power and endurance for over a millennium.” Andrew C. McCarthy was the lead prosecutor of Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman for his role in the 1993 Trade Center bombing. His book ‘Willful Blindness: Memoir of the Jihad’ (2008) describes this prosecution in detail. I suggest to the students who feel ‘threatened by words’ learn about the motivation of the Jihadi and the real damage they cause. Safe spaces won’t protect you.
Norger says
Yes. And it’s noteworthy that to prosecute the Blind Sheikh,Andrew McCarthy had to learn Islamic theology—the prosecution had to be prepared to counter the potential “defense” that the Sheikh was simply practicing his religion. Dismissing the Blind Sheikh as a “hater,” who didn’t understand “true Islam” was never going to cut it in front of a jury. As McCarthy outlines in his book, the Blind Sheikh was then considered the top Islamic scholar IN THE WORLD. (And yet, inconceivably the Blind Sheikh “misunderstood” Islam so spectacularly).
In any event,to his surprise, McCarthy learned that the Blind Sheikh was offering up a totally plausible, indeed learned, interpretation of the Islamic faith. Stanford, can’t we talk about this?
Voytek Gagalka says
“They’d probably fall to their knees and beg…” Except that it will not do a dent to save them, fools. That type of reaction would even contribute greatly to their demise as there is nothing Mohammedans despise more than weaklings and “weak horses.”
Wellington says
Students who need safe paces are wusses.
gravenimage says
Yes–isn’t this just pathetic?
Bill49 says
Robert Spencer
LIVE at Stanford University
Nov 14 11:00 PM ET
http://www.yaf.org/live/
Infidel says
POISON IVY LEAGUES..
Stan Lee says
The Stanford U. front office is full of crap. They’re just a rabid bunch of Socialists who had enough snowflakes eating out of Stanford’s hands to recruit them into informing upon the Stanford Student Republicans and to raise hell about Robert Spencer’s visit, which Stanford tried to discourage.
I won’t believe any measures by Stanford U. to behave as though Robert Spencer is welcome. If they completely had their way, he wouldn’t be, because they fear that his truth will mean more than their damned political correctness. That university has done its worst to incite its snowflakes against Spencer, who still may educate some students and dispell propaganda designed to vilify him.
gravenimage says
Another safe space set up at Stanford in anticipation of Robert Spencer event
…………………
How many of these nurseries are there now at this point?
Odd that so many Stanford students feel threatened by the appearance of this peaceful man, and yet he is the only one who needs a security detail to protect him.
benjamin ehmann says
Yo, Mr. Spencer hope you see this. I live in Murray, and there’s a lot of pizza left in my dorm, if you want to swing by and grab a slice, I can let you in.
gravenimage says
🙂
Politicianphobia says
Now I understand why one of the Koch brothers said he does not usually hire university graduates.
Carolyne says
Has the administration of Stanford never heard of the old saying, “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me?” In this case, the words they would hear from Mr. Spencer would benefit them by preparing them for the oncoming invasion of even more enemies of freedom
Poor little delicate flowers. I certainly don’t wish for their ears to be subject to an onslaught of the truth. Is it possible they might learn something which could be useful in their lives, rather than hiding out in a darkened room smoking something questionable?
UNCLE VLADDI says
OK, enough of this not-even-pseudo intellectual virtue-signalling academic bullshit!
Apologies in advance: I’m gonna hafta go on a bit of a book-length rant here, just to define basic terms.
And as I have to keep saying again and again for some strange, unexplained reason (to leftopaths)…!
😉
Any and all legislators, judges, and educators who put criminals’ hurt feelings above facts should be fired and JAILED.
And that includes using the words “Respect!” and “Dignity!”
Objectifying people as “victims!” is what really “disrespects their dignity!”
Any and all “laws” criminalizing hurt feelings should be repealed and their originators fired and JAILED, too!
Because all subjectivist “laws” are really adversarial crimes, seeking to use fraudulent slander to extort and enslave others. Fraud, slander, extortion and slavery (aka “Political Correctness”) are already crimes.
