There are numerous non-Muslim organizations today that are enabling and abetting jihad terror and Sharia oppression by smearing and demonizing those who are calling attention to them: the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Anti-Defamation League, Georgetown University’s Bridge Initiative, and more. There are individuals who do this as well: Britain’s Prime Minister Theresa May, British Leftist activist Nick Lowles, “scholars” in the US such as John Esposito and Karen Armstrong, and numerous “journalists” both in the UK and the US.
But this is nothing new. In my forthcoming book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS, which will be out this summer and you can preorder here now, I discuss numerous non-Muslims going back to the beginning of jihad violence who have aided and abetted the advance of the jihad for their own short-sighted ends. In the book, you will meet:
- The Christian count whose thirst for personal revenge led him to enable the Muslim conquest of Spain;
- The Byzantine general who deserted to the Muslims and enabled the jihadis to take the Byzantine commander hostage;
- The Hindu leader who paid tribute to the Muslims to avoid a jihadi invasion — and who converted to Islam when they invaded anyway;
- The Byzantine emperor who married off his daughter to the Ottoman sultan to secure his support in a dynastic dispute — and even gave in to the sultan’s demand that Christian slaves be auctioned off naked in Constantinople;
- The British financing of Saudi Wahhabism in their efforts to weaken the Ottoman Empire.
There are many more. It’s time to stop this appeasement and accommodation. But we can only do that if we’re aware of the devastation it has caused throughout history. Get the whole truth, told nowhere else, in The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS. Preorder here now.
JW_Reader says
Add the Democratic Party of USA, the Labor Party of UK, Angela Markel’s CDU in Germany, so on and so forth. Off course, George Soros’s OSF and the bleeding heart Jews of New York should be at the very top of the list. The later group really have no excuse to aid and abet Islam in this information age.
Sons of Liberty says
Add …Barack Hussein Obama to the top of the list ! He enabled a SURGE of Muslims into the United States and was the taqiyya leader in the US . Did he not say the future does not belong to those who insult the prophet of Islam .
mortimer says
Such dhimmi traitors of the West all deserve a reward of HISTORIC INFAMY. They have destroyed their own countries by pandering to a hostile voting block that wish to destroy everything their countries have stood for.
Diane Harvey says
Years ago I was surprised to learn that among the reasons motivating Marco Polo’s visit to China was finding an alternative land route not blocked by Muslims. Columbus’s trips westward was similarly motivated to find a way around the Muslims. Jihad then, jihad now.
gravenimage says
Yes, this is true.
Kepha says
Marco Polo’s route passed through a large number of places where he describes the people as “Saracens”–his term for Muslims.
Chand says
Wasn’t it great that Columbus bypassed the Muslims and discovered a new continent?! What serendipitous fortune! What an opportunity for Europeans to then subsequently loot it, kill off most of the inhabitants and colonize it?
b.a. freeman says
good observation, Chand. of course, nobody else in history has ever colonized another area and killed millions of people, except colonizing europeans (india). no other group of people has ever turned chattel slavery into an industry, incidentally killing millions of men and boys by castration, and half-black babies by infanticide (africa), thus ensuring that no black people could live in their society. no other languages, other than european languages, are so racist that the word for the color “black” has come to mean “slave” (arabic). what religion other than christianity can not possibly be reformed, because its lying, slave-owning, raping, child-molesting founder is considered perfect, and such behavior must be emulated (islam)?
golly, i guess europeans, guilty of mass murder to the last baby, should all be killed – especially if their jewish.
b.a. freeman says
sigh…
“they’re,” not “their.”
gravenimage says
More hatred of the West from the vicious Muslim apologist Chand.
Jaladhi says
The present day Europeans and the rest of the Wet are gloriously following the examples of these traitors!! we have no hope of saving the mankind – it will succumb to the barbarians!!
Tjhawk says
I think we do have hope. Maybe instead of thinking in terms of saving all of mankind, think more locally.
Look at yourself first. Try to identify your skill set. Think like: What do I have to offer, and how can I use my skills to advance the counter jihad? Posting on JW is a good start, and having constructive conversations with one, two, or a few people is another step. You never know what the ripple effect of your efforts might lead to.
Don’t give up in despair.
dumbledoresarmy says
Exactly.
“Each one teach one” should be our motto.
Also: each of us identify our *local* elected representative – first of all, county or shire or town or city council; *then* the next tier of government – e.g in US, the *State* legislature; then the federal. As appropriate for each country.
And we need to be on the watch.
Two models of citizen activism that bear replicating are 1/ Gavin Boby’s “Law and Freedom Foundation” in the UK – they are the ones who helped sponsor the writing of Peter McLoughlin’s “Easy Meat” report and expose, and 2/ Brigitte Gabriel’s “ACT for America” movement in the USA.
UK jihadwatchers can join Mr Boby’s movement and make it bigger and stronger, whether by financial contributions or by personal activism or both. US jihadwatchers can join ACT for America – join their local chapter and get busy (think of it as the modern equivalent of the ‘Minutemen!’… but the weapons are conversation, letters, phone-calls, emails and quite frequently, getting involved in the PTA to head off Muslim subversion of school curricula, etc.
People in other countries should look at the websites of those movements, and ask themselves: is there anything like this in *my* country? If there isn’t, could something similar work *here*? Or do we need something different, answering to local conditions?
Dutch and Swedish jihadwatchers have a clear path: to make their clearly-identifiable Islamoresistant political parties bigger and stronger as fast as possible, by joining, supporting, and discreetly and neverendingly canvassing to get *more* people to join and support.
Be on the lookout, constantly, wherever we are, for any politicians or religious leaders, at any level, who show signs of awareness of the danger represented by Islamisation – especially by hijra, Muslim immigration-invasion – and a willingness to say NO to Muslim demands (of any kind). Genuine friendship with and sympathy for *Israel*, on the part of such politicians or religious leaders, is usually a good sign that the person may be either knowledgeable about jihad, or *educable* on the subject.
When you find any such politician or religious leader: contact them, ensure they know they are on the right track; perhaps feed them more information, such as the Barnabas Fund booklet on Sharia (very accurate and uncompromising on the ways that Sharia violates universal human rights) or Sam Solomon’s book on ‘Al-Hijra’.
And being aware of events such as, in the UK, the rally that Tommy Robinson held at ‘Speaker’s Corner’, or the British Pakistani Christian Association protests and rallies, or pro-Israel events, or in Australia, rallies that have been held by the Australian Copts to denounce Muslim oppression of Coptic Christians in Egypt, is useful: one can attend such rallies in person, wherever possible, or if that is not possible, at least advertise them as widely as one can and encourage *others* to attend. Rallies that involve open resistance to or denunciation of some aspect of Mohammedan bad behaviour, or open support for the victims of Jihad whether in one’s own country or abroad, need to be made bigger – MUCH bigger, bigger than the numbers that the mohammedan insta-mob (and their dhimmi supporters such as Antifa in Europe) roll out at the drop of a hat. How does one create an infidel ‘insta-army’? NOT a chaotic howling mohammedan insta-mob but a huge crowd that is law-abiding and at the same time loud and *resolute*, with clearly stated goals? The right sort of crowd, in the right sort of place, can send a strong message to our politicians… especially when it’s accompanied by avalanches of mail from constituents.
Sons of Liberty says
Absolutely , Dumbledore ! Also, vote out any politician that gives into Islamic pressure from CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood .
gravenimage says
Hear, hear, Tjhawk!
Sons of Liberty says
Absolutely , Tjhawk ! When I was on You Tube chat during the 2016 election I would always direct people to David Wood videos on the Qur’an and Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch . Most Americans know VERY LITTLE or nothing about Islam and the history of Islamic jihad . We have to educate as many Americans as we can on Islam and the consequences of ignoring the hirya .
Vlad says
Hmmm, WE would like to say “Humankind”, not mankind 🙂
Tjhawk says
Ha Ha.
Are you a hoser?
Is Don Cherry a deity?
Did you have Horizontal Bobby Orr taped to your bedroom wall?
Is Tim Horton a culinary genius?
gravenimage says
I’m a woman, and I have never had a problem with the word “mankind”. It obviously includes women.
Sam says
“A surge of stabbings in London was blamed Monday for the city overtaking New York’s monthly murder tally for the first time in modern history. Fifteen people were murdered in London during February, compared to 14 in New York, according to police figures.