Who complains about hurt feelings (aka defending their “dignity”) anyway?! ONLY criminals! They always feel hurt and left out when others try and succeed and they don’t, so they feel jealous and entitled to demand an equality of outcome and permanent rights (like, to your stuff) without any concomitant corollary responsibilities (like to earn or otherwise have to pay for it) over an equality of opportunity!
Any law-abiding person who gets robbed or extorted doesn’t feel “sad” or “uncomfortable” about it, they feel righteously ANGRY! So that’s one way to tell an extortive victimology-spewing criminal from a real victim of same!
Logically all criminals demanding equality of outcome (enslaving their victims) must also demand that other people (their victims) must not hurt the lazy criminal parasites’ feelings!
Hurt “feelings” are all any criminal has as an excuse, as the cause-and-effect facts are always against them. Therefore they are also the only thing that ever matters to criminal (leftist) legislators, lawyers, and judges.
Our emotions are mere reflections of the three basic states of space-time (the static past, the fluid present, and the nebulous future, respectively): static fear, fluid greed, nebulous hope. Not exactly worth defending!
All anti-hurt-feelings “laws” are only put forth by literal psychopaths, who pretend that “feelings HURT!”
i.e: that fear CAUSES pain, simply by being a vague, general memory of past specific pains, future-projected.
Psychopaths are all criminal hypocrites who CHOOSE to experience ALL emotions – even soft ones like sadness and sympathy – AS pains, and so also pretend they then have a “right” to counter-attack others for “causing” them!
But as physiologists, psychiatrists and psychologists know, pain is quickly forgotten, by default, in humans. It’s why some of us don’t learn from mistakes, sometimes not even by direct, “hot-stove” scenario incidents!
Therefore, all claims of others’ words or deeds making people “uncomfortable” and “causing trauma,” are false.
At the very most, they are subjective and unprovable, (and further: not permanent, as one can be acclimated or habituated to any non-physical damage-caused ‘pains,’ including all normal and abnormal fears) and as such, one cannot attack innocent others in advance by making “laws” to prohibit their free expressions, just because they *might* at some future time, in some unknown place, cause some sort of emotional “offense” to persons unknown.
Any and all attempts to do so are subjective hypocrisy, claiming only one’s own chosen group has any real rights, while everyone else only has the responsibility to be enslaved to them, and no rights of self-defense against it.
Therefore any and all such “laws” are crimes, in attacking innocents first: so those making them are criminals.
What’s really going on is slanderous, victim-blaming criminal masochistss CHOOSING to hurt their own feelings!
FEARING FEAR AS PAIN:
When one is “paranoid,” (a criminally victim-blamingly slanderous hypocrite*) one’s attitude is:
“It’s STILL attacking!”/it’s all/you’re all out to get me etc.
So every memory of past attacks is seen as a continuation and encore of a previous attack.
All attacks blend into one ongoing sequence, and as such are not seen as separate unrelated incidents.
Therefore, “fear” (seen by others as the merely generalized memory of past pains) is seen as additional pain.
In short, they habitually CHOOSE to see their own generalized memories of past specific pains as external THREATS, and not as helpful WARNINGS! This habitual choice probably atrophies their brains in certain areas.
Further, it of course doesn’t matter if one “admits” that “it” (God/the Universe) may well also still be attacking other people, because they are merely at most its own components and at worst, mere illusions, parts of its overall binary strategy of carrot-and-stick, hope and fear attacks against one’s self. Since one cannot feel others’ pains, fears or hopes, and since every thing and every one else is prone to be capriciously taken away from one’s control anyway, such people cannot believe in property rights nor maintain emotional ties to others.
They also cannot believe in their own mental abilities nor free-will abilitiy to make choices, since they feel
their own emotions and memories are being imposed on them, as “attacks,” by mysterious outside forces. Therefore, in fact, any and all “mistakes” they ever made, were only the results of attacks which forced them to make them.
Some malicious external entity (the devil, god, fate, the universe) deliberately distracted them from knowing or remembering the knowledge they had needed to not-make the mistakes at the time they were ‘forced’ to make them, so they were not, strictly speaking, mistakes at all, but only more devious attacks. When one chooses to regard all mistakes as attacks, living in denial, one deprives one’s self from ever being able to learn from them!