The British capital also suffered 22 fatal stabbings and shootings in March, higher than the 21 in New York. There have been 10 fatal stabbings in London in the last 19 days, following on from the 80 fatal stabbings recorded in the city last year.”
This is Sadiq Khan’s London. All under his watch and all in a country where firearms are banned.
This is the state Britain is in – “A 78-year-old homeowner has been arrested by murder detectives after a burglar he fought with in his own kitchen died of a stab wound.”
How crazy have our laws become in Britain, when a man cannot defend his own family and property without being arrested and questioned as a murder suspect.
You know Robert, I genuinely appreciate the risks you take in getting the truth out. The warning signs are all there; it’s just that our upside down and back-to-front world refuses to listen, at least right now, anyway.
gravenimage says
I remember my English mother–the daughter of a police superintendant–decrying the violent crime in America compared to England. I think a lot of people believe that this is still the case. But violent crime has dropped in the US, and skyrocketed with unfettered immigration in the UK.
And insane, that Britons cannot even defend themselves in their own homes now.
epistemology says
I can imagine how you feel, Britain’s police used to be the best in the world but now muzzies are in all corridors of power in Britain including the police. Muzzies commit terror attacks rape and groom little girls for prostitution and the police persecute them reluctantly not to be blamed of being racist.
Bur I still hope the process can be reversed not only in Britain but everywhere in Western Europe.
gravenimage says
Me too, epistemology.
Always great to see you posting. Hope you are well.
dumbledoresarmy says
Yes. It is a continual temptation to many in the counter-jihad, to fall into despair; one must, resolutely, refuse.
If I recall correctly, you are Jewish?
I have to say that, as a Christian who is grimly aware of the onslaught of Islam and the menace that it poses to all free humans everywhere – and the awful toll it takes, and has taken, both upon my Jewish brethren and upon my fellow Christians, as well as upon many many others not of our particular faiths – I find the Psalms very helpful. One can pray them **with intent**, slowly and mindfully; and one is then able to withstand the terrible temptation to despair, to ‘freeze’, to give up and do nothing.
gravenimage says
Agreed, DDA.
Mike says
We have the same dumb laws in Australia that protect violent criminals in the act every night on the news someone is stabbed in Australia our city streets are not safe and many smaller towns are not either.Scumbag criminals and terrorists take advantage of our stupid laws.All those who stab their own people in the back and aid and abet Islam and Islam itself should be under a worldwide class action to bankrupt them.
Tjhawk says
I will be placing my order soon. I can’t really say I’m looking forward to reading this history. Some of this history I will already have learned about. I’m sure I was angered and disgusted when I learned about it, and will be angered and disgusted again. There will be many new things in the book that will anger and disgust me.
I don’t like being angry and disgusted.
I will read Robert’s book. I’ll eat high fiber food. I’ll do push-ups and planks. I’ll be a better person.
Now that i’ve Ranted, I must say, from a readability standard, Robert’s books are excellent. They are well written and clear. He interjects humor ( some of it is the gallows variety) when possible. However, there is no getting around the awfulness of the topic.
gravenimage says
I know how you feel, Tjhawk. I often think of all the lovely and edifying things I could be studying, instead. But this is important–the greatest evil we face in our time.
And there can be no better guide though this hell than Robert Spencer.
gravenimage says
through
gravenimage says
Meet the non-Muslims who have aided jihad throughout history
……………………..
May their names live in infamy.
Some of these people have been clueless, or simple cowards. Many have been much worse.
Regardless of motivation, they have caused immeasurable suffering, and continue to do so today.
dumbledoresarmy says
Indeed. I know the name of one of them – John Cantacuzenes, who is credited with selling the Mohammedans the infidel technology – better cannons – that enabled them to take Constantinople. As our Jewish friends say of such evil persons – “May his name be erased”.
gravenimage says
Yes, DDA–there can be no excuse for this deliberate aiding of the enemy. Someone like this had even less excuse than so many of the clueless dhimmis of today–he knew *exactly* what he was doing in enabling the enemy.
For those not familiar, you can learn about this traitor–also known as John VI Kantakouzenos–here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_VI_Kantakouzenos
He allied several times with the Turks against his own people. He also gave his own daughter to a high-ranking Turkish Bey for his Harem, and allowed him to take Christian slaves.
His actions were not only appalling in and of themselves, but also led to the weakening of the Byzantine Empire and its eventual fall to the invading Muslims in the following century.
One small disagreement–far from being erased, I believe these names need to be *widely known*.
Tjhawk says
Yes, the names should be known and reviled.
All Americans know the name Benedict Arnold. ( a revolutionary traitor ) Nobody has named their kid Benedict in generations. You don’t see al lot of Adolfs or Nevilles running around the playground. I wish the same were true mohammeds.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
It has to be said, however, that decades before the fall of Constantinople, its border and even its gates were opened to the Turks. Imagine, Turks were allowed to be tourists in “The City!”
What really took down “The City” and its empire was the adoption and addiction to paying off the enemy instead of funding a military. And that first started generations before 1453.
(I always think that the ancient world continued within the precincts of Venice and that this transfer (not always peaceful and cordial) took place over a century or so. So the fall of Constantinople is not such a momentous event as some would lead us to believe.)
mummymovie says
Can we count smartphone manufacturers into this category?
It would be interesting to find out how so many Africans ended up with brand new, cutting-edge, internet-capable devices to assist with their ongoing northward journey to invade Europe.
I have a very sneaky suspicion some of the usual suspects might be behind a few or more airdrops of refurbished phones.
Sounds silly, but at this point, nothing would surprise me.
gravenimage says
Smartphones are like the internet and other tools–they can be used for good or evil. They are not evil in and of themselves.
Hari Garg says
In India there is one Ram Puniyani. See in youtube his channel and you will get to know by just watching a few videos.
Flavius Claudius Iulianus says
The French Resistance during WWII knew that they had to deal with the collaborators before they could make any headway against the Nazis.
David says
Can you please make this book available as an ebook and not just on the kindle.
rbla says
Muslim conquerors were able to avail themselves of a remarkable and extensive pattern of treachery, opportunism and collaboration from elements among their opponents. The forces of the dar-al-harb were always plagued at the most inopportune times by rebellion, civil war, religious conflict, schism and heresy. Renegades ready to join the Arabs or to “turn Turk” abounded just before or immediately after the warriors of Islam invaded. Often, non-Muslim technicians, mercenaries and scholars seemed to queue up in seeking patronage from Muslim caliphs and sultans. Ambitious non-Muslim rulers and politicians sought alliances against their co-religionists with the Muslims. Many of these were eager to make use of the fierce military energy of Islam and turn it to their own purposes. Suffice it to say that those who played with fire usually themselves ended up burned.
Probably the greatest single act of treachery occurred in the Fourth Crusade. The act of betrayal by the crusaders toward the empire they were pledged to help protect was a perfidious attack by the Latin knights of the Fourth Crusade, not against the Moslems of the Holy Land as first projected, but against their fellow Greek Christians in Constantinople. Also worth noting was that Venice was a major participant in this act of civilizational treason.
In India, as in the west, the Islamic invasions were aided by numerous occurrences of native treason by both Hindu and Buddhist leaders.
gravenimage says
Grimly true.
UNCLE VLADDI says
Terrorism works.
By now, everyone knows islam is nothing more than a terror gang and all muslims are at least potential terrorists.
When confronted by fear, people can respond in two ways:
1.) Honestly – they admit they’re afraid, and so then try to do something about solving the problem; (Conservatives;)
2.) Dishonestly – they pretend to be martyrs, but remain masochists, advising everyone else to Submit, too. (Liberals).
Guess which category most politicians (self-promoting salesmen and liars) fall into?
The solution?
Whenever any organism is attacked, it counter-attacks. (Organisms which submit to diseases like islam, die off).
Cells which have already been successfully co-opted by the disease are also destroyed by the white blood cells.
No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, yet the criminally negligent greed-creed motto of those in charge always seems to be the exact opposite, that: “There’s No Money In Solutions! Whee!” (and its corollary: “It’s not broken, so let’s fix it!”)