They thus also feel perfectly free to counter-attack in the most basic and only real way they can: by hypocrisy: lying and pretending to go along to get along – while knowing that even this strategy is ultimately futile, too. (“Haha – I’m not afraid, since it’s always attacking, and it hasn’t affected me much or killed me yet! Whee”)!
If other people exist, then they, too, are also helpless victims, and as such, are mere pawns of the god/s too. So they feel quite free in admitting that they sympathize with others’ victimology, while still distrusting them.
This is why they always choose to automatically go along (with the criminals’ lie that they are really only fellow victims) to get along (with all the other scary lying criminals) and instantly compromise with or submit to any and all crimes and perversions.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Chapter the Second:
Re; This is why they always choose to automatically go along (with the criminals’ lie that they are really only fellow victims) to get along (with all the other scary lying criminals) and instantly compromise with or submit to any and all really potentially threatening crimes and perversions, while also attacking those who expose them as crimes and perversions – who also incidentally thereby expose their own criminal cowardice at the same time.
Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!
So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:
“Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”
Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!
😉
And even more, from here:
http://sheikyermami.com/2016/08/this-is-so-sinister/
“Offence is always taken, not given. So if you don’t want to be offended, its up to you, don’t be offended, and that’s it…”
“You can call me short, you can me fat, you can call me a Queenslander, you can call me a cane toad,” he said. “Whatever you want to call me, the only person who decides whether I’m upset is me.”
INDEED! We are never responsible for other people’s hurt subjective feelings.
If someone tells slanderous lies about one, then sure one can feel offended, but it’s not a requirement for
justice – one can just as easily “feel:”
“I don’t care about what was said, considering the moron who said it. My feelings aren’t hurt, but I am still
entitled to legal remedy for their criminal fraud!”
The stance that “fear of causing offense” is a good thing, reverses the onus of proof, enslaving people to guilty until never proven innocent:
“Prove you DIDN’T hurt my feelings, or go to JAIL, haters!”
Only criminal LIARS endorse Submitting to the lies of other criminals, too!
“We must all GO ALONG (with criminal lies) TO GET ALONG (with all the other lying criminals)! Whee!”
Endorsing extortion slander and fraud is also a crime.
…….
Criminal Hypocrites will never make sense because to them, their feelings always trump the facts!
Who always wants feelings to trump facts?
Only CRIMINALS!
And WHY (you ask)?
The chosen “belief” of all hypocritical criminals (both muslims and liberals included) is that their subjective feelings (of slanderous paranoia, that they are always the victims, and everyone else is always an oppressor out to get them) trump the real objective facts, (that their psychopathic choice of “belief” in their own idolatrous victimology self-image extortion syndrome, actually defines them selves as the predatory criminal aggressors, and those they slander with their paranoia, as their innocent victims) every time!
The falsely static, idolatrous self-image-enhancing “belief” of all criminals (both muslims and liberals included) is that their subjective feelings (their psychotic, thought-killing stance of slanderous paranoia, that they are always the victims, and everyone else is always an oppressor out to get them, so they alone are always entitled to ever-more rights, and ever-less responsibilities than everyone else; and in fact, to be “fair,” in the interests of “Diverse Equality,” everyone else should have no rights over them at all, and only extorted responsibilities ensuring that they will remain enslaved to the criminals) trump the real objective facts, (that their same choice of “belief,” in its attempt to pre-define them as victims, really ever in fact only pre-defines them selves as the predatory criminal aggressors, and those they slander with their paranoia as their innocent victims) every time!
And criminals are especially “offended” and are most likely to have their feelings hurt when their victims get angry (“hateful”) with them, just because they tried to commit some “crimes” against them!
So, while only real victims will get angry when criminals try to victimize them, only the pretend victims (aka psychotic, idolatrous hypocritical predatory slanderous criminal extortionist aggressors) will pretend that being accused of crimes “offends them and hurts their feelings” and so only criminals will try to ban anger (“Hate!”) at ongoing injustices.
“Everyone feels. Imagine if everyone thought.”
– Bosch Fawstin –