The real reason the islamic threat is being ignored in public, is this not-so-nascent “Globalization” movement, which is clearly treason to ALL sovereign national people’s governments. It’s a plutocratic kleptocracy to be run by all those corporazis who never want to pay any taxes to anyone, anywhere, ever; by the global communazi labour guys who want free movement and the same lowest common denominator wages for their 3rd-world slaves, and of course by the moslems who want their one-world islamic ummah, to be run by their theocratic caliphate government. It’s a triple-threat. Against all these evil forces, we have only the Truth … while only they currently control both the fear and the greed.
As long as ONLY the enemy controls both the behavioural Conditioning binaries of the stick (fear of personally having one’s own family firebombed or beheaded by the Jihad) and the carrot (greed for oil-money bribes), those sales-puppets we laughingly call “our leaders” and their complicit media presstitute pets will insist on maintaining their preposterously backwards, victim-blaming “narrative” that only we are to blame for the Qur’an’s 1,400 years of hate, so that we should all “Submit and learn how to be better victims!”
As long as we remain the lesser threat to them, “our leaders” will continue to ignore islam.
Islam can be easily studied and known in its entirety, by anyone. It will never change!
So, when Western people won’t educate them *selves* about islam because our culture defers all thinking to those “authorities” we PAY to do our thinking and research for us, while they secretly know full-well that the salesmen in charge will always sell us all out, they ARE CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT INFANTILE DELINQUENT TRAITORS TO RATIONALITY AND CIVILIZATION!
It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (muslims) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, and so “make” them commit even more crimes!
No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, and nobody is doing even these muslims any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed “People Of Colour”)!
Pretending there is NOT a Muslim problem but only a white racist problem accepting diversity, is criminally negligent TREASON.
Keeping the muzzie masses ignorant of their own hate-crime death-threat canon seems to be the self-imposed mission of most of the enemedia, government and of course their corporazi owners these days – it’s most likely why they keep lying about islam being a “great religion of peace” all the time! That, and their inherent racism, of course!
We wouldn’t want any of these poor oppressed mentally-inferior swarthy holy-mobster criminals to suffer any “blowback” retaliation (i.e: JUSTICE) for their crimes, now, would we?
😉
To advocate for suicidal masochism as the highest moral virtue, while also claiming the only real crime is to hurt the feelings of and offend criminals by accusing them of their crimes, outs any and all progressive liberal apologists for islam as massively treasonous criminals themselves!
Since islam is nothing more or less than the world’s oldest and largest ongoing extortion-racket CRIME syndicate, where the only “religious” part in it is where its holy mobster crime-gang members slander “god” as their #1 alibi to excuse their own criminal desires and actions where they claim:
“God told us to commit these crimes!”
(CAPISCE?)!
… it’s obvious that our Western governments, with our legally-mandated respect for universal equality of individual, not group or gang, human rights, do indeed have both the right and the responsibility to ban islam from our shores.
But hadn’t you heard?! Being angry at (“hateful” towards) criminals is now the most vile sin, while pitying (“tolerating”) them all as “fellow victims,” is to be deemed the highest moral virtue, these days!
So much so, that the only advice we hear from “our” hypocrite governments, their pet media, and the corporazi globalist banksters who own them all, seems to invariably be:
“Anyone who doesn’t automatically pity all criminals as fellow victims should be hated!”
Which is why hurting the feelings of criminals by accusing them of their crimes, is now a “hateful” crime itself!
And, even if muslims “win” they will only “win” a life of harsh depravity for their descendants.
After all, who is most likely to be “married” to, and raped by, pedophiles? Muslim kids!
(Which will be OUR kids, too, if we let the “elite” enslave us)!
Bill Shackelford says
It is indeed odd that Barak Obama, supposedly a constitutional scholor, would totally ignore the history and meaning on our First Amendment when it refers to freedom of “speech.” Unless I am mistaken, Americans have the right to criticize anyone and anything, so long as it is accomplished peaceably. (I.e. one cannot shout “fire” in a crowded theatre). Mr. Obama seems to be suggesting that this right is limited in the case of Islam. If our founders had intended such an exception, they would have included it in our FIRST amendment. Not only that, if Islam, or any other entity, cannot stand up to scrutiny, it is a false doctrine. Obama attempted to devalue our First Amendment when he stated that the future does not belong to those who criticize Muhhamed. In other words, the future does not belong to those who support free speech?